A mystery novel aimed at kids, Ellen Raskin’s The Westing Game is perfectly charming even for (much) older readers. I tackled it to vet it for my daughter (who then said she wasn’t interested, but I bet she’ll come back to it at some point), finding myself caught up in how the author packed such a clever, intricate plot in a short novel. It won the Newbery Medal for the year’s best work of children’s literature; I think it’s only the fifth winner I’ve read in its entirety (along with The Giver, A Wrinkle in Time, The Graveyard Book, and Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH). Although it takes a temporary turn towards the dark in the middle, I’ll spoil it just a little bit to say that Raskin wraps up the entire story very nicely, and shows the reader just how many clues were right there the entire time for the characters and the audience alike.
The start of the book is a bit of a slow burn, but once you get about a third of the way into it, the pace picks up dramatically, once the long setup is done. Samuel Westing, a reclusive millionaire and owner of Westing Paper Products, dies right at the beginning of the book, and has set up an elaborate scheme for his sixteen “heirs” – most of whom are unrelated to him and surprised they’re even mentioned – to compete in teams of two for the prize of the inheritance. Many of the heirs have unspoken connections to Westing or his family; some are in the apartment building where the story takes place, Sunset Towers, under false names. Each team gets a set of five one-word clues and must try to follow the oblique instructions in Westing’s will to identify which of the heirs killed Westing and thus win the prize.
The star of the story is the youngest heir, “Turtle” Wexler, a mischievous, astute thirteen-year-old girl who will kick the shins of anyone who pulls her hair braid, and who plays second billing to her older sister Angela within the family. Turtle and a judge, J.J. Ford, an African-American woman who is open about her connection to Westing, do the bulk of the real investigating, Turtle to win (and also to make money in the stock market), Ford for the thrill of the hunt. The narrative jumps around to other pairs as well, which I think helps to obfuscate the actual answer to the mystery by giving the reader too many ideas about the various clues, enough to send me in the wrong direction for about half of the book. There’s no other character as magnetic as Turtle, who seemed to me to be a direct ancestor of another of my favorite child protagonists, Flavia de Luce.
The real gift of this book is how Raskin has her characters playing with words, thinking about their meanings, the order, even messing with pronunciations or misspellings, all to try to decipher the clues. It’s a subtle encouragement to the reader to do the same – to expand one’s thinking about how we use words, and how tiny shifts can alter the meanings of anything we say or write, including, to pick one relevant example, the irregular will of an eccentric millionaire.
There’s one scene that might be disturbing for younger readers, although it’s eventually resolved in a way that should satisfy everybody. The remainder plays out as a fairly straight mystery novel, with a structure that certainly recalled Agatha Christie’s ‘bigger’ novels, where she uses a larger cast of suspects and moves the narrative around frequently with shorter chapters. The Westing Game feels in spots like a mystery for adults that was slimmed down – not dumbed down, just made shorter – for younger readers, given how quickly the narrative jumps, often with one character noticing something or coming to a conclusion right before the switch. It works, and might keep younger readers more engaged, although given how many mysteries I’ve read for adults I did get the occasional sense of watching a video with too many jump cuts.
Next up: I’m halfway through Elena Ferrante’s The Days of Abandonment, her second novel, written before the Neapolitan quartet that begins with My Brilliant Friend.
This was one of my favorite books as a kid; glad to see you liked it as well. I’m looking forward to my godchildren reading it as well when they’re a bit older.
I was a precocious reader and at the age of ten I thought this was the best book ever… for the six months between when I read it and when I read the Lord of the Rings. I’ve re-read it more than once over the years and still love it.
Ellen Raskin had another one I remember as good from my childhood, The Tattooed Potato and Other Clues, but that I’ve never re-read; I think it was out of print for a while and it was hard to find in the pre-Amazon days when I was looking. That one’s a little darker, but honestly I never thought The Westing Game dark at all. Not like Bridge to Terabithia, which is an all-time great kids’ book but will mess you up.
The Mysterious Disappearance of Leon, I mean Noel was also a favorite (Westing Game was the absolute fave though). Figgs and Phantoms wasn’t quite as realized, but has a plot point around The Nigger Of The Narcissus that is (I think) astonishing in a children’s book. Considering the Conrad novel has been reissued with the Onion-esque title The N-word Of The Narcissus, I’m itching to see if Raskin has been similarly bowdlerized.
read that for class in elementary school and have never forgotten how much i loved it (and the twist). i have entertained the idea of re-reading it (i am big fan of re-reading books) for a while and having just read your write-up, i will.
and speaking of re-reading, i just re-read “the recognitions” and loved it even more this time. i know you were not the biggest fan but i urge you try gaddis again. maybe “JR”?