I had two new posts for subscribers to the Athletic this week, my annual season predictions post and scouting notes on the Nationals’ Futures Game at Nats Park. I wanted to do a chat, but about 20 minutes before I was going to do it, our Internet went down for four hours. Good times.
Over at Paste, I reviewed Wyrmspan, the new standalone sequel/spinoff to Wingspan, adding a few rules changes to make it more complex while also replacing the birds with dragons.
I spoke to my friend Tim Grierson this week for RogerEbert.com about baseball movies, good, bad, and horrendous. I also appeared on WGN-TV to talk Cubs/White Sox.
I did indeed send around another issue of my free email newsletter, which you should definitely subscribe to if you enjoy my ramblings.
And now, the links…
- Longreads first: This Atlantic piece on the campus climate shift around the Israel-Hamas war by Stanford student Theo Baker, who wrote the story on former Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne’s role in faked research that led to his resignation, is one of the best things I’ve read this year. Baker takes a stance while maintaining balance throughout the piece, and this quote sums up the situation in Palo Alto and many other campuses that are caught between protecting freedom of expression and ensuring a safe environment for students: “The real story at Stanford is not about the malicious actors who endorse sexual assault and murder as forms of resistance, but about those who passively enable them because they believe their side can do no wrong.”
- New York looks at the toxic personal history of pop-neuroscientist Andrew Huberman, who seems to have a history of psychological manipulation of the women in his life.
- New York also has a story from John Herrman on how the pornbots all over Twitter actually try to scam users.
- The American Prospect’s Maureen Tkacik looks at how Boeing drove its best engineers out of the company, leading to the small problem of its planes falling apart or crashing. They had the help of the federal government, which has increasingly outsourced regulation of private companies to the companies themselves. It’s wrapped within the story of longtime Boeing employee turned whistleblower John Barnett, who was found dead recently of a gunshot wound to the temple – between days of his deposition in his case against Boeing.
- Washington, D.C., Attorney General Brian Schwalb has been investigating whether Leonard Leo’s nonprofits violated their tax status by paying his for-profit companies for various services. Republicans aligned with Leo, who helped Trump pack the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary with extreme conservatives, are now attacking Schwalb for doing his job.
- The same is happening to people trying to combat online disinformation around vaccines and COVID-19, as this Atlantic story on the mostly futile efforts to get state medical boards to sanction doctors who spread false information explains.
- Billionaire Republican donor Jeff Yass now owns a sizable share of Donald Trump’s Truth Social after it merged with a shell company in which Yass’s investment firm owned about 2%.
- Remember how a number of kids who caught COVID-19 pre-vaccines ended up near death with MIS-C, a major inflammatory reaction to the virus? Vaccination significantly reduces the risk that kids will get it.
- Long COVID is becoming less common thanks to the vaccines, but many people are still dealing with its long-term effects.
- Police in Raleigh, North Carolina, raided the wrong house in April 2021, confusing one Arab family with another in the same neighborhood. Now the cops are refusing to share bodycam footage in the family’s lawsuit, claiming it might “damage officers’ reputations.” Duh.
- Author Vernor Vinge, who won three Hugo Awards for Best Novel, died this week at 79. I didn’t love his writing, but he ranks among the best sci-fi authors for his ability to foresee the growth of technology and its rising role in the social order.
- Elon Musk tried to use the Center for Countering Digital Hate for reporting fairly on Twitter’s failure to police antisemitic content, and he lost the case in embarrassing fashion. This wasn’t the only bad news for Twitter, as the site has seen its user base collapse in the last six months.
- New research found increasing numbers of Americans leaving their religions and citing anti-LGBTQ+ policies and doctrines as well as the endless cycle of sex-abuse scandals in churches as the main reasons.
- A study published in JAMA says that Texas leads the U.S. in rapes and rape-related pregnancies in the wake of the overturning of Roe and that state’s mad rush to
control womenenact an abortion ban. - The wife of the judge in the mifepristone case now before the Supreme Court was herself paid by the anti-abortion group suing to subvert the FDA’s authority.
- New Hampshire Public Radio spoke to a 15-year-old trans girl in New Hampshire whose ability to play soccer is now under attack, as House Republicans in the Live Free or Die state just passed a bill to ban trans girls from playing middle or high school sports. These bills & laws “solve” a problem that doesn’t exist while ruining the lives of a very small number of vulnerable children.
- The Republican assault on higher education continues in red states across the south and west: Tennessee Republicans wiped out the HBCU Tennessee State’s board so the Governor can stock it with his appointees, over the objections of Black legislators. South Carolina Republicans passed a ban on DEI initiatives at public universities. The University of Kentucky’s President is moving to dissolve the faculty senate and move its policy-making power to the Board of Trustees. Meanwhile, the NAACP’s CEO Derrick Johnson is urging Black student-athletes to reconsider their college choices in the face of these attacks on higher ed, explicitly targeting Florida schools in a statement earlier this month.
- Tabletopper Games has a crowdfunding effort for a new semi-cooperative game, Under Our Sun, with an interesting world-building theme.
That Stanford essay is very good, and I often wonder how I would do in a college environment these days. Coming to either side here, quickly, has the result that a person can at least find shares community. Whereas taking time to listen and learn from multiple perspectives can leave a person very alone.
Surprised to see your approval of the Atlantic article. There’s a lot to critique IMO, from the meta-critique of how it repeats the same arguments of the dozens/hundreds of articles tsk-tsking college activists to its almost complete lack of an analysis of the power dynamics of domestic I/P advocacy, but I think the most interesting/telling part is this:
“The attack was as clear a litmus test as one could imagine for the Middle East conflict. Hamas insurgents raided homes and a music festival with the goal of slaughtering as many civilians as possible. Some victims were raped and mutilated, several independent investigations found. Hundreds of hostages were taken into Gaza and many have been tortured.
This, of course, was bad. Saying this was bad does not negate or marginalize the abuses and suffering Palestinians have experienced in Gaza and elsewhere. Everyone, of every ideology, should be able to say that this was bad. But much of this campus failed that simple test.”
This section does a couple particularly dishonest things. First, it centers claims of atrocities committed by Palestinians above all other moral concerns. Even if we were approaching this from some impossibly neutral viewpoint, those atrocities have been eclipsed by orders of magnitude by Israeli actions both before and after 10/7, making it very odd to to not at the very least mention those in the same breath. Second, it treats some highly dubious claims as fact (see here for one counter: https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7/), and then interprets contention on this factual matter as instead a matter of moral failing.
Thanks for this comment; I’m with you and was similarly surprised.
Relatedly, it’s sad to see what’s become of the Atlantic.
I’m at the UT-Georgia game so I can’t reply in full, but I took something very different from the article. Not that your interpretation is wrong in any way – I just saw it differently.
Agreed. I resent that the author is a teenage nepo baby condescendingly lecturing people that they’re not as intellectually curious or nuanced as him.
As a work of student journalism, it’s really good on-the-ground reporting — well-sourced and including a range of perspectives, although it could have used an editor to quell the young writer’s worst impulses (as when he undercuts the Palestinian protestor by tagging her protest outburst to her subsequent words out of context to highlight what he regards as her self-congratulation). Revealing one’s political leanings is not the affront to journalism that it once was — readers want it, they just get upset when unexpectedly confronted with what they suss out as an opposing view. As a piece elevated to being published to a professional general interest mag, though, it needed to have been done with more care. Is he nepo? I mean, that likely does explain why we’re seeing it.
@ML @sansho1 I think your comments show why this specific piece is so illustrative of the practice of corporate media. That the author did real, adversarial *journalism* in the past then grants him access to do what is functionally *punditry* that does not challenge existing power structures. But at the same time, that familial background/privilege/etc is often effectively required to get yourself in a position to do *journalism* on such a stage is perhaps exactly why the resulting *punditry* affirms the status quo. Either way, its a profound demonstration of what the structural barriers of modern media will and will not allow.
I’m interested to hear more about Keith’s reading of the article, which seems similar to mine except that I’m actually having a hard time picking out the thesis beyond the challenges of communication on college campuses, and that no one – not teachers, not administrators – seems to have any idea of how to address those challenges.
Agreeing with Mike and Malcolm’s surprise at praise for the Atlantic article.
I’m less surprised to see The Atlantic publish it, though. It’s run by someone who left college in the US to voluntarily enlist in the IDF to be a prison guard in conditions that Human Rights Watch reported violated Geneva conventions, among their other awful treatment of their Palestinian prisoners:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Goldberg#Early_life_and_education
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ktzi%27ot_Prison#Conditions_in_1991
Agreed. Didn’t mention this in my OP bc I wanted my critique of the piece to stand on its own, but it’s pretty important to approach anything from The Atlantic on this matter with, at the very least, a healthy dose of skepticism.
“Elon Musk tried to use the Center for Countering Digital Hate ”
I assume that was intended to be written “sue” not “use”.
Honestly, feels like that could go either way.