Stick to baseball, 12/14/19.

I was busy these last two weeks, with numerous reaction pieces for ESPN+ subscribers.

I also held a Klawchat, probably my last of 2019, on Friday.

Over at Paste, I reviewed the new small-box game Ankh’or, which plays up to four but works nicely with two, and wrote up the best games I saw in two days at PAX Unplugged (before my daughter got sick and we had to skip day three #sadface).

My second book, The Inside Game: Bad Calls, Strange Moves, and What Baseball Behavior Teaches Us About Ourselves, comes out on April 21st, 2020. You can pre-order it here, and I have tentative appearances for that week at Politics & Prose (DC), Midtown Scholar (Harrisburg), and One More Page (Arlington, VA).

My free email newsletter will return in the next few days – sorry, I got sick, then the winter meetings happened – and you can sign up here.

And now, the links…

Comments

  1. A tenured professor’s take:

    García-Peña’s case underscores how hard it is to evaluate the research records of people in other fields in an objective manner. I looked up her CV, citation counts, and journal metrics, and thought: “Yeah I’m not surprised Harvard didn’t give this person tenure.” Then I read the glowing testimonials from prominent people in her field about how brilliant and groundbreaking her work is. My hunch is that Harvard was placing too much weight on scholarly publication metrics and not enough weight on letters from appropriate external reviewers (not to mention quality of teaching, but that’s a battle for another day).

    If Harvard doesn’t reverse their decision, she’ll have no trouble getting a prestigious academic job somewhere else.

    • A Salty Scientist

      Going through the tenure process right now, and I strongly agree. I would even have trouble adjudicating cases in fields adjacent to mine. IME, tenure standards at most institutions are fuzzy, which makes tenure decisions susceptible to bias.

  2. Andrew Morehead

    While it has been 30+ years, my memory is that Derek Bok (then President of Harvard) overturned a negative vote on the tenure of a well know philosopher who teaches an immensely popular course in the general education offerings but made the political mistake of being more conservative than his colleagues and writing a book attacking John Rawls’ interpretation of Kant. A quick google search did not find supporting evidence for my memory, so I might have some of the details wrong, but it was a huge deal at the time and I think I have the broad strokes right.

    Such decisions are indeed rare, but there is a reason that administrators review tenure recommendations from departments. García-Peña published a book with a well respected press, eight articles, and won teaching awards. Even by the lofty standards of Harvard it is hard to believe that isn’t over the bar.

    Coupled with the well established biases around evaluations of women, POC, and international scholars, this recommendation clearly merits re-examination. I would add there is also a “tax” on POC in the service area as well, where they are often asked to serve on numerous committees in the name of improving the diversity of that committee, but has the consequences of tying up time a tenure-track faculty member could utilize in better ways.