Stick to baseball, 6/9/18.

The 2018 MLB Rule 4 draft has come and gone and I have recaps up for all National League teams and all American League teams. I also wrote my reactions to day one on Monday night, and held a Klawchat on Tuesday after the fourth round, while teams continued drafting.

You can find more details on my top 100 prospects for the draft on my Big Board, and can see my final first-round mock from Monday afternoon, which had 9 picks on the dot and flipped Arizona’s first two picks.

Over at Paste, I recapped what I saw at Paradox Interactive’s PDXCON in Stockholm last month, where they announced tabletop versions of four of their popular video game titles: Crusader Kings, Cities Skylines, Europa Universalis, and Hearts of Iron.

My free email newsletter is back and I hope it’ll be more or less weekly again now that the draft is over; I’m planning to send the next issue this afternoon or tomorrow morning.

Smart Baseball is now out in paperback! I will be at Politics and Prose in Washington, DC, on July 14th, joined by my friend Jay Jaffe (The Cooperstown Casebook), and hope to announce a signing in the Boston area for the weekend of July 28th shortly.

And now, the links…

Comments

  1. “We all deserve to die in a plague for creating this world.”

    I can’t help but feel that way on a pretty regular basis anymore. And I have 3, soon to be 4, nieces/nephews that I’d like to see have wonderful lives. But I fear they’ll never get the chance.

    Speaking of the Muppets, what did you think of the trailer to The Happytime Murders, even though it’s not quite the Muppets?

  2. ““We all deserve to die in a plague for creating this world.”

    I can’t help but feel that way on a pretty regular basis anymore. And I have 3, soon to be 4, nieces/nephews that I’d like to see have wonderful lives. But I fear they’ll never get the chance.”

    I have a three year old daughter and a 1 year old son. I regularly contemplate just running to the mountains to be in a peaceful place as the world dies.

  3. It’s a pedantic point, but voting isn’t really a Constitutional right. A few amendments prohibit voting discrimination, but there is no affirmative right to vote in the Constitution (and certainly there isn’t for ex-felons).

    • Yes it is – unless you are also arguing that freedom of speech is not a constitutional right either.

    • If voting is a constitutional right, then it’s an un-enumerated right under the 9th Amendment. Michael is right, there is no specific guarantee of people being allowed to vote, it just says that you can’t deny people the ability based on certain characteristics/traits. Regarding ex-felons, that article makes a very good point, in that the 15th Amendment says you can’t base a denial of voting rights based on “previous” servitude. The question really becomes, when does that condition change from present to past? Is it when you are released from jail? When you get off probation or parole? What if you received a suspended sentence, or are released early due to overcrowding? It’s a much more complicated question than it appears on the face, because ex-felons should absolutely be allowed to vote, but when do they become an ex-felon versus just a felon?

    • The 1st Amendment applies to everyone. The amendments that mention voting rights only list people that cannot be denied the right to vote if that right is granted to people of other sexes, races, and ages. If a state wanted to limit its voting to all people who made over $1 million a year, that would likely be federally constitutional (or it should be, unless I’m missing something obvious). Bad policy, but likely constitutional.

      You’re citing to one man’s opinion, an opinion that takes a very, very expansive (and likely incorrect) view. He says that voting rights take a back seat to freedom of speech, assembly, etc. There’s a reason for that: those rights are enshrined in the Constitution. The Supreme Court even said in Bush v. Gore that “The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States.”

    • Jeremy, the 14th Amendment, Section 2 specifically says that voting rights can be abridged “for participation in rebellion, or other crime.” I think the 15th Amendment’s “previous servitude” language quite clearly only applies to former slaves, although some may take a broader interpretation than that.

    • The author of the Atlantic article even admitted in 2006 there was no right to vote. https://www.salon.com/2006/09/21/no_right_to_vote/

      And Politifact investigated in 2013: http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2013/may/30/mark-pocan/us-constitution-not-explicit-right-vote-wisconsin-/

    • “nothing in the Constitution explicitly guarantees our right to vote”

      That’s accurate, and also very narrowly worded.

    • Which makes it much different from freedom of speech. I admitted at the beginning that I was nitpicking, but I wouldn’t call voting a constitutional right. It can, in theory, be restricted for many, many people, unlike other rights explicitly mentioned. My guess would be most Americans don’t know that.

  4. You can’t–and you shouldn’t–run. You exert your influence in every sphere in which you have influence, so that the next generations WILL have a chance at a chance.
    Be optimistic for their sake. This is an epochal time, perhaps…though it will be compressed and accelerated by the comm tech that mindlessly mandates our lives. Read, think and resist.

  5. Count me among the group of people who think the world would be a little bit better if *everyone* smiled more often.

    • A Salty Scientist

      That’s fine as a perspective, but problematic if one is asking strangers to smile. At best it’s condescending, and at worst it’s sexist (if one is only asking women).

  6. Everything about the state of Florida never logging into the NCIS database for over a year screams incompetence, or worse, from the top. From the article, there were only two people who had the access; someone who recently moved to a different position but kept responsibilities from their old position (and were terminated) and another who had zero training. Both worked in the mailroom, which makes zero sense for putting in charge of accessing an external database. Why wasn’t IT involved to bring in some alerting and monitoring, both with regards to the state having access to the database and checking the volume of calls to make sure it is being done an expected number of times?
    They never had status reports sent to upper management on a weekly or monthly basis? How did they immediately know that there were 365 applications for a concealed weapons permit that should be re-done? What about the other 200,000+ applications, were they ever re-done?

  7. The Muppets article/interview is delightful. Thanks for sharing it.