Stick to baseball, 7/17/21.

All of my draft coverage is now up for subscribers to The Athletic, including my team-by-team draft recaps, posted by division:
AL East
AL Central
AL West
NL East
NL Central
NL West

I also recapped the Futures Game with notes on prospects who stood out or who I saw for the first time. I held a Klawchat on Friday.

And now, the links…

  • Longreads first: A new preprint on the origins of SARS-CoV-2 states that “there is substantial body of scientific evidence supporting a zoonotic origin for SARS-CoV-2” and “there is currently no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has a laboratory origin.” This failed hypothesis isn’t just the province of the right-wing; the anti-GMO movement has also latched on to it.
  • A conservative activist invented the nontroversy over critical race theory. If someone tells you CRT is bad, just ask them to name an author who’s written about it, or a book on the subject. Like this Alabama columnist did to a state lawmaker.
  • This ran a few weeks ago, during my hiatus from these posts, but former sportswriter Kat O’Brien detailed how she was raped by a major league ballplayer while she was on the Rangers beat.
  • Influencers who peddle anti-vaccine misinformation are raking in cash from their efforts. It’s almost entirely a grift, with a societal cost measured in bodies.
  • The Delta variant’s threat explained in three simple points by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Ed Yong.
  • The “mystery Chinese seeds” that made the rounds of the news last summer? Probably just a brushing scam.
  • Why don’t we have a vaccine against Lyme disease? It’s complicated. Anti-vaxxers, a dubious claim about side effects, and the regional nature of the disease all contributed.
  • A nurse in Louisiana who posted anti-vaccine views and misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines has, in fact, died of COVID-19.
  • Poynter spoke to Walter Hussman, the conservative megadonor to UNC who led the school to deny Nikole Hannah-Jones tenure and ultimately cost them her services. He doesn’t think he did anything wrong, but also disputes some of the story that’s been publicly reported.
  • MEL magazine is coming back.
  • A power plant in upstate New York is primarily powering a bitcoin mining operation, warming Seneca Lake and polluting the air (as well as contributing to climate change). I’m not sure what the solution is – taxing bitcoin is the most rational economic move, but tricky because of its nature – but cryptocurrencies are an environmental threat that demands some sort of government action.
  • Why did three people in different states contract the often-fatal tropical bacterial disease melioidosis?
  • The state of Alabama took a man’s gun after he shot his wife. Nine months later, they gave it back to him, despite a protection order, and he used it to kill her. I’m sure the fact that he was a cop had nothing to do with this.
  • Men read far fewer books by women than women do. This has real-world implications for the way readers’ minds work.

Comments

  1. Brian in ahwatukee

    I mean, the biden admin and World health Org is saying the lab leak is a possibility. I don’t pretend to have an opinion on this but I think it’s a problem. What’s allowed with masks and gatherings seems to change depending on the breeze blowing. We are told to trust the science but it sure seems like the science is constantly changing.

    It’s not hard to see why people distrust government direction here. *note: I’m a moderna man myself.

    • The “science” doesn’t change. We are constantly learning more things because of science.

  2. Cano for Kelenic

    Natural source doesn’t rule out a lab leak. Not sure why Keith is talking down to that theory

    *pfizer gang

  3. I would gladly pay $1,000 for a Lyme vaccine. C’mon Glaxo, take my money.

  4. Keith, did you not finish the story about the Chinese seeds? The real reason in most of the cases they could investigate wasn’t a scam or anything nefarious at all.

    • You’re right, I thought I had reached the end of the story because of the ads that appeared, but now I look back and I didn’t finish it. I apologize for that mistake.

  5. Hi Keith – I wanted to share what I thought was a well informed rebuttal to the Seneca Lake article you posted. There’s also a companion article at the bottom of the thread. Bitcoin’s environmental impact is often misunderstood or overstated. I know you’ve expressed some concerns over cryptocurrencies in the past (and for certain currencies that’s well justified), however I do think there’s a lot of good that comes form certain currencies existing. Even more so the underlying technology that is just starting to be explored and developed for things like decentralized finance. I’m happy to answer any questions or concerns you have on the topic of cryptos.

    The thread I mentioned: https://twitter.com/level39/status/1412624791052472324?s=21

    • That thread really misses the point: That energy should be used for literally any other purpose than mining some sort of ponzi currency. If it’s carbon-neutral, great! Use it to power homes, not fund this pyramid scheme.

    • It sounds like we have a disagreement on the fundamental value and use of it then. As I mentioned in my first message, I’d be happy to elaborate on what I see as good uses that are a value add to our society if you are interested and open to hearing opinions contrary to your own. Based on those I believe the energy used is more than reasonable for what it will provide over time (but of course should be renewable/carbon neutral to the very greatest extent possible). Either way I enjoy your work, thanks for putting it out regularly. (And for the record I do not own anything other than an insubstantial “rounding error” amount of cryptocurrency due to other financial restraints. So my belief is not rooted in a financial interest in cryptos sticking around)

  6. The article is from last week, but I thought was very interesting. ProPublica has been publishing all the tax breaks the very wealthy get for the last month or so. This focused this one on deductions and amortization sports teams owners can legally utilize. Food for thought given the “biblical loses” teams had last year, and the upcoming labor negotiations in MLB.

    https://www.propublica.org/article/the-billionaire-playbook-how-sports-owners-use-their-teams-to-avoid-millions-in-taxes

  7. One issue I have with the anti-CRT is not only they do not know what they’re arguing against, it’s also borderline impossible to teach US history (particularly Post WW2) without using a racial lens. Teaching about the economic boom in the 50’s and rise of the middle class without mentioning red-lining or how African-Americans weren’t able to use the GI Bill as easily as white people is an incomplete telling of history. Plus it gives you very little context about many of the civil rights protests in the north and south in this country. Imagine trying to teach the causes of the Civil War without mentioning slavery. Those are classic cases of where you’d almost be required to use a racial lens. Not doing so would dishonest hackery.