Stick to baseball, 2/6/21.

I had two new posts for subscribers to the Athletic this week: a breakdown of the Nolan Arenado trade, and a look at a dozen prospects who just missed my top 100 ranking. That ranking ran the previous Thursday. I did a video chat via the Athletic’s Twitter account on Tuesday. Org rankings will run on February 10th, and team by team reports begin the next day.

I’ve had two podcasts since my show returned from my holiday break last month, with guests Britt Ghiroli, national baseball writer for the Athletic; and Seattle Mariners prospect Adam Macko, who was born in Slovakia and first learned to play baseball in Bratislava. You can subscribe on Apple podcasts, Amazon, and Spotify.

Over at Paste, I reviewed the game Cloud City, by one of my favorite designers (Cacao, Gizmos, Silver & Gold), but it was a huge disappointment.

My last edition of my free email newsletter shared some details of my recent nuptials; I’m overdue for another issue because I’ve been writing the team reports and top 20s. You can still buy The Inside Game and Smart Baseball anywhere you buy books; the paperback edition of The Inside Game will be out in April.

And now, the links…

Comments

  1. I was a pretty serious chess player growing up, so I’m sure that identity shapes my thinking about what I want from a board game, which is:

    1. A game that is designed well such that the game play is effective and enjoyable
    2. A rule book that has been tested for completeness and effectiveness via game testing
    3. A complete gaming experience in the core game.

    I don’t need fancy extras. I don’t need expansions that fix the game or make a limited game something better or something more.

    I want to see, experience, and enjoy the genius of the game design. Good art and all helps, but shiny extras that don’t actually improve the game don’t.

    I don’t like all Stonemaier games, but that’s about me. I respect their design, game testing, production, and distribution processes.

    • I’ve also discovered that expansions and fancy extras do less for me than they do for other people. I do want the components to be well-made, but I’d rather have the base version cost $5 more for that.

    • I think it’s worth pointing out that the judge who granted her request was a Trump appointee.

  2. Matthew Warburg

    The Dungeons & Dragons article is a perfect example of the left-wing nonsense that is turning off moderate Democrats like me.

    I’m Jewish and played D&D for many years….it never occurred to me that it was anti-Semitic. Nor did it ever occur to me when reading Tolkein’s works that the Dwarves were supposed to be denigrating Jews.

    This is a perfect example of activists looking for “racism/discrimination” where none really exists.

    • The history of dwarves as a Jewish stereotype is actually quite interesting, and that article really doesn’t do it justice. I agree though, as a fellow Jew & fantasy enthusiast, the use of dwarves in modern fantasy doesn’t bother me at all.

    • Tolkien admitted his dwarves were his fictional representation of Jews.

      I’m not Jewish, so I am not saying I found anything in LotR personally offensive, but I don’t think it’s also fair to dismiss this as “left-wing nonsense.” Unflattering portrayals of Jews in literature go back centuries. The “Wandering Jew” is a stock character found throughout literature – The Scarlet Pimpernel has a prominent one at the heart of its story. We can certainly discuss whether Tolkien explicitly using Jews as a model for his most unattractive, vulgar race is offensive without dismissing it.

    • Just because something never occurred to you before doesn’t mean it’s not true. Furthermore, if mild disagreement with a “left-wing” article is enough to make you doubt your political convictions, then they probably weren’t worth all that much in the first place.

    • Fellow Jew and D&D player here. I agree that dwarves in 5e don’t come off as an attempt to portray Jews in a particularly negative way. At the same time, given Tolkien’s statements that dwarves are a portrayal of Jews and that LotR is clearly an inspiration for D&D, I can see where people would object. I thought the discussion of phylacteries was more interesting. I’ve also only ever seen it as a translation for tefillin, but I never made the connection since tefillin is one of those words I only use the Hebrew for, whether in prayer or in conversation. To me, that feels like a more explicitly problematic connection.

  3. If you want to see some pretty blatant non-flattering “Jewish” characters- just look to the Ferengi on Star Trek Deep Space 9 and Watto in Star Wars The Phantom Menace.