Stick to baseball, 10/2/21.

For subscribers to the Athletic, I posted my hypothetical ballots for the six major postseason awards. Fans are taking it extremely well, as you might imagine.

On my podcast, I spoke with Conor Murphy of the band Foxing, talking about their new album Draw Down the Moon and our mutual interest in games – he’s particularly into D&D and Magic: the Gathering, but we talk a lot about tabletop games we both enjoy. They’re hitting the road next week with Manchester Orchestra and I’m bummed I’ll be in Arizona for Fall League when they come through my area. You can hear their newest album on Spotify, and you can subscribe to my podcast on Spotify or iTunes. I was also on the Athletic Baseball Show again on Friday, where you can hear me say Dylan Carlson might be a breakout candidate for 2022, which I recorded a few hours before he hit 2 homers against the Brewers.

Over at Paste, I recapped my experience at Gen Con, running through every game I saw or played at the convention, and ranked the ten best games I tried.

I’ve been better about sending out my email newsletter this past month, with this week’s edition talking about how challenging I’ve found my role as an adjunct at a local university. And, as the holidays approach, I’ll remind you all every week that I have two books out, The Inside Game and Smart Baseball, that would make great gifts for the readers (especially baseball fans) on your lists

And now, the links…

  • Longreads first: The Guardian profiles Prof. Steven Pinker, a cognitive psychologist and bestselling author who has emerged as a major celebrity in the culture wars while allying himself with some disreputable figures, including the white supremacist blogger Steve Sailer. Pinkerite, a blog dedicated to exposing Pinker’s links to bogus “race science” proponents, asks if this column is “the end of the gentlemen’s agreement” to avoid asking Pinker about his history of defending and working with white supremacists.
  • Zach Helfand writes in The New Yorker about the imminent arrival of the automated strike zone and the loss of the human element. I disagree with the basic premise here – as you might have guessed – but there’s one point worth bearing in mind: The actual strike zone is probably a lot smaller than the de facto one umpires call, and that might mean more walks and longer games.
  • From October of 2020, WIRED looks at the cultural problems that have bedeviled Amazon’s attempts to buy its way into the gaming market.
  • My colleague Meg Linehan wrote a powerful investigative report on NWSL coach Paul Riley’s history of abusive behavior towards his players, including rape, after which his employers, the North Carolina Courage, terminated him within hours.
  • A 2019 book called The Psychology of Pandemics presaged much of our country’s reaction to this current one.
  • Pitcher Kieran Lovegrove came out as bisexual, making him just the second player ever in affiliated baseball to do so and the closest player to the majors as well.
  • A 10-year-old girl in Virginia died of COVID-19 after she was told to walk sick kids in her class to the nurse.
  • As more evidence emerges against the COVID-19 “lab leak” theory, why does the mainstream media continue to push it?
  • Youtube appears to be finally moving to ban all anti-vaccine content.
  • The New York Times did what it too often does, highlighting the views of the deranged few, here talking to New York state health care workers who said they’d choose job loss over vaccination, but I think there’s a subtle message here: These people will use any loophole they can find to avoid the consequences of their choices, like claiming a religious exemption they don’t merit.
  • Yale historian Dr. Beverly Gage resigned as head of the school’s Program in Grand Strategy, citing the school’s unwillingness to fend off influence from conservative donors, including San Francisco Giants owner Charles Johnson, whom you might remember from his donations to Lauren Boebert and Madison Cawthorn.
  • UNC officials met with an Israeli diplomat who pressured them to remove a teacher who criticized Israeli policy while teaching a class on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
  • South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem (R) used her office to pressure a subordinate to issue Noem’s daughter a real estate appraiser’s license, according to the Argus-Leader.
  • Toxic microbial blooms on freshwater lakes and rivers may be a harbinger of a coming mass extinction event.
  • The New York Times’ Pete Wells offered an unflattering review of Eleven Madison Park’s new $335 vegan tasting menu.
  • Board game news: Days of Wonder is selling pink train sets for Ticket to Ride, with $2 from each $4.95 going to the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.
  • The massive 4X game Voidfall, from European publisher Mindclash, is nearing $1MM raised already on Kickstarter.
  • Queen Games is publishing four Stefan Feld “city collection” games, three of which are reimplementations of older games of his (Bruges, Macao, and Rialto) and one of which is new, with a deluxe edition bundle that costs $695. (Not a typo.) I’m not linking to that nonsense, but I am linking to this video critique of Feld’s cultural appropriation in the game Marrakesh, including an embarrassing photo of him in a fez holding some sort of chain to an invisible camel. That this is still happening in 2021 – seven years after Bruno Cathala put actual slave cards in Five Tribes, which is the first major outcry to result in a change to a game that I can remember – boggles my mind. Whether you agree that this is cultural appropriation, or merely harmless appreciation, it was completely unnecessary, and says to me that no one around Feld or Queen thought to say, “hey, maybe this is a bad idea.”

Comments

  1. I think the Pinkerite link is broken, it links to the Guardian article again.

  2. “Cultural appropriation” is a good thing! If you created something others want to borrow or emulate, be proud! That the term is viewed negatively quite literally makes no sense. Throughout the history of mankind, if one culture has an invention, has a fashion that others admire, finds additional uses for something, etc. etc., others will adopt it.

    If one is to be against cultural appropriation, stop wearing many of your clothes, they’re made of cotton! Egyptians and Pakistanis are the only ones allowed, as people from those areas were the first to wear cotton clothes.

    Like curry? Hope you’re Indian, otherwise you’re a terrible appropriator. How about guacamole? You better be Mexican or eating is it a bad look.

    Many are for gun control, but why not go after gun owners for cultural appropriation reasons? Only Chinese should be able to use guns. A Norwegian won the biathlon – what a terrible person, a white European firing a gun? Cultural appropriator!

    Why not make it more local? That restaurant selling jambalaya in Illinois? How dare they?! That’s a New Orleans thing, and it should only be allowed in New Orleans.

    I could go on, I’m having fun, but I’ll stop there. Everybody practices “cultural appropriation” every day, and it is how we have moved forward as a race since the dawn of Homo Sapiens. That people view it negatively is bizarre, unhelpful, and just finding another way to find utility in being angry for the sake of sanctimoniousness.

    • Pretty bizarre rant, Drew.

    • Frank Jones

      Drew, are you using the same definition of “Cultural appropriation” that its critics are using?

      My admittedly limited understanding of the term definitely doesn’t have the same meaning as how you appear to be defining it.

    • He’s definitely not using the correct definition.

      Drew, I really don’t understand why you commented without watching the video I linked. He explains the difference between cultural appropriation and what he calls “appreciation,” and why the former is harmful. It’s like you just walked into a room where a lengthy discussion of the subject was underway, and you just heard the phrase “cultural appropriation” without the context or definition.

    • That whole thing made me think of “inconceivable” from the Princess Bride.

    • I did watch the video! I thought the entire twenty minutes was ridiculous, and that’s why I wrote my comment. Sorry if it was too broad, the video got me thinking about the issue in general.

      More specifically, the gentleman in the video is welcome to have his opinion on splitting hairs between “appropriation” and “appreciation”. I simply disagree. Especially when he talked about how appropriation means profit – go right back my line about selling jambalaya in Illinois. Shouldn’t be happening according to his logic! Also, that when borrowing from a culture, it must be educational – next time I get tacos perhaps the restaurant should also provide a handbook about Mexican culture. Ridiculous.

      Taking from other cultures has always happened, and will always happen, and we should be celebrating it. Specifically to the issue that caused him to record the video, being able to borrow distinctive style to immediately inform people of a culture and location is great! So what that it may not be their current style? If you are or were doing something distinctive, be proud of it. And when others emulate or exhibit it, be proud, not angry. I just find that idea of getting upset about “cultural appropriation” is extremely harmful to society at large, and simply a way to find something new to be angry about.

      I say let Justin Bieber wear dreadlocks, and let the guy from the game wear all the fezs he wants.

  3. A Salty Scientist

    Interesting point on the *real* strikezone being smaller. I’m fully on board with robo-umps, but there may have to be some strikezone tweaks. I’m also curious about how it may change the value of certain pitchers. At least anecdotally based on my viewing of missed strikes and balls, I would guess that pitchers with great stuff but poor control may stand to benefit, while great command guys may get squeezed.

  4. Doesn’t anyone want to rebut Drew’s latest response? I wonder why not.
    I guess he wins.

    And I couldn’t agree with him more. Thanks, Drew, for a thoughtful, joyful, commonsense correction to “political correctness” run amok. Thanks a million!

    • I didn’t “rebut” it because it serves as its own rebuttal. Drew doesn’t understand what cultural appropriation is (as shown by the jamabalaya and tacos comments). That’s too bad.

    • Two women went to Mexico, learned about tacos by asking the locals, opened a place in Portland, and were forced to close over the uproar that they “culturally appropriated”. This actually happened, and is why I offered the jambalaya hypothetical.

      I gave an example that was specifically called out as me not understanding the issue, but it actually occurred in real life! I’m not sure how I could demonstrate a better understanding than by using a real world example.

    • You really don’t get it. It’s just sad, Drew.

      (And those women were at least accused of stealing recipes, not just making tacos.)

    • The women asked the locals how it was done, and brought the knowledge home with them. They did nothing wrong, and should be running a successful business right now. It’s not like they stole specific recipes from the Soup Nazi’s armoire. In fact, if I learned anything from Top Chef, this is how many chefs often move their cuisine forward – traveling and picking things up from the locals.

      I’m sorry that the counter to my opinion is just to say that it’s “sad” that I “don’t get it”, so I guess I’ll be done.

    • Again, you’re getting the story wrong. They were accused of stealing recipes, hence the outcry.

      You really don’t get it when it comes to matters of race. Just nine months ago, you defended a legislator who claimed that “colored” people didn’t wash their hands as well as white people did, saying he was just being “caring” – and tried to argue that “colored” wasn’t offensive. We’re just not living in the same era, apparently.

    • Frank Jones

      Bob,

      It was pointed out that there exists a distinction between Cultural Appropriation and cultural appreciation. Drew apparently doesn’t recognize or understand the distinction, and that’s likely why no one rebutted his most recent post.

      Since you decided to jump into the fray, what are your thoughts on the definitions of the two phrases and the applicability of those definitions to the discussion?

      I eagerly await your reply, since your internet scorekeeping method implies that a non-reply would mean that you “lose” and I “win.”

  5. It’s from back in 2017, but here’s the link to a lengthy, multi-racial roundtable discussion between several Portland chefs, re the ethics and appropriateness of the above-cited Portland burrito place that was forced out of business via death threats and general outrage. (Short version: In this matter, Keith and people like him are the ones getting it wrong. But please, don’t take my word for it. Read it for yourselves, because it’s pretty entertaining and definitely informative.)

    https://www.wweek.com/restaurants/news-restaurants/2017/06/06/the-battle-over-kooks-burritos-led-to-death-threats-and-international-outrage-we-invited-portland-chefs-to-weigh-in/

    • Frank Jones

      After reading that article, I would say that it shows an example of people overreacting. And obviously, the death threats are way over-the-top and indefensible.

      I don’t know the whole story, because apparently there is also a possible issue of recipe stealing that wasn’t discussed in the article.

      Regardless, is that restaurant an effective example of “Good Cultural appropriation?”, as you seem to imply? If there is even such a thing?

      When people complain about inappropriate or offensive cultural appropriation, I didn’t get the impression they are referring to chefs who cook ethnic food. Thus, highlighting such an example in which there appears to have been something of an overreaction seems to miss the point of the discussion.

      Perhaps someone can shed some light on this topic by providing a few examples of respectful, beneficial cultural appreciation and contrast those examples with some clear examples of inappropriate or offensive cultural appropriation?

    • How about the Spokane Indians, a minor league team that has worked with local indigenous peoples to ensure that the team’s name and imagery honor and respect those people, rather than mock or demean them? Reasonable people may still disagree on whether this goes far enough, but it’s a good-faith effort and acknowledges that appropriating another’s culture can be harmful.

      Contrast that with the Washington Football Team’s decades of denial; the Guardians clinging to their nickname, logo, and mascot over 40+ years of criticism; or various colleges retaining Native American nicknames over the protests of the tribes and peoples those names represent.

  6. Drew on cultural appropriation reminds of the current discussions regarding critical race theory, where the examples given by detractors are only marginally adjacent at best and at worst are bad faith straw men.

    Lest that seem partisan, consider a scenario where Westboro Baptist was held up as proof that all Christians are hateful, vindictive bigots. Or the recent Texas abortion law is pronounced to be emblematic of all pro choice belief. If you accentuate the extreme over the typical then you’re bad faith. Period.

    As a musician, appropriation has been a topic of interest for years. On one hand there are tough to defend poseurs like Iggy Azalea putting on a “blaccent” and dressing up in someone else’s culture like it’s a Halloween costume. On the other there’s Eminem or Janis Joplin, who are irrefutably talented and clearly deeply in tune with the traditionally black art form they’re appropriating. It’s a discussion worthy of thoughtful, nuanced discussion. Instead we get clownish “You can’t wear a sombrero, Whitey!” dipshittery like the above. Be better, Drew.