Stick to baseball, 10/22/22.

My second and much longer notebook on guys I saw in the Arizona Fall League went up this week for subscribers to the Athletic. I also held a Klawchat on Thursday.

My guest on The Keith Law Show this week was Craig Calcaterra, writer of the excellent Cup of Coffee newsletter and author of the book Rethinking Fandom: How to Beat the Sports-Industrial Complex at Its Own Game. You can listen and subscribe via iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher, amazon, or wherever you get your podcasts.

You can sign up for my free email newsletter and maybe I’ll send another edition out this week. Also, you can buy either of my books, Smart Baseball or The Inside Game, via bookshop.org at those links, or at your friendly local independent bookstore. I hear they make great holiday gifts.

My friend and former colleague at ESPN Sarah Langs announced a few weeks ago on Twitter that she has ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease. Mandy Bell of MLB.com set up a GoFundMe for Sarah, if you’d like to join me in contributing.

And now, the links…

Comments

  1. The Economist calling for sanctions…some things never change

    https://www.liftsanctionssavelives.org/resources

  2. Didn’t really think Leitch’s article was focused on bad media reporting at all.

  3. I think the article about the English press is by Parker Molloy, not the Tigers minor leaguer Parker Meadows.

  4. Glad to see our march to fascism…marches on.

    Speaking of Dr. Oz, I honestly didn’t know he was Muslim. I don’t know why I didn’t know that, but my point is this: If Fetterman or one of those “unaffiliated” Super PAC’s ran even one ad saying, “Do you want a Muslim in the Senate?” don’t you think Fetterman would be running away with this race? Yes? No? I just wonder if pointing out his religion would be the thing to turn off the MAGAts.

  5. I might support debt forgiveness if it was actually targeted towards those who need it and paired with a plan to actually improve college affordability. This plan is ill-conceived and will only make things worse. Handing out money indiscriminately, some to many new grads who don’t even need it? It is just going to make things worse and now the precedent is set. And why should plumbers, electricians, truck drivers, tradesman, factory workers, etc have their tax dollars foot the bill for those who don’t need it? And for many who don’t even graduate? Big middle finger to blue collar workers who were fiscally responsible.

    • I don’t know Meister, why should my tax dollars prop up petty tyrants in red states? We can go down this road on a great many issues (farm subsidies? federal funds spent to rebuild infrastructure in well-known flood zones?). Crusading against college debt forgiveness is probably not the window you want to tilt at.

    • If student debt forgiveness leads to economic growth that benefits a wide range of the population, then we should do it.

      For example, if the federal government writing a $1 billion check to Elon Musk would suddenly end hunger in the U.S., would you say “do it,” or would you say “Elon Musk doesn’t need/deserve that money?” Low level stimulus policies like this one tend to increase consumption and grow the economy because they increase the disposable income of many taxpayers, who then spend it, which creates more jobs in the services and even manufacturing. If the evidence shows that this level of debt forgiveness will produce a net gain in the economy that impacts a lot of people, we should do it.

    • You understand that recent grads have the most debt and the least ability to pay, right? And that plumbers et al have student debt too?

  6. There’s a reason Jon Stewart’s new show is doing so poorly. People don’t enjoy self-righteousness. He goes after low-hanging fruit in a completely one-sided exchange time and time again and acts as though any disagreement with his stance at all puts you on the side of right-wing extremists. There is so much unsettled science and open questions regarding gender care for minors. Of course laws such as those in Arkansas should be heavily criticized, but those like Stewart aren’t open to any sort of honest debate about the true questions. He’s not pulling anyone to his side, he’s pushing them away with his smug approach.

  7. Mike, a recent law grad or business major starting out at large firms or Wall Street who happens to fall under the 125k limit and is starting out their career will probably be able to pay off their loan in short order vs someone who isn’t going to a Fortune 500 company and is maybe starting a teaching career.

    Talk about increasing inequality from day 1. 125k is 4 times the median income of of the US. How about making recent grads show a good payment history over a period of time, and then forgive some .
    Basic economics says it would help the economy and increase economic activity, sure. It would help it even more if it was targeted to real need.

    And what about fixing the problem and not just treating the symptoms? The answer to everything can’t be just throw more money at it. There are currently programs that do cancel student debt, but the bar of proof and barriers are so high, that even if someone fulfills the requirements, they still have a very hard time getting it forgiven (I am referring to the program that forgives student debt for 10 years of public service).

    Let’s start holding the colleges accountable. 300k for a Columbia Film School degree so that a grad can go make 45k as a production assistant? https://www.wsj.com/articles/financially-hobbled-for-life-the-elite-masters-degrees-that-dont-pay-off-11625752773

    They sell Spielberg. They Deliver ‘Key Grip #4’.

    What’s next, cancel it all?

    • 1. Why are you focusing on an outlier? Almost no one makes $125K out of college. If you’re that bent out of shape about the idea of such people getting their loans forgiven, advocate for more income taxes on the rich and get the money back from them on the back end
      2. Salary != wealth, and any law school+undergrad debt can easily come to far, far more than $125K anyway
      3. More to the point, law grads with loans who might otherwise want to do good (ie. be a public defender) are forced to take those $125K jobs to stay afloat *largely because of the loans.* Getting rid of a determinant of social control that is decidedly negative is a good thing. You should want that
      4. Means testing is bad. Universal benefits are far more durable
      5. Do you not consume art and media? Shouldn’t we not burden those that pursue art and media careers with unpayable debt?
      6. Yes, let’s do free college: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2730/all-info
      7. Yes, let’s cancel all the debt