Stick to baseball, 12/12/20.

I wrote one piece this week for subscribers to The Athletic, looking at the Lance Lynn and Carlos Santana signings and the Angels’ trades for two guys named Iglesias.

For Paste, I ranked the top fifteen new board games of 2020, which range from a game suitable for kids as young as 4-5 to a crunchy two-hour dice-drafter.

My guest on this week’s episode of the Keith Law Show was Tony Paul, who’s covered the Tigers for ages for the Detroit News, talking about the Tigers, what it’s like to cover a bad team, and how baseball can improve its efforts on diversity.

I have two books out for the readers on your holiday shopping lists. The Inside Game: Bad Calls, Strange Moves, and What Baseball Behavior Teaches Us About Ourselves, available in hardcover; and Smart Baseball, available in paperback.

You can also sign up for my free email newsletter for more essays from me and summaries of everything I’ve written between issues of the newsletter.

And now, the links…

Comments

  1. The Loeffler stocks link directs to the Feinstein article.

    • Thanks, it should work now. I fixed it twice and it wouldn’t take, but I think it’s finally working.

  2. A Salty Scientist

    Kary Mullis is another shining example of why I hate the idea of Nobel prizes in general. The prizes largely ignore that discoveries build on the work of many people, and are not due to singular genius. The prizes also lead to hero worship and the subsequent disappointment that the heroes have feet of clay. Add in the politics and bias in the selection process, and I could completely do without.

    Last year, UC Berkeley’s Alumni Magazine also had what I felt was a good article about Mullis’ legacy: https://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/winter-2019/intolerable-genius-berkeleys-most-controversial-nobel-laureate

  3. Brian bin Ahwatukee

    I grew up evangelical so I have some perspective. I think that story tries to place evangelicals into a morally difficult place and that’s not really relevant. Liberals, just like evangelicals, love to cast people as morally inferior. It’s just a matter of what one happens to like and one can finger point that the other is awful. I read a lot of stories attacking evangelicals, and subsequent off shoots (prosperity doctrine is the common one) simply based on them having bad morals.

    I think a lot of evangelicalism is simply a reaction in part to that moral scolding but moreso as a way and method to translate a material consumer attitude (gimme gimme gimme) into a religious one. Gods will cannot be known but it is shown through people having things …boats, or TVs or whatever. Donald Trump is the epitome of that consumer lifestyle with gaudy gold toilets and the like so it must be Gods will that a man with stuff is the president! Looks he’s even anti-abortion. How great is that?!

    I’m tired of the moral scolding that comes from liberals

    • What moral scolding is coming from liberals on this subject? That evangelicals who vote to restrict non-evangelicals’ behavior according to the tenets of their faiths should at least hold themselves to those standards? Or perhaps that they should recognize that our government is a secular one?

      I would love to see the U.S. shift to the French model of secularism, where the government is protected from the intrusion of religion, rather than the converse we have here in the U.S. The liberty of others should not be abrogated to suit the whims of the religious beliefs of a small portion of the citizenry.

  4. Keith, can you elaborate why the Collinsworth apology was inadequate? I thought the apology was sincere, it stated his intentions behind the comment, and he seemed to take responsibility for the comment. I got the impression that he was upset he insulted anyone, which was the reason for the apology. Thanks.

    • As I said to someone who asked on Twitter:

      “I know the way I phrased it insulted many”

      That’s fucking weasel wording. It’s not the phrasing. It’s the meaning. You can’t get around his surprise that ladypersons knew something about his mansport. And he’s just apologizing for his word choices.

    • Cris Collinsworth has nothing to apologize for. It’s reality that women, in general, have less interest in sports than men. Trump lost the election. More men like football than women. These are facts. You don’t want to believe them, fine. But you are living in an alternate reality if you don’t.

      Cris goes all over the country for his job, and apparently he was out and about in Pittsburgh and was impressed that the women he met were super knowledgeable compared to other places he’s been. That’s a compliment!

      I guess speaking the truth is not ok anymore, unless it aligns with what certain people deem to be an acceptable truth to speak.

  5. Brian in ahwatukee

    What moral scolding?! It is litered throughout. Madison Cawthorn is painted as an awful dude (weird she didn’t do that with say…Biden who has an equally atrocious record. Something about the letter after his name, I’m sure) and says “cry more, lib”. That’s actually a funny line but it’s meant to cause gasps in the liberal audience. I mean Madison will be the youngest member of Congress and was born in the 90s (oof). Why didn’t that come up at all? Only the bad parts. That was just one example. Happy to share more

    On the flip side I see you on Twitter favoriting Aaron Rupar tweets regularly. His entire act is to take snips of media that make republicans look bad so liberals can hate watch the media piece. It’s worse than it sounds.

    • Oh, the Biden thing again. Do you still maintain that he’s “sundowning,” as you said in March? Now you’re back to making bogus claims about Biden’s record with women. Cawthorn’s deeds aren’t just worse, but they are far better backed up with evidence.

    • “he will be the youngest member of Congress when he takes office in January.”

      -that article

    • I did read it and referenced doing so in my post (“both you and he”). The thing is that Jonathan Chait is a notoriously bad faith interlocutor and many of the arguments he makes in the piece are bog standard rape apologia.

  6. Brian in ahwatukee

    Tara Reade. I can’t understand how you Alyssa Milano it away considering your very good stance on baseball players.

    Yes he’s sundowning. He’s barely visible these days. He is 78. He broke his foot chasing a dog. I mean, yes! We are still hearing about it and not the doctored videos. He’s a different person now than he was during Obama years. I’m fine being wrong here but am pretty sure I’m not. It will come up very soon again

    Idk, I don’t really think someone who talks tough with minimal action is particularly evil. I mean just this week we saw a Democrat stand in the way of ending surprise billing. He compromised with arbitration (!). Guess who his biggest donors are? I call that just as awful as it actually impacts lives. Someone spouting hate can be ignored or chastised.

    I guess I’m just tired of seeing the constant barrage of “omg, Diane, look at how bad these people are!” Without that same critical eyes toward very awful democrats. Evangelicals are a good example where it’s a persuadable group but they look at democrats and go, “why? to celebrate A black Raytheon board member being appointed to the cabinet?”

    -signed – frustrated in ahwatukee

    • Tara Reade’s allegations have been heavily scrutinized and the consensus is that they don’t stand up. And that’s all you have.

      The sundowning thing is ridiculous. I can’t believe you’re clinging to that after seeing him in multiple debates, and giving several other live speeches. Your personal feelings on Biden are clouding your judgment.

    • Not sure what you’re talking about w/r/t Tara Reade not being credulous. I would be remiss to casually dismiss rape accusations with only a nod to “the consensus.” Especially since the consensus on such matters tends to disbelieve women in general.

      Also not sure why saying Biden has signs of cognitive decline is “ridiculous.” His ability to get through highly prepared speeches/debates doesn’t mean he’s not obviously diminished to some degree. Compare any of his current-day extemporaneous speaking with something like this interview from the last cycle:

      https://www.cnn.com/2016/01/11/politics/joe-biden-bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-income-inequality/index.html

    • I’m talking about how multiple media investigations cast serious doubt on her credibility. Her friend admitting making up a key detail of the story; Reade’s story has changed without explanation, and she has included details that are at least highly improbable; over 60 other women who worked for Biden reported no such incidents; Reade’s former supervisor says she was fired for poor job performance; and so on.

      “Sundowning” is not cognitive decline. Nearly everyone experiences some cognitive decline in their 70s. Sundowning is a feature of dementia. If you say Biden is sundowning, you are claiming that Biden has dementia, which 1) is bullshit and 2) is not something a non-expert should be claiming about a person they’ve never met and have only seen occasionally on TV.

    • Look the accusations could be false, but 1) I’m not going to take Jonathan f’in Chait’s word for it and 2) a lot of the arguments both you and he make border on apologist-type drivel. Who cares if she was fired? Who cares if no one else reported an incident? Maybe she’s the only victim or maybe there’s deep-seated structural reason why no one else reported anything! Victims’ stories change often because sometimes it’s hard to perfectly recollect traumatic experiences!

    • OK, if you’re not going to read the single link I posted, I am ending the conversation.

  7. Brian in ahwatukee

    “Believe women!” Until someone unsavory comes along. Don’t believe them. They don’t matter. That’s the democratic message. It was gross then and is gross now. It’s a mystery why women still underreport.

    I think it’ll come up again. Feinstein has lucid moments too. But that’s been known a while. We’ve heard same rumors about Biden for a while.

    I don’t hate Biden. We know what he is, his record is public. I lived through Obama and experienced the profound disappointment like everyone else. I voted for him twice expecting that hope and change. It never came. Why do we think Biden will be better?

  8. The Senator Feinstein article linked gives zero hard evidence for their claim and includes exactly zero quotes from people on the record. Not defending her, but this was a gossip-style hit piece, not evidence based. I am surprised you included this Keith.

    • Not sure why “zero quotes from people on the record” is disqualifying – and the author is one of the most credible journalists in the U.S. right now.

    • Questioning Biden’s capacity is off limits.

      Questioning Feinstein’s is necessary.

      Hmmm…

    • I never said either of those things, Kazzy.