TV (The Book).

I’ve never met Alan Sepinwall but I certainly feel like I know him, having read his TV recaps and reviews for years now and watched many of his “Ask Alan” videos, so I thought I had a pretty good idea of what would be in his TV (The Book): Two Experts Pick the Greatest American Shows of All Time, which he wrote with fellow critic Matt Zoller Seitz. I was right in that I had a sense of what shows would come in for particular praise in their ranking of the medium’s 100 greatest shows, but I think I underestimated the depth this book provides on so many titles, with tremendous essays on shows’ merits, flaws, influence, and cultural legacy. It’s so good that I could even get caught up in summaries of shows I’d never heard of before – a Novel 100 for scripted, fictional TV programs.

SepinSeitz set some ground rules down before delving into their list, and I’ll repeat them here because, as you know, no one ever reads the intro (or, in this case, The Explanation). The list is limited to U.S. shows only – so no Fawlty Towers or Upstairs, Downstairs – and to narrative fiction, eliminating anything like sketch comedy. They eliminated most shows that are still airing, with a few exceptions for shows with large bodies of work already in the can, and included shows that only aired for one season but penalized them in their scoring system. That system weighs a lot of critical considerations like influence, innovation, and consistency along with what you might consider the show’s contemporary entertainment value. It works in the end, however, as the list they’ve produced is going to start a lot of arguments but at least puts all of these shows in the right buckets to get those debates going.

Since I watch very little TV now, I’m totally unqualified to question anything these guys wrote about shows from the last 15 years or so; I’ve got a few disagreements with shows from earlier in TV history, but by and large I read this book as someone just generally interested in what I missed that was worth seeing. My favorite U.S. show of all time, The Wire, makes their top 5, and several other favorites of mine, including Arrested Development, Parks and Recreation, and Homicide: Life on the Street, all appear in their top 50. They break the list down into chunks – the top ten are “The Inner Circle,” the next forty are “No-Doubt-About-It Classics,” followed by twenty-five “Groundbreakers and Workhorses” and twenty-five “Outlier Classics” – that provide some structure to the list, although I didn’t think the labels were necessary given the depth of the essays on each program. Sure, Police Squad! was a groundbreaker, and Law & Order was a workhorse, but the review for each makes that clear. (SepinSeitz’ ranking of all seventeen L&O cast combinations is a highlight of the book, although I think I disagree with them on “Invaders,” the episode where Borgia is killed, one of the most harrowing of the series.)

Some other scattered observations on the essays and rankings:

• The essay on The Cosby Show is one of the book’s absolute highlights; the authors co-wrote it (many are credited to AS or MZS specifically), and cover everything, including the sheer impossibility of watching the show today given what we know now about the star. It was, however, a cultural milestone in its era, a highly-rated, critically-acclaimed show that anchored NBC’s Thursday night programming for years, and put an African-American family into TV territory that previously had been reserved for white characters. We’d seen upper-middle-class white families on TV that encountered modern problems, but if there were characters of color, they were the neighbors, or one of the kids’ best friends, never at the center of the show. For adults of a certain age today, The Cosby Show contributed to our understanding that there shouldn’t be any differences between families just because of skin color. Unfortunately, Bill Cosby the rapist has destroyed his legacy as a comedian and a silently progressive TV star, and the authors don’t shy away from that problem.

• My one disagreement with the authors here – and with Michael Schur, who knows a thing or two about sitcoms – is the placement of Cheers in their top five. I did watch Cheers pretty regularly for the first half of its run, and somewhere post-Diane, the show turned into a shell of itself, replete with repetitive one-liners, overreliant on lowbrow humor, populated with characters who became parodies of their former selves. (Friends did the same thing after the ‘big’ Ross and Rachel breakup, turning Ross from slightly nerdy but socially functional to awkwardly, annoyingly nerdy and “how is he even friends with these other people?”) I found the show’s last few years cringeworthy enough that I gradually stopped watching, and only returned for the finale and the cast’s drunken appearance on The Tonight Show. They never recaptured what made them a hit – few comedies can sustain anything that long anyway, but I couldn’t put Cheers in the Inner Circle given what it became.

• I was thrilled to see the one Miami Vice episode I remember clearly from when it first aired, “Out Where the Buses Don’t Run,” earn a mention in that show’s writeup. It was stylish, ’80s noir, and I have often felt like I’ve seen its influence pop up in other, lesser cop shows since. (Including, weirdly enough, a Diagnosis Murder episode with Perry King.)

• Shows I was thrilled to see ranked and to earn writeups: Police Squad!, WKRP in Cincinnati, NewsRadio, Moonlighting, Firefly.

• Shows I either didn’t know, or knew but hadn’t considered watching, but will add to my list of shows I would like to watch but might never get to: In Treatment, Terriers, K Street. I’d add Frank’s Place, but it seems unlikely to ever appear due to music licensing issues.

SepinSeitz don’t stop after ranking 100 shows, however, with multiple sections after that to keep you reading and well-informed on the state of TV. There’s a long section of shows currently airing that they recommend and cite as possible entrants to a future re-ranking of the top 100 (or they could do what Daniel Burt did when he updated The Novel 100, extending the ranking to 125 titles). There’s “A Certain Regard,” citing shows that had one great season (Homeland) or did something particularly notable (Little House on the Prairie). They also rank mini-series, which ends up an amusing mixture of big-budget network event programming from the late 1970s (Roots, of course, is #1) and 1980s with HBO mini-series from the current era, and TV movies and even TV airings of plays, the latter two lists by Zoller Seitz.

I could absolutely see someone using TV (The Book) as a viewing guide – maybe not starting at 1 and working your way down, but certainly picking and choosing shows to binge-watch from their rankings and breakdowns. I doubt I’ll ever have that kind of time, but as someone who likes great television and loathes the rest, I just loved the ebullient writing, the joyful praise of shows that entertained and sometimes astounded these two guys who can’t seem to get enough TV.

Next up: I’m slogging through The Collected Stories of Jean Stafford, winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction in 1970.

Comments

  1. Where was Seinfeld ranked? And what were your thoughts on the show Keith? Thanks

    • It’s in their top ten. I thought the first four years were groundbreaking, and then the show became less consistent and more misanthropic, especially post-Susan. I don’t have the same reverence for it that most people do.

  2. Did the late seventies show Quark make the top 100? I’m guessing it was probably 101.

  3. Before Cosby the rapist came out, I tried re-watching the Cosby Show in syndication in college (late 90’s). For the most part, it didn’t seem to hold up then except for a couple of good episodes (especially the one where Theo wanted to live in the “real world”.) Other than those, they weren’t as good as they were for my first viewing.

    I thought Cheers lost a lot after Coach’s passing. He brought a warmth that was needed on that show. Woody could never replicate it. Whenever someone brings up Albania, I always sing his song about it bordering on the Adriatic. I never did get into Friends.

    Great to see Police Squad! (In Color) and Newsradio make the list!

    • I always thought Woody was a dunce, while Coach was just a bit confused. It’s a subtle difference that played out in unsubtle ways.

  4. you know a show is out of ideas when it has characters just keep doing the thing that they’re known for over and over.
    in the case of Friends: Monica’s clean, Joey eats, Ross is a nerd, etc.
    Cheers too: Norm drinks beer, Cliff is weird, Carla’s mean, Sam’s horny.
    rinse, repeat.

    • Exactly. I talked to Alan over Twitter DM about Will and Grace, which I thought might make the top 100 due to its significant cultural impact (first show built largely around gay characters) and because the first two seasons were quite good. Alan pointed out that it suffered the problem you mentioned, and hit that mark early. He’s right, of course, because he’s Alan.

  5. I shall be interested to read what they have to say about Star Trek and M*A*S*H, both of which I assume made the cut.

  6. Since they allowed one-season shows, did the two-season show Pushing Daisies make the cut?

    • No mention of it (or Quark). We loved Pushing Daisies but I wonder if the way it struggled to keep its premise going would have sunk it.

  7. We thought the same thing, although there were a good number of side-stories that they could have pursued. The aesthetics, dialogue, and cast alone can keep us loving it for another season or two but, I mean, how many murders can there be that require a P.I. in that town?

  8. Any discussion on Freaks & Geeks? IMO, best all time one season wonder TV show.

  9. 100 pages in and agree with the review so far. Although I have found it hard to enjoy sections on TV shows that I not only never watched but are so far outside my generation that they had no cultural relevance to me, e.g. “I Love Lucy.”

    • If I may be so bold, I wonder if the issue is not so much culture as it is gender. I operate under the assumption, here, that you are male.

      The reason that I say this is that I, also of the masculine persuasion, don’t really connect with that show either. However, many of my female students (who are 20 years younger than I) do. I have a paper assignment in which students select a TV show and do an analysis of how the show reflects its historical milieu. The most popular choices for that topic (out of about 50 options) are Modern Family, The Simpsons, Star Trek, and I Love Lucy. Fully 95% of the students who choose Lucy are female. At this point, I’ve probably gotten 500 Lucy papers over the last 10 years.

      By way of contrast, I’ve probably had five Seinfeld papers, a dozen M*A*S*H papers, and maybe two All in the Family papers. My theory is that successful shows follow one of two models. The first is that they utterly capture the zeitgeist of their era, as Seinfeld, et al. did. The second is they speak very effectively, Shakespearean-style, to certain universal human struggles. I would put Lucy in this group, as well as many Westerns, Star Trek, etc.

    • Yes, I’m a male (30 years old FWIW). That is an interesting theory, and I don’t know enough to agree or disagree with it.

      I guess the point I was making is more that: I Love Lucy is so old that my parents’ generation didn’t really grow up with it either. And because of that, it wasn’t accessible via reruns in the 90s, during my formative years (while All in the Family, Jeffersons, other major 70s and 80s shows were available). So I did watch those shows on occasion, and so they hold some cultural relevance to me.

      On the other hand, I don’t recall anyone of my friends or acquaintances, males or females, ever referencing the I Love Lucy or mentioning that they watch it.

      So I (and probably my friends) never had any opportunity to seek it out.

  10. Regarding your point on shows turning into parodies of themselves. I doubt it’s on the list, but I found the same true of “Night Court”. The first year or two everyone was semi-competent; after that, Harry (Anderson) was a hopeless socially inept nerd, Dan (John Larroquette) was a sleazy womanizer, etc. MASH is one of the only ones I can think of that went in the other direction — the main characters grew, and (post-Major Burns) the “bad” guys became more nuanced.

    I may need to get this one. Thanks as ever for the review!

    • I think you’re not being fair to Night Court, since it was meant to be a farce. In a farce, of course, characters get more and more farcical, not more and more developed/nuanced.

    • Either Night Court got really repetitive, or I outgrew the low humor. And there was a shit-ton of low humor on that show (pun, of sorts, intended).

  11. I’ve gone through maybe 15 of the entries thus far and am looking forward to finding a show I can dig into. I mostly enjoyed their jockeying about HOW to decide what constitutes the best show and how we answer that kind of question.

    It sort of made me look at the Simpson’s a different way – which have to admit is groundbreaking in it’s comedic variance and originality. However, I have a hard time comparing a show that can break the frame of reality and do many more surreal things than a show like the Wire or the Sopranos that cannot explore themes outside of our basic world. I also think you have to discount a TV show that stays on the carousel for too long and has become much less culturally relevant. I think that hurts a show – just like Albert’s case as an inner circle HOF’r. Steep declines tarnish reputations. Thanks for the review!

  12. Please put Terriers at the top of your to watch list – a truly great one season show that most people missed the first time around due to the terrible title. This is a strange comparison but I was reminded of Firefly when I watched it – wasn’t sure of the concept before watching but was constantly surprised by the humor and choices that the creators made.

    • I second that, Terriers was so good. A real shame they only got to make one season of it.

    • Read the Directions

      I third that. Terriers is a really quiet piece of brilliant storytelling, and I get the feeling the show’s creators surprised even themselves with its depth. I would’ve loved finding out where those storylines and characters went in a second season.

  13. I just rushed in to suggest you put Terriers at the top of your list, but a few others beat me to it. It really is worth your time and at only 13 episodes (IIRC), it’s not an overwhelming effort. It’s so good!

  14. Larry I in L.A.

    “Out Where The Buses Don’t Run”, yes! A tour de force for guest star Bruce McGill that is to the rest of Miami Vice what Darin Erstad’s 2000 season was to the rest of his MLB career.

  15. Yes to Terriers.

  16. Were you ever a fan of Roseanne?