Men at Work.

I generally don’t play many ‘dexterity’ games, meaning games that have some kind of physical component inherent in the play, like Jenga or the 1800s game Crokinole. There are tons of these games on the market but most just aren’t very good, often asking players to do things that are too easy or too difficult, and usually just rewarding the player who had the most fortunate timing rather than rewarding some specific skill or strategy. That made it a surprise that I enjoyed the 2019 game Men at Work, a dexterity game of stacking and especially of balancing, which builds in a way to keep you playing even if you make a mistake and gives players multiple things to do over the course of an entire game.

who can it be now?

Men at Work, designed by Rita Lodl (who appears in the game on one card as ‘Boss Rita’), has players building a construction site of girders and workers, where each player will get a specific instruction on their turn to place one of those two things with some specific additions or restrictions, such as matching a girder to a color already on the site. The initial setup has three girders and one or two workers on grey support blocks so that none of the girders is touching the playing surface. On your turn, you add the girder or worker, sometimes also placing bricks or tiny beams on the arms of the workers as well, while trying to keep the structure balanced so that nothing slips or falls to touch the table beneath. If any parts touch the table, you’ve caused an accident and must remove all such components, and then you lose one of your three safety certificates. If you lose all three, you’re out of the game.

Your moves are determined by a deck of two-sided cards. You flip a card to show two instructions, one for placing a girder and one for placing a worker. The card left on top of the deck will show a girder symbol or a hard-hat, telling you which instruction to follow, and two colors of girders, indicating you must place one of those colors or must place the new worker on a girder of either color. About a quarter of the way through the deck, the Boss Rita card will appear, after which the real scoring begins. If your move adds a new highest point to the construction site, you get an employee of the week token; the first player to get N tokens, where N varies by the number of players from 4 tokens to 6, is the winner. If your move doesn’t add a new highest point, which sometimes isn’t possible, you still must complete the move without causing an accident or risk losing a safety certificate. Play continues until someone reaches the target number of employee of the week tokens, or only one player still has safety certificates remaining.

The one key rule in Men at Work is that you’re supposed to place everything on the structure using just one hand, which is hard enough to remember, let alone to execute. I played this with a seven-year-old who had no problem at all understanding the rules – she only needed help with interpreting card instructions that weren’t all that clear, such as the different cards that say to put the worker on first and then add the bricks/beams, and those that have you put a brick/beam on the worker and then put them all on a girder at once – but I improvised and let her use two hands while I used just one. That was enough to keep the game balanced (pun intended) until eventually the structure got large enough that it was easy for one of us to knock almost the whole thing down with one errant move. It took us about 20 minutes of actual play time (not counting me reading the rules and looking up several cards for more explanation) from start to finish, and there was a lot of laughing in the process too. It’s still not my preferred genre of game but this is high on my list of titles you can play with kids of just about any age.

Wild Rose.

Jessie Buckley’s first film role was in the highly underrated, barely-seen independent thriller Beast back in 2017, a star turn by the young Irish actress just four years who had previously only worked in theater and on British television. She had a minor role in last year’s Judy, which was probably Americans’ first exposure to her work, but once again starred in an independent film, this time the musical comedy-drama Wild Rose, which plays with the standard formula of such smalltown-girl-makes-good movies and shows off Buckley’s impressive vocal and acting range. It’s free on Hulu and available to rent on amazon and iTunes.

Buckley is Rose-Lynn Harlan, who is just getting out of jail as the film opens and heads home to her two children and her mother (Dame Julie Walters), who has been taking care of them for a year while Rose-Lynn served out her sentence for a minor drug charge (revealed a bit later in the film). She’s never without her white cowgirl boots, and her only goal in life is to get to Nashville and become a country-music star, even if it means neglecting her kids or spurning the few people in her life willing to help her, including her mother and the woman whose house Rose-Lynn cleans for work. Susannah (Sophie Okonedo, who does not age) hears Rose-Lynn singing and tries everything to help her get to Nashville, but Rose-Lynn simply can’t get out of her own way.

Wild Rose is half formulaic, but manages to zig and zag enough times to get away from most of the clichés of the genre – notably the way such films generally rely on extraordinary good fortune to push their protagonists along the path to stardom. Rose-Lynn could have that, maybe, but every time she has such an opportunity, reality intercedes, often in the form of her own irresponsibility. She had her two children quite young and still hasn’t accepted the obligations of parenthood, nor does she seem to recognize the burden she places on her mother through her behavior. Yet she’s also spirited and driven and a talented singer and you’ll probably find yourself rooting for her in spite of her actions, even when she has gone past deserving our support. There are some moments that made me cringe, but that is what most helps this script avoid the saccharine elements of typical up-from-nowhere music films.

Nearly all of the songs Rose-Lynn sings in the film, and the majority of the songs on the soundtrack, are covers, many of them well-known country songs (John Prine’s “Angel from Montgomery” is a particular standout), along with a cover of Primal Scream’s “Country Girl” and a few originals. The closing song “Glasgow (No Place by Home),” co-written by Mary Steenburgen, is one of the two best songs in the film along with “Angel” and deserved one of the five Best Original Song nominations, at least over the Diane Warren song and I’d argue over the Elton John/Bernie Taupin track that won.

Buckley is an absolute star, though – she’s magnetic on screen and, it turns out, quite a singer too. (She finished second on a British reality-TV singing competition show at age 19, which led her to drama school and eventually to this career on screen and stage.) I’m not sure what it’ll take for her to land a  role in a major film that gets the attention of American audiences, but after three films, two in which she was the star, she’s reached the “I’ll watch anything she’s in” status for me. She earned a BAFTA nomination for Best Actress along with four nominees for the Oscar for the same award, taking the nod that Cynthia Erivo received here. She makes this movie work, even when it’s a bit uneven, and carries off the star-is-almost-born role to make every aspect of it credible, even when the plot seems a little farfetched (the Susannah bits). The resolution here is just perfect as well, avoiding the sentimental or the maudlin for a conclusion that’s just atypical enough to be satisfying.

Best two-player games for 2020.

I’ve been getting so many requests for recommendations for two-player games this week that I decided to pull the list I’ve added to the bottom of my annual top 100 rankings and make a separate post, with some updates for things I’ve played more recently and a few games on which I’ve changed my opinions as well.

1. JaipurFull review. Jaipur is my favorite two-player game, just as easy to learn but with two shades of additional complexity and a bit less randomness. In Jaipur, the two players compete to acquire collections of goods by building sets of matching cards in their hands, balancing the greater point bonuses from acquiring three to five goods at once against the benefit of taking one or two tokens to prevent the other player from getting the big bonuses. The game moves quickly due to a small number of decisions, like Lost Cities, so you can play two or three full games in an hour. It’s also incredibly portable. The new app is also fantastic, with a campaign mode full of variants. Complexity: Low.

2. 7 Wonders DuelFull review. Borrowing its theme from one of the greatest boardgames of all time, 7W Duel strips the rules down so that each player is presented with fewer options. Hand cards become cards on the table, revealed a few at a time in a set pattern that limits player choices to one to four cards (roughly) per turn. Familiarity with the original game is helpful but by no means required. There’s a brand-new app version out from Repos this fall. Complexity: Medium-low.

3. CarcassonneFull review. Carcassonne brings ease of learning, tremendous replayability (I know I use that word a lot here, but it does matter), portability (you can put all the tiles and meeples in a small bag and stuff it in a suitcase), and plenty of different strategies and room for differing styles of play. You build the board as you go: Each player draws a tile at random and must place it adjacent to at least one tile already laid in a way that lines up any roads or cities on the new tile with the edges of the existing ones. You get points for starting cities, completing cities, extending roads, or by claiming farmlands adjacent to completing cities. It’s great with two players, and it’s great with four players. You can play independently, or you can play a little offense and try to stymie an opponent. The theme makes sense. The tiles are well-done in a vaguely amateurish way – appealing for their lack of polish. And there’s a host of expansions if you want to add a twist or two. I own the Traders and Builders expansion, which I like mostly for the Builder, an extra token that allows you to take an extra turn when you add on to whatever the Builder is working on, meaning you never have to waste a turn when you draw a plain road tile if you sit your Builder on a road. I also have Inns and Cathedrals, which I’ve only used a few times; it adds some double-or-nothing tiles to roads and cities, a giant meeple that counts as two when fighting for control of a city/road/farm, as well as the added meeples needed to play with a sixth opponent. Complexity: Low/medium-low for the base game, medium with expansions.

4. Imhotep: The Duel. Full review. A truly great re-imagining of a larger game for two players, one that forces more interaction between the two of you so you don’t feel as much like you’re playing parallel solitaire. Players place their four meeples on the 3×3 grid that allows them to take goods off of the six boats, three on one side of the grid and three on the adjacent side, and place them in the four spaces on their personal boards, each of which scores in its own way. Several of those spaces create competition for specific tiles, and the boards have two sides so you can mix and match between the more or less interactive sides. There are also blue tiles that give you bonus actions and for which you may particularly want to battle your opponent when they appear. Complexity: Medium-low.

5. PatchworkFull review. A really sharp two-player game that has an element of Tetris – players try to place oddly shaped bits of fabric on his/her main board, minimizing unused space and earning some small bonuses along the way. It’s from Uwe Rosenberg, better known for designing the ultra-complex games Agricola, Le Havre, and Caverna. Go figure. And go get it. Complexity: Low.

6. 7 RoninFull review. An asymmetrical two-player game with a Seven Samurai theme – and when I say “theme,” I mean that’s the whole story of the game. One player is the seven ronin of the title, hired to defend a village against the invading ninjas, controlled by the other player. If the ninjas don’t take the village or wipe out the ronin before eight rounds are up, the ronin player wins. But the ninja can gain a decisive advantage in the first four rounds with the right moves. It’s very clever, the art is fantastic, and the theme is completely integrated into the game itself. It also plays in about 30 minutes. Complexity: Medium-low.

7. WingspanFull review.The only game to which I’ve given a perfect score of 10 since I started reviewing games for Paste five years ago, Wingspan is one of the best examples I can find of immaculate game design. It is thoroughly and thoughtfully constructed so that it is well-balanced, enjoyable, and playable in a reasonable amount of time. The components are all of very high quality and the art is stupendous. And there’s some real science behind it: designer Elizabeth Hargrave took her love of bird-watching and built a game around the actual characteristics of over 100 species of North American birds, such as their habitats, diets, and breeding habits. The European expansion is now out as well. Wingspan won the Kennerspiel des Jahres in 2019, which it more than deserved, making Hargrave the first woman to win that honor as a solo designer and just the second solo woman to win any Spiel des Jahres prize. It’s a marvel. Complexity: Medium.

8. Watergate. Full review. It’s a pure two-player game that pits one player as Nixon and the other as “the journalists,” each with a unique deck, where the latter player tries to place evidence tokens connecting at least two witnesses to the President, and Tricky Dick tries to block them. It’s fun, incredibly well-written, and a real thinker. Complexity: Medium.

9. That’s Pretty Clever. Full review. From the mind of the designer of The Mind, Wolfgang Warsch, That’s Pretty Clever (original title: Ganz Schön Clever) is a roll-and-write game where you roll six dice, each its own color, and can choose one die per roll to score on your sheet. The player sheets have five areas matching five of the dice colors, with the white die a wild, and each area scores in a unique way, with the potential for bonuses like the power to check off a box in a separate area for free. It’s also a great solitaire game, where 200+ is a solid score and 300+ is some Hall of Fame type stuff. Complexity: Medium-low.

10. TargiFull review. Moderately complex two-player game with a clever mechanic for placing meeples on a grid – you don’t place meeples on the grid itself, but on the row/column headers, so you end up blocking out a whole row or column for your opponent. Players gather salt, pepper, dates, and the relatively scarce gold to enable them to buy “tribe cards” that are worth points by themselves and in combinations with other cards. Some tribe cards also confer benefits later in the game. Two-player games often tend to be too simple, or feel like weak variants of games designed for more players. Targi isn’t either of those things – it’s a smart game that feels like it was built for exactly two people. Complexity: Medium.

11. Baseball Highlights: 2045Full review. I was floored at how much I enjoyed this game; it is baseball-themed, but it’s really a fast-moving deckbuilder where your deck only has 15 cards in it and you get to upgrade it constantly between “games.” The names on the player cards are all combinations of names of famous players from history – the first name from one, the last from another, like “Cy Clemens” – except for the robots. It’s not a baseball simulation game, but that might be why I liked it, because it was easier to just let the theme go and play the game for what it is. It’s down from previous years as I’ve found the replay value is limited, even with the expansions. Complexity: Medium-low.

12. Silver & GoldFull review. Phil Walker-Harding is some sort of genius, with Imhotep, the Sushi Go! series, Bärenpark, Gizmos, and this all hits under his name, with the Adventure series he co-created with Matthew Dunstan still on my to-play shelf. Silver & Gold is a polyomino flip-and-write game where there are just eight shapes to choose from in each round, with seven of them displayed in random order (the eighth isn’t used), and players fill in those small shapes on the larger ones on their two objective cards, using dry-erase markers. You score for finishing shapes, with three small bonuses available each game that do usually end up mattering in the final score. It’s portable, easy, lightly strategic, and undeniably fun. Complexity: Low.

13. The MindFull review. The Mind may drive you crazy; I haven’t beaten it yet, playing with several different people already, but I still find it really enjoyable and something that nearly always ends up with everyone laughing. This Spiel des Jahres-nominated game has just a deck of cards numbered 1 to 100, and in each round, every player gets a set number of cards dealt from the shuffled deck. All players must play their cards to the table in one pile, ascending by card number … but you can’t talk to anyone else, or even gesture. It’s a lot harder than it sounds. Complexity: Low.

14. Stone AgeFull review. Really a tremendous game, with lots of real-time decision-making but simple mechanics and goals that first-time players always seem to pick up quickly. It’s also very hard to hide your strategy, so newbies can learn through mimicry – thus forcing veteran players to change it up on the fly. Each player is trying to build a small stone-age civilization by expanding his population and gathering resources to construct buildings worth varying amounts of points, but must always ensure that he feeds all his people on each turn. I introduced my daughter to the game when she was 10 and she took to it right away, beating us on her second play. Complexity: Medium.

15. Ticket To RideFull review. Actually a series of games, all working on the same theme: You receive certain routes across the map on the game board – U.S. or Europe, mostly – and have to collect enough train cards in the correct colors to complete those routes. But other players may have overlapping routes and the tracks can only accommodate so many trains. Like Dominion, it’s very simple to pick up, so while it’s not my favorite game to play, it’s my favorite game to bring or bring out when we’re with people who want to try a new game but either haven’t tried anything in the genre or aren’t up for a late night. I do recommend the 1910 Expansion< to anyone who gets the base Ticket to Ride game, as it has larger, easier-to-shuffle cards and offers more routes for greater replayability. I also own the Swiss and Nordic boards, which only play two to three players and involve more blocking than the U.S. and Europe games do, so I don’t recommend them. The iPad app, developed in-house, is among the best available. The newest expansion, France and The Old West, came out in the winter of 2018, with two new rules tweaks, one for each board. I’ve ranked all 18 Ticket to Ride boards for Ars Technica. There’s also a kids’ version, available exclusively at Target, with a separate app for that as well. Complexity: Low.

16. SplendorFull review. A Spiel des Jahres nominee in 2014, Splendor has fast become a favorite in our house for its simple rules and balanced gameplay. My daughter, now eight, loves the game and is able to play at a level pretty close to the adults. It’s a simple game where players collect tokens to purchase cards from a 4×3 grid, and where purchased cards decrease the price of other cards. Players have to think long-term without ignoring short-term opportunities, and must compare the value of going for certain in-game bonuses against just plowing ahead with purchases to get the most valuable cards. The Splendor app, made by the team at Days of Wonder, is amazing, and is available for iOS, Android, and Steam. I also like the four-in-one expansion for the base game, Cities of Splendor. Complexity: Low.

17. AgamemnonFull review. An absolute gem of an abstract two-player game, with very little luck and a lot of balancing between the good move now and holding a tile for a great move later. Players compete to control “threads of fate” – connected lines on a small hub-and-spoke board – by placing their tokens at the hubs, but there are three different types of lines and control of each is determined in its own way. The board has alternate layouts on the other side for infinite replayability, but the main board is elegant enough for many replays, because so much of the game involves outthinking your opponent. Complexity: Low.

18. DominionFull review. I’ve condensed two Dominion entries into one, since they all have the same basic mechanics, just new cards. The definitive deck-building game, with no actual board. Dominion’s base set – there are ten expansions now available, so you could spend a few hundred dollars on this – includes money cards, action cards, and victory points cards. Each player begins with seven money cards and three victory cards and, shuffling and drawing five cards from his own deck each turn, must add cards to his deck to allow him to have the most victory points when the last six-point victory card is purchased. I don’t think I have a multi-player game with a smaller learning curve, and the fact that the original set alone comes with 25 action cards but each game you play only includes 10 means it offers unparalleled replayability even before you add an expansion set. I’ll vouch for the Dominion: Intrigue expansion, which includes the base cards so it’s a standalone product, and the Seaside expansion, which is excellent and really changes the way the game plays, plus a standalone expansion further up this list. The base game is appropriate for players as young as six. Complexity: Low.

19. Small WorldFull review. I think the D&D-style theme does this game a disservice – that’s all just artwork and titles, but the game itself requires some tough real-time decisions. Each player uses his chosen race to take over as many game spaces as possible, but the board is small and your supply of units runs short quickly, forcing you to consider putting your race into “decline” and choosing a new one. But when you choose a new one is affected by what you stand to lose by doing so, how well-defended your current civilization’s position is, and when your opponents are likely to go into decline. The iPad app is outstanding too. Complexity: Medium.

20. Battle LineFull review. Reissued a few years ago as Schotten Totten – same game, different theme, better art, half the price right now. Among the best two-player games I’ve found, designed by Reiner Knizia, who is also behind a bunch of other games on this list. Each player tries to build formations on his/her side of the nine flags that stand in a line between him and his opponent; formations include three cards, and the various formation types resemble poker hands, with a straight flush of 10-9-8 in one color as the best formation available. Control three adjacent flags, or any five of the nine, and you win. But ten tactics cards allow you to bend the rules, by stealing a card your opponent has played, raising the bar for a specific flag from three cards to four, or playing one of two wild cards that can stand in for any card you can’t draw. There’s a fair amount of randomness involved, but playing nine formations at once with a seven-card hand allows you to diversify your risk. The iOS app is among the best as well. Complexity: Low.

21. SamuraiFull review. I bought the physical game after a few months of playing the app (which, as of November 2019, is still not updated for the newest iOS version), and it’s a great game – simple to learn, complex to play, works very well with two players, plays very differently with three or four as the board expands. Players compete to place their tiles on a map of Japan, divided into hexes, with the goal of controlling the hexes that contain buddha, farmer, or soldier tokens. Each player has hex tiles in his color, in various strengths, that exert control over the tokens they show; samurai tokens that affect all three token types; boats that sit off the shore and affect all token types; and special tokens that allow the reuse of an already-placed tile or allow the player to switch two tokens on the board. Trying to figure out where your opponent might screw you depending on what move you make is half the fun. Very high replayability too. Fantasy Flight updated the graphics, shrank the box, and reissued it in 2015. Complexity: Medium/low.

22. The Castles Of BurgundyFull review. Castles of Burgundy is the rare game that works well across its range of player numbers, as it scales well from two to four players by altering the resources available on the board to suit the number of people pursuing them. Players compete to fill out their own boards of hexes with different terrain/building types (it’s like zoning) by competiting for tiles on a central board, some of which are hexes while others are goods to be stored and later shipped for bonuses. Dice determine which resources you can acquire, but you can also alter dice rolls by paying coins or using special buildings to change or ignore them. Setup is a little long, mostly because sorting cardboard tiles is annoying, but gameplay is only moderately complex – a little more than Stone Age, not close to Caylus or Agricola – and players get so many turns that it stays loose even though there’s a lot to do over the course of one game. I’ve played this online about 50 times, using all the different boards, even random setups that dramatically increase the challenge, and I’m not tired of it yet. Complexity: Medium.

23. MorelsFull review for Paste. A 2012 release, Morels is an easy-to-learn two-player card game with plenty of decision-making and a small amount of interaction with your opponent as you try to complete and “cook” sets of various mushroom types to earn points. The artwork is impressive and the game is very balanced, reminiscent of Lost Cities but with an extra tick of difficulty because of the use of an open, rolling display of cards from which players can choose. The app version is also very good. Complexity: Low.

24. IngeniousFull app review. Ingenious is another Reiner Knizia title, a two- to four-person abstract strategy game that involves tile placement but where the final scoring compares each player’s lowest score across the six tile colors, rather than his/her highest. That alters gameplay substantially, often making the ideal play seem counterintuitive, and also requires each player to keep a more careful eye on what the other guy is doing. The app, which I owned and reviewed, is now gone from all app stores, because of a trademark dispute (and maybe more). Complexity: Low.

25. AzulFull review. The best new family-strategy game of 2017 and winner of the Spiel des Jahres, Azul comes from the designer of Vikings and Asara, and folds some press-your-luck mechanics into a pattern-matching game where you collect mosaic tiles and try to transfer them from a storage area to your main 5×5 board. You can only put each tile type in each row once, and in each column once, and you lose points for tiles you can’t place at the end of each round. It’s quite addictive and moves fairly quickly, even when everyone starts playing chicken with the pile left in the middle of the table for whoever chooses last in the round. Complexity: Medium.

26. CacaoFull review. A simpler Carcassonne? I guess every tile-laying game gets compared to the granddaddy of them all, but Cacao certainly looks similar, and you don’t get to see very far ahead in the tile supply in Cacao, although at least here you get a hand of three tiles from which to choose. But the Cacao board ends up very different, a checkerboard pattern of alternating tiles between players’ worker tiles and the game’s neutral tiles, which can give you cacao beans, let you sell beans for 2-4 gold pieces, give you access to water, give you partial control of a temple, or just hand you points. One key mechanic: if you collect any sun tiles, you can play a new tile on top of a tile you played earlier in the game, which is a great way to make a big ten-point play to steal the win. Complexity: Low.

27. New BedfordFull review. I adore this game, which is about whaling, but somehow manages to sneak worker-placement and town-building into the game too, and figures out how to reward people who do certain things early without making the game a rout. Each player gets to add buildings to the central town of New Bedford (much nicer than the actual town is today), or can use one of the central buildings; you pay to use someone else’s building, and they can be worth victory points to their owners at game-end. The real meat of the game is the whaling though – you get two ships, and the more food you stock them with, the more turns they spend out at sea, which means more turns where you might grab the mighty sperm whale token from the bag. But you have to pay the dockworkers to keep each whale and score points for it. For a game that has this much depth, it plays remarkably fast – never more than 40 minutes for us with three players. Complexity: Medium.

28. Welcome To… Full review. I don’t know if it was the first flip-and-write title, but Welcome To… was the first one I encountered, and I think it’s spawned a few imitators because it’s so good. In each round, there are three cards from which players can choose, each showing a house number and one of six colors; each player chooses one of those three houses to fill in and takes the benefit of that particular color. The goal is to fill out as much of your own ‘neighborhood’ as you can, scoring points for clusters of adjacent houses, for providing green space, for adding pools to certain houses, and more. It’s simple to learn and has huge replay value. Complexity: Low.

29. EverdellFull review. This was my #1 game of 2018, just edging out the legacy game Charterstone. Everdell takes the worker placement and resource collection mechanic of Stone Age and adds what amounts to a second game on top of that, where the buildings you build with those resources actually do stuff, rather than just giving you points. Players build out their tableaux of cards and gain power as the game progresses. Some cards grant you the right to build subsequent cards for free; some give resources, some give points bonuses, and some do other cool things. The artwork is stunning and the theme, forest creatures, is very kid-friendly. The game also crescendos through its “seasons,” with players going from two meeples in the spring to six by game-end, so that no one can get too big of a lead in the early going and new players get time to learn the rhythm. It’s quite a brilliant design, and consistently plays in under an hour. Complexity: Medium-low.

30. GizmosFull review. Phil Walker-Harding’s engine-builder plays very quickly for a game of this depth, and doesn’t skimp on the visual appeal – the ‘energy tokens’ you’ll collect to buy more cards are colored marbles, and they’re dispensed by what looks like a cardboard gumball machine. The engine-building aspect is a real winner, though, as it’s very easy to grasp how you’ll gain things from certain cards and how to daisy-chain them into very powerful engines before the game ends. Complexity: Medium-low.

Stick to baseball, 3/14/20.

I have one new post for The Athletic subscribers this week, looking at what might happen to the draft when there are no games to scout. I will have a ranking of the top 30 prospects for the draft on Monday; I’m not sure what my draft coverage might look like from here on out, as it depends on whether anyone’s playing and if the draft date moves.

Over at Paste, I reviewed PARKS, one of the most popular new games of 2019, featuring artwork from the Fifty-Nine Parks series.

My second book, The Inside Game: Bad Calls, Strange Moves, and What Baseball Behavior Teaches Us About Ourselves, is due out on April 21st from Harper Collins, and you can pre-order it now via their site or wherever fine books are sold. Also, check out my free email newsletter, which I say I’ll write more often than I actually write it.

And now, the links…

Everything Inside.

Edwidge Danticat’s short story collection Everything Inside just won this year’s National Book Critics Circle Award for Fiction on Thursday night, her second NBCC win (her memoir Brother, I’m Dying won the NBCC’s Memoir/Autobiography award in 2007) and the most notable award she’s won yet for her fiction. Each story in this slim, beautifully-written volume revolves around Haitian immigrants to the United States, the cultural shifts they experienced, and the challenges of settling in a country that still has racism and xenophobia in its DNA.

Born in Haiti, Danticat emigrated to the U.S. at 12 years old, and every story in this book revolves around that immigrant experience, especially those of Haitians who emigrated to Florida and move back and forth between the two countries, either physically traveling between them or feeling the pull of one from the other. (Danticat’s Wikipedia entry says that “Although Danticat resides in the United States, she still considers Haiti home. To date, she still visits Haiti from time to time and has always felt as if she never left it.”) Every one of these stories in Everything Inside feels drawn from something very personal to Danticat, as if they’re not just conceived and written but lived-in, so while there will always be a comprehension gap for readers like me (white, Anglophone, U.S.-born to U.S.-born parents) who don’t share her experiences as an immigrant or person of color, several of these stories still pack enough of an emotional punch to connect.

“Dosas” revolves around a home-health nurse whose ex-husband calls in a panic because his new wife – and former affair partner – has been kidnapped in Haiti and he can’t raise the ransom. (In Haiti, a ‘dosa’ is a girl born after twins.) This complex web of relationships, between the protagonist and her ex and between the Haitian diaspora and those who stayed behind (or move back and forth between the countries), colors her decisions and threatens her job as a live-in nurse to an elderly patient with kidney disease.  “Sunrise, Sunset,” originally published in the New Yorker, contrasts two women, a mother and her daughter who has just become a mother herself, as the former faces creeping dementia while the latter grapples with a stark postpartum depression, which culminates in a terrifying moment that confronts the erasure of memory, individual and across generations. “Without Inspection,” the closing story, follows the thoughts of a man who has fallen on a construction site and is heading to his death, during which he thinks about the family he leaves behind and the improbable way in which he arrived in the United States, saved on a beach by a Haitian woman who goes there each day to try to help migrants who barely make it to the shore when their transporters dump them to swim the last mile.

“Seven Stories” is the standout in the collection, perhaps in part because it’s so different from the other stories here. The Haitian-American protagonist, Kimberly, visits an old friend who is now the wife of the Prime Minister of an independent island in the Caribbean, where the elite live in luxury, abetted by corruption, amidst shantytowns and abject poverty. The story of how her friend survived the assassination of her father, himself once Prime Minister, and returned to the island unfolds over the course of the story and diminishes the dichotomy that first appeared to Kimberly when she arrived on the island. The story ends with a wedding and celebration in a village called Maafa – which I assume is an allusion to Ma’afa, a term referring to the “black Holocaust” where European and Arab peoples enslaved Africans and continued to oppress them through colonialism and imperialism – and Kimberly reflecting on how her friend’s life has been anything but simple despite her evident privilege, while Kimberly herself is an outsider (on an island where there’s prejudice against Haitians) viewing the island’s injustices through a different lens.

I’ve read four of the five books shortlisted for the NBCC Award for Fiction this year, and would have voted for either The Nickel Boys or Feast Your Eyes over Everything Inside, but with the caveat that I know there’s an aspect to this collection that I likely can’t fully appreciate because of my background and identity. (I’d vote for this book over The Topeka School.) It’s still a worthy winner, just not my top pick.

Next up: About halfway through Ocean Vuong’s On Earth We’re Briefly Gorgeous.

Feast Your Eyes.

Myla Goldberg’s latest novel Feast Your Eyes, shortlisted for the National Book Critics’ Circle Award for Fiction,employs a novel narrative technique – or gimmick, depending on your point of view – to tell the stories of two women, mother and daughter, whose lives were both affected by a few very specific choices they both made. The mother, Lillian, was a photographer who made headlines when a series of photos she took led to an obscenity trial; her daughter, Samantha Jane, is the narrator, and tells the story of Lillian’s life in a series of essays and quotes as she writes the catalog for a retrospective of her mother’s work. It is an unusual way to tell a story, and has a long ramp-up until it truly gets rolling, but when it clicks it zooms by – puns intended – as Goldberg has created a truly memorable, compelling, complicated character in Lillian, and wants to talk to readers about just how monumental and important a woman’s right to choose can be.

Lillian grew up outside Cleveland in modest but not poor circumstances, and fell in love with photography at an early age, deciding not long after high school that that was how she wanted to make her living – or, at least, to make art, and hope to find a living to support it. She moves to New York, becomes pregnant while still young, and goes to have an abortion, only to bail at the sketchy and unsanitary circumstances. That baby is Samantha, whose very existence alters the course of Lillian’s life, mostly for the better, although the artificial/societal conflict between motherhood and vocation becomes explicit – pun intended – when Lillian publishes a series of photos called Mommy is Sick, which shows a half-naked, prepubescent Samantha handing a glass to Lillian, who is in bed, bleeding after a completed abortion. Samantha was the subject of some of her mother’s photos before that series, but when it lands Lillian and the gallery owner in jail, and eventually goes before the Supreme Court, Samantha’s life is permanently changed as well, as she is now The Girl in the Photos and later switches to her middle name, Jane, to try to avoid the unwanted notoriety the photos have given her.

We know early in the book that Lillian has already died young, but Goldberg still makes her death pack an emotional punch because of how Mommy is Sick drove a permanent wedge between mother and daughter, and from how Lillian never quite grasped its impact on Samantha. Lillian is a reluctant feminist, progressive for her era but less so even to her own daughter, writing just twenty years or so later, especially as Lillian never wanted the First Amendment fight she sparked; for Lillian, it was about making art, and that was enough. Samantha clearly feels like she was often second to that desire to make art, but also strives to understand her mother through her photographs, and interprets the photographs (and thus her mother) for the reader through the series of essays and comments, interspersed with remembrances from several major people in Lillian’s life whom Samantha contacted for the catalog. She resents her mother for making her a symbol in her photos, and for choosing a lifestyle of working poverty that allowed her to keep taking photographs, but also accepts the sacrifices her mother made for her, especially when Samantha has an abortion of her own and considers how that choice changed the course of her mother’s life (and created her own).

You have to buy into the narrative device to appreciate Feast Your Eyes, and I imagine some readers simply won’t be able to get on the book’s wavelength for that reason. For the first few pages I wasn’t sure if I would, but it started rolling for me maybe 20-30 pages in as the story itself began to grab me and the titles of the photographs or series faded into the background. Goldberg’s best trick here is that she pivots within each comment or essay from the photo right into something larger from Lillian’s past; there actually isn’t that much detail about photos that we never see, which could have been dreadful to read. It also works here because Goldberg manages to tie the fabricated photographs to times and places that spur different recollections, by Samantha, or former friends or lovers of Lillian’s, that explore more aspects of her character, and sometimes of Samantha’s as well. Even without the two overarching, feminist themes – how society pressures women to choose between motherhood and career, and how essential a woman’s right to choose is to her agency elsewhere in life – Feast Your Eyes would have been a strong character study, but those additional layers give it impact beyond most of the 2019 novels I’ve read so far.

Next up: Another novel from last year, Ocean Vuong’s On Earth We’re Briefly Gorgeous.

Stick to baseball, 3/8/20.

My entire top 100 prospects package is now up for The Athletic subscribers. That includes:

I also wrote my first draft post of 2020, covering a pair of potential #1 overall picks in Emerson Hancock and Asa Lacy. I held a Klawchat on Thursday.

Episode #2 brand-new podcast, The Keith Law Show (also on iTunes), went up this past week, with guest Carlos Rodriguez, VP of Player Development and International Scouting for the Tampa Bay Rays. My thanks to all of you who’ve subscribed and/or left five-star ratings.

My second book, The Inside Game: Bad Calls, Strange Moves, and What Baseball Behavior Teaches Us About Ourselves, is due out on April 21st from Harper Collins, and you can pre-order it now via their site or wherever fine books are sold. Also, check out my free email newsletter, which I say I’ll write more often than I actually write it.

I only have a few links this week, between travel and the way that the news has been so focused on coronavirus. The best thing I read this week on that topic was Julia Belluz’s piece for Vox on why China’s COVID-19 case rate started declining. An infectious disease doctor answered some common questions about COVID-19 for WBUR.org.

Other links I found worth sharing:

Music update, February 2020.

February was absolutely loaded with great new music, including two albums that I think will end up on a lot of best-of-2020 lists and a bunch of new singles from artists I really like, including one I haven’t even thought about in 20 years. This post is a bit short because I have some non-work things to deal with today/this weekend but the playlist (here on Spotify) is 90 minutes and 23 songs long.

Grimes – Delete Forever. Grimes – or c, or whatever name Elon Musk told her to use this week – may be a bit out there at the moment, but Miss Anthopocene, her first album since 2015’s stellar Art Angels, is ambitious and smart and manages to be compelling even with a lot of tonal shifts from her prior work.

Waxahatchee – Lilacs. This is about as close to country music as I ever get. Katie Crutchfield’s upcoming album Saint Cloud is apparently about her decision to get sober. This is one of the best songs she’s ever done.

Tame Impala – Breathe Deeper. I need to listen to it some more but I think Slow Rush might be my favorite Tame Impala album. Kevin Parker really can’t help himself with the six-minute songs, though.

Soul Asylum – Got It Pretty Good. I really liked Soul Asylum up to and including Grave Dancers Union, but they went off the rails right after “Runaway Train” (which I never liked) became a hit. It’s been 28 years since that album came out, Dave Pirner is about to turn 56, and this song absolutely rocks.

The Mysterines – Love’s Not Enough. This Wirral, England rock trio is my sleeper pick for 2020, almost entirely because of Lia Metcalfe’s vocals.

San Cisco – Reasons. I was wondering just a few weeks ago if we were going to hear from this Australian indie-pop trio, and here they are with a great track that would fit right in on pop radio in just about any of the last four decades.

Jason Isbell and the 400 Unit – Be Afraid. Is this Isbell’s first appearance on my playlists? I believe it is.

Lauren Ruth Ward – Water Sign. There’s something vaguely menacing about Ward’s vocals on many of her songs, but it plays up even more over the doom-like guitars here.

Wild Nothing – The World is a Hungry Place. This is the best song they’ve done since 2012’s Nocturne, and also a return to the mood of that album.

Chromatics – TOY. This was a surprise single, since Chromatics just released their first album in seven years back in October, and this track wasn’t on it. There’s a serious MGMT vibe to the music under Ruth Radelet’s typical whispery vocals.

Working Men’s Club – White Rooms and People. The vocals here are definitely an acquired taste, but the build from the funk guitar work in the verse to the synth-heavy new-wavey chorus is intoxicating.

Talk Show – Stress. The London post-punk quartet’s debut EP, These People, is due out at the end of this month.

Purity Ring – stardew. The Canadian duo’s first new song in three years has a more upbeat melody than much of their music, which I think better suits Megan James’ often childlike vocal style.

Disclosure feat. Eko Roosevelt – Tondo. It’s a new song from the Grammy-winning duo, but it’s barely more than a remix of Cameroonian musician Roosevelt’s “Tondoho Mba,” which was released last year on a compilation by the French DJ Guts.

Christine and the Queens – I disappear in your arms. Less than two years after her acclaimed album Chris, Christine put out an unexpected five-song EP, La Vita Nuova, featuring this track, yet another pop banger with a sinister keyboard line behind a great vocal melody.

Jackie Venson – Make Me Feel. I found it impossible not to compare this song to the Janelle Monáe track of the same name, and think how Venson shows the musical ambition I wanted Monáe to bring to her last record. I will say the whispered “walk with him” part at the end is kind of creepy, though.

Glass Animals – Your Love (Déjà Vu). I either love Glass Animals tracks (“Life Itself”) or hate them (“Gooey”), but their percussion sounds are always interesting. This track is in the former category.

MICH – Ceiling Duty. I know next to nothing about this band other than that they’re from Amsterdam, there are four of them, and this song sounds like shoegaze meets jangly college rock from the early 1990s.

Do Nothing – Fits. They’re not quite punk, not really post-punk, definitely sneering, yet still give us a nod to melody in the chorus.

Sløtface – Passport. Sorry for the late reply is a bit more uneven than their debut but still has a few pop-punk standout tracks like this one.

Throwing Muses – Dark Blue. A bit of an obligatory inclusion, although I’m impressed that Kristen Hersh is still churning out music this dark nearly 40 years into her career.

Aktor – Bad Mirror. Very New Wave of British Heavy Metal here, although the rest of the album (Placebo) can veer into harsher territory.

Toundra – VI. Akt. Toundra’s instrumental, progressive metal is usually interesting but they’re asking a lot with their new album, Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari, a series of six ten-minute tracks that often slow the tempo down well beyond what we expect of this style of music.

Klawchat 3/5/20.

Starting at 1 pm. You can find all of my prospect rankings content here on The Athletic. All 30 team reports are up, as well as the global top 100 and the farm system rankings.

Keith Law: Can you picture what will be? Klawchat.

Jabroni: Can Nick Gonzales develop into an avg defensive 2B?
Keith Law: Sounds like it. I hope to see him later this month, but I haven’t heard anyone say he has to move off 2b, at least. More common is the comment that the elevation of Las Cruces is helping his power.

Trey: Favorite short story collections? Recent or classic.
Keith Law: Any collection of F. Scott Fitzgerald stories.

Larry: Last week I asked how many college starters can grade out better than Nick Lodolo (you said 3-5).  Can you name those pitchers?
Keith Law: I can.
Keith Law: Oh, did you want me to do it now? Just in this draft class, Lacy, Hancock, Meyer, and Detmers for sure. Omitting Ginn since he’s out with ‘stiffness,’ and I see a few others who could get there but I wouldn’t feel strongly enough to list right now.

J5: enjoyed your first 2 podcasts
Keith Law: Thank you! Subscribe and listen on Apple or
Spotify.

Sammy Sosa: How concerned are you that the GOP moves as far right as they want while the Dems continue to meet them in a new middle? How do we prevent future Democratic frontrunner John Kasich?
Keith Law: To be honest, as political issues go, my concerns are almost entirely focused on November 2020. We have to survive that first.

wrburgess: When you critique traits of a player, like the Emerson Hancock “head shakes at release” observation, I have no reason to question that assessment. What I can’t do, currently, is understand the long term ramifications such a tendency may have. Are “head shakes” something changeable? Can a pitcher be coached out of that? Or is it indicative of a permanent mechanic that says “4th starter” to you? How can readers better grasp the context of your comments?
Keith Law: I try to include comments every now and then that explain why certain traits matter. For example, you see very few major-league starters with head-whacks (or head violence or whatever you want to call it). It might be because it’s hard to command the ball when your head is moving that hard at release. My hypothesis is that arm actions so intense that you can’t keep your head steady are correlated with more stress on joints. I can think of one MLB starter who had that kind of delivery and worked it out so that he could not just start, but get to plus command: Max Scherzer.

Vincent Adultman: Pleasantly surprised with your Sikkema ranking within the Yankees system, which also appears to suggest you think he can make it as a starter (even if its at the back of the rotation)- how aggressive should the Yankees be with him- start in Tampa, with a pre-midseason bump to AA?
Keith Law: Exactly. High draft pick D1 starter/regular -> start next year in high A -> goal of AA by August.

Chris: Music question, based on your posts in the comments sections of your music posts, you love metal and then a bunch of alt rock, indie, etc, but you don’t seem to like anything that would be classified as hard rock. There appears to be a hole on the rock spectrum. Do you agree with that?  If so, why?
Keith Law: I do not agree with that.

pakkap: severino is done for the year, tanaka always seems to be a pitch away from elbow surgery, and i’d likely take the under on games played/started for the following yanks: judge (100), stanton (81), paxton (16). how much trouble are they in?
Keith Law: This was the concern I had last year when I picked the Yankees to win ~88 games – the pitching staff seemed a stumble away from losing 50-60 starts or more from its projected rotation members. They have a little depth, but not enough to fade 0 from Severino, half a season from Paxton, and maybe more.

Moe Mentum: Who would you recommend as presumptive nominee Joe Biden’s running mate, and why?
Keith Law: Elizabeth Warren.

Big League Chew: We have an opening in our dynasty league, interested in jumping in? Some real sharks in this league.
Keith Law: do dooo do do do do

KLawFan: What relatively unknown pitching and batting prospects will move up the most in prospect lists by end of this year?
Keith Law: I have a ‘sleeper’ prospect at the end of each of the 30 team reports. Your answers are there.

Chris: When’s your next visit to Nashville?  Will you have time to meet with readers/fans for a board game?
Keith Law: May, possibly doing a signing/talk at Parnassus Books, but I won’t have time to hang with readers, sorry.

Brett Jones: Where was Zach McKinstry on your list of top Dodgers prospects? I was surprised he didn’t make the top 20 considering his 2019 season and his proximity to the bigs.
Keith Law: Low upside. His 2019 was fine, but I’m not sure why you’d assume it would put him in the top 20. Solid role player.

Jay: Has Anderson Espinoza lost too much time at this point to think he’ll ever contribute to a MLB team? I remember him being extremely young for his leagues, but now wonder if he’ll be too old for his leagues and if his stuff will ever return.
Keith Law: Age matters less for pitchers but we have no idea how his stuff will be after two TJ surgeries and what his durability will be.

addoeh: This week, the President has directly contradicted public health officials on multiple occasions. I almost expect him to either (1) issue an executive order that a vaccine for the coronavirus needs to be released to the public prior to any testing or clinical trials or (2) promote some crackpot anti-vaxxer concoction of turmeric and bleach.
Keith Law: The latter.

Tom: Will AJ Hinch be managing a big league club in 2021?
Keith Law: I think he’ll have an MLB team role in 2021. Maybe front office rather than managing at first. I do think he’ll manage again, though.

Tom: Regardless of policy preference, who do you think has a stronger chance to beat Trump: Biden or Bernie?
Keith Law: Straight betting odds? Biden. I think people underestimate the pervasiveness of anti-Semitism in this country.

TYGERTAILZ: YOOOOO KEITH, POISON MOTLEY CRUE AND DEF LEPPARD THIS SUMMER!!!  WANNA GO BRO???  I GOT AN EXTRA TICKET!
Keith Law: I have just enough time to grow out my mullet!

Dan: Is Torkelson’s strikeout rate this year a concern? When you take out the intentional walks it’s quite high.
Keith Law: He has 40 AB. Talk about a tiny sample.

Paul: What are the odds Nick Gonzales can go as high as #1 at this point?
Keith Law: 5% or less. Has to pass Torkelson and Martin and maybe Lacy too.

Randall: Any chance you’re heading to Knoxville soon? Crochet/Sewell/Soularie best prospects in years. Draft thoughts? GBO!!!
Keith Law: Crochet had a top ten spot sewn up, but he’s hurt.

Fisher: Any chance Jays cave and  Pearson, ehhh, stays?
Keith Law: Doubt it. And I can’t dispute that … this isn’t Vlad part two.

Cory: How do Rocker/Leiter compare to Mize to this point?
Keith Law: Mize better.

Steve: Regardless of how Riley does the remainder of ST, should ATL just roll with Camargo at 3B to start the year?
Keith Law: Camargo has some strong performance history in the majors; Riley doesn’t. So yes, I would try that.

Jaysfan: Best Jays prospect outside of Pearson, Woods-Richardson, Manoah & Groshans…
Keith Law: My Blue Jays top 20 is up for Athletic subscribers.

james: I didn’t see Jaylin Davis of the Giants on your prospect write up.  With the Giants seemingly committed to giving him at bats to start the season, do you think he will be able to translate his AAA success to the big leagues?
Keith Law: Not enough to make the top 20. Extra guy.

Ben M: Ginn just announced surgery 🙁
Keith Law: Ah yes, I hadn’t seen that – I knew he was scheduled to see the doctor again this week. He could have had ~$3 million from the Dodgers two years ago. He might get that next year, if he comes back and pitches before the draft, but I’d bet the under (to say nothing of the time value of the money).

Evan: What’s your current playlist while writing?
Keith Law: My February new music playlist which I hope to post tomorrow.

Tommy: Starting to hear rumblings that the Red Sox might give Tanner Houck a shot in their starting rotation to start the year.  Do you see him as a viable long-term starter, or is he future bullpen material?
Keith Law: That makes no sense. Doesn’t have the third pitch he’d need to be an MLB starter. (He’s on the Red Sox top 20.)

Yinka Double Dare: The sundowning septuagenarian guy, the angry-sounding septuagenarian guy, or the incumbent sundowning angry-sounding septuagenarian guy.
Keith Law: All white.

Ryan: I saw your tweet of the video of Zac Veen. That is a smooth looking swing. What is his draft outlook?
Keith Law: Top ten pick. Maybe the first HS player off the board. It’s a weak HS pitching draft – Kelley, Bitsko, Abel are the only clear first rounders right now, although I heard Justin Lange hit 100 last week – so I think it’ll be extremely college heavy up top. Veen is the best bet to break the college streak up top.

Geoff: Do you see the automatic ball/strike system taking over within three years?
Keith Law: Yes, and more importantly, MLB execs seem to expect it, probably for 2022.

Michael: Crazy to say Skubal is the best arm in the Tigers org?
Keith Law: Not crazy, but I don’t agree.

Ken: Hey Keith. Really enjoying the new podcast. The first one dropped on a Wednesday then this week it was Monday. What day can we expect to see it posted going forward?
Keith Law: Monday night or Tuesday morning.
Keith Law: We try to record Mondays. I just got crushed on the 24th when the top 100 hit

Tulsi Gabbard: Is it obvious sexism AND racism that people forget there are THREE remaining Dem candidates? Including a woman of color.
Keith Law: Who? You said Dem candidates, so I know you don’t mean Tulsi Gabbard.

Vincent Adultman: I understand this isn’t your beat, but have you heard any info about if/when MLB will institute an international draft?
Keith Law: They will push for it in the 2021 CBA talks. Not sure if the union will fight it/.

addoeh: Ever done or any desire to do any “daredevil” activities?  Like skydiving, zip lining, bungee jumping, white water rafting.
Keith Law: Nope nope nopity nope.

Adam: We are now 5 years into AJ Preller’s tenure. He had his massive 2016 J2 class, his massive 2016 draft class, and has signed 2 players to contracts well over $100 million. If they lose more than 80 games this year, is it fair to say he had enough time and resources to build a successful team?
Keith Law: That’s not enough time for a J2 class especially to produce All-Star/impact players. Probably also true for a draft class unless you go college heavy and get a little lucky.

Pat D: This is the end, beautiful friend?  On a more serious note, is there a bigger joke of an overgrown man-child currently serving in Congress than Matt Gaetz?
Keith Law: How are his constituents not terminally embarrassed by him?

Zihuatanejo: If Elizabeth Warren’s name was “Warren Elizabeth,” how do you think s/he would be faring in the primaries right now?
Keith Law: Winning enough to still be in the race.

John: Do you find out more about your process and how to improve it when you miss on a player thinking he will be really good, or missing on a player thinking he will not be very good.
Keith Law: The latter. Most prospects don’t work out as expected.

Brian: As a Phillies fan, am I wrong to be pessimistic about Bohm?  The local media seems to be hyping up him greatly, but I worry that a slightly better bat than Maikel Franco isn’t getting the job done.
Keith Law: Much better bat than Franco. I’ve noticed the Phillies writers who trolled me over Franco’s first half-season in the majors never had anything more to say about him…

Chris: Have you ever considered walking away from baseball and having a job that didnt involve sports?  Especially one with less public criticism where no matter what you say, 50% of your readers will disagree and trash you on twitter
Keith Law: Yes, it has crossed my mind, but I also like what I do and enjoy the interactions with the good readers.

Jason: Thoughts on the Yelich extension? Seems good for both sides.
Keith Law: Seems like a bit of an assumption that he holds what he’s done the last two years, but I don’t have any real issue with it either way.

Evan: Number of wins and place the Blue Jays finish in the AL East. Are they really a wild card contender?
Keith Law: Wild card contenders? What?

Brian: Don’t the current injury issues of the Yanks show why trading Mookie was a mistake? You never know when a team is gonna have the year from hell with injuries especially when you’re dealing with guys like Tanaka, Paxton, Severino, and Judge.
Keith Law: It’s at least a fair question to ask. I still think the Red Sox would be well short of the pitching to make the playoffs even if you could say right now the Yankees are an 85 win team.

Marshall: The perception is that the Red Sox reneged on their initial trade with the Dodgers to extract more value. But, since the holdup resulted in the Angels trade falling through, were the Dodgers actually better off too?
Keith Law: I don’t know where that perception came from. It appeared on social media but I never saw any basis. Graterol did have an actual shoulder injury last year.

Andy: It took 10 years but we may have finally reached the point where Chris Sale’s elbow can’t stand up to starting.
Keith Law: I WAS RIGHT

Jeffrey: Has there been any spring training performances that would have resulted in any major moves up or down your top 100 ranking? Or small sample size applies?
Keith Law: Not just small sample size but the competition in spring training is way too variable. You don’t even face the same pitcher twice in many games until the end. Hitters might get two PA and leave. It’s fake.

Trey: Any book signings in NYC area?
Keith Law: Maybe. I think my publicist was working on one for the 21st, release night, after I appear on MLB Network that afternoon.

Nate: is max Meyer a starter long term?
Keith Law: I don’t see why not.

nelson: As a longtime reader of your chats, it’s interesting to me just how much the questions that people ask have changed over the years. People seem more informed about more players than ever and have stronger opinions. Do you agree with this assessment?
Keith Law: I do. There’s a lot more information out there today than 13 years ago.

Brian: Keith, I am an ASU fan and I know Spencer Torkelson is a good player but other managers are treating him like he’s already a hall of famer.  I believe he has been intentionally walked 15 or 16 times in 14 games.  This is crazy over-managing.  Even if he hit .400 it still doesn’t make any sense to continue to do this.
Keith Law: Agreed, but let’s face it, there are not many good tacticians among college coaches. They still bunt in the first inning all. the. fucking. time.

Larry: When will the Democrats stop defaulting to anger and actually try to do something?
Keith Law: How many bills has the Democrat-controlled House passed that the Senate won’t take up?

Michael: Hi Klaw!  Have you every had a year where a team had no prospects in Top 100?
Keith Law: Yes, multiple times.

Turner: This is probably a question for after your new book comes out, but do foresee doing any book signings?
Keith Law: I’ve listed two on recent Stick to baseball posts and I believe we have five confirmed, just not announced on the stores’ sites.

Steve: There was a lot of hype around Blaze Jordan not too long ago and him maybe going top3 or top5, seems to have died off. Where you project he goes in draft, top 10 still?
Keith Law: Yeah, so, that was all some internet bullshit. He was *never* that kind of prospect. He’s probably not even a first-rounder. If you don’t read it from a reputable prospect site – MLB Pipeline, BA, Fangraphs, and I hope me – then don’t believe it.
Keith Law: He’s a no-position power guy from the state with, IMO, the worst track record for HS position player prospects, Mississippi.

J5: If Alex Wood fails miserably, and Gonsolin keeps putting up zeros…. any chance he wins a spot?
Keith Law: I buy that.

Brad: More or less – 30% chance that Garrett Mitchell from UCLA slips out of the first round entirely?
Keith Law: I’d say a bit more. The diabetes will scare a lot of teams off.

SedTimmons: What you ever consider putting together a listing or something searchable for your book and or movie reviews? I was trying to find your thoughts on a book I was considering and couldn’t find it.
Keith Law: Search box on top right didn’t work? Author’s name?

O’s fan: Trying to convince myself into Tork assuming Detroit takes Martin first. Is he really good enough as a R/R 1B to take #2 overall?
Keith Law: It sounds like it, and I feel very confident he’ll go 2 if he doesn’t go 1 (but I don’t assume Martin goes first).
Keith Law: Also, my streak of seeing Tigers scouting director Scott Pleis continued. He was at Veen/Crews last night. I saw him at Lacy’s outing last Friday and Hancock the week before.

Andy: I understand you start your top 100 fresh each year, but a question on Naylor: is his missing the list a product of him not hitting like you might have hoped post-draft, given he made strides catching? In other words, did he need to hit more to justify his 2019 rank?
Keith Law: Yes, was hoping for more impact, and also reports from other scouts were good but not glowing.

Jack: Under the proposed new playoff format from a few weeks back, it also mentioned that every MLB team would play all other 29 teams in the regular season. In your opinion, is this doable or would the travel be too hectic?
Keith Law: I would assume, without having asked them, that the union would fight that like hell.

Andy: Serious question, what happens if one of the old white men gets seriously sick in the next three months?
Keith Law: I had this random thought while traveling: Coronavirus’ death rate is highest for the elderly. What if any of those three gets it? Aren’t they out there shaking a lot of hands? Nonzero chance, right?

Nick: How do you get the hashbrowns to be crispy?
Keith Law: Wrap them in a tea towel and wring out as much moisture as you can, then get that pan and oil rippling hot before you add the potatoes, reducing the heat afterwards.

AngryMets: Would International guys fall into their own separate International draft, or would they be included in MLB draft along with the college & HS kids in the US?
Keith Law: Every proposal I’ve heard has been for a separate international draft. Combining the two would be a bit of a nightmare.

Dave: No question, just a rant. I love the comments you get when fans of a given team criticize your prospect rankings. I doubt very much that they ever read the part where you and other authors discuss the criteria used for assessment purposes (e.g. ceiling, floor, proximity to the majors). I doubt that the realize how good a prospect must be to make a top 100 list or how little the difference is between a ranking of 40 and 60. Instead of respecting your expertise (why are they reading) or their lack of the same, you get the tired and unimaginative “why do you hate my team”?
Keith Law: Or, why didn’t you rank them the way this other site ranked them? Yesterday a fan said I had the Cubs’ #20 prospect too high, and that their farm system was too low. I mean, the futility of arguing over a team’s #20 prospect aside, does this fan actually know about the prospects in each of the farm systems I had ranked above them? I doubt it. It’s silly. If you don’t like my rankings, that’s fine, but let’s not pretend that we all have equal information here.

Nick: Is Nico anything more than an average middle infielder?
Keith Law: Maybe a soft 55.
Keith Law: I was surprised that fans thought he’d be on the top 100. I always say I want guys with some ceiling. That’s not Nico.

WhiteSoxAndy: Am I allowed to finally be at least a little bit excited about the team I root for?
Keith Law: Yes.

Mi Llama es Erick: Any thoughts on the new Tame  Impala album?
Keith Law: I’d like to give it a few more spins but it might be my favorite album of his.

Grover: Were/are you high on Dennis Santana as a bullpen arm?
Keith Law: Thought he was a good bullpen prospect, did not buy him as a starter.

JB: Have you ever had coffee brewed in a siphon coffee maker?  Seems kind of gimmicy, but looks interesting.
Keith Law: Yes at Siphon Coffee outside Houston. It was good. It was not $7 good.

Todd: Keith, at what point, if ever, will Trump ever get calle dout for his lies?
Keith Law: He’s been called out all the time. His supporters don’t care. If they get tax cuts and eliminate reproductive rights, he can say whatever he likes.

Grover: re: the more information, does that also have the negative affect of contributing to fans becoming incredibly defensive and tribal over players they’ve never even seen play because they saw them ranked highly in multiple other places?
Keith Law: I buy that.

Steve: Who do you like more long term – Tatis Jr. or Lux? What about just offensively?
Keith Law: Tatis Jr to both. And I love Lux.

Nolan: What’s the worst “give up a lot of money to pitch in college” example you can think of off the top of your head? Karsten Whitson?
Keith Law: Whitson for sure, especially since he’d agreed to sign and then backed out to ask for more money. Several others I can think of who didn’t sign were affected by something discovered in the post-draft physical, so I can’t pin it all on the player or his representatives.

Mike: What’d you think of luxurious Port Orange when you saw Veen last night?
Keith Law: Funny enough, I had a good meal at Thai Kitchen right near the high school. I’ve never tried kua gai noodle before but I will warn you what they call medium spicy is … well, I could still feel my face afterwards, so I guess it wasn’t hot.

Brent: Not sure if you know the answer, but is there a way to search by “writer” on The Athletic? Love the site and mobile app but wish I could search by writer, cause you work with some real good ones. Thanks
Keith Law: Yes, there’s a writer index, or you can click on the byline in any article and see all of that writer’s stuff.

Rob: In your tram capsules you wrote that Jordyn Adams didn’t hit up to the angels’ expectations. Considering he had a 110 wrc what the hell were they expecting? Seemed pretty impressive considering his age and experience level in baseball.
Keith Law: say it with me: Do ? not ? use ? wRC+ ? to ? evaluate ? minor ? leaguers.

Greg P: Do you ever read any of the comment sections at the Athletic?  I stopped after a little while, but wondered if you did read them.
Keith Law: No. Comment sections are the septic tanks of the internet.

Sean: What to make of Wyatt Mathisen? Former second round pick that flamed out as a catcher, but looked good as a hitter in AAA last year, albeit the happy fun ball. Does he have a chance to turn things around and stick in the MLB?
Keith Law: Purely my speculation but I wonder if his development path would have been better if he hadn’t been in the same system/levels as the disgraced Reese McGuire at the start of his career.

Grover: Would Tim Tebow make a top 1000?
Keith Law: Top 1000 what?

Expos: When will the MLB be back in Montreal full time (or even part time)?
Keith Law: My prediction is still never.

JL: This is not a question, but maybe more of a thought I wanted to pass along. You always say to not scout the stat line, which makes complete sense. But for most of us office dwellers who don’t ever get to see the prospects we’re curious about, that’s about all we can do to spark a question about a prospect with you. Thanks for the chats!
Keith Law: There’s a difference between looking at a stat line and wondering what the player is like and looking at a stat line and assuming what the player is like.

Jimmy The Pratt: Are you a hugger?  I personally enjoy the embrace of others, but this coronavirus has me freaked out.
Keith Law: I am a hugger. I think it’s inevitable that we all get the coronavirus at some point. It’s not going to just die off like SARS.
Keith Law: (Which was another coronavirus, but caused more serious infections with a shorter incubation period.)

JaysFan: Who’d you rather…Moncada or Matt Chapman?
Keith Law: Chapman, easily. Elite defense.

Heater: I am going to Nashville this summer.  Anything my boyfriend and I should do while I am there?
Keith Law: I’ve really never done anything there that didn’t involve food, which is a strength of the city, but I hear they play music there too.

BigLeagueChew: So…we still have this spot in our league Keith…
Keith Law: I don’t play fantasy baseball at all.

Mike: Do you see Albert Almora or Ian Happ having a more productive, long-term career from here on out?
Keith Law: Woof. I liked both as prospects. I’d take Happ now.

Albert: Loving your prospect stuff, and looking forward to notes on Torkelson, Martin and Gonzales, but did you or your agent have any idea about all the lurkers at the Athletic? Seriously, so many comments under moderation your every post that it’s no longer even worth bothering with any feedback there.
Keith Law: I’m not sure what you’re asking/saying here, but then again I don’t read the comments there. I assume they are also a septic tank.

Kip: Why can’t we change laws to make insurance companies compete across state and international lines and remove certificate of needs before we try a massive overhaul like Medicare for All?  The government creates conditions for monopolies, makes life worse, and then politicians throw up their hands and wonder why.
Keith Law: The price elasticity of health care poses a serious problem for competition that the market itself may not be able to address. How much money would you pay for a treatment that will keep you alive? Keep your child alive? Extend your life by a year, two years, ten? The answer is probably “all your money.” That situation is ripe for market actors to exploit. Expecting market-based solutions in a space with as many distortions as health care is probably unrealistic.
Keith Law: OK, that’s all for this week. There won’t be a chat next week either due to a schedule conflict. Thank you all for your questions and for reading all of my prospect content – I’ve seen the traffic numbers and am thrilled so many of you clicked, read, and subscribed. And thanks to all of you who’ve listened to the first two episodes of my new podcast as well. That will be back on Monday with guest Alex Speier of the Boston Globe. Have a great weekend!

The Topeka School.

Ben Lerner’s The Topeka School was shortlisted for this year’s National Book Critics Circle award for fiction and has now moved up to #2 on that Pulitzer predictions page I’ve mentioned a few times here. It’s a strange book, although that’s true of several of the leading contenders this year, with a nonlinear narrative, multiple lead characters, and a story without a clear ending or singular theme. I don’t know if that makes it a better contender for awards, as it is clearly more ambitious than the typical novel, but the result for me as a reader was that it felt incomplete.

The Topeka School is set in Topeka, Kansas, and the school in question is a foundation for young boys with psychological disorders, run by Jonathan Gordon, whose son Adam was the protagonist of an earlier Lerner novel and is a stand-in for the author himself. Adam is the star debater at the local high school and poised to win the national competition in one specific area of debate – none of this meant anything to me, as my school didn’t have a debate team and I doubt I would have had anything to do with it if it had – but is facing crippling anxiety and an existential doubt about the entire process. His mother, Jane, also a psychologist, has written a feminist non-fiction book that landed her a spot on Oprah and made her the target for endless meninist trolls who call the Gordons’ house to threaten her, only to have her troll them back in rather expert fashion. Jonathan is a vague presence next to the sharply drawn Jane and Adam, an unfaithful husband who sleeps with his wife’s best friend and is overly absorbed in his work ‘saving’ the boys at the Foundation, which all goes awry when one of them, Adam’s intellectually disabled classmate Darren, ends up in trouble with the law. 

Adam is the most prominent character in the book, but the star is really Jane, who could have supported the entire novel on her own if Lerner had given her the chance. She’s a strong personality, including that heroic response to her would-be harassers, but also has a history of abuse at the hands of her father with which she’s still coming to grips and that clearly affects her choices decades later. More exploration of that angle and how her mother’s willful ignorance of the abuse destroyed that relationship as well would have elevated the novel and helped make her even more of a central character, as would have more detail on her reaction to Jonathan’s infidelity, but she doesn’t get quite enough page time.

Part of the reason for that is the focus on Adam’s debating endeavors, which I think is a metaphor for our incredibly terrible political environment right now, where winning may be more a function of being louder than being better or being right. A new debating technique called the “spread” has become popular at the time of this novel (it’s set in the 1990s); the speaker simply talks as quickly as possible, raising as many points as they can during their allotted time, and forces opponents to try to keep up in their rejoinders as any unanswered arguments are considered points won. It’s a bit of an arcane point, like basing portions of a hockey novel around the neutral-zone trap, and too inside-baseball at least for me, even though I thought I could see the parallel to social media efforts to drown out opponents and boost candidates through sheer volume of content (even if the support is fake).

The Darren subplot is even more undercooked, and feels utterly tacked on; I was waiting for Lerner to tie it into the Gordons’ story more convincingly but he never does. Darren’s cognitive difficulties make him a target for bullies and an occasional object of derision for classmates, and his eventual lashing out is inevitable and also a lot less than I feared it might be (I thought Lerner was setting up a mass shooting or something similar, but he wasn’t). Darren’s story is largely told through 2-4 page interstitials between the Gordons’ narratives, and his actual connection to the Gordons goes no further than his time working with Jonathan. There’s a half-hearted thread about Darren falling a bit under the sway of an angry old white man, but that story fizzles out without impact. Instead he’s only a side note, as are the hatemongers of the Westboro Baptist Church, who also appear on the fringes of the novel and are among the people harassing Jane on the phone and in person around Topeka.

I’m just not sure I get the adulation for The Topeka School, which ended up less than the sum of its parts. Lerner works in a lot of hifalutin vocabulary from psychology – I don’t know why you’d ever need the word ‘analysand,’ for example, and while ‘cathexis’ is a fun word it also probably isn’t appropriate for its usage here – which makes the book seem smarter than it ultimately is. There are good ideas floating around in here, but the lack of focus on either Jane or Adam means they’re not fully fleshed out, and the novel ends before anything is all that well resolved. Maybe it’ll win one of these awards because it’s ambitious and feels relevant to multiple themes in American society of 2020, but I don’t think it measures up to its primary competition.

Next up: Myra Goldberg’s Feast Your Eyes.