Stick to baseball, 10/8/22.

My hypothetical ballots for five of the six major postseason player awards went up for subscribers to the The Athletic this week. I also held a Klawchat on Friday.

At Paste, I reviewed Wormholes, a space-themed pickup-and-delivery game that’s very easy to learn. I think it’s great for family play, on the weight and fun level of Ticket to Ride.

On The Keith Law Show this week, I spoke with Sports Illustrated’s Stephanie Apstein about the postseason awards, playoff predictions, rules changes, and more. You can listen and subscribe via iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher, amazon, or wherever you get your podcasts.

I sent out another edition of my free email newsletter on Friday night. Also, you can buy either of my books, Smart Baseball or The Inside Game, via bookshop.org at those links, or at your friendly local independent bookstore. I hear they make great holiday gifts.

And now, the links…

  • Longreads first: A Colorado state custody evaluator, who happens to be the brother of actor Val Kilmer, has a history of disbelieving abuse allegations and recommended a teenaged victim stay under the control of her abuser, according to an extensive report from ProPublica. Mark Kilmer has also been convicted of harassing his ex-wife, who accused him of assaulting her.
  • Also from ProPublica: Mississippi police departments have taken to hiding search warrants from the public, flouting state laws on making them available at courthouses, which has the result of protecting officers who may have violated residents’ Fourth Amendment rights in no-knock searches. I donated to ProPublica today, as their journalism is incredible and this type of depth becoming more rare in our media landscape.
  • Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) ran a TV ad so racist the Des Moines Register ran an editorial saying it has no place in their community. The ad seeks to distinguish white Iowan society from anything other.
  • Kareem Abdul-Jabbar weighed in on another DeSantis controversy, where the Governor went on Fox News and falsely claimed that no Americans questioned slavery prior to the Revolutionary War. Even I knew the Quakers were abolitionists well before American independence. He also called out Kyrie Irving’s idiocy for spreading nonsense conspiracy theories on his Instagram account.
  • This New York Times story on Russian men fleeing to neighboring countries to avoid being forced to serve in the war against Ukraine has a photo of some of those men playing the board game Splendor.

Klawchat 10/7/22.

My hypothetical postseason awards ballots column is up now for subscribers to The Athletic. I also reviewed the board game Wormholes, a good gateway game to play with your kids.

Keith Law: There’s no point in asking, you’ll get no reply. Klawchat.

Bighen: Ton of chatter on Mets holding deGrom out of game 2 if they win tonight, how would you align their rotation? Also Carrasco or Walker if Mets need to use 4th starter at some point.
Keith Law: Not a big fan of that unless there’s a health-related reason to do so. Don’t outsmart yourselves.

Alex: The Red Sox just dropped $220 million to finish in last place (for the 2nd time in three seasons).  Is Chaim Bloom just not qualified to run a big market team?  It’s one thing to be an assistant in a “Nobody Cares” market like Tampa, but Boston is a completely different animal.  He’s traded away Betts, Benintendi, Renfroe, Springs, Vazquez et al, and received nothing of note in return.
Keith Law: Jeez, this is the most knee-jerk take imaginable. Ownership forced the Betts trade, and it’s not like Verdugo is nothing, just a good platoon player. Not sure what you thought they’d get for Springs or Benintendi or even Renfroe (I like Binelas some, although the AA debut was very disappointing; he hits the ball very hard). And you’re underselling Wilyer Abreu a ton. But the bigger issue is that you’re reacting based on a small subset of decisions in a short period of time.

Doug: What’s Cristian Pache’s future in MLB?  4OF? Starter?  He’s young of course, but hasn’t done much with his opportunities so far.
Keith Law: I think he’s a starter, but he clearly hasn’t been ready for MLB pitching and the decision to promote  and keep him up so much of last year looks bad in hindsight. Defense & power are more than enough for him to be an average regular, but the A’s are going to have to just live with the low OBPs for a while now.

Jay: Why is there a rush to introduce a pitch clock at the MLB level? Are we really in a rush to fill air time with more empty talking head type shows rather than a live event? No thank you.
Keith Law: Oh I’m a big fan of the pitch clock after seeing how much it speeds up minor league games. It gets rid of a lot of dead time – which, by the way, might just be filled with empty commentary because so many broadcasters are afraid of silence.

Heather: I’ll give you five dollars if you can promise me, right now, that I’ll never have to hear from or about Tony LaRussa ever again.
Keith Law: I wish I could promise that, but you know next June some reporter with no new ideas will track him down to get Old Man Yells at Cloud content.
Keith Law: TLR had a great career. It is a shame it had to end with this regrettable stint in Chicago. It’s like when an acclaimed actor’s last film is some B movie or voicing a character in the Emoji Movie or something.

JJ: Brayan Bello has never thrown more than 118 innings in a season in his professional career.  What kind of cap, if any, would you put on him in 2023?
Keith Law: I don’t feel remotely qualified to answer that. One, I know nothing about his arm or his health. Two, the claim that there was some magic threshold around +30 innings is unsupported by evidence.

Guest: Can you explain why you consider Bonds’ record to be legitimate? It was clearly obtained through committing crimes and breaking the rules of the game, aka cheating. Lance Armstrong was stripped of all his titles and records. I don’t see how this is any different
Keith Law: “Clearly” is doing a lot of work there. I know of no evidence he “committed crimes” and the reality is that the rules of the game to which you refer were either unenforced or nonexistent (e.g., MLB didn’t ban the use of HGH till 2005). Bonds never tested positive for any PEDs. That is by far the best and most objective standard we can use. He failed as many tests as Maris and Aaron did – and given that HGH and amphetamines were available by 1960, I’m not sure why we would assume anyone from a prior era is automatically clean just because there was no testing.

Tom: Hey Keith – do you think Jake Alu could be an everyday regular next season for the nats?
Keith Law: I don’t, unless he’s a much better defender at third base than I realized. That would make him a regular.

Jourdyn: Spencer Strider or Alek Manoah long term?
Keith Law: I love both but I’ll bet on Manoah because of the broader pitch mix.

Efrim: How impressed are you with Alex’s work with Atlanta since taking over? Obviously he was always thought of as a good exec, but the work he did in revamping the front office and adding more analytics based employees. Plus, Dana Brown(amateur draft hire) has worked out well.
Keith Law: Overall, he’s been outstanding, although having worked with Alex I’m 0% surprised by this. The one real misstep I saw was firing Brian Bridges, whose drafts look even better in hindsight, although I can’t say that Atlanta’s drafts have suffered much in his absence either.

Al: How many owners kill their teams Championship chances in the name of money?
Keith Law: Expanding the playoffs actually makes this easier, so look for that number to increase. I might have said Cleveland except they’re in the playoffs and I think they have as good a chance to win as any team.

Michael: Any explanation for the very good season by Pujols after years of being terrible? How about Tyler Anderson? Is one season just a SSS or did they do something different?
Keith Law: The Cards used Pujols very judiciously – like 1/3 of his PA vs LHP, whom he’s always hit. .315 OBP vs RHP. Anderson’s I think is a little more interesting – some health, some increased use of the CH (which was his best pitch all the way back in college).

Tom: any concern with Cj abrams offense, specifically his low walk rate, in 2022?
Keith Law: No.
Keith Law: He needs to get stronger. That’s it for me.

Juwan: The Meneses ride was exhilarating in an otherwise horrendous season, do you view the bat as real?
Keith Law: Great story, but no.

Jack: which core would you rather have (pirates young talent / orioles young talent) ?
Keith Law: Orioles. Although they’re short on pitching – this is the time to trade some of this young hitter surplus to go get at least one experienced starter.

G: Oneil Cruz improved at the plate as the season went on, and did enough in the last month to give me genuine optimism about his future at the plate. With that being said, is there any reason for the Pirates to continue playing him at SS next season?
Keith Law: No. He was one of the worst defenders at SS this year by OAA, and given his size the odds have always been against him staying there. I’d move him to CF and let him put the speed to better use.

James: Does this project to be a strong top of the draft? What do you view as its strength?
Keith Law: Much better college pitching in 2023. Don’t know if I’d call it “strong” but it’s a more interesting group of players in the first round.

Tom: Sss alert – but Elijah green proving those swing and miss reports may be accurate – any concern after seeing him struggle with that in his pro debut?
Keith Law: Twelve games. He only played 12 games. We can’t draw any conclusions from that.

Captain Marani: Does Yadier Molina get into the HOF?  In St. Louis, home of The Best Fans in Baseball, he’s considered a mortal lock, but he better hope that he and Buster Posey are never listed side-by-side on the voters’ ballots.
Keith Law: I have a feeling he’s going to end up getting in given enough time. Vizquel was probably going to get in, with a worse case than Molina, until the stories alleging domestic violence and sexual harassment came out. Prior to that, I thought they were similar players – very good but not HoF-worthy, overrated by specific subsets of writers who could be swayed by comments from other players, coaches, managers, etc.

Champdo: How worried should we be about Torkelson
Keith Law: He’s 22. I didn’t love him the one time I saw him as a underclassman, because I didn’t see great bat speed or athleticism, but all he ever did from that point until his debut this year was hit for average and power. I’ll defer to the long history of performance here.

Paul: Do you like the draft lottery? Seems a fair bit more punitive than other lotteries in other leagues with the worst teams potentially falling to the bottom of the top ten rather than the middle of the top ten if they aren’t lucky.
Keith Law: I do think it’ll deter some tanking, and reduces the chances of a team drafting #1 overall three straight years like Houston did. I would prefer to see a system that pays the very best 5-10 players in each class more fairly, with some sort of modified free agency for them, but that’s probably never happening.

Patrick: I feel like a lot of people still sort of view Ohtani playing both ways as sort of a novelty, where the main pull is the *uniqueness* of it. His pitching especially didn’t seem to get the respect it deserves this year, when he is a legit Cy Young candidate. Am I wrong in thinking that?
Keith Law: You are correct now that he’s finally pitching like the guy he was prior to signing with the Angels. He became a CYA contender this year, really.

Troy: Burnes/Yelich/Mitchell for May/Lux/Vargas/Miller who says no?
Keith Law: Why would the Dodgers do that? Yelich’s contract is an albatross. And the Dodgers seem quite able to draft and develop pitching.

Ted: Just wanted to recommend Iain Reid’s new novel “We Spread.” His previous novels have been very entertaining, both are quick reads and I can understand why they were both turned into films. The new one packs a genuine emotional punch, though. Worth checking out.
Keith Law: Not familiar with his work – thank you.

Owen: What do you make of Andrew Heaney’s season? Is it projectable going forward?
Keith Law: Yes.

Devon: Hi Keith! Thanks for the chat! I was wondering how you feel about Wander’s power? Hamate bone might have been bothering him for awhile…
Keith Law: Yeah, write off his 2022 completely for that reason.

Ryan: How concerned are you about Alek Thomas going forward? Great defense but it seemed like he wasn’t able to pull anything with authority in the second half
Keith Law: I was extremely surprised and disappointed by his low contact quality. I never thought he was a big power guy – average at best – but he didn’t hit the ball hard at all in the big leagues this year, and that is a concern.

frank: Sean Hjelle had some good appearances for the Giants at the end of the season.  Is he anything more than a back of the rotation starter?
Keith Law: I don’t think so, but I think he’s capable of being a 4th or 5th starter.

Jay: Why is it that, every time I watch “The Godfather” (I & II only, of course), Diane Keaton gets more and more annoying?  Forget about offing Fredo, Tony, you’re better off whacking Kay!
Keith Law: Yes, she’s a poorly written character, to put it mildly. That’s a movie written and directed by men about men. She’s a prop.

Baseball: It’s Fun!: More interesting division/divisional race going into 2023: AL East or NL West? The Diamondbacks seem poised to at least take a step forward and the Giants are bound to look better than they did this year, plus the Orioles, Sox and Rays should be much improved on the AL East side. What do you think?
Keith Law: I think the AL East. The Dodgers are still a juggernaut, and the Rockies are not going to contend next year. But the AL East might have five legitimate contenders next year, and I don’t think any team is head and shoulders above the rest there like the Dodgers are in the West.

Steve: Re: Boston and Bloom – I mean Boston hasn’t been to the ALCS since….2021
Keith Law: It’s a drought.

Pat: Every prospect ranking had Victor Robles as pretty much guaranteed as at least a league average regular- if not signifcantly more.   What happened to him, and is it too late to find it?
Keith Law: He is what will happen to Alek Thomas if Thomas doesn’t start hitting the ball harder.

Leites: Hi Keith!  Curious what you see as the upside for Elehuris Montero and Michael Toglia at this point . . .
Keith Law: I still give Montero a chance to be a regular. I don’t see it with Toglia.

Benji: If you were Scott Harris, how aggressive would you be this offseason? Lots of roster turnover is coming, but would you expect that to be filled with more interesting AAAA players and spare vets or legitimate middle to upper class FAs? Long ways to go or with the perpetually weak AL Central does it make sense to push sooner?
Keith Law: I think you have to fix whatever’s going on internally – lack of development + lot of injuries – before you go externally.

Roger: Thoughts on the debuts for Ryne Nelson and Drey Jameson? They seemed to get hit pretty hard in AAA but had great outings in the majors. I don’t want to be the box score guy but I haven’t been able to watch actual tape of their MLB starts yet.
Keith Law: Bear in mind that their AAA club is in Reno, about 4000 feet above sea level, and plays a ton of games at other extreme hitters’ parks. I mostly disregard all of their stats from there as I do with Albuquerque.

Appa Yip Yip: Have you gotten any looks at Addison Barger?
Keith Law: Yes and I wrote about him here: https://klaw.me/3wAuQpa

Lorne: Is Baltimore an “attractive” FA destination since the future is/at least looks bright? What once was a great baseball city has suffered through some tough decades (?) and it’d be nice to finally see a rebound
Keith Law: I absolutely believe any team is an attractive destination for free agents if they offer more money than any other club.

JR: Was a little surprised you had Judge as MVP. While clearly you laid out the rational reasons it’s just hard for me to comprehend how a guy like Ohtani that does so well as a hitter and pitcher isn’t an auto win for the MVP. I figured the Judge rhetoric was media trying to talk itself out of Ohtani so I appreciated you laying it out with the numbers to back it up.
Keith Law: I talked about it on my pod yesterday with Stephanie Apstein. I was surprised (but am not disagreeing) that she thought Judge would win it in a rout – I thought Ohtani would get more of those he’s-a-novelty votes. But she probably has a better feel for this than I do.
Keith Law: BTW, thank goodness they didn’t overturn that HR call. What a shitshow that would have been.

Moritz: Hi Keith, not sure if you have seen it or commented on it already. MLB have decided to black out the postseason for all international MLB TV users. Great Job growing the game…
Keith Law: I haven’t seen this and can’t find anything on this in a quick search. Is that accurate? Are they just charging more or something?

Dan: How much credence do you give people like Chris O’Leary (aka The Pain Guy on Twitter)? He claims to have “fixed Adam Wainwright”
Keith Law: Zero.

Kevin: Thoughts on shift “ban?” Do you think teams will just work around it by shifting the LF into short right against lefties or is that too much of a risk leaving the LF line wide open?
Keith Law: I hate it. That’s the one rule change I truly oppose. We’ve never really told teams where to put their fielders before. What reason do we have to start now?

Dan: If you had to pick the top 5ish things for the Nats to get back into contention, what would you choose?
Keith Law: They need more production from their drafts. I see just about all of their draft picks coming through Wilmington (Cole Henry is one big exception, as he’s been hurt so much but pretty good when healthy) and they are not getting the value they need to be getting, especially from top picks.

Dave: Is it really so wrong to think that “gender identity” is a superstitious, metaphysical concept on par with that of a “soul” and that it shouldn’t replace biological sex in law? And that teaching a child that he or she could have been “born in the wrong body” because of their “gender identity” is abhorrent? This seems like the correct rationalist position to take.
Keith Law: It is wrong, because unlike the soul, there is clear scientific evidence for a gender identity that differs from biological sex. I’m sorry that this bothers you, but facts do not care about your feelings.

David: Keith, What do you see as the ceiling for Endy Rodriguez? Also, what position do you think he plays? I’d say catcher but I know having Davis also in the system may force a move.
Keith Law: Above-average everyday catcher. Nice problem to have there. I do think they have a year to figure it out with Davis missing so much of 2022.

Guest: I think the obvious answer for Pujols’ “very good season” is that it turns out that he’s YOUNGER than reported. Everyone had it all wrong this whole time.
Keith Law: That’s funny.

Aaron C.: I know you generally need multiple looks at a prospect to make an informed analysis. But, when it comes to restaurants, if you have a mediocre-to-bad experience the first time, are you inclined to give them another chance(s)?
Keith Law: I’m not. There’s a place in Philly where I had a terrible experience, and even though it’s consistently ranked among the top 5-10 in the city, I don’t see why I’d go back there and spend money again when there are so many other great places here.

James: what do you think of Rockies Brendan Rodgers so far ?
Keith Law: Disappointed. Just hasn’t been the hitter I expected based on my looks in HS.

Jackie: What, if any, awards vote do you have this year?  How is that decided?  Why does a vote get an MVP ballot, instead of a Cy Young or Manager of the Year?  (Also, my bold prediction/guarantee:  Julian McWilliams of The Boston Globe, a loyal employee of John Henry, will be giving his third place vote, regardless of ballot, to Rafael Devers.)
Keith Law: I have NL RoY. They’re assigned by the BBWAA. Each chapter gets 2 votes for each of the four awards, and each writer typically gets just one ballot unless the chapter is short of voters.

Michael: Will you quit Twitter when the Musk deal closes?
Keith Law: No. I already use it far less than I did 3-4 years ago because it’s pretty toxic and Twitter does such a terrible job of dealing with misinformation and harassment.

Romorr: RE the Orioles question, do you think they should trade for a starter, and sign one in FA? Or trade for 1, and add a bat. I like Kremer, Rodriguez, and Bradish to start the year, so adding 2 starters sounds good to me.
Keith Law: Bradish isn’t a starter. Kremer is more of a back end guy. I do love Hall but the control isn’t there yet. They really need to add a couple of starters.

Michael (W Hartford CT): Do you think that MVP voters should consider the negative impact of having to use a sixth starter in assessing Ohtani’s candidacy?
Keith Law: If a voter were boosting Ohtani for him filling two roles with one roster spot, I’d say that’s ignoring the fact that they need the sixth starter for him, which negates the roster advantage.

Romorr: 174 K’s for Colton Cowser was a surprise to me. The walks are good, but is there anything to the high amount of K’s going forward?
Keith Law: I think he’s a solid regular, don’t think he’s going to strike out enough to detract from that, and some of the Ks were from the aggressive promotion to AAA to end his first full pro season.

James: Do you think we will see more teams give out big contracts to very young players to try and save long term ? Like the braves have been doing
Keith Law: Yes – teams already are doing that, or trying it. But Atlanta got two guys to accept well below-market deals (Acuña and Albies) where others haven’t had that success.

Kevin: Has Hayden Wesneski’s major league performance raised his status in your/evaluator’s eyes or too small of a sample size?
Keith Law: Small sample size but I think I was fairly positive on him at the time of the trade, too.

Jason: Does Carlos Beltran get in on the first ballot?  I always put him in that “solid candidate but not a mortal lock” category, but some segments of baseball fandom seem to hold the Houston cheating scandal against him (though, for the life of me, I couldn’t tell you what he actually did).
Keith Law: I think he was a first ballot guy until the scandal. I will be voting for him.

Dave: What are your thoughts on the Scott Harris hire in Detroit?
Keith Law: Everything I’ve heard about him has been positive. I’d really like to know who else they interviewed, though, as it looks like they just ignored MLB’s guidelines, and I have a hard time seeing how diversity is ever going to improve in the exec suites if teams don’t even give non-white male candidates a chance in the process.

James: Would you rather have Zac Gallen right now than Jazz ?
Keith Law: No. I would take either of them quite gladly.

comish4lif: I view the Bonds home run records as legitimate. That’s my personal choice and decision. The main fact pushing my choice is that MLB and Bud Selig did very little to stop it at the time. Now Bud is in the BBHOF and Barry is not. It would be a lot of work to convince me that MLB, Teams, etc didn’t know about the steroids in the game.
Keith Law: Bud Selig (and Bowie Kuhn) did not deserve their enshrinements. But that process – the crony committees – is an absolute joke.

Doug: Cole Winn had a rough year statistically (awful walk rate).  Cause for concern or just tougher competition as a 22 yo in AAA?
Keith Law: Different baseball in AAA (although I think this year the Southern and Texas Leagues used the MLB ball, not in 2021) and that takes some adjustments. Not concerned.

Jason: If you’re the A’s do you keep Langeliers or Murphy behind the plate? Is Murphy worth more or less than the players they got back for Matt Olson?
Keith Law: I’d trade Murphy because of Langeliers – Murphy’s value is through the roof given the years remaining.

Phil: We know KeBryan Hayes defense is strong but seems his bat took a step back this year (maybe health related). Will he hit enough to be an above average 3rd baseman? Is his primary issue launch angle and too many ground balls?
Keith Law: The Pirates’ biggest problem in the last 5 or so years has been non-development of bats. They drafted and acquired a bunch of guys with high contact rates, but then haven’t converted all that contact into quality contact. Hayes is one. Newman is another. It was half of a plan. Now they have their work cut out for them, especially with Hayes who has so much upside if they can get him to hit the ball harder (and why doesn’t he? He’s not small, or weak).

Phil: Any concerns with Riley Greene, seems like   he should’ve had more hrs over that many abs? Are you expecting a much better year in year 2?
Keith Law: He’s so young, I’m not worried either.

James: Would you go to a Savannah Bananas game ?
Keith Law: I don’t go to baseball games unless it’s for work. I don’t know a lot of people who go to the office just for fun. I like what I do, but separating work and non-work is important to me.

Chris: Is Joey Wiemer going to develop into anything?
Keith Law: He could, but there’s a lot of risk in the bat given his swing and miss.

comish4lif: Regarding AAA pitchers like Nelson and Jamison for example – those guys don’t just get to go after every hitter. Right?
They frequently have a plan, something to work on, for example, 1st pitch curve to everyone, all fastballs this inning, etc.
Keith Law: That’s less typical for AAA pitchers than low-A or complex league guys. At AAA they should be calling their own games to prepare them for the next level.

Guest: Is there any hope for the Reds in the next 2-3 years? Nice group of rookie SPs if they can stay healthy but hard to have a lot of confidence they’re going to be able to put a true contender together.
Keith Law: Yes, and the system is very strong. Not next year but maybe 2024-25 they’ll be a sleeper.

Mo: How would you upgrade the Cardinals’ offense this off-season without blocking Walker (RF), Gorman (2B?), Herrera (C), and Winn (SS)?
Keith Law: DH and LF seem like good spots (we’ll see about nootbaar, who was good in a short sample).

Greasy Nick: Curious if you’ve read The Sympathizer?
Keith Law: Yes, I’ve read all the Pulitzer winners. Here’s my post on it: http://klaw.me/1ZoZR5T

Matt: Hey Dave, what sex is XXY?
Keith Law: There are a number of conditions that lead to DSDs (differences in sex development) where a person’s genotype and the development of their internal or external sex organs do not match. 5-alpha-reductase deficiency is one. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia is another. Swyer Syndrome is a third. The sex binary is a myth.

Mike: Between Carroll, Lawlar, and PCA, is it fair to be a little less concerned about shoulder injuries to hitters going forward? Those are just three that come to my mind but I feel like there have been more success stories of late with respect to shoulder surgeries
Keith Law: I don’t think we’ve overreacted to those for hitters, but I still think they’re a big concern for pitchers.

Greasy Nick: Do you think Matt Mervis is legit, or is he a textbook AAAA prospect?
Keith Law: He’s another older guy who hit well against younger competition this year, like Vaun Brown, Niko Kavadas, etc. I’ll just say the vast majority of those guys do not pan out. Occasionally one does (Jeff McNeil is the best example of the last decade) but if you’re betting on them as a group, the odds are overwhelmingly against them.

Mike: SSS but Kelenic did look better in his last stint and was whiffing less. Cautious optimism?
Keith Law: Too much value to give on him.

George: Which chapter are you:  part of the Philadelphia chapter, or one of the misfit toys in a nebulous “National” chapter?
Keith Law: Philly.

James: Do you prefer hot or iced coffee ?? Dependent on season ?
Keith Law: Hot. Never got into iced coffee. Ice numbs the taste buds, so you end up tasting the notes in coffee much less when it’s cold. That’s the same reason ice cream has so much sugar in it – you need more to counteract the effects of the temperature.

Guy B: What should the Red Sox do with Devers?
Keith Law: Pay the man.

James: Favorite AFL stadium ??
Keith Law: Salt River is the best but I have a soft spot for the old-time charm of Scottsdale.

James: Do you like coffee ice cream ?
Keith Law: Yes if it’s dark and tastes like coffee and not like a fucking single-shot venti latte.

Thomas: If Barry Bonds weren’t a black man with a generally … prickly disposition, would his status as the record holder be viewed differently?  If it had been Mark McGwire or Kirby Puckett who had hit 73, would there be so much debate over the legitimacy?
Keith Law: It’s just a gut feeling, but I agree with your take – Bonds is an Angry Black Man and the white gatekeepers don’t like that.

Scott of Lincolnshire: On the shift: could you start seeing infielders more in motion pre-pitch?  Like if Schwarber is up, have your SS running towards 2nd base right when pitch is thrown?
Keith Law: I suggested this on the podcast yesterday – it could be weirdly entertaining, like having the one man in motion on offense in the NFL.

Dave: Hi Klaw. Just wondering if you’ve seen or heard about Red Sox prospects Miguel Bleis and Ceddanne Rafaela? Are they guys or GUYS?
Keith Law: I haven’t seen Bleis but saw and wrote about Rafaela multiple times this summer.

Tom2: I see where Roger Maris Jr wants separate HR categories for his dad and Judage and for Bonds, McGwire et al. But I don’t remember seeing him explain how his dad hit 16, 39, then 61 HRs in 3 season. You know, if we’re sure everything was on the up and up back then.
Keith Lawhttps://www.theonion.com/roger-maris-jr-sets-single-season-record-for-…

A Salty Scientist: I love your yearly column on ‘misses.’ When thinking about these for evaluating your own biases in evaluation, how do you try to determine whether someone hit on their 99th percentile outcome versus a more systematic issue where you had their 50th percentile (and whole distribution) pegged incorrectly?
Keith Law: McNeil is a good example of someone where I didn’t change anything. He’s a 99th percentile guy, with an unusual skill set too. Whereas Bieber is someone who did change my process, as did Goldschmidt, guys who found different paths to success from what I anticipated or considered likely, and thus required me to open my mind more and see those new growth patterns or possibilities.

Heather: Speaking of Kirby Puckett, should he be in the HOF?
Keith Law: I thought he was a borderline case as a player, but I do not believe we should start removing players once enshrined. I wouldn’t have voted for him at the time, though.

Appa Yip Yip: I find it hard to believe, given that we know coaches in the minors were recommending sticky stuff to pitchers in the minors, that there weren’t coaches in the 90s taking guys aside and being like, listen you gotta add some muscle. Developing players is how minor league coaches get promotions. Blaming individuals for systemic issues is a pretty classic play though.
Keith Law: Or coaches in the 60s and 70s saying, hey, these little green pills will give you a little more focus. To say nothing of the 100-plus MLB players with therapeutic use exemptions for ADHD medications that are built around amphetamines. They improve attention, reduce reaction times, and speed executive functioning. Hank Aaron even admitting using them at least once.

Steve: one thing overlooked in all the single-season HR records talk is that almost all of them came in expansion years or within a couple of years of expansion, which is why Judge’s feat this year is all the more impressive and should be held in that regard rather than some mythical “clean” record
Keith Law: Correct – I pointed that out on one of the podcasts yesterday. We don’t have asterisks for expansion years even though we have very strong evidence that those years (and the temporary talent dilution they create) lead to move outlier performances. Maris hit 61 in the Angels/Senators 2 expansion year. McGwire & Sosa had their chase in the Dbacks/Rays expansion year. Even the Marlins/Rockies expansion year led to a huge spike in leaguewide offense.

Kevin: Could Elly De La Cruz or Jackson Chourio turn into Julio/Wander type of prospects?
Keith Law: I think they already are. Chourio is more like Wander, Elly more like Julio (who has tightened his approach a lot since A-ball, which Elly needs to do).

James: You admit you are not a football/NFL fan.  (Or at least that used to be the case).   Is the trolling of Carson Wentz a bit of sorts, or do you dislike him for some reason?
Keith Law: My wife is a huge Eagles fan, and I saw more than enough of Carson Wentz to be glad to see the team move on from him.
Keith Law: Hurts is a blast to watch.

Freddie: What’s the ceiling for Vaughn Grissom?
Keith Law: Above-average regular, borderline star.

Tony: Where do the White Sox even go from here? Bloated payroll, underperforming players, weak FA class, bad farm so little trade ammo… what a mess!
Keith Law: I think you lean into this core at least one more year and try to contend again in a winnable division in 2023.
Keith Law: OK, that’s all for this week – thank you all so much for the questions & for reading. I’ll head to the AFL later this month and will file a few scouting notebooks from out there, after which I’ll get to free agent rankings. Stay safe!

Ready Set Bet.

Ready Set Bet is a raucous betting game that’s great for a larger group, with up to 9 folks able to play at once (and if you have ten, once can serve as the race’s announcer), from John D. Clair, the designer of Mystic Vale, Cubitos, Dead Reckoning, and Space Base. He’s also a Dodgers fan, if memory serves correctly, but regardless, all of his previous games have been more gamers’ games, while Ready Set Bet is much lighter and is more of a party game at heart – but a surprisingly fun one given how common and boring the betting theme can be.

Ready Set Bet involves four horse races, and players will bet in real time, placing their tokens on the giant central board, as someone rolls the dice to move the nine horses along the race track, betting until three horses pass the red line on the track. At the end of each round, all bets are paid off, and some bets require players to pay a penalty if those bets didn’t come through. After the first three rounds, each player gets their choice of two cards to give them an extra power through the rest of the game or a one-time bonus. After four rounds, the player with the most money wins.

The horses are represented by the numbers 4 through 10, plus two more horses that bear two numbers, 2 and 3 as well as 11 and 12. The dice you roll to move the horses are just two regular six-sided dice, so the horses in the middle (6, 7, and 8) have a natural advantage, but in Ready Set Bet, if you roll any total twice in a row other than 7, that horse moves several extra spaces to try to compensate. I’ve had the 4 horse win because I happened to roll it three times in a row, which moved it nine extra spaces and gave it an insurmountable lead.

There are two major tweaks to the common betting-game formula in RSB, both of which work quite well. The board has betting spaces for every horse to win, places, or show, and each space has a multiplier on it to represent the payout if that bet comes off. The multipliers are higher on horses farther away from the middle numbers of 6-8, but many of those bets also have a small penalty if you bet on them and the horse lets you down, although it’s generally just a dollar or two. There are also some betting spaces on the board beyond individual horses – betting that a horse in a certain color group will win, or betting on one of the “unusual scenario” cards that appear in rounds 2-4 that have conditions like one horse winning by a certain amount or at least four horses not getting past the one-quarter mark.

The other big tweak is that once someone places one of their tokens on a betting space, it’s occupied for the remainder of that race. Each player has a set of betting tokens numbered 2, 3, 4, and 5, and with fewer than seven players each player gets a second 3 token. To place a bet, you take one of those tokens and place it on any betting space that isn’t currently occupied. If your horse comes through, you get the value of your token times the multiplier on the betting space. There’s no benefit to keeping any of your tokens, so the incentive is to place them all before the third horse crosses the red line – roughly two-thirds of the way across the race board – and to do so sooner than other players do, since most of the betting spaces are limited to just one token.

I’ve played Ready Set Bet as a player, but also played it with family and served as the dice-roller and announcer, including my niece and nephew, who are now 10 and 6, respectively … and my nephew ended up winning outright, because he just bet big on any horse that got an early lead, and at one point got an extra 7 token by way of one of those end-of-round bonus cards, placing it on a 7x betting space for a horse that won. That points to the game’s accessibility, and the way that a little luck can balance things out. I didn’t expect to like this game all that much given the premise, but the simplicity of play and the way everyone, with folks aged 6 to 75 when I played with family, got into it ended up selling me on the game after all.

Music update, September 2022.

Lots of new music in September … but not a lot of great music, I think, even with two extremely strong new albums and a couple of others of note. As always, you can see the Spotify playlist here if you can’t see the widget below.

Kid Kapichi – Super Soaker. Two of my favorite albums of 2022 so far came out in September, including Kid Kapichi’s second album in the last 18 months, Here’s What You Could Have Won, which carries forward the harder-edged rock with Alex Turner-like lyrics but expands their musical palate somewhat, such as adding a guest appearance from Bob Vylan.

The Beths – When You Know You Know. And then there’s The Beths’ third album, Expert in a Dying Field, their best one yet, with more uptempo songs and a more consistent musical throughline over the entire album.

White Lies – Trouble in America. A tremendous track from the bonus edition of As I Try Not to Fall Apart, frankly a better song than several that did make the original LP.

Sports Team – Dig! Another banger from Sports Team, but unusual for them in that the vocals are far more conventional, and clearly play second fiddle to the driving guitar work.

Sprints – Literary Mind. These Dublin punks go a little more pop here, without losing any of their usual intensity, in what I think is their longest song yet.

Courtney Barnett – Words and Guitar. A cover of the Sleater-Kinney song from an upcoming album of covers of the band’s 1997 album Dig Me Out.

John-Allison Weiss – Different Now. This is the first new music from Weiss, who has previously recorded as A.W., since 2017’s “Runaway,” although their indie-pop sound is quite similar even after the five-year hiatus.

Editors – Vibe. Editors just released their seventh album, EBM, their first with Blanck Mass (Benjamin John Power) as a full-time member. The sound across the album is similar to what they’ve shown since their big stylistic shift around 2009-10 to something more electro-noir, with a heavy New Order influence. I also really liked “Karma Climb,” the first single from the record; and “Kiss,” which is great in the sub-4 minute single version but wears out its welcome at 8 minutes on the album.

The Fashion Weak feat. Gruff Rhys – Welsh Words. The debut single from a new Welsh band, with help from Super Furry Animals lead singer Rhys, with hilarious lyrics about songwriting advice from Joan Didion.

Freddie Gibbs feat. Moneybagg Yo – Too Much. Gibbs might be the best active rapper going, certainly in terms of flow and delivery, and just dropped his fifth album, the expansive $oul $old $eparately, on Friday. “Dark Hearted” and “Space Rabbit” are also highlights.

Phoenix feat. Ezra Koenig – Tonight. I like this song despite the intrusion of Vampire Weekend (via Koenig, their twee-voiced lead singer and songwriter).

Jamie xx – KILL DEM. The second new single this year from Jamie xx, whose In Colour was one of the best albums of 2015 and provided two standout tracks of the entire decade in “Loud Places” and “See Saw,” but who hasn’t put out another LP since. His solo work is electronica, but he’s also one of three members of the indie band the xx.

Quicksand – Giving the Past Away. A muscular new track from these post-hardcore icons, left over from the sessions for last year’s album Distant Populations.

Palm – On the Sly. A Philly art-rock outfit that’s been around for a decade, Palm just crossed my radar this month with this new track reminiscent of some of Battles’ better work.

WITCH – Waile. WITCH are legends of Zamrock, a musical style from the sub-Saharan country of Zambia that emerged in the 1970s, and were active from 1972-1984, by the end of which they’d moved away from rock and towards disco. This is a new recording of a song they played live in their heyday but never committed to wax. With the crossover success of Mdou Moctar, I could see WITCH (which stands for We Intend to Cause Havoc!) finding a new audience as they continue to tour.

Wheel – Blood Drinker. I’m a big fan of this Finnish prog-metal outfit, whether it’s their ten-minute, multi-section tracks or tighter radio-friendly ones like this one, primarily because of their guitarwork, both the sound itself and the intricacy of some of their guitar lines. This is the advance single from their upcoming EP Rumination, which follows last year’s full-length album Resident Human.

Stick to baseball, 10/1/22.

Since my last weekend post, I’ve had three few posts up for subscribers to the Athletic, including my annual column on players I was wrong about, my annual Prospect of the Year column, and a quick scouting take on last weekend’s Future Stars Main Event showcase for the 2023 draft.

For Paste I reviewed the board game Cellulose, from Genius Games, which produces science-themed games that try to be both accurate and educational. It’s definitely the former, but I’m not sure about the latter, as it’s a good worker-placement game that you can play well without getting into a lot of the technical stuff.

On the Keith Law Show this week, my guest was author and sportswriter Will Leitch, who wrote the wonderful 2021 novel How Lucky and who has a new novel coming out in May that you can pre-order here. We discussed his writing, his beloved Cardinals, and the upcoming slate of movies for this fall and winter. You can listen and subscribe via iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher, amazon, or wherever you get your podcasts.

My free email newsletter should return next week. COVID and some travel and other stuff just knocked me for a loop.

And now, the links…

Neurotribes.

Steve Silberman’s 2015 book Neurotribes: The Legacy of Autism and the Future of Neurodiversity is a history of autism, but one told through anecdotes of people with the neurodevelopmental condition or the scientists who studied it. It’s also an education, and an attempt to set the record straight that we are not, in fact, in the middle of an autism “epidemic,” but that the condition has always existed, even if doctors at those times didn’t realize what they were seeing.

Much of the history of autism is one of tragedy, as people with the condition were often treated as insane, or as imbeciles, and stuck in institutions or otherwise abandoned by their families. The condition was seen as incurable – meaning it was seen as something you’d want to try to cure – and that an autistic child was nothing more than an animal. This view persisted, at least in the west (there’s no discussion here of views of autism outside of the U.S. and Europe), until the early 20th century.

That’s when two researchers working independently* had their Newton/Leibniz moment, as both Leo Kanner, working in the U.S., and Hans Asperger, working in Vienna, both published key papers identifying autism as a condition with a specific, and in both cases narrow, set of symptoms. Asperger’s name has lived on beyond Kanner’s, but at the time, Vienna was under Nazi control, and Kanner’s work and views took precedence on the larger stage.

*I got a kind note from Steve Silberman via Twitter, saying: “The biggest historical scoop in NeuroTribes is that Kanner and Asperger were NOT working independently, but shared two assistants, Anni Weiss and Georg Frankl.”

If you know of Asperger, it’s through the now-deprecated “Asperger’s syndrome,” which has been subsumed into the larger diagnostic term autism spectrum disorder. One of the most enlightening parts of Neurotribes is Silberman’s explanation of that entire process, although its roots are horrifying: Because the Nazis were murdering any children held in institutions for health or mental reasons, Asperger’s work focused on the socially awkward prodigies he found. This spurred the still-extant stereotype of the autistic savant, which was further cemented in the public mind by the film Rain Man, the history of which Silberman details at great length and with significant empathy for everyone involved in the film.

Kanner viewed Asperger much as Newton viewed Leibniz, and we’re all quite a bit the worse for it, as the rivalry meant Kanner worked to “own” the definition of autism for some time. He claimed the disorder (a term still in use in the technical literature) only affected young children – if they were older, they had schizophrenia or something else – and that the cause was parental indifference. The idea of the “refrigerator mother” who failed to love her child enough, thus giving the kid autism, persisted for decades, at least into the 1980s. When that finally started to crumble, parents began looking for other explanations, landing on environmental toxins and, with the help of a fraudster named Andrew Wakefield, vaccines.

All the while, parents and researchers were looking for a cure, in no small part because Kanner’s definition of autism excluded all but the most serious cases. Some attempts were well-intentioned, while others were (and still are) quackery, and even dangerous. There’s still an institution in Massachusetts that uses shock therapy on autistic residents, despite no evidence that it works (and ample evidence that it’s torture). The FDA has had to issue warnings about so-called “miracle mineral solution,” which is bleach by another name, and which Youtube for one has banned but refuses to remove instructional videos about. (MMS does not cure autism, or anything else, but it can kill you.) Silberman gets into some of this, although I think the bleach stuff largely postdates his book.

It took some substantial efforts by later researchers and especially by activist parents to bring about changes. Those parents demanded changes in how the medical establishment viewed and treated their autistic children, and lobbied for changes in the definition of autism so that school districts would be forced to provide accommodations for autistic students who were previously left behind or even told that they had to attend school elsewhere. The passage of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in 1975 and again in 1990 as well as the Americans with Disabilities Act in 1990 allowed autistic children to stay in public schools and required the districts to provide them with individualized education programs (IEP) to determine what accommodations and modifications the child needs to succeed in school. It shouldn’t have been that hard, but Silberman makes it clear that Kanner’s narrow definition and the stranglehold he had on the definition of autism, helped by a small number of others who seemed to profit from their work with autistic kids, made this process far more difficult.

There’s far more to Neurotribes than just a history, however. Silberman discusses a few notable historical figures who almost certainly were autistic, including chemist and physicist Henry Cavendish, the discoverer of hydrogen; and Nikola Tesla, inventor of an overpriced electric car. (Hold on, I’m getting a note here that that isn’t correct.) Temple Grandin makes several appearances on these pages as well. There’s also a deep dive into the correlation between autistic people and sci-fi fandom, including Claude Degler, a key early figure in spreading the gospel of science fiction (until his views on eugenics caught up with him), and perhaps an autistic person himself. Silberman argues that sci-fi fandom was one of the first safe spaces for autistics, as personality “quirks” were less important than one’s passion for the subject – and perhaps because those quirks were more common among the fan base anyway.

There’s a wealth of information within Neurotribes, even though the book is now seven years old and it seems like the medical community knows even more about autism now than it did then. It’s a well-researched and well-argued work, one that encourages empathy for autistic people but not pity, and if anything gives more respect to Wakefield, the NVIC, and other cranks than they deserve, presenting the views of people who seek to find non-genetic causes for autism fairly before explaining that the evidence says they’re wrong. And Silberman makes it very clear that autism isn’t what history tells us it is, or even what many people probably still think it is, thanks to Rain Man or, worse, Music. It’s a deeply humanistic work of non-fiction, and that alone makes it worth a read.

Next up: Dr. Stephanie Cacioppo’s Wired for Love.

An Immense World.

Ed Yong won the Pulitzer Prize for Explanatory Writing last year for his articles in the Atlantic (not my employer) about the COVID-19 pandemic, which I called way back in May of 2020, over a year before the award announcement. I was already a fan of his work after reading his tremendous first book, I Contain Multitudes, a thoughtful, detailed look at the importance of the microbiome, and how so many of our actions and policies work against our own health because of our fear of bacteria. (He also described the experiment to infect male Aeges aegypti mosquitos with the Wolbachia bacterium, which makes the eggs that result from their mating activity fail to hatch. It has since been used to reduce mosquito populations in areas where dengue fever is endemic.)

Yong’s latest book, An Immense World: How Animal Senses Reveal the Hidden Realms Around Us, is a big departure from anything he’s written before, although he retains both his commitment to scientific accuracy and the sense of wonder that permeated his first book. This time around, he’s exploring an area I would guess most readers have never contemplated: How animals sense the world, often in ways that are beyond the reach of our senses, or even rely on senses that humans don’t have.

Yong begins with some discussion of the erroneous historical view, one that still persists today on a smaller scale, that non-human animals are less cognitively capable than we are, because we have evolved consciousness and they haven’t. It’s a view that fails on its face, as just about everyone who’s been around a dog knows that canines can hear sounds we can’t – hence the dog whistle, at least in its literal sense. It turns out, unsurprisingly, that there are examples across the animal world, and in some cases in other biological kingdoms as well, of senses more powerful than our five senses, and examples beyond those.

One of the best-known colloquial examples, although I would say probably not a well-understood one by laypeople, is echolocation in bats. Bats are nearly blind, but their powers of echolocation, using what we now call sonar to determine not just where objects are around them, but to find food and distinguish, say, something to eat from the leaf on which it’s sitting, involve a mental processing speed that is hard for us to comprehend. And it turns out humans are capable of echolocation as well, although evolution hasn’t advanced our skills in that area to the same extent because we haven’t needed it.

Yong also describes the handful of species that can sense the Earth’s magnetic field, a sense humans do not have at all, to find their way back to the beach where they were born, in the case of some turtles. There are animals and insects that can see parts of the infrared spectrum that we can’t, but there are also substantial portions of the animal kingdom that don’t see the world in the same colors we see – which is why waving a red cape in front of a bull is just a silly tradition, as bulls don’t have the red cones in their eyes to detect that color. Indeed, few animals see the world in the same colors that we do, which comes down to the fact that color isn’t something inherent in nature; it is how our eyes perceive vibrations of molecules in nature, because we have red, green, and blue cones in our retinas that send signals that our brains convert to color. (And some people, almost all women, have a fourth cone, making them “tetrachromats,” which Yong also discusses.) If you don’t have those cones, you see the world completely differently.

Yong ends with what is probably the most important part of An Immense World ­– an examination of how humans are screwing all of this up. You’re probably aware of how climate change and overdevelopment are already threatening habitats around the world. Light pollution threatens many species that rely on natural light sources to find food or shelter, or to migrate; noise pollution interferes with many species’ ability to communicate with each other, to find mates or identify predators. Humanity’s rapid rise in the last 200 years has been an unmitigated disaster for everything else on the planet, and Yong points to even more threats to biodiversity than those we already know about (e.g., those explained in The Sixth Extinction). There are also some examples of species adapting to these changes – birds that have learned to hang out near streetlights to eat the moths attracted to the illumination, for example – but they’re too few to make up for the losses. We have to be the ones to adapt, to live with less light, less noise, less everything, so that we don’t lose any more than we’ve already lost, especially not before we’ve learned more about it.

Also, Ed will be my guest this week on the Keith Law Show. The episode should be up on Tuesday, 9/20.

Next up: Steve Silberman’s Neurotribes: The Legacy of Autism and the Future of Neurodiversity.

Stick to baseball, 9/17/22.

My one new post this week for The Athletic is a scouting notebook looking at some Yankees and Red Sox prospects, including Jasson Dominguez, Yoendrys Gomez, and Cedanne Rafaela. I’ve had to push some things off, as I got sick on Tuesday and it turns out that my COVID number is finally up.

My guest on The Keith Law Show this week was Dr. Justin E.H. Smith, author of the book The Internet Is Not What You Think It Is: A History, A Philosophy, A Warning, which you can buy here on Bookshop.org. You can listen and subscribe via iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher, amazon, or wherever you get your podcasts.

My free email newsletter returned today after a long hiatus, describing my COVID experience so far and linking to a lot of the stuff I’ve written over the last few weeks.

And now, the links…

  • Hasidic private schools in New York City fail to provide even the most basic secular education to students, but have taken in $1 billion in taxpayer money, according to an extensive New York Times investigation. It would appear that various Mayors and Governors have declined to fully examine the issue for fear of alienating the Hasidic voting bloc.
  • Years of investigations by the Kansas City Star and other outlets appear to have resulted in the arrest this week of a former Kansas City, Kansas, detective who stands accused of raping two women, taking money from drug dealers, and framing innocent people. It’s unbelievable how long people were aware of what Roger Golubski was allegedly doing, yet he was able to continue to do it, and even retired from one department and got a job with another.
  • The co-chair of the Michigan state GOP referred to Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg as “a weak little girl.”
  • Fred Franzia, the winemaker behind the popular $2 wines known as Two Buck Chucks, died this week at 79.
  • An Iowa law on restitution for victims of violence means that a woman who, at age 15, killed the man who raped and trafficked her, owes his family $150,000. It is, literally, a law of unintended consequences. A GoFundMe for the woman has raised nearly three times that amount already.
  • Jennifer Rubin writes in the Washington Post that the Christian right is ignoring the biggest threat to their existence: Declining religiosity in younger generations. The younger you are, the less likely you are to identify as Christian, or as religious at all.
  • Noted liberal rag (checks notes) Bloomberg has an op ed arguing that the Texas judicial ruling that companies could decline to cover PrEP treatment for employees takes religious freedom too far.
  • Sagrada: Artisans, the legacy version of the great dice-drafting game Sagrada, is now on Kickstarter and already funded.
  • Age of Inventors, an economic/resource management game from a small Greek publisher, is also on Kickstarter and also funded this week.
  • Dune: War for Arrakis, an asymmetrical area-control game pitting the houses Atreides and Harkonnen against each other, is also on Kickstarter, and fully funded even with a higher goal. It seems like it’s designed primarily for two players, but with 3 or 4 the extra players control “sub-factions” loyal to one house or the other.

Power Failure.

Power Failure is a clever small-box game from Genius Games that rethemes a Taiwanese game called Power On!, taking some of the concepts of the great route-building game Power Grid while including a key message about climate change. Sometimes a game just hits you the right way; Power Failure has just so-so ratings on BGG, for example, and my daughter really didn’t care for it, but I think it’s both clever and fun. It’s great value at $17 or less, as on Amazon or Miniature Market.

Power Failure has two main conceits: You’re building an engine of power plants that you can fire once per turn, with each plant type requiring different fuel (in the form of cards); and building and firing plants usually involves adding carbon tokens to the shared tower in the middle of the table. When that tower falls, it ends the turn of the player who placed the last token on it, and everyone else has to discard a card from their hands, simulating the environmental cost of generating energy, especially through dirtier forms like coal and natural gas. At the end of your turn, you can “fire” all your plants of one type, and then use the total power you generated to claim a City card that represents the power demand of one city, which is the only way to gain victory points in the game.

Beyond the tower, this is a hand-management game – you get a hand of cards that include power plants, fuel cards for some of those plants, and special action cards. On every turn, you can take three total actions, which can include selecting a card from the common market, playing a card from your hand (building a plant or using a special action card), or firing up all of your plants of a single type. You can do the same action type twice, and in the first two or three rounds you’ll use all three actions to play or draw cards.

There are three main types of power plants in Power Failure, coal, natural gas, and nuclear; plus renewable energy plants that require no fuel and fire automatically on every turn. All power plant types require that you add one carbon token to the tower when you build them. Coal plants require one coal fuel card each to fire them, and you have to add three carbon tokens per plant when you do so. Natural gas plants require one natural gas card each, and you add two tokens per plant when you fire. Nuclear plants don’t add carbon tokens, but you need two separate cards for each plant you fire, one for fuel and one to represent the handling of the nuclear waste. Some renewable plants generate a variable amount of energy, from 0 to 2 units, based on the number showing on the top card on the deck, so you can’t build an entire energy strategy around them, but they can be enough to supplement your other energy sources to get you to a better city card.

Thus your goal is to build an engine of plants, likely concentrating on one type, that you can fuel and fire every other turn or so to try to fulfill a contract on a city card. The catch for coal and nuclear plants, which are cheaper to fire, is that they pollute. For every coal plant you fire, you must add three carbon tokens to the tower, and for every natural gas plant, you must add two. So you might build an engine with three coal plants, which would generate 18 power, enough to claim any contract in the game, but you have to add nine tokens to the tower, doing so one at a time. The tokens are hexagonal wooden pieces about a half-inch thick, and you can stack them flat or vertically, depending on how hard you want to make it for the next player. When the tower falls, your turn ends, you generate no power, and everyone discards a card, after which you reset the tower by starting out with three tokens and play resumes. There’s a little dexterity involved here, which does exclude certain people from playing, unfortunately. I do think the idea is clever because of the way it introduces variability into the mix – every form of power production pollutes at some level, but it’s hard to predict who will actually be the polluter to push the total over some threshold.

Games take 45-60 minutes, and I think it’s good for any age range that can handle the token placement part of the game. There’s some light text required, but it’s manageable for younger players. I also appreciate the color scheme, which is brighter and clearer than Power Grid’s fifty shades of grey. It’s a serious engine-builder at heart, though, with the dexterity element a small part of the game. You can play it mostly solo against other players, or you can play more competitively with a “take-that” strategy that swipes fuel cards your opponents might need. I think it’s a small gem of a game that deserves a wider audience than it’s gotten so far.

Paris: La Cite de Lumiere & Eiffel.

Paris: La Cité de Lumière is a short but involved two-player game from 2019, bringing polyominos, tile-laying, and a unique drafting mechanism into a tight 30-minute playing time. It received a major expansion late last year in Paris: Eiffel, which debuted at Gen Con 2021 but hit the mass market this year, bringing further scoring cards to allow players to change strategies – but it doesn’t address my core issue with the game, the way the drafting forces you to potentially stop selecting building tiles.

Each player begins the game with eight square cobblestone tiles, each of which is divided into four squares that can be blue, orange, or purple, or just show a streetlight. One player is blue and the other is orange, while purple squares can belong to either player; you can only place a building on squares of your color or grey. In phase one, you may either place one of your cobblestone tiles on the game board, which is actually set inside the bottom of the box, or take one of the polyomino-shaped building tiles from the supply – but once you’ve placed all 8 of your tiles, you can’t take another building.

Paris: La Cité de Lumière base game.

In phase two, players alternate placing the building tiles they’ve taken on to the board. There are also eight Action cards placed around the board/box in each game, out of a set of 12 possible cards in the base game, which you can use to gain additional points or sometimes violate some of the rules of the game; each player has four action tokens that they will use to claim those cards during this phase, and once used a card can’t be reused. At game-end, you score for each of your buildings that is adjacent to a streetlight, earning the product of the number of lights and the number of squares covered by that building; and for your largest contiguous group of buildings, one point per square. You also gain a point for each postcard you used that shows a stamp, and lose 3 points for each building you took but failed to place (surprisingly easy to do).

The postcards are a huge part of the game because they’re so powerful. One allows you to place a fountain tile on cobblestones of your color or the neutral color, and then you get 3 points for each of your buildings that touches it. Another gives you a giant streetlight that lights up buildings two squares away rather than just adjacent spaces. Another gives you a purple cobblestone to place on a square of your opponent’s color, after which you immediately place a building on it. The game comes with a recommended set of eight cards for your first game or two, leaving some of the cards with complicated scoring for experienced players, although I don’t think there’s that much of a gap.

Paris: Eiffel adds eight more action cards, mostly based on actual landmark buildings in the city, and add new ways to score along with 3-D cardboard buildings you might place on the board. You still use just eight cards in the game, but can now mix and match from 20 choices rather than 12. The Eiffel Tower card lets you place the tower on a 4×4 area that contains at least one streetlight, after which those lights double their point value for scoring, while you also get two points for squares of your player color under the tower. The Obelisk (found in the Place de la Concorde) gives each player two points for every building they place that falls in the same row or column as the obelisk sits. Notre Dame and the Catacombs let you piggyback on one of your opponents’ buildings for more points or to count it in your largest building group. Quartres Pauvières lets you score for the number of board edges your buildings touch – 1, 2, 4, or 8 points.

The soring is definitely point salad-y, although the cards mean that the players get to pick their own scoring methods to some extent, and I think that’s probably the game’s greatest strength. It’s a novel approach to the asymmetrical two-player game. The weird drafting mechanism at the start just sinks the game for me, unfortunately. People do really love this game, though – it’s highly rated on BGG, which skews towards more complex games, but also has sold well enough to merit an expansion. It just isn’t my cup of thé.