Kitchen Nightmares: Original recipe versus extra snarky.

The American version of Ramsay’s Kitchen Nightmares, just titled Kitchen Nightmares, is off to a solid start in the ratings, so we’re likely to be treating to quite a bit more swearing and family drama over the rest of this season. Although it’s entertaining, it can’t hold a candle to the BBC original.

The main difference revolves around food: the original version did, and the American version doesn’t, with food almost an afterthought in the way the U.S. show is edited and presented. It’s clear that Ramsay spends some time – perhaps a lot of time – in the kitchens of the restaurants he visits and in redesigning the menus, but the show gives us almost none of that content, instead preferring to show us arguments (which are many and varied) and “confessional” clips, the staple of the American reality show perhaps known as the best opportunity for the morons in each show to either 1) claim that they didn’t actually excrete the shit that hit the fan or 2) show some fake tears.

Episode #3 (The Mixing Bowl) was a perfect example. The restaurant’s manager, Mike, is an obvious fraud; Gordon sniffs him out in about ten seconds (although Gordon was outright hostile at that point, making fun of Mike’s weight, which I thought was out of bounds and out of character for the BBC version of Gordon) and at the end tries to convince the chef/owner to fire the guy. Mike spends all his confessional time either claiming that his various screw-ups weren’t his fault or crying. I understand that the producers and editors can make someone look bad through selective editing, but they can only make you look bad if you do bad stuff. I’ve been in my share of restaurants, and the only time I’ve had a chef or manager sit down at my table to chat was when it was a relative of mine. Mike was sitting down left and right, and giving out 50% coupons. You can cry all you want and claim it was some teenaged waitress’ fault, but it doesn’t take a lot of tricky editing to make you look bad.

But what we saw remarkably little of in this episode was actual cooking. The BBC version emphasizes the food; nearly every restaurant Gordon goes to is failing because the food isn’t made from fresh ingredients, is too complicated, or outright sucks. (“What the fuck were you thinking when you put apricots in the mashed potatoes?” has become something of a running joke in our house – well, at least when my daughter’s in bed.) The show shows a lot of the food, both before the revamp and after, and the bulk of what Gordon is shown doing is either working with the chef or creating a new menu, and usually we get a healthy dose of both. There’s certainly some drama on the BBC version, with chefs walking out and one episode with a hilarious bit of sibling rivalry, but what we’ve seen in the first three episodes here trumps the worst of the BBC series.

The production of the U.S. version also leaves a bit to be desired. I could do without the confessionals, which add nothing other than showing that Americans – at least those who work in restaurants – are immature little twits. (In other news, Kitchen Nightmares is the #1 rated show in France.) The free restaurant makeovers are a bit of a joke; in the British version, most of the improvement comes from hard work, not hitting the decorating lottery. And Gordon feels a lot more scripted. Not only is he generally more ornery, but even his asides to the camera seem like they’ve either been written for him or they’re the result of numerous retakes. The spontaneity of the original isn’t there. Finally, the U.K. version’s final segment, running five to seven minutes, includes a second visit by Gordon to the restaurant about a month after the initial trip, and he often has to review some of his major lessons or to just air someone out a second time. And sometimes business is just wonderful and it’s all hugs and roses (and f-bombs). But the U.S. version skips that; just one of the three episodes has had a real second look, two weeks after Gordon left and without Gordon there at all.

I haven’t deleted my Season Pass to the U.S. version, in spite of all of these flaws. I like Ramsay and I want to hear what he has to say between f-bombs. I’m also strangely riveted by one particular type of drama – seeing what an unaware or meek boss will do with an employee who is lazy, incompetent, or both. And I hold out hope that they’ll cut the gimmicks and let Gordon and the food rule the show. Gimmicks wear thin, but good food never does.

Comments

  1. Yongjae Lee

    I never watched BBC version, but the US one looks a lot like Restaurant Makeover from the Food Network; at least it shows more cooking part than this one.

  2. I completely agree. One other thing about the American version that bothers me – before every commercial, they preview what is “up next” – so you get to see the same shot of Mike blowing up about 8 times during the show. I think they could cut that out and add about 5 minutes of actual content to the show.

  3. I agree completely. The problems on the BBC version usually came down to the food and that was the most interersting part, to see if Gordon could get the chef to change his menu for the good of the restaurant (and it was also fun to wonder, “What made you think someone would order swordfish topped with bananas and salsa?). If we wanted to see conflict with people, we can watch any other reality show. As the American version of the show is set up, it could be just any guy ripping any group of people at any profession, the restaurant and food is secondary, and that’s a shame. I hope they get back to what made the BBC version so great.

  4. sorry, put this under the wrong entry…

    i’ve proclaimed the us version the best show on television. perhaps i am evil-hearted, but i love watching ramsay smack down incompetent owners and chefs that are convinced their way of doing things are effective. it is so blatantly obvious that what they are doing is not working, yet they often bitterly defend their positions. leads to classic buffoon drama which normally ends with ramsay yelling “are you mad?!” or “you’re a f*cking moron!”

    juicebucket long island dude (peter, brother of owner) from last week needs his own show. complete disaster of a human being.

  5. “I could do without the confessionals, which add nothing other than showing that Americans – at least those who work in restaurants – are immature little twits.”

    i agree with most of your analysis, but i enjoy the twits. i find most of them hilarious.

    also, i’m not one to be offended (ever, and am not at all in this case; and i agree that most of the people highlighted on the show are ridiculous), but calling all American restaurant workers immature little twits is a little harsh.

    i served and bartended for periods through undergrad, law, and mba school. i worked with a lot of people in similar positions, and the most frustrating component of the experience was dealing with guests/customers that blatantly looked at you as an inferior person/little twit.

    so next time you grab a bite and your server approaches the table consider that they may be using the position as an unglamorous means to an end, and not a fledgling career.

  6. Small point of correction. It is not a BBC show but a Channel 4 production in the UK.

    What the US version lacks is the simplicity of the UK version – which was to emphasise that there are many ingredients to creating a good restraurant (passion, good sense, organisation) but that the most important is producing good, fresh and simple food on a consistent basis. That is why the UK version concentrated on the food.

    It is a shame that the US version does not comprehend that …