Stick to baseball, 1/14/17.

I’ve been writing Top 100 stuff (and making related phone calls) all week, so the only content I wrote that didn’t appear here on the dish was my review of the boardgame DOOM, an adaptation of the 1990s first-person shooter video game and an update of an earlier attempt to make a boardgame of it.

You can preorder my upcoming book, Smart Baseball, on amazon, or from other sites via the Harper-Collins page for the book. Also, please sign up for my more-or-less weekly email newsletter.

And now, the links…

Comments

  1. Well let me tell you something, KLaw, whatcha gonna do when Hulkamania and Peter Thiel’s billions run wild on you?????

  2. The turmeric/curcumin story is a perfect example of how dishonest quacks like Mercola can manipulate people who don’t have an in-depth understanding of science and medicine. There are a ton of legitimate scientific papers that show curcumin having a positive effect against numerous disease causing pathways in vitro (to put it in layman’s terms, in a test tube). These effects don’t hold up in the body because curcumin is digested extremely fast, so very little makes it into cells and it has no pharmacological effect (this is a good thing too, curcmin inhibits so many enzymes that if it wasn’t digested quickly it would probably be highly toxic). But it’s easy for someone like Mercola to highlight the studies and tell gullible people that turmeric will fight cancer or whatever else ails them.

  3. Keith, what helps you more, if we buy your ebook or hardcover? Keep up the great work.

    • I’ve looked at my contract, and in the end it’s probably the same either way. There are escalating royalty rates based on physical copies sold – if I hit certain thresholds, the rate bumps up – but if it’s a moderate seller it will probably be a difference of pennies to me. Thank you for asking.

  4. Jesus, I don’t know if I can bring myself to read the Shapiro and West pieces. Different ends of the spectrum, both blowhards.

  5. Mercola made over $10 million last year?! I was led to believe that only those on the payroll “Big Pharma” were making money. Maybe, just maybe, a shitload of money can be made being anti-vaxxer, like Mercola and working for the Dwoskin family.

    I just read Mercola’s Wikipedia article. My favorite sentences:

    “He has written two books which have been listed on the New York Times bestseller list: The No-Grain Diet (May 2003) and The Great Bird Flu Hoax (October 2006). In the latter book, Mercola dismisses medical concerns over an avian influenza pandemic, asserting that the government, big business, and the mainstream media have conspired to promote the threat of avian flu in order to accrue money and power.”

  6. Ryan is exactly right regarding turmeric/curcumin.

    It turns out that Derek Lowe, in addition to being a pretty good pitcher, is a well-respected blogger who writes about the pharmaceutical industry from a chemists perspective. Just this week he wrote about the issue with believing that curcumin is a panacea of healing: http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2017/01/12/curcumin-will-waste-your-time

  7. If you don’t like the direction of Sherlock this season, you’re going to be very unhappy with BBC’s new Hercule Poirot series. He’s going to be an mma trained, parkour enthusiast with tat sleeves.

  8. I’m having trouble summoning any outrage for the pillow advertising issue. Can someone explain to me why this is such a serious breach of consumer trust? I don’t care about the legalities, etc., I mean why is this such a big problem?

    This is a 100% serious question, not trying to be argumentative or to indicate that I know better. I’d love to be informed if anyone has insight.

    • It comes down to honesty in advertising. If someone advertised that they have a “special” BOGO deal, but it’s ALWAYS available, then that’s neither special nor a deal. MyPillow isn’t the first to get whacked for this; Macy’s and a few other department stores have been hit with enormous fines and/or judgments in the last decade or so for this same thing, where they advertised a “sale” but never actually sold the items for the full price that was listed (i.e. item “lists” for $100, is sold everyday in reality for $80, but always with a 20% off sign on it).

      Where I’m shocked this doesn’t come into play more is the auto business, where the “discounts” offered are in actuality not discounts at all, but in fact reflect an absurd list price that the dealer never expects to get.

    • Yep. The thing is, it’s super easy to get around that. For example, Men’s Wearhouse and Jos. A Bank run very frequent sales, but they’re not constant. They come often enough that you almost always wait for the next sale, but there are times when those shirts actually do retail for the sticker price (like when you spill coffee all over your shirt the hours before you’re supposed to meet your colleague’s client. Fucksticks).

    • Thanks for the replies guys.
      I get the concept of it, and the things companies do to get around it (Kohl’s is a great example: have 2 shirt brands, alternate them on sale every couple of weeks)… but I’m still unclear on the ethics behind it. As long as they are charging the consumer the amount listed on the tag, and the consumer is willing to pay that price, how is that an unfair practice? I see clear differences between this and for example, “fine print” in mortgage and credit card agreements.

    • I think Jeremy nails it with the “honesty in advertising” statement. If a company never sells its product at the “full” retail price, but instead always marks it as 50% off with a BOGO sale, then it’s using smoke and mirrors to fool the consumer into thinking they are purchasing a product at a greater value than is accurate. At best, it’s shady business dealing, and there is probably a fraud argument to be made, as well.

      While you are correct, jay_B, that they are charging the consumer the price listed on the tag, the company is also giving the consumer the impression that the product is worth more than the listed price, even though it may well not be.

    • the company is also giving the consumer the impression that the product is worth more than the listed price, even though it may well not be.

      Exactly. It’s a fairly well-established cognitive bias that we value stuff more if it costs more – preferring more expensive wines, for example, when in blind taste tests we can’t tell the difference between those and $9 bottles. So these fake sales exploit the bias to make us think we’re getting a steal of a deal on a valuable product.

    • Again, thanks for the replies all. Curious if you believe that this is something that should be actually illegal/regulated by the government? I’m in a weird situation in my brain as I’m a pretty liberal person who believes in things like single-payer healthcare, but at the same time I just can’t wrap my head around this type of sales tactic being something the government is involved in.
      Thanks for the informative discussion!

    • Similar to new car sales are the pricing strategies of stores like Kohl’s and Macy’s. MSRP is very high, but you can buy them with huge discounts pretty much anytime. The MSRP may reflect a former price, future price, or price at another store

    • jay_b, I think that there is a pretty legitimate argument for government regulation, and I say that as, generally, a (small L) libertarian; it’s not the most egregious thing ever, but it’s legitimately harmful to consumers.

      addoeh, I was actually referring far more to used car sales than new. These days, selling a new car is actually about how low you can go and still make money, not how much you can sell it for, with few exceptions; the internet has been an incredible tool for new car buyers, in that you can see what a particular car is selling for at every dealer in your area within minutes. Cutting costs is how dealers make money on new car sales, along with the insane amounts of money that the manufacturers throw at them for high volume sales. Used cars, on the other hand, don’t have a true set price that you can look up; KBB, NADA, and the other pricing sites all offer different methodologies and different answers. A dealership can advertise $5K off every used car, but what they’ll actually write on the purchase and sale agreement is a price $5K higher than you negotiated, then apply the “discount.” It’s a tactic to get you in the door, but it doesn’t actually affect how much the car sells for, just like Macy’s pricing strategy for dress shirts.

      Kevin S. Been there dude….there’s never a sale when you absolutely need the new shirt/tie/jacket. Fucksticks indeed.

  9. Keith,

    Regarding DeVos, are you using “creationist” as a synonym for “Christian?”

    • Those terms are not synonymous, so I would not do so. Are you simply looking to create conflict?

  10. No, I was asking a question. You can go back to being 4 feet tall now.