CODA has become the top underdog to win Best Picture after taking the top honors at the Screen Actors Guild and Producers Guild of America awards in the last few weeks, buoyed by Jane Campion tone-deaf comments at the Critics Choice Awards when The Power of the Dog won the top prize there. It’s definitely the feel-good movie of the year, and well-executed for its type, but it’s formulaic and predictable enough that it doesn’t belong in the Best Picture conversation despite its positives. (It’s available to stream free on Apple TV+.)
Ruby Rossi (Emilia Jones) is the CODA of the title – a Child of Deaf Adults, born hearing to deaf parents (Troy Kotsur, nominated for Best Supporting Actor, and Marlee Matlin) and with a deaf older brother (Daniel Durant). The family lives in Gloucester, on the north shore of Massachusetts, and runs a fishing boat, for which they depend on Ruby as the one hearing member of the family, thus keeping them in compliance with Coast Guard rules. Ruby loves to sing, and if you can’t see where this going, you might not have seen a movie before. Of course, the music teacher at Ruby’s school (Eugenio Derbez) hears Ruby and suggests she apply to Berklee, offering to help her prepare for her audition, forcing her to choose between her family and a career.
As a coming-of-age story, CODA checks the right boxes, not least of which is the humor essential to this sort of narrative. Ruby’s parents are impossible, probably too much so to be credible, but because the film largely works from her point of view, it works because just about every teenager thinks their parents are impossible. Kotsur is fantastic, including a few scenes where he improvised some dialogue, not just in his scenes with Ruby but also in the subplot about the decline of commercial fishing in general and the way that the single buyer for fish at their port seems to take advantage of the family when Ruby isn’t there. (More on that in a moment.) Ruby is also bullied at school, in part because when she first started attending she spoke ‘funny,’ but also because her family fishes for a living, even though they are hardly the only family in town to do so – and, by the way, where exactly are the Gloucester accents? – which gets in the way of her crush on Miles (Ferdia Walsh-Peelo of Sing Street), who the music teacher assigns to do a duet with Ruby, because of course he does.
CODA follows a pretty clear formula from start to finish, and you’ll see everything coming a mile away, right down to the big finish. It at least improves on the French original by casting deaf actors in the roles of the deaf characters, but this is still a paint-by-numbers script, and it centers the experiences of Ruby over those of her family members, as if to say that the burden of being a hearing person in a deaf family is greater or more important than the burden of being a deaf person in a hearing world. That includes some nonsensical scenes at a doctor’s office and in a court where Ruby translates for her father, even though the Americans with Disabilities Act requires the provision of an interpreter in both settings. This isn’t just a plot contrivance – it violates a federal law, and a half an hour or so north of Boston, this just isn’t going to happen. The doctor’s office scene is mined for Ruby’s embarrassment, but the courtroom scene is there just to underline how helpless her family will be without her there, and that’s both wrong and embarrassing for the screenwriters – who are hearing, by the way, and appear to miss the boat (pun intended) several times on deaf experience and culture. (Here’s a take from a deaf writer who found the film frustrating for that reason.) You know she’s going to nail the audition and get the guy and figure something out with her parents, because that’s just how these movies work.
The film does do many things right, starting with representation of deaf people in the first place, although I’d like to know where the family’s deaf friends, who are mentioned but never seen, are hiding for the entire film. This world is built by people without disabilities for people without disabilities, and if you have a disability of some sort, whether it’s mobility, sight, hearing, or something else, you will find the world has built extra obstacles for you because the easiest and cheapest path was to pretend that you don’t exist. Ruby’s family ends up playing an important role among the fishing community as they push back against an exploitative middleman and what they perceive as overregulation (for which they must pay directly), and that wouldn’t happen if Ruby weren’t there to interpret in both directions at one critical public meeting. It’s a sign of what’s lost to everyone when we marginalize any set of people, and shows the isolation of her family while also providing several humorous moments.
Kotsur’s performance rivals that of Kodi Smit-McPhee’s for the best by an actor in a supporting role, and I’d be good with either winning the Oscar in that category on Sunday. Jones’s work might be flying under the radar too much, but she’s also excellent, with great comedic timing and a lovely singing voice that at least makes it plausible that her teacher would react to her singing the way he does. Derbez’s character is ridiculous, but he plays the hell out of it, and I challenge you not to like him as he leans into the artiste stereotype, flipping his hair and rolling the r in his name, Bernardo, for about ten seconds each time he says it. By the time she gets to the audition at Berklee, which you know the whole time she’s going to end up attending, the script just piles one absurd element on top of another to get to the desired outcome. It’s charming, but you’re just going to have to accept the unreality of it, and that’s a shame given the movie’s clear intent to put deaf people and deaf culture in the center of the story. It’s an entertaining film, but not a great one, better honored for its performances than for the script or the film as a whole.
It sounds to me like you aren’t happy that CODA will win the best picture so you are being unfairly harsh in your review. You’re grumpy, but not that grumpy. Is it really a bad movie b/c the ADA rules aren’t followed when the parents go to the doctor? Things that happen for Ruby’s embarrassment are also known as entertaining and plot development. As for predictability, would you rather she fail and work on a fishing boat? Movies can be predictable or formulaic but still well executed, enjoyable and in this case, unique.
That’s a weird comment, and vaguely insulting, which I don’t appreciate.
It sounds to me like you really like this movie, and aren’t that open to hearing criticism of it. Yes, predictability is a negative. Yes, being formulaic is a negative. If I can figure out where a movie is going before we’re even a quarter of the way through it, I find the movie less entertaining. I’m glad you liked the movie, but don’t respond to my criticisms by getting personal.
Thanks for sharing the Jenna Fischtrom Beacom review, Keith, and for pointing out the failure of the script to accurately portray the ADA. I work in a college disability office and my radar went up immediately in the doctor’s office scene at the beginning of the movie. To respond to James above, it’s not a mere quibble that the film doesn’t take place in a universe with the ADA in it. It infantilizes the deaf characters, makes them overly dependent on their daughter/sister, and fails to demonstrate how we as a society are responsible for accessibility.
And it’s just not realistic! Imagine a similar film set in contemporary times without the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Segregation is widespread, no one questions an all-white jury in a court scene, and a white teenager raised by a Black family fears leaving home for college because her skin color lets her protect the family from the cops and earn more money working because of rampant pay discrimination. Can you imagine critics not noticing the film being set in an alternate universe? Awards being showered over the film for it being progressive about race?
All that said, the acting is terrific and just seeing a Deaf family on screen is a breath of fresh air. And it’s a lovely enough coming-of-age story. I enjoyed watching the movie last summer with my kids. I’m just a bit confused at how many people who should know better miss the flaws.
Loved the review. I think I pretty much felt the same way about the movie as you, though I found the music teacher an insulting stereotype rather than endearing. Though I guess the actor did lean into the absurdity of the caricature, so I’ll give him credit for that.
I am wondering what you meant about the “Jane Campion tone-deaf comments at the Critics Choice Awards.” Are you talking about her response to the interview Sam Elliott gave? If so, I’m not sure I understand what it is she said you found offensive.
No, it was her comment about the Williams sisters.
I just watched this last night, and I think I might actually have it ranked 2nd out of the 8 Best Picture nominees I have seen. (Still need to watch Drive My Car and Don’t Look Up, which I’ve been avoiding for several reasons, and which your review has reinforced as to why.) I think the reason I rank it 2nd, though, has more to do with the other nominees being weaker in my mind. I tend to go for the Roger Ebert philosophy of judging a film for what it tries to be rather than what it doesn’t try to be. But, yea, there was still a lot of formula to this one, though at least it was well done formula. I won’t be upset if Troy Kotsur wins the Oscar, but I’d still prefer Kodi Smit-McPhee.