Stick to baseball, 3/23/24.

At the Athletic, I wrote about a bunch of prospects I saw in the Cactus League, including two Breakout games; plus a list of six breakout candidates for 2024; as well as a Q&A with our fantasy expert Nando di Fino.

At Vulture, I wrote about the surge in cooperative tabletop games that started with Pandemic and then picked up during the … pandemic, really, along with a list of 14 of the best.

Now that this post is up I’ll begin the next edition of my free email newsletter.

And now, the links…

Comments

  1. Each week I read this article, I feel a piece of me dying a little more. Though that could just be the natural passage of time.

    Being the cynic that I am, I believe there is a secondary motive to passing those anti-LGBTQ+ laws. They’re actively encouraging people who oppose the laws to move out of the state instead of staying to fight. I know it’s probably a losing battle, but I think it’s a fight that needs to be fought and won. If they force people to leave for states that aren’t so obviously bigoted, they’re just ensuring that their states continue to vote the RIGHT way and they’ll be able to continue to dominate the Senate and the Electoral College.

  2. Brian in NoVA

    My main moral argument with the death penalty is simple. Even if it was found to be a deterrent, we know for a fact that there’s a margin of error for executing people (i.e. state sanctioned murder). Any margin of error above 0 is enough of an argument against it in my world view.

    • The other issue is that death penalty-type cases aren’t what clogs the system. We prosecute frivolous offences and no one wants to clean it up because they’ll appear “soft on crime.” Legalizing some or all recreational drugs would help a lot more than keeping the death penalty.

      In addition, the pressure that prosecutors can put on people to plea bargain has a cost. By some measures, up to 25% of all confessions are false (source: https://falseconfessions.org/false-confessions-happen/#:~:text=While%20the%20notion%20that%20someone,have%20involved%20a%20false%20confession.). Accused people without resources to mount a robust defence are often pressured into confessing and taking a plea deal instead of fighting the charge and risking greater punishment.

    • @ Ridley

      Yes, exactly. I alluded to this in a comment below but without as much detail. There are many similar examples in addition to drug “crimes”.

  3. I am 95% a death penalty skeptic, in part because of the mistakes, and in part because no other Western democracy does it, which strikes me as instructive.

    The 5%, however, is because the threat of the death penalty is leverage in securing plea deals. I have never seen anyone comment on what would happen if that threat was off the table. Would it cause the courts to be even more clogged up?

    • Here’s one research paper on the subject that argues the reduction in cases would be too small to offset the enormous costs of capital punishment.

    • Is the threat of violence leverage the state should be employing? Enforcers ensure gambling debts get paid by threatening to break kneecaps, but we generally don’t talk about the utility of ensuring non-delinquency when we decry the practice.

    • The death penalty is abhorrent. I don’t understand how “possibility of further clogging the court system” is even remotely relevant to the discussion.

      But, since it apparently is part of the discussion –

      Our entire justice system is so fucked up. If a person is actually guilty, that person gets rewarded for pleading guilty, and gets a lesser sentence? I don’t see why that should be a factor. The sentence should be based on the severity of the crime and/or the threat a person poses to society.

      Or, if a person is actually innocent, and chooses to fight the charges, and loses, that person gets a harsh sentence as punishment for not pleading to a crime that was not committed? This is absurd.

      As for plea deals in capital cases: If a person is facing life in prison with no possibility of parole, would that not be sufficient motivation for that person to accept a plea deal? I’d rather be dead that spend the rest of my life in some horrible prison.

  4. Your search engine informs me that you have used “beclowned himself” twice on this site, and it bechuckled me each time. Thank you, Keith.

  5. “If a person is actually guilty, that person gets rewarded for pleading guilty, and gets a lesser sentence? I don’t see why that should be a factor. The sentence should be based on the severity of the crime and/or the threat a person poses to society.”

    Well, it means prosecutor/law enforcement resources aren’t tied up in this case and could be directed towards other cases. There could also be situations where it is easier for victims to accept some punishment so they don’t have to testify at trial, which may not be easy. Also, the perpetrator could have information to offer, like where a body is buried, which could help the victims.

    I agree with your statement on the innocent, however.

    • I understand the reasons for offering plea deals, I just do not agree that the reasons justify doing so.

      If prosecutors and government are worried about a backlog of cases, maybe they should stop prosecuting people for non-crimes and shift their focus to actual crimes.

  6. Thank you for including the story about MO AG Andrew Bailey beclowning himself once again, Keith! It is a nearly weekly occurrence with that particular clown

  7. Thank you for continuing to share Nex Benedict’s story. Even were their death actually a suicide, acting as if the pattern of bullying and this specific incident are unrelated beggars credulity. I haven’t watched the police cam footage yet, but it sounds as if the officer was completely out of line with the advice on not pressing charges. Heaven forbid bullies be held to account and yes, endanger their futures, when they treat their classmates this way.

    • I am baffled as to how no charges have been filed. Crimes were committed, and someone died. Why isn’t anyone being held accountable?

  8. I read your piece on cooperative board games on Vulture. Well done. Sadly, one of the best coop games is no longer available. Yggdrasil is a fantastic game with the Norse gods and evil ones trying to destroy or protect the cosmic ash tree. Each god has its own powers to thwart the evil doers. If you or your readers can find the game, it is a great example of a coop game. There is more than one way to win (or lose). The replayability is excellent. There is real tension if the good guys are losing. Admittedly it is a niche game, with a fairly high degree of difficulty, but that isn’t a bad thing.

  9. I have only played the original version of Yggdrasil, not the 2d edition or Yggdrasil Chronicles. I don’t think any of them is currently available.