Oscars 2021: What the actual?

I didn’t think anything on Sunday night would really merit a reaction post, but, well, here we are. You can see my preview post with picks and predictions here.

  • I don’t intend for this to be a hot take, but I suppose it is, at least compared to the consensus I’ve seen on Twitter: Anthony Hopkins’ and Frances McDormand’s wins were driven more by age than by race. Both played roles about people aging, and facing some of the scarier aspects of getting older – losing one’s memory, and losing one’s home/income – and for an Academy electorate that has always favored films around those sorts of themes or just older people in general, those two films were probably too tempting to overlook. It may be spun as more #OscarsSoWhite fodder, and I don’t know how to argue against that position without seeming insensitive to the broader point, but I believe those two awards were much more about an aging voter pool than a white one.
  • Hopkins would have been my pick for Best Actor anyway, even though of course I wanted Boseman to win and to give Taylor Simone Ledward, his widow, one more opportunity to speak before a national audience. Her acceptance speeches for him in this awards season have been moving, and graceful, and powerful, and I immediately thought of her sitting in the audience or at home (I don’t know if she attended), feeling stunned and hurt by the announcement of Hopkins’ name, especially since the whole telecast seemed set up to end with her speech. But I also believe Hopkins’ performance was just better: a bigger, more difficult role, more central to the film. I thought it was the best performance of the year by any actor, leading or supporting, just edging out Carey Mulligan’s in Promising Young Woman (my pick, obviously, for Best Actress).
  • Yeah, so I think Stephen Soderbergh, or whoever chose to flip Best Picture and the two lead acting awards, will not be invited back to do the telecast any time soon, which is a shame because the first two hours or so were quite good. The more intimate setup worked extremely well on camera, and the choice to give viewers some background on nominees made the awards more interesting and personal than when we’re just getting recaps of movies that I’d already seen. Writers, editors, costume designers – they’re just names to people like me who don’t work in the industry. Those biographical bits should stick around forever.
  • No one will remember that part thanks to the choice to flip the last two parts of the show, though. I can only assume this was a bet on Boseman winning, and his widow closing out the broadcast, and that the producers told Joaquin Phoenix that if anyone else won he should say the name quickly and bid everyone “good night!” before the place went down in flames.
  • I am glad that much of the post-Oscars coverage is focusing on Chloé Zhao’s historic win – she is the second woman, and the first woman of color, to win Best Director. That’s 70 Best Director awards given to men (one to a pair of men, for West Side Story) and two to women.
  • I didn’t think the comedy bit worked, especially with Glenn Close so clearly reciting a script (which was cribbed straight from Wikipedia), although I give her credit for dancing to “Da Butt” – all on the same night she tied the record for the most career nominations (eight) without a win.
  • I did enjoy Frances McDormand’s big “I already have two of these” energy, though.
  • While most of the outrage I saw on Twitter was over Best Actor, I think the worst choice of the night was in the Best Documentary Feature category, where My Octopus Teacher, about a middle-aged white man with all the personality of Wonder Bread befriends an octopus. The underwater cinematography is beautiful, but when the octopus is a more interesting character than the human, that’s a problem. The other four nominees in that category were all about some important issue – Time (Black people caught up in the carceral state), The Mole Agent (the elderly, especially those in nursing homes), Crip Camp (the disabled, and the push for disability rights), and my pick for this award, Collective (government corruption) – and were all more interesting and broader in scope. Instead, we get a film about a white guy with what appears to be no job and plenty of money futsing around like a tourist in the waters off South Africa, talking to squid. Not only do I think My Octopus Teacher was a bad choice to win the award, I don’t even think it should have been nominated. Transhood, on HBO Max, was much, much better.
  • Another Round winning Best International Feature over Collective wasn’t a whole lot better, although at least in this case Another Round is a decent movie, just sort of trivial, and, as writer-director Thomas Vinterberg said in his excellent acceptance speech, it’s a movie about a bunch of middle-aged white guys.
  • Did anyone look better than Riz Ahmed and his wife, author Fatima Farheen Mirza? I say no, as I shop online for black mock turtle necks.

Comments

  1. Agree with The Octopus Teacher as the worst choice, I didn’t look at the odds until seeing all the nominees and was absolutely befuddled to find out it was the odds on favourite. It was pretty, but that whole thing felt like it could’ve been a short. I’ve read that it being on Netflix was a big factor for it, but Crip Camp is also on Netflix (and Obama produced) and Time is on Amazon Prime so not exactly hard to watch either. Just one of the those Academy decisions I’ll never understand.

  2. You say “a film about a white guy with what appears to be no job and plenty of money futsing around like a tourist in the waters off South Africa, talking to squid,” I say:

    -an exploration of animal consciousness
    -a meditation on communication across boundaries (metonymized by the species boundary), as well as
    -what it means to have an Umwelt or world, in the phenomenological sense, and the possibilities for exploring the worlds of other beings

    I won’t say that it definitely deserved to win, since I haven’t seen most of the other nominees. But it would be a shame if we limited our conception of the documentary genre to, essentially, advocacy journalism. There’s a big world out there, and lots of ways to explore it through the medium of film!

    • I agree. I can’t speak to these specific films, but I strongly dislike the common conception that documentaries exist primarily to “educate” in the most direct sense of the term. Reminds me a bit of this Douglas Sirk clip I saw the other day: https://twitter.com/DannyDrinksWine/status/1254454125221167110

    • I have never said that documentaries have to be educational or to advocate for a certain position. The best documentary I’ve ever seen is Man on Wire, which does none of that. But My Octopus Teacher is dreadful – the story and the one human in it are both boring. It’s just pretty. As a 15-minute short (as Chris said above), it would have worked much better. There just isn’t enough material here to justify its running length.

    • Far be it from me to tell someone else what they should or should not find boring. You like what you like. And while I agree with Keith that the film was not great, and there were better choices available (I would have voted for The Mole Agent), and the guy was something of a smacked ass, I’m with Brian on his three bullet points. The octopus, and the implications for non-human consciousness, was absolutely fascinating.

  3. Did anyone look better than Riz Ahmed and his wife? LaKeith Stanfield would like a word with you.

  4. If I’m remembering what has been said on The Ringer’s Big Pic podcast correctly, the acting body within the Academy is the largest and most diverse (albeit probably not diverse enough) subgroup. Hopefully that mitigates some of the potential for #OscarsSoWhite. I haven’t seen The Father yet, but I haven’t heard of anyone who has that didn’t think Hopkins’ performance was great. I did see Ma Rainey and though Boseman was good, but the movie didn’t click with me on the whole.

  5. Agree with you on the documentary feature. COLLECTIVE was an extremely powerful film, maybe its Romanian provenance (a European film culture that has seldom found favor with Oscar voters – maybe due to its overwhelming bleakness?) worked against it.

  6. It’s very difficult to discuss Chadwick Boseman’s lock until he wasn’t status without coming across as implying that his death was the only reason he got to that position, or that Hopkins extremely deserving win wasn’t solely as a counter to that opinion.

    But I do wonder what would have happened if Boseman hadn’t been deemed as an early “lock” in the best actor category. For one, I think it’s possible that Daniel Kaluuya (also a worthy winner) doesn’t get promoted in supporting actor despite having his character name in the title of the film, which might have made space for a really great story like a win for Paul Raci, which I would have loved to have seen,

  7. Minor point Keith but the Coen Brothers also shared Best Director as well for No Country for Old Men.

  8. Keith I agree with most of your points, but disagree that on the telecast in general. Getting the background on a lot of the behind-the-scenes players was nice, but the absence of clips was a poor choice and made the program seem much longer. And for those of us that haven’t seen most of the movies, it deprived the awards of any sense of context, as we had no idea why, for example, the costume nominees deserved their place there.