I wrote two pieces for subscribers to The Athletic this week – a season preview, with breakout candidates and team predictions; and a look at the top 100 prospects who made Opening Day rosters. I held a live Zoom Q&A via The Athletic’s Twitter account on Thursday.
For Paste, I reviewed the new flick-and-write game Sonora, where players flick discs on to the same board, possibly knocking each others’ discs out of the way, and score on their personal scoresheets based on where the discs end up.
My book, The Inside Game: Bad Calls, Strange Moves, and What Baseball Behavior Teaches Us About Ourselves, is out now. You can order it anywhere you buy books, and I recommend bookshop.org. I’ll also resume my email newsletter this weekend.
And now, the links…
- Longreads first: GEN looks at evangelical women who’ve left their churches and the Republican Party because they couldn’t reconcile Christian support for Trump with the ostensible tenets of the religion.
- The New Yorker‘s Isaac Chotiner interviewed Thomas Chatterson Williams, one of the authors of the Harper’s letter decrying ‘cancel culture’ on the left; it’s an informative conversation, made better because Chotiner is unafraid to challenge Williams’ inaccuracies and to correct others in the final text.
- The Jackson Free Press spoke to doctors and nurses at the University of Mississippi Medical Center’s dedicated COVID-19 ICU about how overloaded they are and how sick the victims become. The executive vice chair of emergency medicine, begging people to wear masks and keep distancing, says, “Please don’t make this worse.”
- A SPLC Hatewatch investigation found that OANN employee Jack Posobiec went to Poland to meet with a Polish neo-Nazi party, promoting their messages through his popular Twitter account.
- Customs and Border Protection is involved in far more cities than just Portland, and they’re not being transparent about their activities.
- Florida’s former top coronavirus data scientist claims she was fired for refusing to manipulate data to make the pandemic there appear less serious than it actually was.
- WIRED looks at the difficulty of calculating herd immunity requirements for COVID-19; the quick summary is that we need a vaccine to get there.
- A group of over 100 scientists called for a rapid review system for research preprints so papers like the Stanford one that used highly questionable methods to claim that the rate of COVID-19 infection was 50 times higher in California than widely accepted don’t get widely reported before they’re further vetted.
- To be a parent right now is to be a liar, writes Dan Sinker for Esquire.
- Dave Grohl – yep, that one – wrote an op ed in the Atlantic in defense of teachers, saying we need better plans before we reopen schools.
- Why have rates of premature births gone way down in some areas during the pandemic?
- Here’s a list of all of the known QAnon supporters running for Congress this year, or who tried to run; fourteen have already secured spots on November ballots. Sixty-two of the 67 are Republicans. Meanwhile, Twitter has at least begun to ban or limit accounts promoting the QAnon conspiracy theory, on the grounds that the ‘movement’ is associated with increasing violence. Facebook needs to do the same.
- Over 280 Wall Street Journal employees signed a letter to the paper’s new publisher asking for a clearer distinction between the news and opinion sections, something the paper reported on itself (subscription required).
- A Philadelphia attorney who makes her living evicting people on behalf of city courts is married to a city eviction judge who doesn’t recuse himself from cases involving her.
- Quanta has a pretty good, concise explanation of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems.
- Board game news: Renegade Game Studios announced the release of a new RPG, Kids on Brooms, that is itself a spinoff of the game Kids on Bikes.
- Capstone announced the late 2020 release of Renature, from designers Michael Kiesling and Wolfgang Kramer, which I assume is a sequel to their 2017 game Reworld. The two are probably best known for their collaborations on Tikal and Torres.
I enjoyed the evangelical women piece and thank you for sharing.
I grew up in that environment and have since rejected it entirely by for different reasons. I am familiar with all of the anti-women positions the movement largely takes but in transparency have never considered that would be a reason for women to leave. But yeah, duh, makes perfect sense.
By the logic of the Esquire piece, we are always liars as parents.
Everyday life requires parents to act as filters on the information that flows to children. Just like we keep them safe from things harmful to their physical body, we must also keep them safe from things that can be harmful to their mental and/or emotional well-being. There are better and worse ways to do this and the child’s age plays a huge role in determining if/when/how to do this.
What makes right now different is how obvious and explicit the process is. We typically do this without a ton of thought or on topics that seem obvious to shield children from because we’ve always shielded children from them. The unprecedented nature of the pandemic and how it impacts our lives is making visible things that tended to happen invisibly.
Same as it ever was Kazzy, even if the explicitness is a unique experience for many of us. I was a young kid growing up in SoCal during the summer of the “Night Stalker” murders, and one miraculously survived attempt occurred in my town. Of course my parents told me nothing about it, and I only learned about it later when I was a teenager reading retrospectives. And I now do the same thing today for my own kids with the worst of the pandemic news, who are incidentally almost exactly the same age I was in the summer of ’84.
I was in the sixth grade when Laurie Dann murdered one boy and took five others hostage at another area school, about 10 miles from the one I attended. That day, teachers told us we couldn’t go outside for recess because it was an “ozone day”.
The New Yorker is a good interview and shows the sort of nuanced and open-minded discussion we too often avoid. The interviewer does a great job of challenging certain positions while remaining respectful. And I think the interviewee — whether you agree with them or not — shows why we should more deeply engage with ideas that challenge us. Even if you disagree with him (and I did in many spots), he was able to offer nuance that could be further examined, which is exactly what the interviewer created space for. We need MUCH more of that these days.
While I appreciate the idea of rapid peer review for journalists, I doubt it will help much. The good ones like Ed Yong already talk to experts before commenting on preprints, and the bad ones will sensationalize anyway. I will say that one of the good things about preprints is that there are far more eyes on the ones with large claims than happens with formal peer review (generally only 2-4 reviewers). Bad papers slip through the cracks in peer review, and then have the veneer of respectability. Vocal preprint critiques make it less likely that formal peer review will miss those same flaws.