I’ll be on ESPNEWS today at 3:40 pm EDT, and for anyone in Des Moines, I’ll be on KXNO tomorrow morning at 8:25 am CDT.
→ By
→ By
→ By
Organic, Inc.
Samuel Fromartz’ Organic, Inc. might be the most balanced nonfiction book on a contemporary subject I’ve ever read. Even though Fromartz is clearly a pro-organic partisan, he focuses the work on the food and the various personalities that helped turn organic food from tasteless hippie health food into the panoply of choices the organic-minded consumer has today.
Organic, Inc. is part history and part description of what “organic” really means, both today and what it meant in earlier eras. The history is interesting enough, as Fromartz discusses how natural farming methods were slowly and then quickly overtaken by more industrial production methods, from the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides to the loss of critical agricultural techniques like crop rotation, and then shifts gears to focus on the various organic-food advocates who, for health or culinary reasons, pushed back against the agro-industrial complex. While many of the characters Fromartz presents were – to my eyes, at least – certifiable kooks, some, like chef Alice Waters, who is responsible for introducing Americans to “spring mix” or mesclun salad, were just passionate about one specific aspect of organic food (in Waters’ case, taste) and matched it to a niche in the market that would allow them to sustain and even grow their food-related businesses.
Fromartz also provides two chapters that delve more into the way Big Bad Corporate America has gotten its grubby mitts on organic food. One chapter talks about soy milk, going into the history of White Wave, the company behind Silk that has since sold out to Dean Foods, which has introduced non-organic products under the Silk name. (I checked at Whole Foods yesterday; even chocolate Silk can’t call itself organic because the cocoa used in the drink isn’t organic.) The last chapter goes into the pitched battles, some still ongoing, between the hardcore organic community and the growth-oriented side seeking to ease labeling rules and guidelines for organic agriculture and husbandry. Fromartz builds the first six chapters to leave this conflict as somewhat inevitable, and manages to keep his own views out of the fray, although it would be hard to read that chapter and side with the “growth” crowd when you see what they would like to make acceptable under the label “organic.”
Fromartz’ prose was the one obstacle that was tough to surmount, however. His word choices are often awkward and occasionally wrong, referring to one veterinarian as “widely regarded” without saying how he was regarded or what he was regarded as. I also caught a handful of grammatical errors or funky word orders that made the subjects of sentences unclear. I also would have preferred to see inline citations; the book has a thick Notes section, with notes by page number, but the lack of inline citations creates a game where you guess that there might be a citation for what you just read and check the Notes section to see if there’s one there. Given the frequency with which he uses the “Some people say” device, inline citations are a must.
If you care about food, or the environment, Organic, Inc. is a solid and informative read. I know I’ll be looking for organic strawberries wherever possible, and will probably shift what little conventional dairy buying I do to organic as well, all the result of the information Fromartz gave in the book, rather than any rhetorical or polemical arguments I’ve read.
Next up: A return to the TIME 100 with Bernard Malamud’s The Assistant.
→ By
XM and chat today.
I’ll be on XM 175 with Jeff Erickson today at 12:05 pm EDT, and then will do a chat on ESPN.com at 1 pm EDT.
→ By
A Thousand Splendid Suns.
A Thousand Splendid Suns, Khaled Hosseini’s second novel, will inevitably be compared to his first novel, The Kite Runner, a runaway success (which I read last summer) and an announcement of a tremendous new voice who could straddle the chasm between popular fiction and contemporary literature. I’ve been told that A Thousand Splendid Suns is even better than Kite Runner, but I’m not sure I could say either work was superior. What Suns offers that Kite Runner didn’t was a more assured and complex narrative, evidence of Hosseini’s development as a writer and storyteller.
Suns is, in Hosseini’s words, the story of the women of Afghanistan. It focuses primarily on two: Mariam, the illegitimate daughter of a Herat businessman and one of his servants, who ends up orphaned and married off to a man forty years her senior; and Laila, a young girl raised in relative prosperity in Kabul whose life is altered by the civil war after the Soviets are expelled. Their lives end up intertwined through independent tragedies, and one of them will ultimately have to make the ultimate sacrifice to save the other.
The two women face hardship after hardship, both finding themselves victims of circumstance and of the men in the increasingly patriarchal world of Afghanistan as it moves from rule by Communists to warlords to the Taleban. Both of their lives end up dominated by Rasheed, Mariam’s husband, an older man who abuses both women, forcing them into an uncertain and eventually fulfilling partnership.
Hosseini makes it clear that he believes that Afghanistan can never rebuild without contributions from and involvement of its women; the book’s conclusion, more positive than that of Kite Runner in spite of all of the tragedies that have preceded it, punctuates this argument by tying several areas of rebuilding to the involvement of women. He also emphasizes the importance of living and loving in the moment; in a world where the future is so uncertain, allowing short-term anger and resentment to trump ties of blood and love is more than foolish, but can lead to a life of regret. Neither theme is all that deep or complex, but the stories he weaves around them are. Hosseini also continues to offer references or nods to works of classic literature, from the plot point borrowed from Tale of Two Cities to a soft allusion to the lovers’ separation in Jane Eyre, and I assume those are complemented by references to poetry and narratives from the Afghan literary tradition that are unknown to most Western readers.
Next up: I’m already halfway through a nonfiction book, Organic, Inc., a history of the natural-foods movement that will, at the very least, have me buying organic strawberries from now on.
→ By
Draft Day! And a love note.
It’s here! I’m about to go get changed for the draft show – 49 minutes away, on ESPN2 – but I had to pass this along. Someone calling himself “SG” came across my post on Giada’s awful carbonara recipe and decided to have his say:
You’re making fun of the size of her head? Who notices her head? I’m usually checking our her massive cans. And whoever said she was making authentic Italian? Not her. It’s called “Everyday Italian,” numbnuts, meaning that they are easy recipes that are variations on classic Italian dishes or ones that are simply inspired by ingredients and techniques found in Italian cooking. She was born in Italy to Italian parents you know. Many of her recipes are handed down from her mother.
She has received formal training and has worked as a professional chef in notable restaurants. What the hell have you done?
If what this guy says is true … then Giada’s mother was a lousy cook, too.
I couldn’t just approve this priceless comment and let it lay buried on a long-forgotten thread. Enjoy!
→ By
Chat & TV.
I’ll be chatting today at the Four-Letter at 2 pm. I’ll also be on TV to talk about the draft at 4:10 EDT on ESPNEWS, again in the 7 pm hour (Pregame) on ESPNEWS, and possibly on Baseball Tonight at 10 pm, although that last one isn’t confirmed. On Thursday, I’ll be on the Herd on ESPN Radio at 10:25 am PDT, and of course, the draft show is 2-6 pm on ESPN2.
→ By
TV today.
I’ll be on ESPNEWS in about an hour, 3:40 pm EDT, to talk Jay Bruce and the draft.
Also, I have a new article up on ESPN.com on the 2003 draft, and we have 70 reports up on the site that you can access through the top 75 rankings.
EDIT: Shame on me for not thanking Mike A. of River Ave. Blues and Jason C. of Prospect Insider for helping me choose the best and worst drafts of 2003. There were too many candidates for “worst” for me to do it without seeking some outside counsel. Jason commented that “I think 20 teams tie for 30th best – or first worst,” and the line I used in my column about the Dodgers “showing off” came from Mike.
→ By
Draft content.
My predraft content is starting to appear on ESPN.com today, so for those of you waiting for it, here are links to what’s up already. I’ll update this post as more content appears; there are reports on most of the top prospects coming, I assume later in the day.
Also, I’ll be on ESPNEWS today (Friday) from 4:10-4:30 pm EDT in the Insiders segment.
Updated top 75 prospects ranking
Overview article (As of right now, this is free to non-Insiders)
If you have questions related specifically to those articles, please ask them in the Conversations on ESPN.com rather than here.