Top Chef, S9E13.

Recapping the worst episode of Top Chef I’ve ever seen…

* First order of business is to discuss the guest judge this week, Pee Wee Herman. I was too old for his original kids’ show, and never quite got the hipster-chic of it. I really don’t care about the public-indecency arrest, nor do I think it’s germane to a discussion of his appearance on this show. The real problem with Pee Wee Herman is that the character isn’t funny – and an unfunny guest judge who spurs the other judges to try (and fail) to be funny creates a very awkward show that, for me, was unpleasant to watch even before we got to the elimination-challenge foolishness.

* Quickfire: Twenty minutes to make pancakes. I love this challenge, because pancakes are such a classic dish, very American, often badly done, like lead in the stomach, tasting just of buttermilk or of the artificially-flavored syrup in which they are drowned. A pancake is one of the quickest of quickbreads, and while I prefer waffles – better surface/interior ratio, so you get more browning and more crunch – I like the way this gave chefs a blank canvas.

* Was it just the editing, or were most of the chefs just eyeballing their batter? I’m obsessed about measuring ingredients for doughs or batters of any sort, usually with a scale.

* The ricotta pancake thing, for me, is a little played out, and two chefs employed it – lemon-ricotta from Lindsay, ricotta-buttermilk from Grayson (who used chiffonade of basil in her fruit topping, which I love, as it has a surprisingly sweet flavor). Ricotta does produce a really light, fluffy end product though, including the zeppole at Via Napoli in Epcot, so maybe I’m criticizing a trend that is more of a new technique. But we didn’t get a lot of unusual flours, which surprised me because it seems like an easy way to change flavors and textures.

* Probably worth pointing out how incredibly forced the laughter from the chefs was during this entire episode. Grayson at least seemed to have some nostalgia for Pee Wee’s Playhouse, but that was it. Herman’s “the best pancakes I’ve ever had” gag was lame – anyone who didn’t see that coming shouldn’t be allowed to drive.

* Ed wins by going Jackson Pollock with the batter so he serves mostly the crispy edges of pancakes without the doughy interiors. This reminded me of a customer-from-hell incident my wife and I witnessed in a Cracker Barrel in Elkhart, Indiana, in 1998 (a story I may have told before, so bear with me). The burly guy in the next booth, dining alone, orders the pancakes “extra crispy,” and right before the waitress leaves to put in the order, shouts, “did I emphasize crispy?” So, in a development as obvious as a Pee-Wee Herman gag, the guys sends back multiple plates of pancakes because they’re “not crispy enough.” To this day I really have no idea what a crispy pancake would look like or whether that clown ever got what he wanted, or what he deserved for treating the server the way he did.

* Elimination challenge: This was a new low for Top Chef, surpassing the previous low, set when Pee Wee Herman walked into the kitchen at the start of the episode. The chefs had to head out on bicycles to find their ingredients at the farmers’ market in the Alamo district, and then had to find restaurants that would allow them to cook their meals in their kitchens. This is ridiculous for more reasons than I can list, but I’ll start with these.

1. The show is called “Top Chef,” right? So what part of this challenge is remotely relevant to being a chef? It had little or nothing to do with cooking, or even running a kitchen, which I could argue is a relevant consideration for evaluating someone’s cheffing skills.

2. Requiring the chefs to ride all over town on bikes is a pretty big handicap for anyone who’s not in shape, or has bad knees, or is otherwise physically limited. And given how hot it was during the filming of this season, weren’t they asking for someone to get hurt or pass out?

3. It had to be more structured than the editing made it appear. The show’s producers arranged this with restaurant owners beforehand, right? I mean, clearly these restaurant chefs/owners aren’t that surprised to have a TV crew and a random cook show up and ask to use their kitchens, and the chefs keep showing up at the same places, which can’t be a coincidence. So did the contestants get a list of restaurants to hit? And were the restaurants separately compensated? (Or was it just for the free publicity?) They had to know beforehand so they knew they would be asked to write up bills for the chefs. And if I’m right, why not make that clear to the audience?

4. None of that part of the show was even a little entertaining, let alone instructive about food or cooking.

* Moving along rapidly, Ed decides he wants to get proteins at the restaurant, which seems kind of foolhardy; don’t you build your dish around your proteins? He ends up using chicken breast instead of what he hoped for, shrimp, and is nearly eliminated because of it.

* Grayson says, “game night at the Schmitz house, usually one of us breaks down and cries.” I hear ya, girl – Ticket to Ride matches can get pretty fierce.

* Lindsay falls way behind the other chefs in getting ingredients – again, what are we judging here? Then she loses the kitchen she arranged to use because they don’t hold her spot and Sarah shows up. We sure learned a lot about Lindsay’s culinary vision by watching her get screwed over like that. The judges criticize her dish for having a little too much goat cheese, and Pee Wee Herman keeps talking about how amazing it is to have food served in “little boats,” so apparently he’s never seen an endive in his life.

* Sarah makes a “chicken skin vinagrette,” but it wasn’t just from the fat rendered from the skin, since she crisped it on the grill. I haven’t seen a recipe yet but am very interested now. The judges loved her okra, crush her for not seasoning her perfectly-cooked soft-boiled eggs. Outside of that – and chefs do get the axe all the time here for improper seasoning – this could have been a winner as a reconceptualization of a classic dish, a formula that always plays well on Top Chef.

* Ed got a little weird about sharing the kitchen with the guy who actually owned the place, although he was better humored about it at judges’ table than he was in the confessional. I get the criticism of the chicken’s texture if he pulled it too early and didn’t allow it to carry over, but Gail’s comment that poaching in beef fat isn’t flavorful made zero sense to me. Everyone knows the last time McDonald’s fries were good was when they still fried them in beef tallow.

* Grayson makes stuffed chicken breasts, which I’m not crazy about since they tend to dry out fairly easily, especially cooked without skin, because you’re trying to get the stuffing to at least get hot if not actually cooked through, by which time the breast meet is dry. Tom loves the combo of ingredients and loves her butternut squash but not in concert with tomatoes. Weird that Grayson would get large chicken breasts at a farmer’s market – you’d expect smaller ones if they’re really free-range or pasture-raised.

* Paul remains wildly ambitious even when working in someone else’s kitchen. It also seemed like he got along the best with his hosts, which says the easygoing manner we’re seeing post-editing is probably legitimate. He worried, as usual, about the sweet/sour balance, which the judges liked as long as you got all of the elements at once. Only David Tyree could stop him now.

* Can I just emphasize again how terribly unfunny this whole episode was? If Pee Wee Herman isn’t able to provide humor, what the hell is he doing here? Charlize had better insight into the food, and she’s hot. Just bring her back next time instead of letting some has-been comedian be a guest judge.

* Winner: Lindsay. Sounds like she just had the least flawed dish. Paul gets the thumbs-up as well, so I assume it’s fair to call him the runner-up this week.

* Loser: Given what we saw, which of course is a limited look, I expected Sarah or Ed to go home over Grayson. Grayson had a hell of a run though; she seemed early on like she lacked the range, but proved that she could succeed within her limits, and (not that it matters for judging) came off on TV better than anyone other than Paul.

* Last Chance Kitchen: Editing made Grayson look like the winner, but Ed betting the pack of cigarettes that it’s Beverly makes me think that’s who really won the LCK finale. Tom has the line of the week, funnier than anything PWH said, to Grayson: “I would not wake up this early in the morning just to fuck with you.” One preposition makes all the difference.

* Other LCK observations: Interesting to hear eliminated chefs, mostly men, now praising Beverly … Please stop saying “Asian” like it’s one fucking cuisine. Bev is Korean and her dish was more Thai than anything else; they’re no more similar than two European cuisines from different countries. It’s beyond annoying to hear Asian cuisine dismissed like it’s a gimmick, or some narrow style that could be summarized in a Dummies book.

* Final three: I’m sticking with Paul, Ed, and Lindsay.

Comments

  1. Worst episode ever… I can’t imagine the creative process that resulted in this episode – unless it involved several bottles of cheap wine…

    This entire season has lack episodes where they simply cook – and the few where they have gotten to do so, we have seen some amazing dishes. I’m hoping for a return to dignity next season – but am not counting on it.

    As for this episode, I was sure Grayson was toast before the episode even started – the Meatball comment was funny but no one gets away with talking back to Tom on this show. For a similar reason, I am sure Bev will be winning LCK. Only one judge there.

  2. the ONLY praise that I can give, it it seems they eliminated Grayson because her flaw was the least connected to the ridiculous parameters/conditions places upon the judges. The concept for the dish (the vegetable combo) and giant pieces of chicken she presented, tat came across as unappetizing. The other two had issues related to amount of time they had to prepare, cook, taste, etc and Grayson’s was a function of her concept/visualization and not the constraints of the challenge.

    Only thing that I can potentially compliment.

  3. Keith, have you ever given thought to who are the best chefs to ever cook in Top Chef. For me, Rich Blais and the Voltaggio brothers are locks for the top 5.

    Also, this episode was stupid. I find myself pulling for Beverly, if for no other reason than to make Sarah miserable.

  4. It was a pretty bad episode, and Pee Wee added nothing to it. That said, I didn’t mind the idea of the challenge.

    I’d argue that the whole challenge is relevant to being a chef. Being a top chef and running a kitchen is about creativity, planning, execution, and the ability to focus under limited time and a lot of pressure…which is exactly what the challenge was about, although not in the traditional sense. I never worked in a professional kitchen but having seen what goes on, cooking on the line is pretty physically intensive- high temperatures, lots of running around, and with space usually at a premium lots of bending and flexing. I hope the producers were being safe with offering water and taking precautions to making sure the contestants were ok physically, but I didn’t see the bike riding as being out of the ordinary given the chef lifestyle.

    The challenge might have made more sense with more cheftestants…it would have been interesting with 12 or 14 left to let the chefs pair up in teams and try this with tandem bikes…but not with 5 left and not with pee Wee as a guest judge. Like many dishes on the show, interesting concept, poor execution…

  5. The “finding a kitchen to work” in was so transparent that it came close to offensive. That the audience shouldn’t recognize that not a single restaurant even blinked when approached by a random person on a bicycle with a basket of groceries, asking to use their facilities. Overall it was a terrible episode and the second one in a row which asked the chefs to dumb down their food, whether it be for Healthy Choice or for Pee Wee. You’d think that by the time we got to the top 5 they’d be finished with the gimmicky crap. Here’s hoping for a decent end to the season with more elements of Top Chef and less of The Amazing Race…

  6. #3 is precisely why I think 100% of “reality” TV is fake. As far as I’m concerned, if it’s not live TV, it’s scripted, because even when it’s not explicitly scripted, producers use editing to control what we see, often to the point of being deliberately misleading. Most reality shows desperately try to distract the viewer from remembering that a TV crew is present. For example, even in something like House Hunters, are we REALLY supposed to believe that these couples are actually hashing out one of the most important decisions they’ll make in a mere minute or two?

  7. I can only think of Ron ‘Fucking’ Swanson in regards to the pancake story.

    “You may have thought you heard me say I wanted a lot of bacon and eggs, but what I said was: Give me all the bacon and eggs you have.”

  8. Look on the bright side, Klaw. If an entire episode can be based around Pee Wee, what’s stopping the “Snarky Sports Writer and Tweeter” episode next season?

  9. as far as the “durr, beverly’s cooking asian again,” i wonder if it would be the same if she wasn’t “asian.”

  10. Couldn’t agree more about the “Asian” comment. There’s an enormous difference between Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Korean, Vietnamese, etc. cuisines. And, even worse than that, if you are making just one dish, and you are Asian, why wouldn’t you make an “Asian” cuisine?

    Completely agree about PWH by the way. Who is producing this show? Who was the idiot that decided PWH should be on it? It actually wasn’t the worst decision in recent Top Chef history – that would be the cookie monster decision. Just give me someone that knows about food for these Quick Fires and focus on the cooking.

  11. I’m a fan, but you’re a terrible, terrible snob. Don’t you ever get tired of the act?

  12. i’m with BIP.
    tom always preaches its all about the food !!
    BS..the true motto is “it’s all about the editing”

    the fact that gail simmon’s blog and tom on watch what happened have to explain the decisions should tell us all we need.

    then gail says lindsay was bold enough to do beef…well hello…peewee asked for chicken.

    they can make anyone the winner and justify it!

    fyi BIP
    see link below…HH is fake as well
    http://www.jsonline.com/entertainment/tvradio/123406493.html

    i’m done with top chef!

  13. I agree about Herman. It was just awkward and uncomfortable. I cringed half the time he opened his mouth.

    The restaurants had to be notified ahead of time. Some of the contestants didn’t even introduce themselves, just said, “Hi, can I use your kitchen?” Also, was it just me, or was Lindsey rather rude to the people in her kitchen (perhaps it was just in comparison to Ed and Paul)?

    And about the decision to send Grayson home … I got a late start on watching this episode, so I was watching on DVR. After the episode, Watch What Happens Live came on and Tom Colicchio and Carla were the guests. Tom started to talk about the decision of who went home and said he wanted to come on the show because he had watched the show that morning and was surprised how it was edited. He started to explain that a lot of the criticisms of Grayson’s dish had been removed … and that’s where the DVR ended. Of course, at that point, it took too long to switch over to Live TV and I missed the rest of what he had said. So it sounded like it was just an editing trick. Hopefully he posts a blog this week and clears it up.

    I also think Bev wins, but why does Ed’s confidence in her make you think she did? I assumed it was just because it always seemed like Ed never appreciated the way that Bev was treated, so he was pulling for her.

  14. Nico Samuelson

    Top Chef Top Five: Blais, Hung, Angelo and both Voltaggios.

  15. Nico has four of the top five in there, but I’d say put either Stefan Richter (who crushed his entire season before he seemingly got bored) or possibly the first winner of all, Harold Dieterle, rather than Angelo; Angelo was certainly a top competitor, but I never felt he was so dominant as Stefan or Harold, and his food never seemed as interesting to me.

  16. Well yes, that sucked. Last week when I saw the preview and saw Pee Wee I knew that it was going to be terrible and alas, it was. All season I’ve generally been trying to remain optimistic about the show. It is after all coming after – perhaps – the best season and thus some let down is to be expected, but with the exception of the Charlize episode, it’s been pretty atrocious. In part it seems like the chefs aren’t as strong, but it’s more than that: the challenges are gimmicky. Like this one, and all of the ridiculous “catering” challenges. Plus, the guest judges lack the culinary significance of past seasons. Cat Cora and Emeril? Really? That’s very kind of them to bring us Food Networks leftovers. Pee Wee? Ugh… Shoot me.

    Fortunately, the season finale is bringing them to my neck of the woods, so I’ll watch this one out to see Vancouver, and because I want to see Paul win, but next season?!? I don’t know. To be fair, the weakest past seasons in my opinion (5 and 7) were followed up by awesome seasons (6 and the Allstar), so I’ll be there at the start of season 10, but it might be on a short leash.

  17. Nail on the head, Keith. Watching the judges interact with Pee Wee was twelve kinds of uncomfortable, and the whole concept for the elimination challenge was flat out ridiculous.

    Based on the post-editing stuff we saw, it sounded to me like Ed had the worst dish…..I was kind of surprised that it was Grayson who was asked to leave. It kind of makes me wonder whether the judges don’t just eliminate whoever makes the worst food on a given day, but actually take into account which chefs have, on average, been the best through all of the challenges to date.

  18. Seriously? Horrible. Good recap, though. I also thought Ed would go, but I was not able to watch Tom’s explanation.

  19. Regarding the randomness of the restaurants they had to cook in, I am absolutely convinced that each restaurant was notified and aware that one of the contestants would be cooking, and that they would be asked to assist. Two things seal it: 1, Sarah showing up in the kitchen Lindsey picked…way too big of a coincidence in this context, and 2, I swear there was a split second of the show where they showed the map the contestants were using, and there were 5 clearly marked locations all near each other. I took this to clearly indicate the 5 pre-arranged restaurants, and more tech savvy individual may be able to get a screen grab.

    I have no idea what the producers thought they were gaining by leading us to believe it was a wild goose chase, rather than just stating, “hey, we picked 5 places where you can cook, each have advantages and disadvantages…good luck.” The added benefit of that approach would be to at least take some of the “non-chef” related aspects out of the challenge, and evince an intent to focus on the cooking.

    I can live with the editing for sake of drama/suspense (even if the judges were surprised by the extent of the edits as has been suggested) but the level of subterfuge that was unsuccessfully executed in this episode smacks of a wanna-be Top Chef type show and not the real deal.