The Lost Daughter.

The Lost Daughter is the directorial debut of actor Maggie Gyllenhaal, who also adapted the screenplay from an early novel by the Italian author known as Elena Ferrante, the mind behind the Neapolitan cycle of novels that begins with My Brilliant Friend. Starring Olivia Colman and Jessie Buckley as the same character in two different eras, the film presents a haunting portrayal of motherhood in a world that prefers mothers to exist in tightly constrained boxes.

Leda, a college professor of comparative literature and mother of two grown daughters, has come to a Greek island on a working vacation, with Colman playing her in the film’s present day. Shortly after her arrival, a boisterous American family arrives to disrupt her idyll, including a young mother (Dakota Johnson) and her daughter, Elena. The girl goes missing on the beach one day, and Leda ends up the one who finds her – but Leda takes Elena’s doll, holding on to it even though the girl is inconsolable. Her subsequent interactions with the family trigger a series of flashbacks to when Leda was a young mother herself (where Buckley plays her), trying to balance her career and her two young daughters, with a husband who is unsupportive, to say the least. Leda’s memories, and the choices she made, invade on her present day, leading to erratic behavior and more questionable decisions.

Much of Ferrante’s work revolves around casual sexism in Italian society (a fair analogue for western society as a whole, but probably even more misogynistic than its peers), from who women marry to what they may do for work to how they’re expected to be mothers. At its most superficial level, The Lost Daughter shows Leda today coping with the weight of memories, and some regrets, over choices she made as a young mother, all because she’s seeing a young mother now whose husband doesn’t appreciate her and who herself may not fully appreciate her own daughter. Leda faced an untenable situation, trying to complete her graduate studies with two young children at home and a husband who believes his work takes priority. An academic conference gets her a brief respite from the dual life at home, and leads her the major inflection point of her life.

Leda in the present is a powder keg in search of a spark; the flashbacks show how the keg got its powder. Gyllenhaal gives us scene after scene of Leda struggling with one or both of her girls – at bath time, at meal time, and especially when she’s trying to work and her husband is nowhere in sight. It’s such an atypical and nuanced portrait of motherhood for the movies: Most movie mothers are saints, and if they’re not, they’re monsters. We see Leda losing her patience with her kids, or failing to respond to them as a mother “should” by the norms of the genre, and Gyllenhaal portrays it all without judgment or scorn. It is here that the film becomes whole, and solid, rather than superficial. The greatness of The Lost Daughter lies in how it treats Leda’s motherhood as aggressively normal.

The Lost Daughter loses something, no pun intended, when Leda starts to act bizarrely in the present, none more so than when she keeps the damn doll. The theft itself was plausible, but to continue to keep it when the child is wailing for it and her mother and family are desperate for its return just paints Leda as a terrible person. My interpretation, at least, is that what the world has done to Leda has led her to this point, whether she’s crazy, or delusional, or truly misanthropic, and that serves to undermine the more important theme here, that society is crazy, and misogynistic, and forced Leda into a choice she still can’t reconcile.

In Greek mythology, Leda is a young woman whom Zeus covets, so he takes the form of a swan, rapes her, and impregnates her. She gives birth to a girl, Helen – as in, of Troy – which is the Anglicized version of the name Elena. (Elena was my maternal grandmother’s name. She went by Helen.) Here, Elena isn’t Leda’s daughter, though; she’s the child on whom Leda seems to fixate when thinking about her own daughters, Bianca and Martha. Homer’s version of the myth has Helen abandoning her children to elope with Paris (or, possibly, being abducted), sparking the Trojan War. The Leda myth appears elsewhere in the movie, as Leda the character was a scholar and avid reader of Yeats, who wrote “Leda and the Swan” about the legend, so the allusion is clearly intentional.

Colman has already been nominated for the Golden Globe for Best Actress in a Motion Picture – Drama, and won Outstanding Lead Performance (an all-gender category) at the Gotham Independent Film Awards. She’s a lock for an Oscar nod for the same, and deserving. At the same time, Jessie Buckley is just as pivotal to this film’s success, and overdue for this sort of accolade, delivering an outstanding performance in Beast and a similar one in Wild Rose to little fanfare. Buckley has less screen time to fill out the character of Leda the young mother, yet that character provides essential depth to the story; if Buckley can’t convince the viewer of the agony and struggle of Leda as a mother and striving academic, the present-day parts that were already shaky would collapse. Gyllenhaal should be in the running for nominations for Best Adapted Screenplay (likely) and Best Director (unlikely, given the category’s extensive historical bias against women).

This might be the best movie I’ve seen so far from 2021, and if not, it offers the most fodder for consideration after it ended. There’s more here than one blog post, by one writer, who also happens to be a man, could possibly cover.

Comments

  1. Nick Christie

    Great Review. I’ve written some about the complexity of this film, too.

    My impression at that moment when our female lead’s bizarre, neurotic actions intensify was different than yours, particularly when I spent a few hours thinking upon it. One interpretation is the one you mention. Another is that perhaps our protagonist is an imperfect narrator. That she has always been a narcissist… and like many other great intellectual narcissists (traditionally male, but by no means gender exclusive) she has created her own history in her mind. One that depicts her own journey in ways she ‘wants’ to remember it, but might actually be dishonest, or at least reductive in their simplicity or fantasy.

    In her flashbacks, she’s a sexually confident person; the woman in this film is not. She’s incredibly sexually awkward. Whether with a man her senior, or a young man barely 20. She sits at a bar during Ed Harris’ attempts at staring into her eyes and chatting her up, awkwardly asks to finish her meal… and then ‘an hour’ later musters up the courage/lust to saunter over (sexually confidently, she presumes) to whisper an Italian come hither to him. And when confronted with his utterly confused reaction, she abruptly tucks tail and scampers off. It’s not just ‘odd.’ It’s hilariously bizarre. Every phase of it.

    In her flashbacks, her husband is constantly unsupportive and eventually sexually inadequate as well. He seems good natured and good looking, but otherwise mostly worthless. Maaaaybe? Maybe this is an accurate show of a brilliant, beautiful prodigy saddled with a man of medium force of character dragging her down like a lead weight? Or maybe these are the memories of a guilt-ridden neurotic who is selectively (justifying her own legacy of affairs and walking out on her family) putting forth these bitter memories as precious justification?

    And lastly, there’s the Jessie Buckley factor. And given how Olivia Colemen “stares” at young Dakota Johnson’s risque swimsuit and exceptionally petite figure (through Maggie Gyllenhall’s excellent direction)… is this a 48-yr old woman looking at a woman half her age and thinking “pre-children I looked something like that?” Or is this a 48-year-old person who ‘Never’ looked like that (or like petite Ms. Buckley) but in their own history was some gorgeous, poetic figure in their mid-20s? I’ve certainly met many a vain man in his 40s or 50s who wrongly remember themselves as some super athletic, masculine young person in yesteryear before the paunch and balding hair line, but in reality were awkward (trimmer, but not muscular) young men. Are those stares just pure old fashioned resentment/wish fantasy? Are her flashbacks of herself a promotion of herself as something/someone more petite, gorgeously trim after her two kids (no Kate Winslet, Mare of Eastham style of body in these love scenes) another neurotic fixation?

    As Coleman’s actions grow more and more rancid (outbursts, awkwardly resentful glances, immense jealousy) I began to wonder whether these flashbacks are her own self-mythologizing. Which, to your original point, is very akin to a complex human novel on the human condition.

    A brilliant protagonist who came from working class roots to master romance languages and push her way into male-dominated academia, all while still raising two daughters? That’s already remarkable, and yet often times the vanity of those who really strive and push for excellence indulge/craft a narcissistic hero’s journey, particularly when in the midst of stage of life where clearly (as all her strange behaviors indicate) she is battling some damaged sense of self. Perhaps that self had that intense vanity all along, hence all the latent unpleasantness spewing out of her like those crawling creatures oozing out of that Doll in the cupboard.

  2. You should check out the interview with Maggie Gyllenhaal.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2022/01/11/maggie-gyllenhaal-lost-daughter-interview/

    I have not read the novel but I think the leads of the story should have been switched. I really wanted more time with Buckley (I thought she gave a really powerful performance and was not sure I would ever say this but overshadowed Colman). I can imagine, and I know Gyllenhall likes ambiguity and the viewer’s interpretation, but I do not see where older Leda comes from younger Leda. I can see her having regrets but the break was too much (and some of the other weirder interactions with the family from Queens).

    Still have Power of the Dog ahead of it (as well as Pig).

  3. I’m in on anything with Olivia Coleman since Broadchurch.

    The doll thing threw me off too! Sleeping with it and dressing it up. Seemed to fetishize Coleman’s ‘abnormal’ view of motherhood when the purpose of the movie is to almost normalize it. I’m sure the worm coming out of its mouth was symbolic for something but I’m not sure what.