Dune.

Dune could have gone wrong so many ways, but the biggest risk in converting Frank Herbert’s sci-fi classic to the big screen was always the plot. The novel’s setting is iconic, from the desert planet to the sandworms, yet the complexity of the story around the Christ-like Paul Atreides stood out as the greater challenge, the one aspect of the book that couldn’t be addressed with CG. Denis Villeneuve’s Dune does a remarkable job of distilling the first half of the book into a single, accessible story that simplifies the plot without overdoing it, while also providing the look and feel that have helped make the novel an enduring classic of its genre.

(Disclaimers: I love the original Dune novel, so much that I read all five of Herbert’s increasingly terrible sequels, but have still never seen the David Lynch film adaptation from 1984.)

Dune follows the familiar template of the ‘chosen one,’ a story arc that stretches back to the Bible and continues now in YA fiction, most notably the Harry Potter series. The messiah here is Paul Atreides, the teenaged son of the Duke Leto Atreides, who rules the planet Caladan, and his concubine Lady Jessica, a member of the cultish spiritual order the Bene Gesserit. Paul exhibits unusual mental abilities from an early age that indicate that he may be the savior foretold by the Bene Gesserit’s prophecy. The story opens when the Emperor orders the Duke to take stewardship of the desert planet Arrakis, the only source of the drug known as spice or mélange, which also happens to be an essential element in interstellar travel. The present rules of Arrakis, House Harkonnen, are not especially keen to lose their powers, leading to armed conflict that puts Paul on the run and in charge of his own destiny.

Villeneuve’s decision with his co-screenwriters to split the book into two films, hoping the first would fare well enough that the studio would greenlight the second, paid off twice – it did do well enough that we will get a sequel, and I would argue that it only did that well because it didn’t try to cram a densely plotted 500-page novel into a 150 minute movie. There’s so much room to breathe here that Timothée Chalamet gets far more screen time to give a little depth to Paul’s character, while Rebecca Ferguson, as Lady Jessica, may be an even bigger beneficiary, as some of that character’s most important scenes would almost certainly have been cut in a single-film adaptation. Paul’s character comes alive more in the second half of the book, once he’s on the run with the Fremen people, which leaves a modest void in a first-half movie for another central character to fill, and Ferguson does so with the film’s best performance.

The cast of Dune is incredible on paper, although the result is more “I can’t believe they got Charlotte Rampling!” than “I can’t believe how great Charlotte Rampling is!” Oscar Isaac is here. So is Javier Bardem. Stephen McKinley Henderson, who you know by sight even if you don’t know him by name. And there is some value in having these very famous people, any of whom can command a scene by themselves, in smaller roles. They don’t get quite enough to do – not even as much as Jason Momoa does in a memorable turn as Duncan Idaho.

The film does look amazing, though. Villeneuve is no amateur at worldbuilding on the screen, and this is the Arrakis of the page, whether in wide shots or close-ups, feeling vast and foreboding and terrifyingly dry. You’ll find yourself craving water watching this film. Many of the special effects are impressive, especially those showing the various flying vehicles on the surface of the planet, but there’s just as much wonder in the sword fights or the scenes showing troops massed in formation when the Atreides arrive on Arrakis to take control.

Dune ended up with ten Oscar nominations this year, including Best Picture, Best Cinematography, and Best Adapted Screenplay, but not Best Director, which surprised me given how much Villeneuve had to put together here even taking the script (which he co-wrote) as a given. I’m not surprised at the lack of acting nominations, given how many people and named characters in the film, and how little depth most of them get even in a film that’s a solid two and a half hours. Ferguson might have had an argument for a supporting nod, but that’s probably it. My guess is Dune wins a bunch of technical awards – ones it may very well deserve – without taking Best Picture or Adapted Screenplay. Of the four BP nominees I’ve seen so far, though, I think it’s my favorite.

Comments

  1. I enjoyed the movie as well- but after reading this piece I wondered if the source material could support another vision as well. I don’t think Denis’s movie is detracted from the lack of explicit Islamic themes- though perhaps the orientalism could have been handled better, but it definitely made me curious as to whether one that explicitly embraced Herbert’s exploration of Islam and modernity could be like.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/10/28/dune-muslim-influences-erased/

    The author of this piece did a great interview with the folks at Throughline and you can tell how much he loved the Dune books and still enjoyed the movie for what it was even as he had hoped for more.

    • That’s a great piece. Thanks for linking it. I completely agree about the score – it was unremarkable.

      I assumed that they toned down its Muslim influences to avoid offending Muslims and Arabs, not least to avoid a backlash from fundamentalists who might interpret any of it as a depiction of their Prophet. But that was my own speculation.

  2. But does this version have Sting wearing nothing but a codpiece?

  3. I was somewhat disappointed by this film. I have seen both “versions” of the David Lynch disasterpiece and the SciFi channel miniseries, so I was naturally comparing in my head. (I have not ever read the book, nor do I plan to. I just don’t roll that way.) My main issue was with the pacing. While it was definitely a good idea to attempt the two-parter, I felt that it both took forever to get to the betrayal sequence, and that there was information that they excluded that should have been there. (They never really explained the concept of Mentats, if I remember correctly, they just show it, which I could see confusing the non-familiar audience.) Then, after the betrayal, I felt like the film kind of plodded along to the ending. I still think it was visually stunning and was certainly surprised by the lack of a nomination for Villeneuve, though he took it in stride. I’m still not quite sold on the concept of Timothée Chalamet, though he was better than I expected. I’ll be interested to see who they cast as the Emperor for Part 2. (Fingers crossed for Patrick Stewart, but that probably won’t happen for several reasons.)

    I think I mentioned this in another review of yours, but pacing issues is something that I felt plagued a lot of films I saw between September-January, including No Time to Die, Nightmare Alley, Eternals, House of Gucci, West Side Story and Licorice Pizza. At some point, these directors need to rely on their editors.

    One last point. I read a rumor that the sequel would shift the focus from Paul to Chani. That just makes absolutely no sense to me. Hopefully that was just one person’s mistaken interpretation.

  4. What are the other 3 BP nominees you’ve seen? I’m aiming you are planning on watching the rest. I’m genuinely curious to get your thoughts on CODA if you get a chance to write it up.

  5. As a degenerate fan of the Lynch Dune, I recommend it for completists and fans. I think it suffers from exactly the issue Keith diagnoses, which is cramming the book into one film. I have heard good things about the series but haven’t seen it.

    Stephen McKinley Henderson was well cast. I found DEVS to be hit or miss, but he and Nick Offerman were among the reasons to watch. Josh Brolin was great casting, and Stellan Skarsgard was surprisingly good as Baron Harkonnen. Kenneth McMillan’s unhinged portrayal was one of my favorite parts of the Lynch version but Skarsgard brought a more restrained but still utterly corrupted Baron. The Fremen casting will play out in the second half but was promising on first blush.

    I suspect that the lack of a Best Director nom is Academy voters taking a wait and see approach. If Villeneuve lands the second film that will likely lead to a nom and perhaps a win. My wife works in film and her take is that this was half a story, which may be typical of industry types.

  6. I thought the film’s strength was that it captured the novel’s strength: incredible world-building. I’m not sure if would have found the movie’s incomplete story compelling if I had come to it ignorant, but in a way, that’s the book. Mediocre storytelling but some of the best and most memorable world-building (universe-building, in this case) in sci-fi. Herbert was kind of the anti-Heinlein that way.

  7. When somebody asks what great sound design means, this is a good movie to show them. Just does a remarkable job of creating a sonic experience where the noises somehow seem realistic and convincing…but also otherworldly. Even if Hans Zimmer (or this particular score) isnt your cup of tea, he is one of the rare composers where the rhythmic and deep sound effects be uses in the music sort of intermingle with the sound effects in a holistic way. Another example of a film where the environment and immersive experience is so shaped by the combo of the “sound/noises” with the music is Dunkirk, where he use the noise of a ticking clock as the foundation of the score. The chanting on the score is occasionally a bit overbearing but I found some of the mixing, including the eastern instrument work to be really interesting.

  8. In terms of Oscars, this feels like the Peter Jackson/Lord of the Rings situation where Fellowship and Two Towers got a ton of nominations, but it was sort of understood that Academy would use Return of the King as an opportunity to reward the entire endeavor. If he lands the plane with part 2 (which plot wise is a very different movie which frankly should be more stoned out of its mind and mystical and weird—less grounded, less political intrigue so who knows if they will be as receptive), I suspect part 2 is where the real hardware comes out?

  9. Hans Zimmer’s score was exceptional and core to the experience of the movie.

  10. Love this movie, completely new to Dune beyond the general pop culture stuff like “the spice must flow” and huge sand worms. It felt stately and serious, patient and self-assured, but never boring. Can’t wait for the second half.

  11. Really liked Dune. But would also highly recommend the 1984 version, if only to be familiar with the batsh*t crazy “film” which has aged incredibly poorly and has become a sort of touchstone of nerd culture. Plus, as mentioned above, Sting in a codpiece.