Margin Call.

Margin Call jumped on my radar when the late, lamented Yahoo! blog The Projector gave it a glowing review back in October, and then named it their must-see movie of the week a fortnight afterwards. Featuring an absurdly deep cast, the film follows an investment bank or hedge fund heavily exposed to CMOs during a 24-hour period right at the start of the U.S. housing market meltdown. It features no violence, no sex, no weapons drawn, no manufactured drama, and is entirely gripping from the moment a junior analyst (played by Zachary Quinto, whose production firm financed the film) discovers that his employer is, in effect, bankrupt.

Quinto plays Peter Sullivan, a former engineering student turned financial analyst whose boss, Eric Dale (Stanley Tucci), is fired in the opening scenes after 17 years at the company. Dale hands Sullivan a flash drive with an unfinished spreadsheet on it that he indicates is important – and it is, as Sullivan discovers, dragging his new boss Will Emerson (Paul Bettany) back into the office at 10 pm to point out that the firm’s portfolio has it on the verge of collapse. Emerson goes to his boss, the depressed, disgruntled Sam Rogers (Kevin Spacey), who takes it to his boss, the amoral Jared Cohen (Simon Baker), who eventually calls in the head of the firm, played by Jeremy Irons (I told you the cast was strong) as if this was an updated work of Shakespeare and he is both the play’s central figure and its empty conscience.

Margin Call‘s central energy source is that one bit of knowledge – that the market is close to a panic, and such a drop in the housing market would drive this unnamed firm out of business – which it uses to power all of its characters, allowing us to sit back and watch their reactions. There’s no gotcha moment, no twist of a bit of unknown information revealed in the final scene to change the film’s direction; most of the movie takes place overnight, when U.S. markets are closed and thus can’t move. This movie is about the reactions of professionals with widely varying backgrounds, loyalties, and years of experience in the industry, and how they move in response to the news that the empire they built is crumbling, and that saving it will hurt others, and could even cause a wider financial panic. It’s not quite a character study, as we don’t stay with any one character long enough to give him/her sufficient depth, but a characters study, almost like witnessing a sociological experiment.

It felt to me far more like a great play than a typical movie – or perhaps more like a British film than an American one, with an emphasis on dialogue and interactions to move the story forward rather than exogenous events inserted by the writer(s). Irons’ arguments with Spacey, who seems to be growing a conscience or merely working harder to suppress it, Bettany’s conversation with the seemingly-principled Tucci, and Quinto’s vaguely comic-relief chatter with a younger colleague played by Penn Badgley had me hanging on their words, not just for their import to the story but to how they were structured and delivered. There is, of course, a message about greed, and the disconnect such traders felt with the owners of the mortgages they swapped and sold without regard to the effects on those ‘regular’ people; I also thought the dog symbolized the soul or conscience of its owner (saying more would spoil it). But I was far more wrapped up in the intensity of the conversations, the emotional reactions to the news coming down the wire, and the way characters rationalized their actions to themselves than I was in the larger themes the film might have wanted to express. It had slow moments, including a long ramp-up to the handoff of the flash drive that kicks off the main plot, and some less effective subplots (including Demi Moore, delivering little in an empty role other than appearing in the hackneyed “sitting sideways on window bench overlooking Manhattan” shot), but as a fan of simple, cerebral dramas, I found more than enough strengths to overcome some slight choppiness of the script.

Comments

  1. This review will now lead to my renting this via Redbox. I was intrigued when I saw it a few weeks ago, but ultimately didn’t pull the trigger because my wife generally won’t watch “R” rated movies.

    Since it doesn’t feature any sex or violence, my guess is it drew its rating based on some choice language. Is it overly vulgar?

  2. It was my understanding that the firm in the film was based on Lehmann Brothers, which was an enormous investment bank, and not a hedge fund.

    I agree that it felt a lot like a stage play, probably because it was so dialogue-driven. Apart from the scenes outside Tucci’s brownstone, and the couple of scenes of Bettany and the junior analyst in the car, it took place entirely in the firm’s offices. Maybe that’s how they saved enough money to afford Demi Moore. /snark

  3. I know Lehmann was an I-bank, but this firm isn’t Lehmann, just based on what happened to Lehmann (and a hedge fund or two). I don’t think the firm’s actual business model was ever identified, but it was also incidental to the plot. What matters is the extent of their exposure.

    There’s a lot of foul language, but I wasn’t bothered by it.

  4. It has been a couple of months since I saw it but my sense was it was sort of a hybrid that explained not just Lehman but also American Insurance Group. And I totally agree with KLAW that it felt like a play … I know it was not a Mamet effort but it had some Glengary in it. Anyways, I thought Bettany and Spacey were great and I loved the movie.

    (The reason I say AIG is the movie depicted a situation where the house prop trading account was blown apart and really what felled Lehman was something entirely different.)

  5. Edit: American International Group

  6. I saw Margin Call at Sundance last January and liked it, but wasn’t blown away. I had trouble getting into because I wasn’t rooting for any of the characters, you just kind of want them all to get boned.
    I did learn in the Q&A that the filmmakers leased an entire floor of a NYC highrise to shoot the movie. They used about half for filming and the other half for all the backstage stuff. There are only a couple of scenes in the movie that were shot outside.
    ‘The Guard’ was my stand out film from last year’s Sundance BTW.

  7. Just watched it last night (on demand through my cable) – the story is definitely an investment bank, as their business model is shoehorned in: there’s a part where Sullivan is explaining his model to Emerson and discusses that they are holding the mortgages and other CLOs on their books until they can repackage and sell them off to other investors (the implication being hedge funds, sovereign wealth funds, foreign governments, etc.) – the risk is how the market is moving with the loans still on the books and the mark-to-market requirement for the bank creating a loss that would be greater than the entire market capitalization of the firm (meaning they’re a publicly traded company). While I don’t think this is about Lehman specifically, I felt it was more about the “proverbial investment bank”, in the same way that Wall Street 2 changes the names of many of the banks (this does a much better job detailing how an I-bank really works).

    I enjoyed your review Keith – pointed out a few metaphorical items I wasn’t tracking, as well. While I watched this because I’m interested in the financial markets/banking world, I found it to be a great story, if you can keep up with the jargon. I also appreciated how the film kept raising the question of ethics in the financial industry without bashing us over the head with the “answer.” Their are hints, but there doesn’t seem to be a “pure evil,” despite how cruel Jeremy Irons can come across at some points.

  8. Edited the post to say “investment bank or hedge fund.” If the firm was ever explicitly identified as either, and I missed it, please let me know. Thanks.

  9. Keith,
    are you going to write up Downton Abbey? I’m a big fan, but my anecdotal polling to date suggests the audience is me, married women, and Patton Oswalt.

  10. Klaw-

    I finally got around to watching this movie on your recommendation and agree with you; it was great. However, I think there was one major error – don’t the firings and discovery of the problem take place on Friday? That would make the all night discussion leading up to the trading take place Saturday morning. I’m pretty sure markets are closed on the weekends and no trading takes place, but I’m no expert in the field.