Stick to baseball, 5/28/22.

For subscribers to The Athletic, I published my redraft of the 2012 draft class, as well as the associated look at the first-rounders who didn’t make the cut for the redraft.

Over at Paste, I reviewed Azul: Queen’s Garden, the fourth game in the Azul series, which is solid on its own but also has no real mechanical connection to the original, and has a fiddly placement rule that really bothered me.

On the Keith Law Show this week, I spoke to my friend Jonathan Mayo about this year’s draft, including our different mocks that went up on May 19th. (Here’s mine, for subscribers to the Athletic, and here’s Jonathan’s.) You can subscribe via iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher, amazon, or wherever you get your podcasts.

I do send out a free email newsletter about twice a month, and now I realize I’m due for another one. My two books, Smart Baseball and The Inside Game, are both available in paperback, and you can buy them at your local independent book store or at Bookshop.org.

And now, the links…

  • People who fight new development in their areas (often referred to as NIMBYs,” for “Not In My Backyard,”) under the guise of opposing overpopulation or fighting climate change are motivated by racism, xenophobia, or just outright misanthropy. We’re threatened less with overpopulation than with an aging global population, declining fertility, and too many people spread over too much space.
  • Speaking of which, here’s a twitter thread on men who were supposedly “canceled” for sexual harassments or assaults, and how successful they’ve been since. I don’t think every tweet here is accurate, as some of these men clearly have been worse off, but the gist is accurate.
  • San Francisco Pride Parade organizers asked police, who typically march in the event, to do so in plainclothes. So the cops withdrew from the event, and now the Mayor has, too.
  • Gabe Kapler wrote on his personal site about his decision to stop coming out on the field for the national anthem, calling the performative exercise “participating in a self congratulatory glorification of the ONLY country where these mass shootings take place.” I haven’t stood for the anthem in several years now, in accordance with my own conscience. That’s all the anthem is – performative patriotism.
  • Meanwhile, the party’s hero appeared at CPAC along with a Hungarian talkshow host who has called Jews “stinking excrement” and the same clown who pushed the bogus Pizzagate conspiracy theory several years ago.
  • Paste‘s Clare Martin writes about John Mulaney’s decision to bring Dave Chappelle on stage, unannounced, at his comedy show, and the myth of the “good ones.”
  • Dr. Paul Sax wrote a post in praise of ophthalmologist Dr. Will Flanary, whom you may know as Dr. Glaucomflecken, the very popular TikTok account where he skewers America’s dysfunctional health care system, the journal review process, and orthopedic surgeons. Dr. Flanary was the commencement speaker at the graduation ceremony for the Yale School of Medicine this past week.
  • Board game news: Arcs, the latest game from Leder Games (Root, Fort, Oath), is now on Kickstarter.
  • I missed this Kickstarter, but Fliptown looks like a pretty solid roll-and-write, due out next March. I’ll post this link again if they allow late pledges at some point.
  • Offline Editions announced a new game, Kyudo, from designer Bruno Cathala, who also designed Kingdomino and Five Tribes. (Link in French, but there’s a video teaser.)

Comments

  1. I’d say “good guy with a gun” was debunked during the Buffalo massacre when a security guard tried to stop the assailant, only for the bullets to do nothing because of body armor. But Uvalde was another example.

    • Oh, but some woman in West Virginia killed a shooter and police said “she saved several lives,” so they still won’t listen.

  2. The flaw of the #MeToo movement has been that all women are to believed. Hopefully, that flawed idea does die down. There was also a time when police were always to be believed as well.

    The trial doesn’t paint Heard or Depp in the best light, but Heard has demonstrated herself to be quite manipulative at a minimum. Not to mention several testimonies that have been quite damaging to her case. We’ll see what the jury decides, but this sure shouldn’t have any greater impact.

    • I don’t agree that that was the idea. Any woman – anyone – can just go on social media and post an accusation without evidence. The idea is that we would listen, and start with an open mind, rather than the assumption that all victims were lying, or that they somehow ‘deserved’ what happened. I don’t think we ever really got there, let alone to believing all women, as you can see from that Twitter thread. There are thousands and thousands of people out there who still think Louis C.K. and Bill Cosby and R. Kelly did nothing wrong.

  3. Thank you Keith for highlighting the Mulaney/Chappelle, I hadn’t heard that and might not have. I’m a big John Mulaney fan and had tickets to see him in July and am selling those tickets now. The surprise aspect of bringing out Chappelle makes this so much worse but overall

    • During Game 5 of the NBA Western Conference Finals in SAN FRANCISCO, Dave Chappelle was introduced to the crowd as the “world’s funniest man” or something similar. In San Francisco. Apparently he had a late-night performance at a nearby comedy club after the game.

  4. Brian in ahwatukee

    Gun hobbyists have transitioned to personal protection from the govt tyranny. Yes, a group of people who cannot walk up stairs with a break half way, will stop some Invading force with drones and tanks. I think that if one has a hobby that is the leading cause of childrens deaths, I’d find another hobby.

    Not related – I don’t see a review if Neuromancer. Any thoughts? I did not like it at all. But I get why it’s sci-fi legend

    • I loved Neuromancer – think I read it before I started this blog, though. I enjoyed the way he used the futuristic tech just as the backdrop for a good story, rather than as the main event (as in Snow Crash). The sequels were nowhere near as good, IMO.

    • A Salty Scientist

      Plus, those cosplayers are far more likely to support an authoritarian coup for their preferred leader than actually stand up to it.

  5. I stand for the anthem out of habit. What really pisses me off enough to keep me in my seat is when they play “God Bless America:,

    • Yeah, I never stand when they play it during the seventh inning stretch. I’ve gotten some nasty looks and pointed comments, as if that’s also some sacred anthem.

  6. Senate Bill 168 in that Texas gun law link couldn’t possibly be more…awful? Ironic? On the nose?

  7. I do wonder whether there’s room to abhor humor that makes fun of trans people qua trans people and to support equal protection under the law for trans people in our society, while at the same time using factors such as the equipment a child was born with and the natural presumptions of differentiation in gendered physical development to inform the rules we make regarding schoolchildren. School bathrooms are fraught spaces not just for trans kids, but for gay kids, disabled kids, dysmorphic, shy, or just unpopular kids. Raise your hand if you were on the receiving end of a swirlie in high school (raises hand). The potential for cruelty exists in any unmonitored space. The Oklahoma law, in that it requires access to single-occupancy school bathrooms, is reasonable to me.

  8. The mayor of Uvalde, who seems to be kinda terrible, went on Fox yesterday to once again say mental health, not guns, is the problem. He claims that the city tried to build a mental health hospital that would be a “hub” for 44 counties, but the city was suddenly told it was going to cost $26 million, which they obviously didn’t have. He blamed this on the U.S. government giving billions in foreign aid to “countries that don’t even like us.” Meanwhile, because he was on Fox, he naturally wasn’t asked about the governor of his state slashing $211 million from the department that oversees mental health programs, nor the fact that “Texas ranked last out of all 50 states and the District of Columbia for overall access to mental health care, according to the 2021 State of Mental Health in America report.”

    But, right, it’s all the fault of the federal government, as always, and naturally the problem isn’t the guns that their state has made it easier to access than a glass of beer. Fuck these people.

    • A Salty Scientist

      The deflection to mental illness makes me really fucking angry. First, because individuals suffering from mental illness are no more likely to commit acts of violences than the rest of the population, but are instead over twice as likely to suffer from acts of violence. Second, because easy access to guns results in a ton more successful suicide attempts than in countries that don’t have easier access, so reducing easy access to guns would go a long ways towards actually helping our mentally ill. And finally, because it deflects from the fact that other industrialized nations also have societal problems with mental health, but they have nowhere close to the number of mass fatality events.

    • Yep, everything you said.

    • Yeah I’ve said for years that the mental health thing is a massive red herring. Republicans have been cutting mental health funding for almost 40 years (going back to their beloved Saint Ronald of Reagan). Now they want to claim mental health has been the problem all along? Then go back and increase funding. I’d bet if McConnell brought a mental health bill to the Senate floor that all 50 Dems would go along. Instead they play the mental health card and then don’t fund the damn thing while ignoring the real issue. It can’t be a coincidence that the US has all these mass shootings. If only there was something we could do like tax the crap out of ammunition, lower magazine capacity, require firearm insurance for gun owners (like car insurance), etc. But nope instead, we’ll do nothing and pretend to be shocked the next time there’s a mass shooting.

    • Florida made some reasonable gun law changes after Stonemam Douglas. Not perfect but it’s a start. I get the feeling Texas will just ask people when they purchase a gun if they are a good guy and call it a day. Even this might be “government overreach”.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/28/florida-gun-laws/

  9. Two issues regarding tone: 1) The SF pride parade banned uniformed police officers. Saying they “asked them to march in plainclothes” frames the debate very differently. Keep in mind, these are LGBTQ officers who have fought for equality in SFPD and want to march in solidarity with the movement. Telling them they can only march if they “hide” who they are seems like just about the most hypocritical thing possible for this particular event.
    2) Claiming that anyone who doesn’t want mass development in their town is racist is just ignorant. The fact is, mass development is not a good idea in every town. That’s what creates suburban sprawl. Mass development should occur where the jobs are located, and then in strategic locations based on transportation, infrastructure, natural resources, etc… It really needs to be decided on a town by town basis. The people who use the term “NIMBY” don’t have to deal with the repercussions of these bad decisions, they just move on and demand that something else be built in someone else’s town.

    • This isn’t the kind of development that creates sprawl, though. That’s moving further away from the downtown core, which, historically, has often been to get away from people of color and/or immigrants. Those are the same people the author of the article is discussing.

    • Your argument w/r/t cops at pride seems disingenuous (at best). “Cop” is not an immutable identity, so framing this as them having to “hide” as an implicit comparison to closeted LGBTQ people is a false equivalence. Furthermore, the historical event that instigated pride was a literal terror campaign instigated by cops…seems blatantly obvious that most would have issues with allowing uniformed cops to participate!

  10. I would be in total agreement of your #MeToo movement argument if there wasn’t a thread just posted that calls out so many celebrities for having any professional based on accusations only. Some of those accusations have a ton more substance behind them then others and sure as hell seem true, while others haven’t stood up to deeper scrutiny. There are way too many people who do believe our starting point should be to believe all women making these accusations.

    Unfortunately, and this seems to be more common nowadays, but so movements (#MeToo, BLM) get captured by their most extremist supporters. Extremely important issues that need to be addressed in major ways end up Hr necessary support of those in the middle.

  11. Just a few typos in that last one of mine. Damn iPhone. “…end up losing the necessary support.”

  12. Keith,

    Thank you so much for supporting the Transgender community. It’s not about “grooming” or converting others. I have a 10 year old Trans boy. I had my first inkling before the age of 2 when I took my child (avoiding names) out of the tub and we were talking and I said “You know you’re a girl, right?”. My child looked at me and said “I not a girl, I a boy”.

    We’re supporting our child. Truthfully, it is a tougher life for that and not what I would have chosen for my child – but that’s the point…it’s not my choice. We support our child ad will probably be starting hormone blockers in the next year (which allow us to DELAY a final decision on going through male or female puberty – I don’t see the issue on this). We want our child to make sure and waiting until 14 seems a responsible way to do things.

    We don’t want the Government getting involved in our personal lives. I have always favored Dems due to social values, but my wife is a former Republican (leaving after 2 years of Trump) and realizes that the Republicans are for more Government in our home. Free speech? Let’s punish Disney. Freedom to assemble? Let’s ban all protests in front of homes in Florida. Voting? Let’s find ways to limit it. Sad state of affairs, but thank you for all that you do.

    I love your baseball writing, your idealogies (sp.?), and your love of board games. Keep up what you do. Every little bit helps!

  13. Mike,
    You’re right about being a cop not being an immutable identity, they weren’t “born that way”. But it’s not just a job either, and they are being unfairly judged and vilified based on perceptions of their “group” rather than their own actions or character. These cops are members of the LGBTQ community. Rather than just protesting against cops, they became cops and fought for change within the system. They should be hailed as heroes, not shunned by their own community who they are fighting so hard to protect and represent. Banning the cops only perpetuates the stigma they have fought so hard to overcome.

    • “Rather than just protesting against cops, they became cops and fought for change within the system”

      You are probably not actually naive enough to actually believe what you wrote there, but for the sake of argument please demonstrate what “change within the system” has occurred and how it is more meaningful than “just” protesting against cops.

  14. I’m not sure why you think I have some secret agenda. I’m not some “blue lives matter” troll. The spokesperson for SFPD is trans, the other officers who want to march are gay or trans as well. You don’t think they’ve had to fight to earn respect in the department? You don’t think their presence in the force has had any effect on their fellow officers? Maybe I am naive, but I believe their service has probably generated a lot more acceptance among their peers than any protest or parade.
    I believe banning these cops is a mistake. I think the organizers were reacting to the current political (anti-cop) climate when they made this decision and didn’t really think it through in regards to the actual cops who want to march in the parade. And given the history and continuing purpose of this parade, having out and proud police officers marching in their uniforms is extremely meaningful and unifying. Excluding members of the LGBTQ community from their own parade just because they’re cops is divisive and only hurts the cause.

    • I don’t think you have a secret agenda, I just think you’re not being honest with yourself here. Do you really think a modicum of representation within the police is enough of a bulwark against the fact that the institution as a whole is explicitly tasked with upholding the dynamics of capital that specifically target those classes of people for discrimination? Do you think it’s actually unreasonable that a celebration of perseverance in the face of such an institution would seek to exclude members of that institution? Most of your statements start with “I think” or “I believe” but I don’t think you’ve really done the thinking on this.

  15. The cops are gay and trans, so no, I don’t think it’s reasonable to exclude them from the pride parade.
    I think that “modicum of representation” helps, and they are a symbol of progress and unity. Attitudes about the LGBTQ community have changed a lot over the past 50 years, within the police as well as in general society. It took legal action for the police to even allow the first pride parade to happen. Now a trans woman is the public face of SFPD. That is progress. And that woman is being told she can’t wear her uniform in the parade? That she should be ashamed? These brave people are out of the closet and working within the very “institution” that once targeted them, and now they’re the bad guys? That is objectively a step backwards.
    How does excluding them help anything? What is achieved? What message is sent? How does excluding gay and trans people from marching in their own parade advance the cause?

  16. I worked for two summers in a salmon hatchery in Valdez, Alaska, including the summer when the pinks matched their pre-spill numbers for the first time (2004, setting a new record). That one is generally profitable, but I would be interested to see how the finances/processes/results/etc. differ between the operations.