James.

Percival Everett has been writing novels for over twenty years, but he’s having a moment right now: his 2001 novel Erasure was adapted into the film American Fiction, which won its screenwriter Cord Jefferson an Academy Award; and his latest novel, James, won the National Book Award and the Kirkus Prize for Fiction while making the Booker Prize shortlist. (It should have won that too, but lost to Samantha Harvey’s Orbital.) James retells the story of Jim, the escaped slave who accompanies Huckleberry Finn in Mark Twain’s novel, from Jim’s perspective, completely reimagining the character and most of the narrative, in a book that is far more of an adventure than the novel that inspired it while also giving its protagonist far more humanity than his creator ever did.

James narrates Everett’s novel, and does so in an erudite voice that, of course, has nothing to do with the slave dialect the character uses in Twain’s work. In this novel’s universe, slaves know how to speak as well as or better than their white tormentors, but they feign all manner of ignorance to make the whites feel better about themselves and thus try to improve their own odds of survival. The plot starts out on the same track as in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, with Huck faking his own death to escape his abusive father while James runs away to avoid being sold and separated from his wife Sadie and daughter Lizzie. (Twain mentioned Jim’s wife, but didn’t name her; Everett is following the convention of other writers who’ve used these characters.) The two flee upriver, with James seeing the corpse of Huck’s father but not telling the boy, Huck witnessing the murderous feud between the Grangerfords and the Shepherdsons, and the two encountering the con men who call themselves the King and the Duke and who eventually sell James to a local slave owner.

Everett fills in the blanks in Twain’s novel by following James rather than Huck, giving James’ dialogue with other slaves – all in proper English, generally more proper than what the white characters use – and his own inner monologue on his life and on philosophy. He’s visited in dreams by Locke and (I think) Rousseau, reads Voltaire and John Stuart Mill, and eventually gets a hold of a pencil at great cost so he can begin to write some of his thoughts on paper. James’s narrative diverges from the original when the King and Duke briefly leave him with a third man, who sells him to a traveling minstrel group, where James meets a man named Norman and escapes with him while looking for Huck, who’s still with the two bandits. This arc returns James to their home in the end, without an appearance from Tom Sawyer, and leads to a conclusion that is far more satisfying than Twain’s, if less realistic.

James, or Jim in Twain’s work, is just not a well-developed character in the original stories, even as Twain wrote him in a far more sympathetic manner than just about any of his contemporaries did when writing of slaves or even of Black people in general. Everett’s James is intelligent, sure, but the difference is that he is whole: he has fully-developed thoughts and ideas, values, a sense of justice, empathy for others, and a desire for even a little agency over his own life. It stands above nearly every other continuation or adaptation of a famous novel I’ve ever encountered, with the possible exception of Wide Sargasso Sea, Jean Rhys’s similar retelling of Jane Eyre from the perspective of the madwoman in the attic – but Everett’s novel is angrier and wittier and much better paced than Rhys’s.

Everett also mimics Twain’s use of the picaresque format both for its thrilling elements and its satirical ones, although here the satire is subtler than it is in some of Everett’s other works, like the absurdist Dr. No or the violent fantasy of The Trees, the other two of his novels I’ve read so far. James reads like Everett was trying to stay authentic to Twain’s work as much as possible until he veered away from the plot in the last third of his own novel – and it works, because of the familiarity of the original (one of the few novels I’ve read twice, and the only one I had to read in high school and in college) and because of how well-structured it was in the first place. Everett is brilliant and wildly imaginative, so his restraint here isn’t just impressive, but makes the whole work more powerful in the end. I have read very few works of great literature with this sort of haste, because the story and the character are so compelling I never wanted to put the book down.

Next up: Sarah Pinsker’s A Song for a New Day, winner of the 2020 Nebula Award for Best Novel.

Comments

  1. Keith, you should read more of his works. I’m sure I’ve been telling you that for years. I Am Not Sidney Poitier is so good and one of the funniest books I’ve ever read. I remember, years ago, stumbling onto Damned If I Do, a short story collection of his and thinking that I just uncovered a writer no one knew about. From there, I tried to hunt down as many of his books as I could.

    • At every bookstore I’ve hit in the last year, I’ve grabbed anything by him I’ve found. I got James from the library, just because I didn’t want to buy the hardcover version, but he’s on my list now of “buy everything they wrote” the way I did with Graham Greene and Evelyn Waugh.

  2. Before 2024, I had not heard of Percival Everett. I discovered him after watching American Fiction and realizing it was adapted from his novel Erasure. I then read four of his books in 2024. Trees is the best of the four I read.

    https://app.thestorygraph.com/reviews/1fb09aef-31bd-415f-915a-efc7360bcb5d

    https://app.thestorygraph.com/reviews/958adb3d-c6bb-429d-b024-f573bb8e2488

    https://app.thestorygraph.com/reviews/431585ac-5472-402f-b3f5-753788cdd3d1

    https://app.thestorygraph.com/reviews/8f26b502-eda0-41cc-b92b-d98c711296a4

    • I’ve read the first two of those. I still have yet to see Erasure in a bookstore, I assume because the movie made it too popular.

  3. Thank you for the review, Keith. I remember hearing a description of the book sometime back but it had fallen off my radar. It has been so long since Erasure has been checked out at my university library that it has been moved to remote storage. Of all of Everett’s books that we have, and we have quite a few, James is the only one that’s currently checked out. Bummer…

  4. Forgive my foolishness and dumb jokes, but are all his books named after 80’s English bands (Erasure, James)?

  5. I didn’t particularly enjoy Dr. No. It certainly sounds like James is a greater work in many respects; do you think that this book could still be enjoyed by someone who didn’t like the previous work?

    • Yes, I’ve found every one of the three novels of his that I’ve read to be wildly different in style and scope. Only the prose is similar.

Speak Your Mind

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.