Black Panther was a tremendous action movie, a smart film with an incredible cast, an interesting concept and solid story, and brought some great action sequences that helped the film survive a story that didn’t quite hold together in its final third. The loss of its star and the actor who played the title character, Chadwick Boseman, meant that the long-awaited sequel Black Panther: Wakanda Forever was hemmed in by real-world events and would have to start its story with something acknowledging Boseman’s death.
That’s part of why Black Panther: Wakanda Forever is so long, running over two and a half hours, but for a script that was forced on some level to hit certain points, it’s smart, empathetic, and more interesting start to finish than its predecessor. It’s the action that lets this film down, not the story, as there’s something almost perfunctory about the battle sequences, both large and small. And the film doesn’t need a lot of that fighting anyway – it’s smarter and more thoughtful than a film that just resolves everything by having characters throw each other off buildings or boats.
Black Panther: Wakanda Forever opens with T’Challa dying off screen as Shuri (Letitia Wright) moves frantically to try to find a cure, only to have their mother Queen Ramonda (Angela Bassett) arrive to inform her daughter of T’Challa’s death. This leads to a brief but solemn sequence to open the film as we see the community mourn and get glimpses of the Wakandan funeral rites, which are interspersed with scenes from the outside world, where other nations are demanding access to vibranium, with one country going so far as to stage a raid on Wakanda to try to steal some. An incident aboard a mining ship that was searching for an underwater source of vibranium in the south Atlantic exposes the existence of a suboceanic culture, Talokan, that also has access to the powerful metal. A young scientist named Riri Williams (Dominique Thorne) – whom Marvel Comics fan know as Ironheart – designed the ship’s vibranium detector, putting her life in danger and setting up a conflict between Wakanda and Talokan over her fate and their relations with the rest of the world.
The reveal of Talokan and a sort of diplomatic mission to the underwater kingdom allows screenwriters Ryan Coogler and Joe Robert Cole to engage in more of the world-building that was so mesmerizing in the first Black Panther film. There’s an extended flashback that explains the origins of Talokan and how their king Namor (Tenoch Huerta Mejía) has been in power for centuries, tying them back to a Mesoamerican tribe that was threatened by white slavers and the smallpox viruses they brought to the region. Namor is the only Talokanil character we get to know, unfortunately, although the stage is set for more such characters to appear in a future movie.
There’s also further development of the Wakandan culture on screen through the death of T’Challa and a further character death partway through the film, as well as more exploration of some of the core characters from the initial movie, notably Shuri and Nakia (Lupita Nyong’o). Nakia has left Wakanda and her post in California where she was about to work at the end of the first film, a decision that the film explains in pieces right through the end credits. There’s a little more exploration of Okoye (Danai Gurira) and M’Baku (Winston Duke), but I would have loved to see more with both of those characters, as well as the new Dora Milaje fighter Aneka (Emmy winner Michaela Coel of I May Destroy You). Instead of getting more time with them, we get a couple of pointless bits with Everett Ross (Martin Freeman) and his boss/ex-wife Val de Fontaine (Julia Louis-Dreyfuss), which are throwaway scenes that don’t advance the plot and are painfully unfunny.
Indeed, there’s a lot of humor in this film, and it often feels organic as different pairs of characters are thrown together – nearly always women, by the way, because this is very, very much a film about the women of Wakanda. Serious conversations turn light with a bit of unexpected banter, and the actresses deliver it seamlessly in ways that also make the relationships between them more credible.
Eventually, two things have to happen in this movie beyond the acknowledgement and grieving that open the story. One is that we need someone else to become the new Black Panther, and the other is that that character and Namor have to fight, probably within a larger battle between Wakanda and Talokan. The former worked for me – I thought it was one of the two obvious choices, and I thought the way the script handled it was smart and insightful, especially when that character takes the herb and travels to the ancestral plane. There’s a shorter story arc there that brings that character through to the film’s (first) conclusion that is effective if a little facile and sets us up well for at least one more movie in this series. The second part, the huge battle that mostly wraps up the film, had the problem I have with most Marvel movies I’ve seen – the fighting is mostly ridiculous, because one or more characters are all but invincible, people on the screen are doing all sorts of absurd things, and people are thrown great distances into hard objects without anything worse happening than getting the wind knocked out of them. It’s good that the ultimate solution in this movie isn’t just one character beating the hell out of another, but there’s a lot of that between A and B that didn’t help the plot and that just wasn’t as exciting as the action stuff from the first movie.
As for Angela Bassett and her Oscar nomination, I think she was clearly better than Jamie Lee Curtis, who won the award for Everything Everywhere All At Once, but I would have voted for Kerry Condon (The Banshees of Inisherin) or Stephanie Hsu instead of Bassett, who isn’t in the movie all that much and whose character is not that complex here. She is regal, but it’s a bit of the Judi Dench thing – is it enough to just be the queen, even if you’re not on screen and don’t have a lot of work to do to build out the character? (Yes, I know Dench won, but that will be a controversial win forever.) The most award-worthy performance in this film, for me, was Wright’s, as she has way more to do to develop and fill out her character, who went from a fun sidekick in the first movie to the closest thing this film has to a lead. This film leans on her almost as much as the first leaned on Boseman.
Is Black Panther: Wakanda Forever better than the original Black Panther? Yes … and no. It’s less fun and ebullient. It misses Boseman in many ways. The action sequences don’t work that well and there’s too much CGI in them. But there’s also a better story here, some really interesting and worthwhile character development, and more meaning in its story and conclusion. It almost demands a third movie in the franchise, beyond the Ironheart TV series that’s coming soon (with Thorne in the title role), that goes further with the women who now lead Wakanda in almost every way. It may not be what everyone involved intended for the franchise when it first starter, but Black Panther: Wakanda Forever has the series in a good place.
Easily one of the best reviews I’ve read of this film. Honestly, it’s just refreshing to hear someone discuss an MCU film without devolving into hyperbole about how it’s “the death knell of the MCU” or some nonsense like that.
I think your notes about the action sequences are spot-on and points out the need for Marvel/Disney to continue making films and shows that focus on the more street-level characters (so excited for Daredevil: Born Again). Films like Black Panther, Ant-Man, Guardians of the Galaxy, etc. require a certain amount of superhero insanity in the action sequences, that the CGI-fest is sort of inevitable.
In the more grounded projects like “Captain America: Winter Soldier”, the action is inherently better because the stakes feel higher when you’re dealing with less overpowered characters. The balance between the two types of heroes and villains is necessary for the larger story being told across all of the MCU projects, but the variety we’ve seen in the latest phase of the MCU is one of my favorite things about it.
Completely agree with high level take of “better story and character development/less memorable action.”
I wouldn’t say Coogler and partner solved the need for a new BP in original fashion. The film follows from the comics in this regard. Had Boseman lived I fully expected to see a second Panther while trying to avoid Shazam levels of absurdity.
I don’t agree that Angela Bassett deserved the Oscar over Curtis. Curtis’s character was equally critical to the plot, (probably?) had more screen time, and called for more range and arc than Ramonda. I can absolutely see arguments for Condon (her delivery of very demanding dialogue alone…) and Hsu (again, the role demanded range and she was far more critical to EEAaO’s plot than Curtis). Hindsight, but What’s Love Got To Do With It was overlooked on it’s release and it’s only over time that the film and Bassett’s performance has been recognized. Just shows how much of the nomination and awards process comes down to lobbying and influence.
Also, I seem to recall the Sub-Mariner (Namor) character being revealed as a mutant (think X-men), with treatment of mutants used as a way to explore bigotry and out-group status. While it makes sense for the ethnicity to be played up in this series, I’m interested to see if the mutant angle resurfaces (ba dum dum) in future films.
I’ve said this to other people but the degree of difficulty that Coogler had with this movie and the fact that it wasn’t a total mess blows my mind. He first had to create a story about grief that is the core of the movie. He also had to make an action movie that stays in line with the MCU while finally telling a story about racial dynamics and exploitation in the world. Obviously it wasn’t first. A few of the plot points seemed very contrived and the action sequences were very blah to put it mildly. That said, the movie accomplished what it needed to do especially compared to the rest of phase 4 in the MCU which ranged from good (Wakanda Forever and Shang-Chi) to blah (Black Widow) to downright awful (Eternals and Thor: Love and Thunder)
Agreed on the rankings. I’d add Dr Strange:Multiverse of Madness into a category between blah & downright awful.
Honestly tired of all the mutlverse movies. EEAO was great because it was so creative, but, too often it seems like they’re either A. confusing or B. lead to lazy story writing..as the multiverse concept allows the writer to write themselves out of any plot hole or dead end by jumping to a different universe/time.
Black Panther: Wakanda Forever is the kind of movie you get when an impossible real-life tragedy necessitates making massive on-the-fly changes when you decide that you’re going out of your way to be ultra-respectful to the tragedy, and you take the next logical steps to move forward, only to have those steps blow up in your face because of other real-life problems.
I’m not sure I’ve disagreed with one of Keith’s reviews more than this one. This movie was an ordeal in multiple ways. It plodded along with very few interesting characters or moments until it settled in for the inevitable, over-produced climax. The Talokans were not very interesting, and Sub-Mariner was another in a long line of mediocre Marvel antagonists (if not outright villains). The absence of Nakia for most of the movie was noticeable and the appearance of SPOILER was obviously included because of Boseman’s absence, which obviously hung over the entire movie, almost to a suffocating effect.
Which leads me to my strongest disagreement with Keith. Letitia Wright was horrible. Her performance was fine when she didn’t have to show emotion or speak above a normal decibel level. Anytime she was required to deviate, she gave an abject lesson in Overacting 101. Based on the first movie, it was obvious that she was the only logical choice to inherit the Black Panther mantle, but that, of course leads to the other problem for this movie and potentially this entire part of the MCU going forward. Wright’s real-life COVID controversies have given me an very negative impression of her as a person, which definitely has an effect on how much I want to watch her on screen. The fact that she’s never satisfactorily answered any questions about it makes the situation worse. Of course, if she were to answer those questions, it’s very probable that Disney would be forced to give her the Gina Carano treatment (justified), so I’m not expecting that to happen.
Regarding Bassett not winning the Oscar, well, that’s a shame, but I always felt her nomination was more a sympathy nomination anyway. She probably should have won for What’s Love Got to Do with It all those years ago, but the reason she didn’t win this year is because everyone jumped on the EEAAO bandwagon. I’m sure it really hurts to be nominated and lose, but I don’t think anything nefarious was the reason for the loss.
I don’t think the MCU is dead, or even dying, but it’s definitely a little sick right now. Unfortunately, I’m not sure if anything on the schedule is the cure.
Agree pretty closely with this, probably rate it a little lower, like 2.75 out of 4 stars. Maybe bump it to 3 due to the challenges with Boseman passing.
Good movie, I liked how it explored grief & Wakandan culture..but, overall i was 30 minutes too long & it felt like a “tweener” movie that was the 2nd in a trilogy used to set up the 3rd movie as much as anything else.
Agree on the Freeman/Louis-Dreyfuss arc..that could have been removed or lessened, but, again seems like it was in here to set up something going forward.