I wrote two ESPN+ pieces this week, on the Madison Bumgarner contract and the Corey Kluber trade. I didn’t chat this week as I’m preparing for the holidays and had a lot of personal business that required my time.
On the board gaming front, I ranked the top ten games of 2019 for Paste and the best board games of 2019 by category for Vulture. I’ll have a piece up this weekend on Ars Technica ranking the best board game apps of the year. Also for Paste, I ran down the best games I saw at PAX Unplugged earlier this month.
My second book, The Inside Game: Bad Calls, Strange Moves, and What Baseball Behavior Teaches Us About Ourselves, comes out on April 21st from William Morrow (Harper Collins). You can pre-order it now through that link or wherever delicious books are sold.
And now, the links…
- The Mormon Church has built up a $100 billion fund they claimed was for “charitable” purposes, but has hoarded much of the money and only made distributions to two for-profit businesses owned by the church, which if true is a massive case of tax fraud.
- Professor Julie Sedivy writes about rediscovering her parents’ native tongue, Czech, after her father died, and how the process reconnected her with her roots.
- I’ve been listening to the audiobook version of Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman! and have been struck by just how much of a creep Richard Feynman appears to be in his own telling. It turns out I’m far from the only one who noticed, and, worse, his second wife accused him of physical and verbal abuse. To make it worse, the audio version has its own problems, such as the narrator trying to imitate non-American accents, with an especially cringey version of a Japanese accent that might make Krusty the Clown blush.
- Over at the Atlantic, Amanda Mull says enough with the year-end rankings, and while I agree there are a lot of those posts, I think she misses a large part of the point: They become both conversation starters, which is one of the main reasons I post rankings here, and ways to find new music or books or movies you might not have heard about previously.
- Clint Eastwood is clearly a chauvinist asshole, with his new film, Richard Jewell, fabricating a story about a real journalist offering sex in exchange for information – a story that never happened, about a journalist who has since passed away and can’t defend herself. Ankita Rao writes in the Guardian how harmful this pervasive stereotype is.
- I guess one good thing about the ongoing measles epidemic in the U.S. is that it is waking up more media outlets to the existential threat anti-vaxxers pose. Men’s Health has a column from Jacqueline Detwiler on how scientific BS has brought measles back, and how we can fight for science against denialists.
- A bill in the New Jersey legislature to end non-medical exemptions to mandatory schoolchild vaccinations – which is only rational, since there are no religious prohibitions on vaccinations, and if you have a “philosophical” objection to vaccination then you can just home-school your kid – stalled in the Senate after vocal protests from anti-vaxxers. The Newark Star-Ledger’s editorial board commented by saying that the anti-vaxxer movement has gone off the rails, comparing vaccinations to “hate crimes.” Do you live in New Jersey? Find your legislators and call them Monday to let them know you support this bill.
- The Washington Post‘s Dave Sheinen profiles fringe relief prospect Gabe Klobosits to talk about how the proposed cuts to minor league baseball might impact players at the margins of organized baseball. It’s a good piece, but I think it’s an anecdotal argument that doesn’t consider how many other players like Klobosits never pan out (and he hasn’t yet) and what the overall cost is to employ and develop those players, and additional coaches and staffers, in the hopes you’ll find one or two hidden big leaguers.
- A disabled artist designed a hotel room that is deliberately difficult to stay in, trying to mimic the experience disabled people have in rooms designed solely for the non-disabled, for the Art B&B in Blackpool, England.
- I do like my elite status when I get it, so this New Yorker piece on the madness of airline elite status hit rather close to home.
- The Department of Agriculture listed Wakanda as a trade partner, trading ducks, donkeys, and dairy cows with the U.S., even though Wakanda is a fictional country. We have handed the keys to our government to the dumbest possible people.
- China responded too slowly to a pig virus called African swine fever, leading to an epidemic and fears it will spread beyond China’s borders.
- I’d never heard of Bolze, a French-German hybrid language spoken in a small town in the canton of Fribourg, before finding this BBC Travel post about the language and its associated culture.
- The Anti-Defamation League now lists the ‘ok’ hand gesture as a symbol of hate, depending on context, of course.
Everybody knows that you need Wakandan vibranium to build a Space Force fleet.
Happy Holidays, Keith.
“…and ways to find new music or books or movies you might not have heard about previously.”
Absolutely this. Thank you for the lists, Keith, as my finger came off the pulse of current pop culture a ways back.
That article on Bolze was fascinating. (I am into languages.)
The most annoying thing about the depiction of Kathy Scruggs is that she was not afforded the same courtesy that the male FBI agents were, in that they were not fictionalized or composited. If Eastwood wanted to use that fictional plot point (which he obviously shouldn’t have), then he should have not used the real reporter’s name. It’s really rather disappointing that he’s become this way in his elder years.
Clint Eastwood has always been this way. Perhaps you did not notice that, for example, “Dirty Harry” is basically an advertisement for fascism.
Well, he didn’t do anything but star in Dirty Harry.
Well, if someone with the power to pick their projects chooses to star in an overtly right-wing film (or an overtly left-wing film, or an overtly religious film, etc.), that is generally instructive. Do you have any doubt, for example, the Jim Caviezel (“Passion of the Christ”) is a hard-core Christian, or that Sean Penn (“Milk,” “Dead Man Walking”) is a hard-core liberal? In fact, Paul Newman (noted liberal) was offered “Dirty Harry” and turned it down because the character was too right-wing for him.
Beyond that, Eastwood did uncredited work on that film as both director and executive producer, and recruited a screenwriter (Dean Riesner) to punch up the political messaging of the film, a response to the counterculture of the 1960s.
It’s not just Dirty Harry. Whether it was portraying gun-controlling law enforcement as jack-booted in Unforgiven or the welfare leeches that were Hillary Swank’s family in Million Dollar Baby, Eastwood hasn’t bothered to hide his politics in his films.
Actually, he was also the executive producer, as per IMDB
While we’re on the anti-vaccination nonsense, check out this writeup about how a major funder of anti-vaxx groups has made over $100m+ selling “natural health products”.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2019/10/15/fdc01078-c29c-11e9-b5e4-54aa56d5b7ce_story.html
Throughout history, snake oil sales has always been a lucrative industry. The Dwoskin family also made a lot of money being anti-vaxxers.
I’m not sure if this is something with the website, but I can’t access it on my phone unless I’m on WiFi. If I’m on LTE the page goes blank.
Yep, same issue for me. I’m guessing you have either AT&T or T-Mobile for your carrier. I know others have complained about getting a HTTP 403 (Forbidden), but I’m like you in that I only get a blank screen. It is probably some sort of domain name server issue with those two carriers, though that usually takes a day or two to propagate. This had going on for about two months for me.
Keith, do you heard anything else from this?
Having the same issue with my AT&T mobile service.
Hilarious how journalists are upset about a possibly untrue aside in a movie about :checks notes: a true story of journalists pushing an untrue story.
“a possibly untrue aside”
Can you provide any evidence whatsoever that this “aside” is true? Anything? Because so far, no one involved with the film has been able to do so, and that makes this defamatory – and everyone, not just journalists, should be upset to see it.
Former mormon here. I don’t think they’ve done anything illegal – this is a much more nuanced article: https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2019/12/17/100b-in-mormon-till-does-not-merit-irs-attention/?fbclid=IwAR3pEe07QkKtuEdM8bwYLTl-LPzn0b9Jl_Wr-8Qpnm-23KZuMUs03D8ci68#6e4d48305d5b
The real story here should be that tax laws allow charities to amass these fortunes tax free and with no transparency. Also, you would think that a church that holds itself out as being Jesus’ only true church would act more like him and give most of this money to the poor and needy. I don’t recall the part in the Bible where Jesus became a finance bro and amassed a ton of wealth.
Not sure anything will happen here, but let this serve as a reminder to all of us that tend to be charitably inclined – research how the organization you want to benefit will be using the money before you give it to them.
I saw Richard Jewell last night and I thought it was amazing. I don’t like the trope that women journalists use sex to competently carry out their job duties, but this is also a very minor part of the movie. So minor, I would preferred that Eastwood not use it because it doesn’t matter to the plot. And focusing on such a minor detail in evaluating the movie misses the forest for the trees. The forest in this case is that the movie is largely indictment of the media and law enforcement who sloppily followed a sensationalist story. On that front, the movie was enormously successfully and engrossing. Paul Walter Hauser is simply amazing and deserves a best actor nod from the Academy. Olivia Wilde has also weighed in on the controversy and I thought gave sufficient answer, “The perspective of the fictional dramatization of the story, as I understood it, was that Kathy, and the FBI agent who leaked false information to her, were in a pre-existing romantic relationship, not a transactional exchange of sex for information.” And yes, this was comment made after she initially said that transactional relatonships were common in the 90s while commenting that Scruggs was a multi-faceted person and shouldn’t be reduced to one scene. This is a fictional representation of the movie so I can accept that the nature of the relationship as depicted in the movie was a pre-existing romantic relationship on a fictional level even if I don’t like this plot point because of the broader implications. I don’t think this is necessarily an uncommon experience for me as I sometimes come across movies that I love but still have minor eyerolls of representation that I find problematic, usually from an Asian American perspective. Overall, I hope the controversy doesn’t dissuade people from seeing the movie because the movie is much more than this one scene and shouldn’t define it.