Stick to baseball, 2/17/18.

My one new piece for Insiders this week covered the top 30 prospects for this year’s MLB Draft, in advance of yesterday’s opening night in Division 1. And I held a Klawchat on Thursday. Unfortunately I did not recover enough from whatever ailment I had this week to make the trip to Myrtle Beach, but hope to be on the road next weekend.

I reviewed the board game Seikatsu, one of my daughter’s new favorites, here this week, with another review hitting Paste‘s site next week. Also, I never tweeted this link at all, but reviewed the Romanian-language film Graduation, from Oscar-nominated director Cristian Mungiu, on Wednesday.

Smart Baseball comes out in paperback on March 13th! Some readers have reported difficulty finding the hardcover version in stores, but it is still available on amazon at the moment.

And now, the links…

Comments

  1. I found that WaPo piece on how many school shootings there have been this year to be the most tone-deaf, irrelevant piece I’ve read this year. The journalistic equivalent of telling someone they used a comma when a semicolon was called for. Does the number of school shootings change, depending on how tight or loose your definition is? Of course it does–no great insight there. And if the “true” number is 5 or 10 or 15 instead of 18, does that substantively change…anything? It does not. Not one iota.

    • Tone-deaf, perhaps, but irrelevant? I think inflating the number of incidents plays right into the hands of the NRA and its adherents’ beliefs that advocates of gun control will stop at nothing to take all their guns (and, in the words of one asshat who showed up in my mentions the other day, “erode the Constitution.”) Five school shootings is horrific enough. Exaggerating the number doesn’t help – people don’t respond more to a greater number of tragedies or a larger victim total – and it may actively hurt the effort to get any semblance of meaningful gun reform passed.

    • CB – Despite what some folks in high office might tell you, facts matter and should be corrected when erroneously stated. If someone advocates for a position I agree with (here better gun control, a position I strongly support), but does so using incorrect facts or inferences from those facts, I have to push back before those who disagree with the position use those mistaken facts to distort the debate.

    • keith: I am afraid I disagree. The WaPo author clearly had an agenda, given the manner in which his information was presented. I think that he has set the stage for a worse version of what you are talking about, since now the gun nuts can say, “See! Even the liberal Washington Post says that the anti-gun folks lie and exaggerate!”

      dlf: Thanks for your patronizing response. Perhaps if you learn how to write, I will hold your words in higher regard.

    • Keith, I absolutely agree that this is important. I do not agree with your position on gun control, but I’m happy to have an honest, fact driven discussion of that (or any) issue, so I appreciate that you point out what seems to be obvious here (what dlf said quite well, and not patronizingly at all): facts matters. That is simple.

      This is, however, yet another example of what I have become sadly used to here; CB insults someone for disagreeing with his position. Sometimes he starts it, sometimes he doesn’t, but I can’t remember the last time he posted something without resorting to personal attacks. Here, for example, he says “[p]erhaps if you learn how to write, I will hold your words in higher regard.” Even if dlf’s writing were terrible (it’s not), that would be unnecessary. I hope, Keith, that you will remind CB to uphold the decorum you have always demanded of your audience here; there’s no reason for him to care about my opinion, but I’d imagine from his frequent posts that he at least respects and cares about yours.

    • And Jeremy criticizes me for making personal attacks…by making a personal attack.

      If you’re struggling to find a post from me in which I did not “resort to personal attacks,” perhaps you might refer to my first posting in this very thread. I did not turn snarky until dlf’s passive-aggressive, condescending post.

    • I didn’t think dlf’s post was either of those things, FWIW. Seemed like he was advocating for the same thing I was.

    • Well, it came off differently to me.

      In any case, the assertion that I always feel the need to attack someone simply does not stand up to scrutiny.

    • CB, I don’t believe I attacked you, but if you took it that way that’s unfortunate. I pointed out that you frequently resort to insulting people. That is, as best I can tell, accurate. Keith, feel free to tell me I’m out of line if you think I am, but I don’t see it.

  2. Keith,

    I’m surprised you haven’t written about Douglas Schifter yet, and am curious on your take.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/06/nyregion/livery-driver-taxi-uber.html

  3. Keith – no Top Chef reviews this season?

    • I announced back in December that I wasn’t doing recaps this year, and have said in at least three separate chats since then that I wasn’t doing them or even watching the show.

  4. Keith – not watching TC means you missed the burn by Tom when he basically said one week all their food sucked and was like it was made by amateurs (paraphrasing). This season has been much more gimmicky and overall not as good as past seasons, in my opinion. Put another way, there hasn’t been one chef on this season that makes me want to go visit their restaurant.

  5. Keith,
    Was the pitcher 16 when that went down? I ask because I’m talking to counselors and asking them on this subject I found from them this is quite common. Usually not 16 though. Most said 13 yr olds and younger in the same family.
    Hopefully the younger one got help also.

    • Heimlich? He was 15. It is possible, even likely, that he was himself a victim of abuse or other trauma … but that doesn’t change the outlook for him.

  6. Scott Pruitt is not only unqualified for the job at EPA (and an absolute slimebag in my book), he is the antithesis of what that leader of that agency should stand for: regular folks over big monied interests. But we should not be focusing our attention on the money he’s spent on traveling; that’s small potatoes in the grand scheme of things. Instead, we should be extremely alarmed by the amount of money and precious time we will have to spend in the future cleaning up and restoring the country from the amount of damage he has allowed to happen. It is shameful in this day and age that short-term profits are more important than the vast majority of people in this nation and to its children who will have to face an uncertain future.

    • I agree there are more important issues to hold against Pruitt, but there is a chance the coverage leads to a resignation the way Tom Price was oustered. There is also a slight chance we get someone who is not as awful. Plus it would slow down any changes during the transition.

  7. The AI article is great. Those of us who have been paying attention know whats coming for the economy, but this was a great overview of the problems.

  8. Another courageous NYTimes piece of the single greatest threat facing this country today:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/17/opinion/sunday/yoga-pants-sweatpants-women.html

  9. I cancelled my WaPo subscription over the McArdle hire. I’ve read her enough over the years to know just who she is and I can’t use any fraction of my money to support her. It’s weird how the NYT and WaPo set themselves up as a civically responsible thing to subscribe to and now their OpEd strategy is in large part to troll their own readers for clicks. Seems short-sighted, though maybe the people who care enough to cancel a subscription over it are a small minority.

  10. Keith, in case you haven’t seen it yet, there is an interesting piece on Splitsider about Facebook’s deleterious effect on online comedy. It’s an interview with comedy writer Matt Klinman, and there were some parallels to the WIRED article.

    http://splitsider.com/2018/02/how-facebook-is-killing-comedy/