Man on Wire.

New post over on ESPN on Leonys Martin and a few other prospects, plus today’s Klawchat transcript and today’s Baseball Today podcast.

The documentary Man on Wire
won the Oscar for the best long-form documentary in 2008 and has the honor of being just one of two films with at least 100 reviews to hold a perfect critics’ rating on rottentomatoes.com, the other being Toy Story 2. The film uses the narrative style of one of my favorite genres in fiction, the heist or con story, to describe the event that captured national headlines and launched its protagonist into global stardom.

If you’re unfamiliar with the story, in 1974, French tightrope walker Philippe Petit and a few of his friends brought about a ton of equipment up to the unfinished roofs of the Twin Towers and strung a wire between them, after which Petit spent about 45 minutes walking, sitting, and lying down on that tightrope, about 450 meters above the ground, attracting a crowd of gawkers and, eventually, the authorities. (The film’s title comes from the police report on the incident, where the first three words under the heading “Complaint” are those of the title, written in capital letters.) It was an audacious, foolish, and incredibly wonderful achievement, and a beautiful memory of a time when those towers stood for something other than 9/11.

Petit’s history with the towers actually predates their construction; he relates first learning of the plans to build the towers and immediately realizing that conquering them was his life’s dream. Fortunately for us, he had a trove of archival footage, both still and video, which is incorporated into this documentary, which gives us a window into his preparations for the stunt, the relationships between members of the team, and the fact that fashion in the 1970s was awful even in France. (Men + overalls = regret.) The narrative jumps back to Petit’s first efforts as a tightrope walker, including his walks between the towers of Notre Dame and between two arches on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, before plunging into the long-planned caper in Manhattan, including how they got all that gear past security and how team members were nearly caught in both towers the evening before the walk.

The most impressive part of the movie for me wasn’t Petit’s exploits or the explanation of how his ragtag team managed to sneak all that equipment to the tops of the towers, but of the reactions of two of the NYPD officers on the scene. Both men, shown in interview clips from 1974, make it clear that they recognized right away that they weren’t just watching some criminal or mischief-maker, but were witnessing history, watching one man do something so amazing that people would still talk about it thirty-plus years later. To be able to remove oneself from the moment, and to subdue the natural indignation of the officer of the law towards one who would so flagrantly mock it, is a testament to both of these men and to the wonder that Petit’s endeavor inspired.

Although the effort ends in victory, as Petit completes his walk and ends up serving no jail time, the film ends with bittersweet notes due to Petit’s loss (or perhaps repudiation) of his devoted lover, Annie, and the apparent (and not well-explained) decline of his friendship with the one team member who stuck it out to the end. That friend, Jean-Louis Blondeau, breaks down in tears twice in the film’s final segments, but has had harsher words elsewhere for his former colleague, accusing Petit of fabricating various too-good-to-be-true anecdotes in the film. (Blondeau is professional photographer, and I imagine much of the archival footage was his.) The lover, the still-pretty Annie Allix, is gracious in accepting that Petit’s walk in the clouds altered his life forever, and perhaps realized through his betrayal of her that he would never be as committed to her as she was to him – or as he was to himself. Petit is charming, but beneath that charm lies a self-assured nature that might be megalomaniacal in other contexts, such as the sentiment that perhaps the towers were built specifically for him to climb and walk.

Man on Wire is exquisitely made and paced, never dragging, rarely wasting words or time (aside from the pointless “reenactment” of Petit’s post-walk “celebration” with a female admirer that looks more like an outtake from Benny Hill), giving everyone his or her say even while Petit is the star of the show. Most importantly, the directors allowed the event to speak for itself, rather than larding the film with opinions from people uninvolved in the preparation or execution of the walk. The images and Petit’s words will transport you to that foggy morning in August, 1974, but with the benefit of the backstory behind this amazing achievement.

Comments

  1. I remember as a kid going to the WTC w/my folks and various school trips. If the wind wasn’t too much they would let you onto the roof above the observation deck and you can see the world from up there.

    In one corner was a stick-figure drawing of a man on a tightrope w/a signature and the date. That’s how I learned about the man who walked across the towers.

    Thing is, if you looked from where the signature was, you could see where he walked. Your eye goes from right in front of you to across to the other tower and you’re just like “No F*****G Way.” That he was up there for 45 minutes in that wind is just ridiculous.

    The movie is an excellent look at an eccentric man w/a wild dream.

  2. Tom Haberstroh

    Watched this the other day. I didn’t expect to be gripped by a tight-rope tale, but this was a fascinating film throughout. I couldn’t believe all the archival footage that was included and I found the practicing scenes actually quite compelling. It took a while before I realized the clips weren’t re-enactments.

    Really enjoyed how the Twin Towers were a character in the doc without any allusion to 9/11. Since I wasn’t alive in the 70s, it’s hard for me to grasp how important the erection of those two buildings were to the world.

  3. There is an excellent novel by Colum McCann that centers around this day in NYC history called “Let the Great World Spin.” It is one of my favorite books of the last few years.

  4. +1 on the rec for “Let the great world spin”.

  5. Glad to hear you enjoyed the film, which has stuck with me, in my memory and imagination, more than almost any film I’ve seen in the last 2-3 years.

    May I nitpick, though, and point out that the film has a single director (James Marsh) as opposed to “directors” (plural)? Amongst passionate film people, such as myself, it is a significant distinction. Marsh is a really fascinating figure, and I’d also recommend his very fascinating, mysterious, and under-seen “The King.” Also, I know you’ve mentioned you don’t make it out to the cinema much, but a current release of his (also in the documentary category) is “Project Nim,” which I am eagerly awaiting–looks and sounds truly fascinating.

    Question to you, Keith: are you familiar with the work of Errol Morris? I enjoy reading your work quite a bit, and he strikes me as a filmmaker perfectly suited to you (or, at least, the impression I have of you as a reader). If you’re not familiar, the place to start is “The Thin Blue Line”; if you are familiar, I’d be curious to hear a brief response to him/some of his works you’ve seen.

  6. Another +1 for “Let the Great World Spin”. I read that for a class based on lit written after 9/11. Very good. I really enjoyed that documentary as well. Petit is such an arrogant Frenchman. I thought for sure he would surrender, like the French always do, but he did it!

  7. I was always intrigued by “Let the Great World Spin”, but never pulled the trigger on buying it or reading it. I think I will give it a shot.

  8. Wonderful review, Keith. I have been suggesting this movie to folks since catching it on Netflix last year — terrific storytelling.

  9. (Apparently I was very fascinated when posting earlier. Couldn’t find an edit button, but feel free to MadLibs in some adjectives on my behalf.)

  10. the reenactments were useful to fill the gaps in portraying narrative that would otherwise be very poor film. The movie is brilliant, and probably would have totally broken down without Philippe to lead us through the journey.

    http://meadowmuffinsofthemind.com/2011/05/22/man-on-wire/

  11. Keith, Loved your review. There is a children’s book about this that your daughter would probably love, mine certainly did.

    The Man Who Walked Between The Towers