The Thirty-Nine Steps.

I’m in the midst of the wakes/funeral after a death in my wife’s family, so my moderation of comments and responses to them may be sporadic and arbitrary for the next few days.

The blog post on Borchering and Washington is up on the draft blog. I think video of Washington will be up tomorrow.

John Buchan’s The Thirty-Nine Steps is on the Guardian 100 and served as the inspiration for the excellent early Hitchcock film of the same name, although Hitchcock, as was his wont, rewrote a good chunk of the plot, including the meaning of the title phrase, so if you’ve seen the film much of the book will still be new to you. It’s a straight-up spy story with an emphasis on action: The protagonist finds himself privy to an international plot and by the start of the second chapter is on the lam from both the authorities and the nefarious plotters seeking to destabilize Europe and spark a world war.

The book runs a brief 106 pages and the narrator is in almost constant motion; when he’s not on the move, he’s hiding or planning his next move or both. The double pursuit ups the stakes and almost guarantees that he’ll be in danger, but also increases the need for him to engage in some serious social engineering to find food and shelter as he dances around Scotland trying to evade his pursuers.

I’m not sure how it landed on a list of the greatest novels of all time – it’s good, but it’s just a spy/adventure novel and doesn’t even have the distinction of being the first work in that genre (Erskine Childers’ lone novel, The Riddle of the Sands, holds that honor). It’s a good airplane read or just the solution for a dreary day, as an unnamed man quoted in the book’s introduction put it: “It was one of those days when the only thing to do was read John Buchan.”

Next up: Nonfiction – William Easterley’s The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good.

Comments

  1. I’d be willing to bet that if Hitchcock hadn’t adapted it (and that adaptation hadn’t been so excellent) the book wouldn’t have made the list.

  2. You mention the movie, but there is also a play based on the movie, which makes it a second generation descendent of the book. I don’t think the play is touring yet, but I saw it in London three weeks ago. It’s an ingenious little effort. Minimalist staging. Only four actors, three of whom cover a multitude of different characters. The fourth wall is well broken with many asides, verbal and facial, to the audience. (And there is the mandatory appearance by Hitchcock.) Except for the basic plot line, it probably has little relationship to the book, but was one of the most entertaining theatrical performances I’ve ever attended.

  3. The mention of “first work in the genre” reminded me not of other first works, but of definitive works. Keith, have you read James Crumley’s The Last Good Kiss? It terms of derivative power, it inspired an entire generation of elite crime fiction writers (Lehane, Connelly, Pelecanos, Blunt, Burke, Hamilton, Huston). Highly recommended.

  4. Zach from Wiley

    Maybe my favorite “Thirty-Nine Steps” anecdote (not that I have too many) is the edition I found at a friend’s house published as part of the “Classics of Children’s Literature Collection”.

    Mommy, what’s a conspiracy of Jews?

  5. My condolences on your family’s lost. Best of luck.

  6. Keith,
    Deep condolences on your loss.

    Will be taking in any of the BC/Virginia games this weekend?

  7. my prayers are with you, Klaw and Claw.

  8. my thoughts are too.