I’ve been getting reader recommendations for Marlon James’ A Brief History of Seven Killings, winner of the 2015 Man Booker Prize, for several years now, including a recommendation from our Twitter friend Old Hoss Radbourn. I’ve even owned the Kindle version of the book for more than a year, picking it up at some point when it was on sale for $2 or $3, but then procrastinating because the book was so long and seemed dense. Well, it is long, it is dense, and there were certainly parts of the reading experience where I wasn’t entirely sure what was happening, but it’s also very good, a transgressive work of postcolonial fiction that takes a strong political stance and weaves a compelling, violent narrative around the real-life assassination attempt against Bob Marley in 1976.
Marley isn’t named in James’ book, referred to throughout merely as the Singer, and his 1976 performance at the Smile Jamaica concert, an event held to try to stop violence between supporters of the two main political parties in Jamaica at the time, is central to the book. Two days before the concert, seven gunmen broke into Marley’s house at 56 Hope Road and shot him, his manager, his wife, and one other member of the Wailers, although somehow there were no fatalities. James works from historical accounts of the assault, including manager Don Taylor’s claims that he attended a street-justice ‘court’ and execution of several of the gunmen, and then populates the narrative with a cast of extraordinary characters – including some of the shooters, Jamaican drug dealers and underworld figures, a white Rolling Stone writer covering the Singer, a woman trying to escape the violence for the United States, and more – to build this sprawling novel where even the good guys are probably bad guys too.
Although the Singer – the shooting, the concert, just his mere existence at the heart of Jamaican culture in that moment – is central to the story, he’s not a character in the book. James shifts his narrative among multiple people, mostly men, and gives many of them individual stories that give their characters depth. (The BBC story on the Man Booker announcement says the book has “more than 75 characters,” but I think about a dozen come through as core characters with three-dimensional depictions, which is still a remarkable number.) James also writes each chapter in the language of the character speaking it, so much of the book is written in a Jamaican patois that slowed me down while reading, and I’d say it took me a hundred or more pages before I got used to the vastly different vocabulary and speech patterns, but that’s also part of the power of the book to evoke a setting and, for me at least, to emphasize that this is a culture and place that is very different from anything I’ve ever experienced and that I shouldn’t judge its characters or events through my lens.
A Brief History of Seven Killings does imply in the title that the book will be violent, but even that did not adequately prepare me for how violent it is – graphic, yes, but also seeming to revel in its own violence. There’s a scene of a massacre in a New York crack house which is pivotal to the plot of the final section of the book but also horrifying in how casual the murders are and how James chooses to describe them in such bloody fashion. There’s a similarly casual attitude on the part of most of the characters towards rape, and a weird mix of outright homophobia and acceptance of some gay or bisexual men among the gang members involved in the assassination attempt. The novel makes heavy use of many gay slurs, one of which is part of Jamaican patois, which I assume is a fair representation of how these characters might have talked but no less jarring to read.
The core themes of James’ novel, opening a window on a pivotal time in modern Jamaican history while exposing the CIA’s suspected role in fomenting this violence and even accelerating the cocaine trade, recalled those of Junot Diaz’s The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao, which did the same for the brutal rule of Dominican dictator Rafael “El Jefe” Trujillo, who may have been assassinated by the CIA as well. While Diaz’s work made the oppressive Trujillo regime’s crimes against its people more personal, James’s novel puts the government’s misdeeds at a further remove – the authorities’ incompetence and selectively applied attention helped create these enclaves of wealth and poverty, and a lawless environment where local gangs would inevitably pour in to fill the void left by the absence of real government or the corruption of the local police. The infighting between the two main parties and the proxy war in the streets also created the opportunity for the most famous Jamaican in the world at the time, the Singer, to be simultaneously beloved by his people and marked for death by one faction vying for power. I’m at a disadvantage reading such novels, since I came into it with no knowledge of Jamaican postcolonial history and very little knowledge of the country’s culture, but reading James’ novel and then going online to read about events described in the book became a sort of superficial education on the subject.
Because James weaves multiple smaller plots around the central event of the assassination and its aftermath, there’s no single resolution to the novel, and many of the storylines fade out rather than reaching a clear conclusion. One particular death provides closure to other characters, while other events seem to end one phase of Jamaican political culture only to usher in a new one. It all adds to the feeling that James’ novel is the equivalent of a good Tarantino film – it’s hyper-realistic, over the top with violence, with a wide cast of characters, darkly funny at times but also tackling serious themes amidst the shock and gore. It’s not for everyone – one of the Booker committee members said it wasn’t a book you’d give to your mother to read – but it’s a great exemplar of why the Booker’s decision to open the prize up to writers from other countries was a good one.
Next up: Graham Greene’s It’s a Battlefield.
Terrific piece. Thanks for writing this and other reviews. We benefit from your perspective as a reader. One thing, regarding your final sentence: James is Jamaican, and Jamaica is part of the British Commonwealth. The Booker was always open to writers from the Commonwealth. Its recent decision was to open up the award to writers from America.
Trevor: Thank you. I thought James counted as American for the Bookers because he’s lived in the US for over 25 years and might be a U.S. citizen. Plus I think I misread the BBC piece to which I linked (it mentions that the prize had been opened to all nationalities), which mentions the rule change right before discussing James, so I assumed they were saying he’d been ineligible, which would thus imply he was American under their rules since we aren’t in the Commonwealth.
If you are finding it a difficult read I would strongly recommend the audible version..it totally freed the book of its initial shackles. Yes the patios remains but it flows much more freely and you quickly pick it up. This is a book where, I believe, the oral format is stronger than the written one
I am one of the folks who recommended this to you over the years. Glad you finally read it. I see you are powering through the Man/Booker winners as well. I would put this near the top of the modern winners for sure. In the last few years there has been a nice run, with The Sellout, The Luminaries, A Sense of An Ending, Bring Up The Bodies, and this. When you are ready, Alan Hollinghurst’s The Line of Beauty is pretty much a perfect novel, and, both of J.G. Farrell’s works, Troubles and The Siege of Krishnapur are well-done, I have a slight preference for Troubles (which, btw, was a retrospective award called the Lost Man Booker). As far as pure dreck, there is really only one bad book left for you (since you’ve already read Ann Enright!)- DBC Pierre’s Vernon God Little is just not good. Some of the older books are, like the older Pulitzers, a little dull.
I’ll put Vernon God Little off for a while, then. I already have The Finkler Question and The Life and Times of Michael K.. I’m not really racing to finish this list, though – it was more a way to find some new (to me) and interesting novels to mix things up.
The Finkler Question is very interesting. I had a spirited discussion with one of my former professors about it. When you post your review I’ll mention his comments. I love Coetzee, the Michael K is great.