Stick to baseball, 12/9/17.

For Insiders, I had four pieces this week (and may have another before the day is out). I wrote about what Shohei Ohtani’s deal with the Angels means for them and the AL West, Seattle’s trade for Dee Gordon, the signings earlier this week of Kevin Maitan, Mike Minor, and Miles Mikolas, and deals involving Welington Castillo, Aledmys Diaz, and Brad Boxberger. I held a Klawchat on Thursday.

For Ars Technica, I looked at the upcoming virtual reality adaptation of the board game Catan.

If you missed them here on the dish, my annual cookbook recommendations, gift guide for cooks, and top 100 board game rankings are all up.

Also, here’s your weekly reminder to buy my book Smart Baseball for everyone on your holiday list.

And now, the links…

Comments

  1. Good longread this morning at ESPN, about how the University of Louisville’s athletic department became swimming in cash while the academic side of the school saw drastic budget cuts. There’s a $160M shoe deal, a $250M taxpayer funded basketball arena that is cost the citizens of Louisville even more, an athletic director being paid more than the entire budgets for big academic departments like math and history, and the men’s basketball team is now under investigation by the FBI.

    http://www.espn.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/21710106/louisville-athletic-director-tom-jurich-leveraged-big-deals-build-university-sports-powerhouse-only-watch-burn-amid-charges-excess

  2. The Economic Policy Institute has never endorsed an idea that wasn’t also part of the Democratic Party platform, so let’s treat their analysis with a grain of salt. (These corporate cuts probably aren’t terrible in principle but in practice they will be because of other tax law changes & the deficit.)
    That said, I’m only commenting to let you know I saw the stealth edit of “won’t” to “will.”

    Keep up the great work.

    • While the EPI is left-leaning, let’s not grossly overstate the point. They have certainly opposed Democratic policies when they perceived them to be problematic (and, in particular, anti-labor). They were leading the charge against the TPP, for example, when Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were both strongly for it, and Bernie Sanders had nothing (yet) to say.

    • Someone (you?) pointed out the wording mistake on Twitter. I had rewritten the sentence and forgot to flip the verb.

  3. “These corporate cuts probably aren’t terrible in principle but in practice they will be because of other tax law changes & the deficit.”

    Corporate tax cuts is they incentivize pulling cash out of companies, so instead of using the companies resources to grow and develop the company, they are taken as profits.

    This is terrible in principle.

    • “pulling cash out of companies”

      And…where does the cash go? To shareholders? And what do they do with it? Invest in other companies? (Parts of it, surely.) Spend it so it goes as income to others? (Parts of it, probably.) Money doesn’t disappear just because it’s no longer on a corporate balance sheet. Of all the problems with the tax bill, that is not one of them.