Stick to baseball, 1/26/19.

I had one ESPN+ piece this week, on the three-way trade that sent Sonny Gray to Cincinnati. I also held a Klawchat on Thursday. The 2019 top prospects package begins its rollout on Monday.

At Paste, I reviewed the cooperative game Forbidden Sky, from Pandemic designer Matt Leacock, who adds a fun STEM element to the same framework he’s used in Pandemic and the other Forbidden titles.

And now, the links…

Comments

  1. Mitchell Walk

    Hi Keith – You get a lot of starter board games for kids questions. My daughter (age 5) received Labyrinth (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labyrinth_(board_game)) for Christmas this year and we have a great time playing together. It’s not new at all, but might be worth giving it a shot as another game you can recommend. We also really enjoy the first versions of Ticket to Ride and Carcasonne.

    • Thanks – I do know that game but it’s probably a bit young for my daughter and I to play now.

  2. What makes a tax on pornography any worse than a tax on cigarettes or gas or wealth? Or is it only the wall part of that sentence that is a problem?

    • It’s easy to define a cigarette or gasoline, and the use of both includes negative externalities. I don’t know who is supposed to be defining what content is pornographic, and thus subject to the tax, and its use is a private matter with no externalities.

    • Not pretending to be an expert, but isn’t there a fair amount of research that shows a link between pornography and violence towards women?

      I’ll grant you the definition bit is more tricky.

    • isn’t there a fair amount of research that shows a link between pornography and violence towards women?

      No, there is not.

    • And of course much of pornography is free, making a tax on it absurd to collect. But you can’t spell crazy without (R-AZ), so here we are.

    • But not all of it is free so you could theoretically at least put a extra tax in place in the bits that are pay services. The implementation of this can’t be any harder than Elizabeth Warren’s proposed wealth tax, right?

    • This isn’t an extra fee on pornography that people purchase. Instead it will be software on new devices that will block access to everything deemed pornographic. The “tax” comes in via a way to purchase access to adult websites that would disable the filter. If you disable the software without paying the “pole tax”, you risk jail time and fines. How it decides what is porn and what isn’t is a problem. And of course, websites are going to figure out their way around the filters.

    • Forcing government spyware onto every electronic device people own, to monitor what they view in their homes, would not fare well in the courts. Even Gorsuch would probably draw the line there.

    • I don’t know if “pole tax” was intentional, but regardless, I literally LOL’d

    • Pole tax was intentional and, admittedly, taken from the article Keith linked to.

  3. As always, thanks for the links. Did you see Wesley Morris on Hollywood reconciliation fantasies?

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/23/arts/green-book-interracial-friendship.html

    • Yes, someone (you?) sent it on twitter this morning, after this post was done. I agree with Morris’ point, although he takes forever to get there.

  4. I immediately went and added High Flying Bird to my Netflix list after reading that article. In a lot of ways, I’m both looking forward to and dreading work stoppages that I feel are imminent in both MLB and NFL (don’t really care that much about NBA anymore). I dread them because I enjoy watching the sports, so I don’t want games cancelled, and because I hate how the owners always get away with the “TEH PLAYERZ ARE TEH GREEDY ONEZ!” line and have fans fall for it every single time.

    On that note, did you see how Jerry Crasnick was just hired by MLBPA? He’s going to work as “senior adviser for player, agent, and media relations,” which I hope means he can put his communication skills to work to help make fans realize that the players are just fighting for their fair share and market worth.

    The Joni Ernst story really bothered me, for all the wrong reasons. I’m happy to see that she’s speaking out, but as you said, it really makes me wonder about her vote for Kavanaugh. That man being on SCOTUS is a worse abomination than Thomas and Gorsuch being there. (I honestly think that if Trump is impeached or resigns for anything related to the Mueller investigation, that Kavanaugh should also be impeached. Maybe Gorsuch, too.)
    Not to mention I disagree with Ernst pretty strongly on most every position she holds. I’m curious as to what, if any, impact these revelations will have on her 2020 campaign. Will it help win her sympathy votes or will it turn off certain voters who are disinclined to believe any sexual assault victim? Interesting to watch.

  5. Reactions to this take on the Covington Catholic incident will depend on political leanings. I thought it was spot on.

    https://theconcourse.deadspin.com/dont-doubt-what-you-saw-with-your-own-eyes-1831931203?fbclid=IwAR2pyN0XMBEG9ghuNXotN7o8kd_ft8xD6snVJXtIlq-v-v321wI5EoicRpU

  6. Brian in ahwatukee

    Why not sub out porn for cartoons? Or video games? It becomes absurd very quicky.

  7. Regarding Covington Catholic, adults should not be approaching kids in that manner. I don’t care about your political beliefs, it should not have happened. I can’t believe that any adult would think that the kids did something wrong in that situation. I coach a lot of youth basketball and there are times when a kid will do something that I don’t like. As the adult, I have to keep my composure. I will likely complain about the incident in my car after the game but that is all.

    Not every student attending Catholic schools are privileged. Where I live tuition is income based. Catholic schools in cities are thriving as parents choose to avoid failing public schools. Also, child of all faiths are welcome in Catholic schools.