Stick to baseball, 5/12/18.

This week brought the return of the redraft columns, where I go back ten years and ‘redraft’ the first round with full hindsight. This year’s edition redrafted the first round of 2008, led by Buster Posey and with several guys taken after the tenth round (one in the 42nd!) making the final 30; as well as an accompanying look at the 20 first-rounders who didn’t pan out. Both are Insider pieces, as is my column of scouting notes on Yankees, Phillies, Nats, and Royals prospects.

My review of the new Civilization board game is up at Paste this week. Civilization: A New Dawn takes the theme of the legendary Sid Meier video game franchise and simplifies it to play in about an hour to an hour and a half, but I felt like some of the better world-building aspects were lost in the streamlining.

Smart Baseball is now out in paperback! I’ll be at DC’s famed bookstore Politics & Prose on July 14th to flaunt the fruits of noble birth and, perhaps, sign copies of the book. I’m also working on a signing in greater Boston for later that month, so stay tuned for details. Also, please consider signing up for my free email newsletter.

I also wanted to mention a few new baseball books by folks I know that have come out in the last six weeks: Russell Carleton’s The Shift: The Next Evolution in Baseball Thinking, which I think goes well with my own book without covering much of the same ground; and two books on the Dodgers, Michael Schiavone’s The Dodgers: 60 Years in Los Angeles and Jon Weisman’s Brothers in Arms: Koufax, Kershaw, and the Dodgers’ Extraordinary Pitching Tradition, even though Jon liked the movie Moneyball and therefore was wrong about it.

And now, the links…

Comments

  1. “despite progressive policies like higher minimum wages and taxes or bans on certain types of pollution. ”

    Because of. Because of, not despite of. A population that can afford the goods and services it produces, and is healthy enough to stay employed results in more economic activity.

    • Also I’m not sure about the line about pollution. California is one of the few states that’s actively trying to work on climate change and other pollution-caused problems. Californians undoubtedly produce too much pollution, and traffic is terrible. Is the pollution worse than in other parts of the country? How does California’s pollution production compare to other high-traffic states, like Massachusetts and Virginia?

    • My point is that most classical economic theories would argue that high rates of taxation and regulation will slow economic growth. In California, at least right now, that’s not happening. The one-size-fits-all idea of lowering tax rates to spur economic growth may not apply equally well to a developing economy like Estonia in 1991 (which has grown fantastically well thanks to a low-tax regime) and a highly developed one with a diverse population like that of California.

  2. Imagine how great California could be if they let people build the occasional apartment building once in a while.

  3. Nice to look at the BEA data underlying that California article and see that economies are growing pretty much everywhere. 12 states grew 2.5% or more on 2017 and only 3 shrank.

    • But again, California has enacted policies that, in theory, should inhibit growth, and it’s growing anyway.