Winnie-the-Pooh.

Seriously – A.A. Milne’s first book of stories for his son, Winnie-the-Pooh, is #22 on the Radcliffe Publishing Course’s list of the 20th century’s top 100 novels. They’re pushing the definition of “novel” with this one, both because it’s a collection of stories rather than a novel and because it’s very short, but it’s still a fun read and something I look forward to reading to my daughter.

The stories revolve around the familiar set of characters, including Edward Bear, better known as Winnie-the-Pooh, a “Bear of Very Little Brain” who has a series of minor adventures that typically involve a rescue at the hands of Milne’s son, Christopher Robin. The humor is unmistakably English, almost like Wodehouse or even Waugh for children, and the language used isn’t dumbed down. The characters have actual character – Rabbit is bossy, Owl is book-smart but light on street smarts, Piglet talks a good game but is actually a chicken, and so on. Winnie-the-Pooh is a little dim, but can sometimes be clever despite his diminutive cranium. And I have to admit that I share a certain affinity with the bear:

“When you wake up in the morning, Pooh,” said Piglet at last, “what’s the first thing you say to yourself?”
“What’s for breakfast,” said Pooh. “What do you say, Piglet?”
“I say, I wonder what’s going to happen exciting today?” said Piglet.
Pooh nodded thoughtfully.
“It’s the same thing,” he said.

Speaking of Waugh, I’ve got one more review from my trip, his Decline and Fall, probably coming on Friday.

Also, there is a Klawchat today at 1 pm – HTML page is here but it’s not linked on the baseball page yet.

Comments

  1. Now this was funny, to read an actual (serious) review of Winnie-the-Pooh from you is totally unexpected. It helps pass the time until your chat.

  2. We stumbled onto a copy of the Classic Pooh stories at a garage sale a while back. I have to change some of the words a bit, so she understands better, but my daughter loves hearing those stories. Fortunately, my wife refuses to read them, because she hates dry English wit, and so I am “forced” to do the job.

    Excellent review, Keith.

  3. Klaw, just curious: why no politics q’s on the chat (Nick in Boston)? You take literary and culinary q’s so why not politics?

  4. We’re not allowed. I can’t go on there and say “Obama is teh R0XOrS!!!!” or something.

  5. Why was Tigger searching various toilets?

  6. Thanks, that makes sense. You wouldn’t say that anyway Keith, I know you better than that. I know you wouldn’t vote for Obama.

  7. As you can probably tell, I’m always asking a lot of q’s in the chat and one that confuses me is this. Is it better to have a weak hitting, solid defensive shortstop (Adam Everett comes to mind) or a better offensive player who is weaker with the glove (such as Hardy)? I always thought defense trumps offense at that position, but is there a limit to how little offense you would go for?

  8. I’ve also been fortunate enough to read the classic “Winnie the Pooh” stories to my kids. The first time through, I found myself pleasantly surprised at the humor/wit in the stories and enjoyed them quite a bit. My kids also like it when I try to imitate the voices.

  9. Keith,
    Quick question about your chat; you remarked that Darryl Cousins should not allowed to umpire a series in Tampa. Could you explain that? I don’t pay that much attention to who the umpires are, but I feel like I would have heard something horrendously bad that he’d done in the past. Thanks.