Stick to baseball, 8/10/24.

I’ve been tied up the last few Saturdays with other things, so here’s a quick rundown of what you might have missed.

I wrote 14 different trade-deadline reaction pieces at the Athletic but there isn’t a single link to all of them beyond my author page, so if you missed anything that’s the place to start.

You can see my annual Gen Con recap post, which covers every game I saw at the convention plus my top ten games from the show and which this year ran over 10,000 words, over at Paste. I also reviewed the light family game Biomos, which I kind of liked when I first played it but eventually decided had too much randomness for me.

Stadium has changed its programming schedule and I’ll no longer be going to Chicago, but instead will be doing remote video work for them that will appear before their broadcasts of minor-league games (it’s all AAA games this month) or will show up on Amazon Echo devices and MSN. Unfortunately, I know several people lost their jobs in the changeover there, with some resources moving to the new Chicago Sports Network.

And now, the links – just some of the ones I saved over the last three weeks:

Comments

  1. Brian in NoVA

    As disgusted as I am about what happened to Khelif (and I can’t even imagine the hell she went through when it should’ve been the crowning glory for her), I’m glad that this happened. It exposed every lie in the transphobe movement. First off, I have zero issue with transathletes playing in sports if they follow the recommended protocols (I’m not gonna get into the inconsistencies because that’s creating 10 more rants). Second, make no mistake . There is zero evidence that Khelif or Yu-Ting are trans or biologically male in any way. Instead a bad faith actor (who is too corrupt for the IOC) creates a non-troversy when conveniently enough both beat Russia boxers. The IBA has never even said what “test” they used, the methodology they used, or the actual results. They just pulled a “trust us, bro”. That leaves us with a case where the transphobes like JK Rowling and her ilk ran with a bad-faith argument to go after two women who didn’t deserve the abuse and scorn they got online while also putting them in danger (especially Khelif given Algeria’s stance on LBGT+ people). So that leaves us in a place where now cis athletes can get tagged with the trans tag in an effort to diminish their accomplishments. Is it any surprise that Khelif and Yu-Ting are from non-western nations? This has always been one of my points with the transphobes. They were never gonna stop at trans-athletes. Anyone that doesn’t look exactly like what they think a female athlete should look like (especially if it’s from a country certain people don’t like) will catch their eye and suspicions. Congrats trans-phobes, you just played yourselves in the biggest way possible.

  2. Gojira playing the Paris opening ceremony = (Claudio Simonetti’s) Goblin playing Milan/Cortina in ’26, I’d have to think.

  3. I saw that appeared on WGN News during the sports segment after the trade deadline to talk Cubs and White Sox deals. Will you be doing more work with them or was it just a one time thing?

  4. Oof…having a few weeks off (of doing these posts, at least) sure gave you a strong backlog of stories.

    The weather service thing is so weird. They’ve been trying to get rid of free weather forecasts for decades. In part this is so private companies could re-sell them at a profit. But, there’s also the problem that anything the government does that’s popular and effective is anathema to their party. It’s almost like a party that believes the government is bad trying to run the government has some inherent contradictions.

  5. Brian in ahwatukee

    Did you read/review dark forest and deaths end (completing the 3 body problem trilogy?) I didn’t see a review.

    I thought the best book was the last one

    • Haven’t read either – I couldn’t buy into the twist ending of the first book (the scientist contacting the alien race). Just soured me on continuing.

  6. “I’m not sure how this didn’t get get more coverage…”

    In all seriousness, where did you expect it to get coverage?

    I found out about it because one of the independent news orgs/journalists I support reported it. I assume you wouldn’t seriously expect the NYT to do so. There’s a reason that I dropped a 20-year subscription several years back, and it’s not because I don’t believe in supporting journalism.

  7. A Salty Scientist

    Those Rutgers departments have got to be so toxic at this point. Can’t imagine it being good experience for students in any of their labs, though they’ve been at it long enough that they may be selecting for similarly toxic phenotypes. Ugh.

    • As someone who runs a chemistry department, I can’t help but also wonder about those students’ placement into postdoctoral positions. Advisors’ relationships and reputation play such a huge role in that process.

      Obviously sticky issues around academic freedom (which the letter alludes to) but ad hominem attacks (and libel) clearly cross that line. I would certainly hope the Rutgers admin is less feckless than it comes across as and some action occurs soon, but Offices of University Council are often so risk averse as to stop all progress on addressing such things.

    • A Salty Scientist

      A good point ATM. I would definitely be wary taking on a postdoc coming out of those labs. And would talk to other letter writers to see if there are any concerns about the students. Which raises another issue–I wouldn’t serve on committees with either of those two, so there’s selection for who is willing to do so. Those Profs have the freedom to be asshats (presuming they are not actually committing libel), but their colleagues have the freedom to not associate with them beyond the professional bare minimum.