My annual column of breakout player picks went up on Thursday for Insiders, and I held a Klawchat that same day. I had one other Insider post since the last roundup, on four prospects I saw in Arizona, one Cub, one Royal, and two Padres.
You can preorder my upcoming book, Smart Baseball, on amazon, or from other sites via the Harper-Collins page for the book. The book now has two positive reviews out, one from Kirkus Reviews and one from Publishers Weekly.
Also, please sign up for my more-or-less weekly email newsletter.
And now, the links…
- Call your Representatives ASAP if you oppose the stripping of online privacy rights, not that I think anything’s going to stop the Republicans from helping the ISPs here.
- Why don’t we have a Lyme disease vaccine for humans, even though there’s one for dogs? Blame the anti-vaxxers.
- You can also blame them if rubella, which causes autism, makes a comeback.
- Venezuelan’s spiraling economic crisis means there’s a severe shortage of critical drugs for the mentally ill.
- Thank goodness the Administration is trying to save us from such dangerous people as the Syrian refugees who’ve started a booming chocolate company in Canada. I feel so much safer already.
- Is the Admin’s ban on the use of laptops and tablets on certain Middle Eastern airlines actually just retaliation in an ongoing trade war?
- I don’t complain about the amount I pay in federal income taxes, but I do think it’s ridiculous how difficult and complicated it is. (I have used an accountant for the last five years, since my work contracts became more involved.) Why is filing still so difficult? Because Intuit and H&R Block spend millions in lobbying to keep it that way.
- An independent group that monitors civilian deaths from airstrikes (including those by drones) says they are overwhelmed by the uptick in such claims since the new Administration took office. The drone program was one of the worst of Obama’s policies, but it appears it’s been cranked up since the regime change. This is a very good way to make a whole new generation of terrorists who hate the United States.
- You should be horrified by the “advice” a Homeland Security official gave Gizmodo staffers on workplace violence.
- The New England Journal of Medicine has an op ed suggesting some better answers for HHS Secretary Tom Price on mandatory immunizations.
- If you live in Florida, call your state reps to tell them you oppose the new bill to allow the teaching of creationism in public schools. It’s a violation of the separation of church and state anyway, but still, let’s not go down that particular toilet.
- The gluten-free craze is driven by anti-science and opportunism. A lot of pseudo-doctors (like “naturopaths” or chiropractors) sell a bunch of tests and treatments to people who don’t need any of this, using consumer misperceptions about things like gluten.
- Chiropractors like this one, accused of practicing medicine without a license. If your chiropractor starts claiming s/he can cure or treat various diseases, call your state licensing board.
- A company that takes advantage of consumer ignorance about science had to recall one of its products because it contained peanuts. So much of organic/non-GM marketing is about the claim that consumers of other products don’t know what’s in their food. The irony is thick here.
- Julie DiCaro asks Indiana basketball to reconsider considering Steve Alford for its open head coaching position.
- I particularly enjoyed Will Leitch’s look at the biggest droughts in various pro and college sports because I’m pretty team-agnostic in any sport, so my rooting interest is often determined by who’s gone the longest without a title/playoff appearance/whatever, or who’s never had one in franchise or school history.
- There’s supposed to be a ruling in the Roman Polanski rape case due within the next 90 days. He’s 83, and spent 40 years outside the U.S., fighting extradition and avoiding jail time for drugging and raping a 13-year-old girl. Why the fuck would we let this creep back into the country?
- New York Times food critic Pete Wells visited Austin’s Franklin BBQ.
- Tacos Chiwas, one of the hottest new restaurants in Phoenix from 2016, was burglarized earlier this month. I ate there in October and was a big fan of their Chihuahuan-style tacos, which were an absolute bargain too. There’s a GoFundMe page to try to help the restaurant’s owners recover some of what they lost.
- I gave Leitch a link, so now I have to give one to Grierson. Here’s Tim’s rundown of the documentaries at the annual True/False film festival, held in Columbia, Missouri.
- I was unfamiliar with the annual Disability Day of Mourning until reading this editorial on the unnoticed crimes of caregivers killing their disabled charges.
- The Texas state alcohol licensing board spent tends of thousands of public dollars partying, traveling to expensive resorts to drink with industry lobbyists. The state government of Texas is a septic tank.
- White supremacists have created a “guide” to posing as black people while operating troll accounts on social media.
- High Street on Market is one of my favorite restaurants in Philly, maybe my favorite, period. I didn’t realize that chef-owner Eli Kulp was left paralyzed by the May 2015 Amtrak derailment until I saw this week about a new wine from his restaurant group. They’ll donate $25 from every bottle to spinal cord research.
- I’m sure you’ve seen one or both of these, but in the Schadenfreude Department, we have the idiot woman who voted for Trump, only to see her husband arrested and likely deported, and rural Trump voters about to lose their development programs if his proposed budget passes. I want to feel bad, but these people each bear some tiny sliver of responsibility for this mess we’re in. Voting matters, and voting incorrectly has consequences.
Schadenfreude at a family being ripped apart is messed up, dude.
I don’t see why. With her vote, she was more than willing to hurt other people.
Empathy is no parlor game, you either have it or you don’t.
Keith says he isn’t feeling happy that the family was ripped apart, just that he isn’t feeling empathetic for them either. And I haven’t really heard anyone who feels for them unless they are close to the family. Maybe the woman’s husband should have said he has always a fan of the “Ny Mets” like Apu on the Simpsons.
For my part, I have plenty of empathy. But not for her. Like Keith, I’m not celebrating her misfortune, but I’m also not particularly lamenting it. I see little difference between her and, say, someone who drinks, drives, and kill themselves. Actions have consequences…
For situations like these, I’ve been stealing a line from Esquire’s proudly liberal Charles Pierce: “I have empathy but no sympathy.” As a young newlywed in the 1980s, I ate my share of meat-free meals, did a lot of amateur auto repair, and cashed about a half dozen unemployment checks. Like almost everybody, I understand walking a worried floor, wondering where the money is going to come from. So, when someone in economic peril decides that a purported billionaire, with a documented (often self-professed!) history of amassing wealth via dubious methods, will be a knight in shining armor for the working class, I’m with CB. It’s nearly impossible to muster any sympathy.
It’s not about lack of empathy.Keith’s word – Schadenfreude – “pleasure derived by someone from another person’s misfortune.” Deriving pleasure because someone’s vote resulted in the destruction of her family is messed up.
Eh, I think schadenfreude is a little more complicated than that definition. The Wikipedia entry on it also uses the term “self-satisfaction,” which in this case is probably more apt than “pleasure.” Others who’ve commented that they feel no sympathy for this woman mirror my views quite well too.
The truly astounding thing was her saying “I wish I hadn’t voted at all.” Aside from the people who spoiled their ballot with non-competitive candidates, there were two choices. Her husband is in jail and she doesn’t wish she’d voted for the person who would have ensured he wasn’t incarcerated. She wishes only that she hadn’t voted for the person who made it happen. I cannot classify that brain as being functioning.
Ronaldo is trying so hard. Why do any of us owe our empathy for this woman who made a conscious choice to support a VERY clear policy goal?
I appreciate how hard you trying to deflect from the intentions expressed, Ronaldo, but feel like your efforts might be better spent elsewhere.
Is this the same Ronaldo/Ronaldinho from before that came looking to start arguments?
I guess who is going to fell sorry for this woman? The people who think that all forms of illegal immigration need to be dealt with harshly are going to say “Good!” The people who want better solutions to the problem are going to say “You voted for the candidate that said they were going to do this. What did you expect?” Her story isn’t unique other than she voted for Trump. Her physical action of voting for Trump may have been small, but her goal behind it wasn’t. I’ll feel sorry for those families that are truly victims in this, not those that participated in their own demise. The saying of “You made your bed, now sleep in it” applies.
Is this the same Ronaldo/Ronaldinho from before that came looking to start arguments?
Not the same. I believe I have that other person blocked.
She sounds like she knows she bears some responsibility. There’s your opportunity for empathy. Moral scolding sounds no better from the left than the right, but hey enjoy your dopamine rush.
This Ronaldo has said nothing wrong. Suggesting he go elsewhere for disagreeing seems a greater offense to the spirit of discussion.
I have no problem whatsoever with Ronaldo’s comments or with him disagreeing with me.
I’m sorry for asking if this Ronaldo was the same as the old one that caused problems. It wasn’t my intention to say that he should leave because of the questions he’s asking.
Yeah, for the record I’m not trying to start trouble or anything. I just have a different take on things than Keith, whom I respect and feel like I can respectfully disagree with. The only reason I visit this site is that I appreciate his takes, and the Saturday links are a fantastic curation of important stories.
Sure the woman messed up, and her lack of awareness is costing her dearly (though not really, she would be in the same predicament had she spent every waking hour of 2016 volunteering for Hillary Clinton). But she didn’t know this was going to happen. She should have known better, but she didn’t. But her family is being destroyed. Call it pleasure, call it self-satisfaction, I just can’t get there. I personally know a family who are proud Republicans and sent their son to Iraq; he came back home with PTSD and killed himself. They voted for Bush and supported the war full-throatedly. I can acknowledge that their political beliefs have come back to haunt them, but I feel absolutely terrible for them and self-satisfaction just doesn’t seem like something I could ever feel when I think about them. I feel the same way about this woman. Her kids are losing their dad. I don’t know. It just seems off to be self-satisfied or whatever by her fate.
The article about killing disabled folks is horrible. Therr are organizations that give respite for medically fragile children and adults which is what I’ve heard is a part of these deaths. I literally can trust about 5 people long term with my daughter (meaning a day) and it can be really hard and trying. We take advantage of an org locally in phoenix (Ryan house (can’t link, on mobile)) that allows us to go on vacation or take care of life events without her.
Thankfully about 90% of children who are diagnosed with Downs in utero are aborted thanks to people like Keith Law supporting abortion-on-demand, and using their platform as baseball writers to advocate as much.
Do you have any data that could support this assertion?
“about 90% of children who are diagnosed with Downs in utero are aborted”
Considering the difficulty to access an abortion in many states, in addition to the substantial amount of Americans who are philosophically opposed to this particular medical procedure, that number cannot possibility be correct.
This New York Times article in favor of keeping abortion legal cites this stat: Though precise numbers are unavailable, at least two-thirds and as many as 90 percent of fetuses found to have Down syndrome in utero are aborted. I think the issue is the denominator – how many pregnant women are able to afford the tests to find out if their fetuses might have Down Syndrome? – although the numerator is also high because the same “soft” markers can mean higher risk of miscarriage or stillbirth.
Terry, I’m flattered you think I’m that powerful, but Roe v. Wade was decided five months before I was born. I warned you in October (the last time you made a stupid comment about my views on abortion) about your tone, and I’ll warn you again.
Wow, I do (at least to some degree) stand corrected. 90% sounded truly unbelievable to me.
The thing I don’t get about people like Terry is, are they suggesting that someone who works at ESPN (or as a college professor, or at a newspaper, or as an actor, or in some other fairly public role) is not allowed to have opinions? I mean, it’s not like this is meadowparty.espn.com.
The Amazon page for your book also suggested I buy a book called “Old School Grit” (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01N0N578T?ref_=ams_ad_dp_ovrl). I want to believe someone at Amazon is trolling you.
A few years ago, the national firms lobbied successfully to require all tax preparers to take additional training. They benefited two ways. They can charge their employees more for the training they provide and many small tax prepares quit because of the increased requirements. I prepare taxes as a second job out of my house. In my opinion, one should ever have their taxes prepared by a national firm. I would estimate that 90% of people paying to have their taxes prepared could use someone like myself and save a lot of money. People with extremely complex returns should use a CPA firm.
Indiana already hired someone else, so no worries on the Alford front, so to speak. I didn’t remember that story about, though, so I’m a little disturbed.
On the other hand, the Polanski stuff always makes me uncomfortable. Mostly because I think Chinatown is one of the best films ever made, and The Pianist is excellent. So, as with Casey Affleck recently, I run through the gauntlet of trying to separate my like and praise for their artistic output with my distaste for their personal lives.
Lastly, I work for a CPA firm as a staff accountant, and I’ll be studying for the CPA exam later this year. H&R Block is always derided by those within the accounting profession. But I had always used their service to file my taxes, mostly because they were free. They are great for people who don’t have complicated returns or don’t have businesses. Once you have any kind of complexity, though, using a CPA firm is a good idea. But like Joe D said, I don’t think a national CPA firm is a good idea for personal tax returns. There are countless local CPA firms that are probably much better for that purpose.
Along Will Leitch’s article, a few years ago I decided to figure what top division sports team has the longest championship drought anywhere in the world. Since European soccer leagues have promotion/relegation, I made a rule that in order to qualify for the list, a team had to be in the top division for that country at least 50% of the time. Complicating matters is that times they also usually have other trophies to be won other than the league title.
So the team that has gone the longest without a league title is Stoke City in England, which was founded in 1863. However, Stoke City has won a League Cup (third most important trophy in English football) in 1972. So the team without any major trophies with the longest drought seems to be Somerset County Cricket Club in England, founded in 1875. Hamilton Academical, a soccer team in Scotland, was founded in 1874. They just missed the 50% barrier (I think they were 40’s). They are currently in Scotland’s top division.
Glad you linked to the article calling the ‘laptop’ ban on Middle-Eastern carriers what it is: a way for the US (and now I believe UK) to strike back at the ‘ME3’ (Emirates Airline, Etihad & Qatar Airways). I firmly believe that is what this is, and they added other airlines from other countries in that region to make it less apparent.
The major EU and US airlines have been lobbying hard for both areas to be more protectionist in disfavoring the ME3 airlines from rapidly expanding, dumping ridiculously cheap fares and in many ways un-needed capacity on the EU and US market. The US majors ratcheted up the lobbying effort when Trump got elected as well.
While I don’t think what the US airlines have claimed is 100% accurate (the ME3 airlines have received umpteen billions in government subsidies to offset losses), it does raise questions when I can travel non-stop to India for $680 on Etihad.
Also, the human rights violations clouding those airlines (worker conditions for grounds crews and the people that built the massive airports that are essentially there to house the ME3 airlines) makes it worse as well.
Any chance we could get a post on your best of Philadelphia restaurants? My wife and I recently moved here and always enjoy your food reviews.
That’s a good idea. I’ll do that some time soon.
I think the WaPo link suggesting the laptop ban
was implemented for economic reasons was
off base. We know laptop based explosives have
already been used, and methodologies will only
get better in the upcoming months. I expect
these restrictions to be extended to other airlines
and more routes.
Get used to typing on your phone!