Stick to baseball, 1/12/19.

No ESPN+ content this week, as I’m working on the prospect rankings and saving those extra bullets in the hope that someone like Bryce Harper or Manny Machado will eventually sign. I did hold a Klawchat on Thursday.

My latest review for Paste covers the deduction board game Cryptid, one of my top ten games of 2018, in which each player gets one clue, and you need to deduce all other players’ clues to identify the one hex on the variable board where the Creature is hiding for that specific board and set of clues. It’s quite fun, like a board game with a puzzle at its heart.

And now, the links…

Comments

  1. I’m not sure the 70% tax bracket would change a lot of rent seeking of top executives. It probably does mean the CEO doesn’t take the extra $5-10 million bonus they would receive today, but that money would just be re-distributed among the other top executives that are one or two levels below the CEO. Their salary/bonus would increase an extra $250-500K. So the CEO would no longer be at eight figures, “just” high seven figures, while other executives that were low seven figures would get to mid-seven figures.

    • So I rather doubt we’d be at 37% up to $10 million prior to jumping to 70%, and you are making the argument for a lower threshold, and indeed, from FDR until Reagan the top marginal rate was at least 70% and was almost always hit at a much lower threshold, even adjusted for inflation.

  2. Gladwell does a good job making stuff up/deliberately misinterpreting stuff

    https://twitter.com/davelevitan/status/1083018835471536128

  3. Was not disappointed in the caption. Thank you.

  4. Joe Lieberman should be working on his next GOP convention speech. 2020 isn’t too far off and I’m already pining for that low energy, monotone delivery.