I’ve been tied up the last few Saturdays with other things, so here’s a quick rundown of what you might have missed.
I wrote 14 different trade-deadline reaction pieces at the Athletic but there isn’t a single link to all of them beyond my author page, so if you missed anything that’s the place to start.
You can see my annual Gen Con recap post, which covers every game I saw at the convention plus my top ten games from the show and which this year ran over 10,000 words, over at Paste. I also reviewed the light family game Biomos, which I kind of liked when I first played it but eventually decided had too much randomness for me.
Stadium has changed its programming schedule and I’ll no longer be going to Chicago, but instead will be doing remote video work for them that will appear before their broadcasts of minor-league games (it’s all AAA games this month) or will show up on Amazon Echo devices and MSN. Unfortunately, I know several people lost their jobs in the changeover there, with some resources moving to the new Chicago Sports Network.
And now, the links – just some of the ones I saved over the last three weeks:
- Longreads first: ProPublica obtained several training videos from Project 2025, the Trump-linked plan from the right-wing Heritage Foundation to largely dismantle the federal government, advising people on how to skirt judicial review, to remove any references to climate change, and to avoid creating any kind of evidence through open records. You can read more about the details of the GOP’s plans in the Boston Review. The Atlantic dove into the Project 2025 plan to end free weather information by shutting down the NOAA.
- A massive new study published in Nature found that COVID-19 vaccinations reduced the incidence of common cardiovascular events.
- A study published in the BMJ showed that wearing surgical face masks reduced the incidence of respiratory symptoms consistent with infection.
- New York City gave a subsidy running to the hundreds of millions to the Yankees and to the UAE’s Prime Minister for the Willets Point soccer stadium project.
- Also from ProPublica: Washington state’s policy of giving tax breaks to data centers is now conflicting with the state’s attempt to shift towards green energy. First it was crypto; now it’s AI. Regardless of the reason, we need to make tech companies pay for this kind of excessive energy usage – and if that means I don’t get AI-generated summaries and search results that I didn’t ask for, oh well.
- Two rational explanations for the non-troversy over the Olympic women’s boxers Imane Khelif and Lin Y-ting: The BBC goes into the scientific differences between genotype and phenotype, and why chromosomes aren’t the final answer on gender; and RTÉ points out that the so-called “controversy” all stems from a discredited source whose test results were never explained. I’d add to this that the whole thing reeks of transphobia, and somehow trans folks were roped into the attacks despite actually having nothing to do with the matter, because the right sees them as popular scapegoats.
- A dozen scientists authored a letter to Rutgers asking them to open a formal investigation into two professors who have been harassing and attacking researchers who have studied SARS-CoV-2’s zoonotic origins, comparing them to Pol Pot and referring to some as “murderers.” Richard Ebright is a lab-leak conspiracy theorist who has been particularly virulent (pun intended) on Twitter for years now, and the university has appeared to do nothing whatsoever about his behavior.
- The Journal of Virology published an editorial that points out the harms that come from continuing to promote the debunked lab-leak theory. In the spirit of full disclosure, my employer published an editorial that pushed this failed hypothesis two months ago.
- Why is there so little coverage of Egypt’s attempt to bribe President-elect Donald Trump in 2016 with a $10 million ‘donation’? The Philly Inquirer’s Will Bunch argues that a large part of it is that bribery has become tacitly accepted in America, all the way up to the Supreme Court.
- J.D. Vance endorsed a book authored by one of the main pushers of the insane Pizzagate conspiracy theory, far-right influencer Jack Posobiec, that argues that anyone who doesn’t agree with their right-wing views is “unhuman” and “vermin,” mirroring the language Adolf Hitler used to demonize Jews before the Holocaust.
- The Bulwark dove into Vance’s dog-whistling comments about “cat ladies.”
- Pro-school voucher groups dumped $4.5 million into primaries in Tennessee last week, some backed by Charles Koch and Betsy DeVos, both strong opponents of public education.
- Through the end of July, the U.S. had seen three times as many measles cases in 2024 as it did in all of 2023, thanks entirely to anti-vaxxers and the credulous fools who listen to them.
- I’m not sure how this didn’t get get more coverage – far-right protesters in Israel stormed military bases hosting Hamas militants and the IDF’s military court. Meanwhile, just yesterday video emerged of IDF forces raping a Palestinian detainee, and Israel’s National Security Minister and Finance Minister both appeared to defend the accused rapists.
- Gojira’s awesome performance at the Olympics’ Opening Ceremonies earned them a brief writeup in the New York Times.
- A pastor in Florida who is the father of nine children was arrested on charges of raping his 15-year-old niece. No trans people or drag queens were involved.
- Elon Musk shared a deepfake of Kamala Harris through his Twitter account, which violates the policies of his own site.
- The Hugo Awards almost had a second huge scandal in as many years, but this time they got in front of it, revealing that someone had spent thousands of dollars to try to buy 377 votes for a particular finalist in one of its categories. Last year’s Hugos were undermined by the revelation that the organizing committee disqualified several nominees that ran afoul of the Chinese government’s preferences.
As disgusted as I am about what happened to Khelif (and I can’t even imagine the hell she went through when it should’ve been the crowning glory for her), I’m glad that this happened. It exposed every lie in the transphobe movement. First off, I have zero issue with transathletes playing in sports if they follow the recommended protocols (I’m not gonna get into the inconsistencies because that’s creating 10 more rants). Second, make no mistake . There is zero evidence that Khelif or Yu-Ting are trans or biologically male in any way. Instead a bad faith actor (who is too corrupt for the IOC) creates a non-troversy when conveniently enough both beat Russia boxers. The IBA has never even said what “test” they used, the methodology they used, or the actual results. They just pulled a “trust us, bro”. That leaves us with a case where the transphobes like JK Rowling and her ilk ran with a bad-faith argument to go after two women who didn’t deserve the abuse and scorn they got online while also putting them in danger (especially Khelif given Algeria’s stance on LBGT+ people). So that leaves us in a place where now cis athletes can get tagged with the trans tag in an effort to diminish their accomplishments. Is it any surprise that Khelif and Yu-Ting are from non-western nations? This has always been one of my points with the transphobes. They were never gonna stop at trans-athletes. Anyone that doesn’t look exactly like what they think a female athlete should look like (especially if it’s from a country certain people don’t like) will catch their eye and suspicions. Congrats trans-phobes, you just played yourselves in the biggest way possible.
I’m going to go out on a limb and also guess that only women who don’t present as stereotypical are subject to extra testing.
And after doing some google homework, that hypothesis was correct. Only 4 out of hundreds of boxers were tested: https://apnews.com/article/olympics-2024-boxing-imane-khelif-iba-a26248f5285889dae13743f535ef9ed3
Gojira playing the Paris opening ceremony = (Claudio Simonetti’s) Goblin playing Milan/Cortina in ’26, I’d have to think.
I saw that appeared on WGN News during the sports segment after the trade deadline to talk Cubs and White Sox deals. Will you be doing more work with them or was it just a one time thing?
Just a one-time thing.
Oof…having a few weeks off (of doing these posts, at least) sure gave you a strong backlog of stories.
The weather service thing is so weird. They’ve been trying to get rid of free weather forecasts for decades. In part this is so private companies could re-sell them at a profit. But, there’s also the problem that anything the government does that’s popular and effective is anathema to their party. It’s almost like a party that believes the government is bad trying to run the government has some inherent contradictions.
Did you read/review dark forest and deaths end (completing the 3 body problem trilogy?) I didn’t see a review.
I thought the best book was the last one
Haven’t read either – I couldn’t buy into the twist ending of the first book (the scientist contacting the alien race). Just soured me on continuing.
“I’m not sure how this didn’t get get more coverage…”
In all seriousness, where did you expect it to get coverage?
I found out about it because one of the independent news orgs/journalists I support reported it. I assume you wouldn’t seriously expect the NYT to do so. There’s a reason that I dropped a 20-year subscription several years back, and it’s not because I don’t believe in supporting journalism.
Those Rutgers departments have got to be so toxic at this point. Can’t imagine it being good experience for students in any of their labs, though they’ve been at it long enough that they may be selecting for similarly toxic phenotypes. Ugh.
As someone who runs a chemistry department, I can’t help but also wonder about those students’ placement into postdoctoral positions. Advisors’ relationships and reputation play such a huge role in that process.
Obviously sticky issues around academic freedom (which the letter alludes to) but ad hominem attacks (and libel) clearly cross that line. I would certainly hope the Rutgers admin is less feckless than it comes across as and some action occurs soon, but Offices of University Council are often so risk averse as to stop all progress on addressing such things.
A good point ATM. I would definitely be wary taking on a postdoc coming out of those labs. And would talk to other letter writers to see if there are any concerns about the students. Which raises another issue–I wouldn’t serve on committees with either of those two, so there’s selection for who is willing to do so. Those Profs have the freedom to be asshats (presuming they are not actually committing libel), but their colleagues have the freedom to not associate with them beyond the professional bare minimum.