The Love Songs of W.E.B. Du Bois.

Honorée Fannone Jeffers’ debut novel The Love Songs of W.E.B. Du Bois is one of the best 21st century books I’ve read, an epic work of historical and contemporary fiction full of three-dimensional characters, evocative places, and an exploration of how personal and generational trauma echoes through years and family trees. Winner of this year’s National Book Critics’ Circle Award for Fiction, it’s an actual heartbreaking work of staggering genius.

The novel follows two stories in the same family line, focusing on Ailey Pearl Garfield, who is three years old when the novel opens and a graduate student by the time it closes. She’s one of three sisters born into a well-off Black family in an unnamed northern city, but whose roots are in Chicasetta, a small town in rural Georgia that, as we learn over the course of the novel, went from Creek territory to slave plantation to village, with Ailey’s ancestors there throughout. Her narrative follows the traumas of her modern family, especially those of her sister, Lydia, and herself, as we learn early in the novel that both were molested by their grandfather over a period of several years.

Their ancestry traces back to the Creek people who originally lived on that land until white colonoists tricked them out of it, eventually kicking them off the land and building a brutal cotton plantation there. The primary slave owner, Samuel Princhard, was especially vile and his crimes seem to pass through subsequent generations like a genetic inheritance, although eventually some of the slaves escape the plantation and create new lives for themselves after the Civil War. Ailey’s connection to her ancestors runs through three aged relatives still living in Chicasetta, especially her great-uncle Root, a former academic and expert on Black history who loves to debate the relative merits of W.E.B. Du Bois and Booker T. Washington. When Ailey makes her meandering way to graduate school, after an abortive attempt at pre-med to follow in her father’s and her oldest sister’s footsteps, it is Uncle Root who both opens doors for her in a predominantly white world and who coaches her through the worst moments. Along the way, characters die, come in and out of Ailey’s life, and dredge up old memories, all of which collides when Ailey’s research into her own lineage as part of her dissertation runs headlong into Princhard’s story and the many people who lived, worked, and died on that plantation.

The Love Songs of W.E.B. Du Bois runs to nearly 800 pages, but Dr. Jeffers has created an immersive world – two of them, really – where, for me at least, the reader is as close to the scenes as possible. Few writers can evoke images and create characters this real and solid, let alone in a debut novel. Ailey and Uncle Root are the standouts, but they’re just the head of a wide cast, and even many of the secondary characters are still memorable and move beyond stock status. Jeffers also weaves a discussion of intersectionality throughout the book, mostly that of Black feminism and the roles of women in Black American society as well as in American society at large – and yes, the phenomenon of white women leaving Black women behind in their fight for rights appears several times, including in probably the weakest character in the book, Rebecca, who only appears briefly near the end.

The historical passages in Chicasetta, on the plantation and before the white settlers seized the land, have the same gauzy feel of some of the great works of Black American literature set in that time period, including Beloved, with elements of magical realism at play. Jeffers centers the slaves in the story, treating the brutality of their lives as a matter of fact, which I found increased the horror of it – this was just an accepted part of their reality, living under a capricious, vengeful god in human form. She still does give time to the slaveowning family, but that’s because telling their story becomes a critical part of telling Ailey’s.

Ailey herself is a beautifully flawed, realistic character, often exasperating in her choices or even words but ultimately the hero of the work – and the hero of her family, the one who doesn’t just survive her trials but steps forward to reclaim the family’s legacy and take it forward for future generations. I imagine someone will try to turn The Love Songs of W.E.B. Du Bois into a movie, but this book has the rich storytelling of the best narrative television series we’ve seen. It deserves the longer treatment, or none at all. And of the candidates I’ve read for this year’s Pulitzer Prize for Fiction – which includes the very good Hell of a Book, by Jason Mott, winner of the National Book Award – this is by far my favorite.

Comments

  1. Some of your recommendations I’ve loved, some I’ve not been as high on (never thought one was bad though). But I think when you have had reviews this effusive I’ve batted 1.000. Going on the list.

  2. Andrew Morehead

    I agree with your Pulitzer predictions, while I personally enjoyed “Hell of a Book” more, I really enjoyed and admires “The Love Songs of W.E.B. Du Bois” and I think the latter fits my own prejudice about what the Pulitzers value more. I really didn’t like “Bewilderment” and I think “The Sentence,” “Matrix,” and “Harlem Shuffle,” which seem to be other front runners aren’t even close to my favorites by those authors. “Intimacies” is also a front runner according to pprize.com, which I can also see, but I do prefer the first two books. I guess we’ll find out right after I post this.

    I just read “Monsters of Templeton,” the first novel by Lauren Groff, which I really liked. You might want to read the cover blurb and see if it interests you.

    • Well, a book I’d never heard of ended up winning – The Netanyahus. I’ll report back when I get it from the library.

  3. I loved the first 3/4 of Hell of a Book, but I felt the end was a bit of a let down. I think Matrix is certainly my least favorite Groff book. I liked Harlem Shuffle- though not as much as Whitehead. It looks as though he is writing a sequel. When I read that news I was like sure? Bewilderment is like the rest of Powers- there is a lot happening and some of it works and some of doesn’t. He’s a smart dude and a good writer and I think he sometimes gets in his own way. I actually think he does better with longer narratives. I have The Sentence but I haven’t read it yet. Honestly, I pretty enjoy everything from Erdrich. I just started Love Songs- about 50 pages in.

    • My caveat is that I have not yet read Love Songs, but I agree with (what I read to be your) sentiments: I was a bit underwhelmed this year looking for a PP winner. I would have taken Hell of a Book, because I thought it really was, but after that? No One Is Talking About This (Lockwood) #2 for me, followed by The Trees (Everett). Matrix and Intimacies were very good, but don’t really speak to the American condition. Harlem Shuffle was boring AF, and one of the books I was most disappointed in this year (only after The Lincoln Highway, which was terrible). Bewilderment? Meh. And Erdrich won last year with a book I honestly though was actively bad (The Night Watchman), so I wasn’t counting on her, although The Sentence was OK. And like Keith, I have no yet read The Netanyahus.

    • I think Percival Everett is one of the most underrated authors out there. So, I was very pleased to see him nominated for Telephone last year- though I must admit it is not my favorite. I prefer his more comedic novels- see I’m Not Sidney Poitier. No One Is Talking About This was also very good. I still haven’t read Kitamura’s novel.