Stick to baseball, 4/20/24.

I updated my ranking of the top prospects for this year’s draft, going to 50 names but not without some difficulty; and posted a scouting notebook covering a half-dozen prospects in the class I saw over the previous ten days. I also held a Klawchat on Thursday.

As I mentioned in my chat the other day, the Athletic spiked my podcast and cut the daily baseball show to three a week, so I’m no longer doing any regular podcasts for them. I did make a guest appearance on the Windup on Friday, talking draft and prospect stuff.

I am now appearing weekly on the Stadium streaming channel, on the 2 pm show Diamond Dreams, which is entirely about prospects, with occasional appearances on their roundup show The Rally. You can get the app here. Right now, it doesn’t appear that shows are archived, but I’m looking into it.

Once this is done, I’m hoping to get another edition of my free email newsletter out this weekend, before I head back to Chicago for the next show.

Taylor Swift is on Threads now – but I was there first. I’m on Bluesky, too. I ended up re-verified on Twitter, which makes me eligible for a cut of ad revenues around my tweets; I’m going to donate all of it to the Trevor Project. My first and only payout so far was $16.64, which I’ve already donated.

And now, pop an edible (if it’s legal where you are) and enjoy the links…

Comments

  1. I don’t understand the logic in the Vox article. Sotomayor’s statement basically says the court’s decision in Counterman supercedes the Fifth Circuit’s ruling, making Counterman is the good law here, not the whatever the Fifth Circuit said. Which means the right to protest is not “abolished” or anything like it.

  2. Brian in NoVA

    If we take the 5th Circuit’s decision to its logical conclusion, a certain individual who appointed several 5th Circuit judges is responsible for a lot more crimes than we even realized. I almost hope someone tries to use that argument.

  3. Daren Magady

    I’m sorry your podcast is no longer on the Athletic. They’ve cut several great podcasts in the past year.

    I wish the Mother Jones piece wouldn’t contribute to econ9mic illiteracy with its headline. The bottom half of households having no or negative wealth isn’t a story: considering the neg net worth of young adults living in their own for the first time, especially recent college graduates entering the work force with no assets and college debt there are likely individual retirees living on SSI when more net worth then the bottom 10%.

    The bigger story is that the bottom class managed to double their net worth in 7 years even though the covid shutdown and interest rate and inflation/wage growth/low unemployment headwinds should have made that more difficult.

    • I’m confused by the point of your comment here. “The bottom half of households having no or negative wealth isn’t a story: considering the neg net worth of young adults living in their own for the first time, especially recent college graduates entering the work force with no assets and college debt”

      Why is the expectation that young people should already be in debt, with no assets, when they enter the work force? Isn’t that a sign of something wrong with our economy? Go back several decades and young people could save up money through high school, work in college, and leave not with debt but with a positive net worth. People age 18-25 should not be expected to have 0 to negative net worth when we have hundreds of people with billions in net worth. Our society has an incredibly amount of wealth and it is being hoarded by a few.

  4. I like Steve Inskeep and am NPR guy, but I did not find his response to Uri’s criticism particularly persuasive. It felt like the spent half of it disparaging the critique before offering red herring arguments – like the no party affiliation evidence that ignores the actual claim made. Curious if you found it more convincing than I did.

    • I did find it convincing, as Berliner clearly had his thumb on the scale for the party affiliation argument, and most of his criticisms of NPR haven’t held up under scrutiny.

  5. Thanks Keith. I gave it another read after Inskeep’s critique. Maybe this is why I found the critique wanting, it spent half of it creating a strawman (that Berliner asserted the newsroom had only Democrats) when 1) Berliner’s claim is about three quarters deep into his article and hardly the most important assertion and 2) it never precludes ‘no party’ affiliates. Given the amount of ink he spent on that alone just felt like grasping. For context, this still as far as I know is a true statement: “In recent years I’ve struggled to answer that question. Concerned by the lack of viewpoint diversity, I looked at voter registration for our newsroom. In D.C., where NPR is headquartered and many of us live, I found 87 registered Democrats working in editorial positions and zero Republicans. None.”

    Also have to admit, I rolled my eyes at Inskeep on this one: “Above all, Uri calls for “viewpoint diversity” but did not seem to embrace it for this article. He didn’t seek comment from anyone or otherwise engage anyone who had a different point of view. The failure to vet the story may explain why the errors and omissions all go in one direction, toward confirming the writer’s pre-existing opinions.” Is he applying an organization’s editorial standard to an individual’s opinion piece? I respect Inskeep too much to think he’s this obtuse. Also, see above, not as convinced his “omissions” were as great of sins as made out to be.

    On the other hand, I will say that I find Berliner’s decision to now leave NPR a hit against his credibility.

  6. Wonderful to see you supporting The Trevor Project and giving it a bit of a plug here!

  7. Daren Magady

    Tony, sorry if I was obtuse, and looks like I had a large error I meant to top when I said bottom, it is a huge issue that the top tier managed to grow while others lost in the last 7 years. However, FRED data shows us that as far back as 1992 the bottom 50% only had 3.5% of total wealth.

  8. Chris Quinn is getting all kinds of props for his attention-seeking columns about Trump and unfortunately no scrutiny for the otherwise awful news product he oversees. When much smaller competitors in Cleveland beat him on stories, he goes out of his way not to credit them and then blames lack of resources, leaving out the fact that he dedicates newsroom positions to covering the sale of sports memorabilia and concert tickets — read: ADVERTISEMENTS — and a veteran staffer who only rewrites news releases about restaurant openings and product recalls. He’s hardly the journalistic heavyweight he makes himself out to be.