For Insiders, I wrote a preview of today’s July 2nd international free agent class with help from Chris Crawford. I also wrote some thoughts on the Futures Game rosters, although of course they’re already getting tweaked for player injuries. I wrote a free piece on Monday, expressing my disappointment in the Mets’ decision to sign Jose Reyes.
Klawchat resumed yesterday after a week off around my Omaha trip, and my latest new music playlist is up too.
Sign up for my newsletter!
And now, the links…
- Making a Killing: The New Yorker examines the gun business in the wake of the Orlando massacre. Hint: Like any industry, gun manufacturers profit off fear and misinformation.
- Brian Hooker, one of the biggest proponents of the absolute bullshit idea that vaccines cause autism, lost his 14-year case before the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Hooker’s story is featured in the fakeumentary Vaxxed, and you can bet he’ll keep claiming vaccines caused his son’s autism, not, you know, his own genes and bad luck.
- A 63-year-old CEO decided to bully and harass a woman on LinkedIn because she posted a Dilbert cartoon he didn’t like. Really.
- Two good food stories from NPR’s The Salt blog. First, on Purdue improving the quality of life for its chickens, right up to the way in which they’re killed.
- Second, on the rising popularity of ancient strains of wheat like einkorn, emmer, and spelt.
- Ah, Mississippi, where a state rep – I’ll let you guess which party – told a mom who can’t afford her daughter’s diabetes meds to just buy them with the money she earns. What an awful person. He eventually met with the mom to try to save face.
- Former residents of the Chagos Islands, forcibly removed nearly a half-century so the U.S. could build an Air Force base on Diego Garcia, lost their legal challenge for the right to return to their home island. When you read about forced resettlement of Native Americans in the 1800s and think that could never happen today, well…
- This was a big week for abortion rights, and while the biggest focus was on the trashing of Texas’s HB2, SCOTUS also declined to hear a case where religious pharmacists sued for the right to decline to sell Plan B, the so-called “morning after pill.” This is another win for science as well as women’s rights; the plaintiffs claimed this pill was equivalent to an abortifacient, when in fact the hormone in Plan B, levonorgestrel, prevents fertilization, and is not considered effective after a fertilized egg has implanted on the wall of the uterus.
- You’ve probably seen Jesse Williams’ speech at the BET Awards, where he accepted the show’s humanitarian award for 2016, but if not, read the transcript and, if you can, watch the video. We may disagree on the content – this was a speech of emotion as much as of reason – but I was most impressed by how well he delivered it. It was a complex speech filled with lines that were clearly intended to serve as quotes or epigrams, and thus filled with landmines for even an accomplished speaker like Williams. It was too clever by half at times (“gentrifying our genius?”) but his delivery was hypnotizing. I could train for years and never do what he did.
- 107 Nobel Laureates have called out Greenpeace for its anti-science position against genetically modified crops. This rift is only going to grow: Where environmental groups have, historically, been the pro-science advocates, they’re increasingly at odds with the scientific community on genetic modification.
- Audio link from the BBC World Service’s Witness program on the Cuyahoga River fire of 1969, part of a broader story of urban decline and rebirth in Cleveland.
- The Rio Olympics are headed for all-time disaster levels, with the Zika epidemic, raw sewage in the waters, unpaid first responders, and, now, soup kitchens closing for lack of funds because the money is going to prop up this shitshow.
- This 1999 op ed, bylined by Donald Trump, blasts Pat Buchanan as a dangerous proto-fascist who needs to be stopped.
- Stanton Healthcare is an anti-abortion company that wants to take down Planned Parenthood with a chain of “women’s health” clinics that offers no reproductive health services, not even birth control. Her views are rife with anti-science nonsense, like referring to contraceptives as abortifacients (you keep using that word…) and fearmongering about synthetic hormones.
- Vaccine deniers like to point to the cases of Hannah Poling and Brian Krakow’s son, but the evidence in both cases turns out to be lacking, especially in the Krakow case, as the boy showed clear signs of autism prior to vaccination. These loons will make anything up to support their anti-science beliefs.
- Clarence Thomas doesn’t like the idea of restricting domestic abusers’ access to guns. Now, there’s some internal logic in his position: He’s arguing against any gun ownership or access restrictions at all, ultimately, and while I don’t read the Second Amendment that way or believe that was at all the authors’ intent, it’s one possible reading. But given the relatively high rates of homicide committed by convicted domestic abusers, isn’t this a gun control measure that we can all agree would work to keep victims safe without infringing on the law-abiding public’s right to bear arms, to say nothing of that well-ordered militia bit?
- Quebec City spent nearly $350 million to build a hockey arena that still has no tenant. Cities doing this merely play into the leagues’ hands for extorting better deals out of other cities, sometimes in cities that already have adequate facilities. Meanwhile, I’m going to predict the NHL team in Las Vegas proves a big flop; the city has poor demographics for pro sports anyway, and, of course, no history whatsoever of hockey fandom.
- An investigative journalist who worked as an English teacher to the sons of North Korea’s elite found herself receiving a torrent of vile criticism for doing undercover work. It’s bizarre and I wonder if a male writer would have received the same treatment.
- The Koch brothers have gotten a bill through the House that would prevent the IRS from collecting the names of donors to tax-exempt groups, because we definitely want less transparency in campaign financing, not more.
- The Canadian “naturopath” (read: child-neglecting Dunning-Krugerrands) parents who let their son die of meningitis rather than getting him medical attention were convicted of failing to provide for his well-being, with the father, also an anti-vaccine dipshit, getting four months in prison. I’m stunned they haven’t lost permanent custody of their other children, who are clearly at risk here; if the parents came into court and said aliens from Enceladus were protecting their children, we’d call the parents mentally ill and rescue the kids, but their vaccine-denial views are every bit as bogus.
- Amy Schumer’s “too dark to air” sketch on gun control wasn’t too dark to release online, and I’m sure the faux-censorship angle gained it more viral traction. It’s quite good, of course, and not least because it features Coach McGuirk.
- Buzzfeed steals content. It’s not plagiarism, which would be actionable; instead, they’re lifting ideas, outlines, and recipes, things that can’t be legally protected by copyright. It’s legal, but wholly unethical, and made worse by the clownish defenses some of its editors are offering. Apologize, tighten your standards, fire offenders, move on.
- This New York profile of adult film actress Stoya, including her decision to go public with rape accusations against co-star and ex-boyfriend James Deen – spurring a torrent of similar accusations, none of which has kept him from working in their industry – is quite well done for such a difficult subject. Text NSFW, of course.
- I enjoyed the Atlantic‘s profile of Black Flag’s legacy but really wanted more.
- I’ll end on a slightly sappy note – the story of a millionaire, a homeless woman, and the dog that led him to help save her life.
I fail to see how refusing to hear the Washington pharmacy’s case is a victory for women’s rights and science and not trampling on the religious exercise of the owners. The bill allowed for several secular exceptions, and the pharmacy – according to the trial court – referred the prospects to over thirty pharmacies within five miles. Whether the egg is fertilized or not is not the issue; the issue is that the pharmacists consider(ed) it immoral to provide the drug. If a private business elects not to provide a service, it is no business of the state or a prospective customer to require it. And if the business ends up closing, I cannot see how the community is served by such a result.
If a private business elects not to provide a service, it is no business of the state or a prospective customer to require it.
This is not just “a service,” by the way. It’s a fully legal, often medically necessary matter of health care, and the government does have the right to ensure access to such services for citizens who might otherwise remain unserved for reasons of geography or prejudice.
Unfortunately, that same regulation allows pharmacies to refuse patients on Medicare or Medicaid, which strikes me as more outrageous. Those are the types of citizens who may have trouble traveling from pharmacy to pharmacy. Exceptions like that make it seem like there was a clear intent to target religious objectors.
The case may be a small victory for women’s rights and science–small because a denial of cert. has little consequence. But it is not a victory for the judiciary. The Ninth Circuit overstepped its bounds by not giving the requisite deference to the trial court and SCOTUS should have reviewed the case and given more guidance one way or the other.
“. . . the government does have the right to ensure access to such services for citizens who might otherwise remain unserved for reasons of geography or prejudice.”
Even if I stipulate to that (I would argue the point, but whatever), neither were at issue in this case.
Weren’t they? The core doctrine of most denominations of Christianity – certainly of Roman Catholicism and of the evangelical Protestants behind these laws and lawsuits – is that non-believers will be condemned to hell after death. A businessperson of one of these faiths could deny service to a Jewish person, arguing that the customer was destined for perdition, and serving him/her violated his religion.
Your right to practice religion, your First Amendment-guaranteed freedom of worship, does not grant you the power or ability to discriminate against others in commercial life. There is no argument here that anyone’s freedom to worship (or not) is being restricted or abrograted. It is a commercial transaction in question here, inherently secular in nature. Permitting anyone to cry ‘religion’ to justify prejudicial behavior opens the door to businesses refusing to serve other races, religions, classes, or sexual orientations under the guise of a constitutional right.
I guess that’s where we disagree. I don’t think an individual becomes unaffiliated when s/he enters a commercial transaction. I am also extremely uncomfortable with the prospect of a state licensing board requiring all OBs to be willing and able to perform abortions, which would seem a logical extension of the rule you support.
As for this specific case, certainly we can agree that geography wasn’t at issue. As for prejudice, I didn’t see anything in the trial record to suggest that the pharmacy was motivated by any bigotry against women or otherwise. There was, however, some evidence to suggest the state was. No matter, I guess. The appeals court made its ruling. I hope you and your family have a terrific 4th.
.I don’t think an individual becomes unaffiliated when s/he enters a commercial transaction.
Agreeing to enter into commercial transactions, with the attendant protections our laws provide to all parties therein, means ceding certain individual rights. This goes back to Rousseau (maybe earlier) and is a pretty clear underpinning of our ultimately secular, relatively free-market society. You can’t open a diner that only serves whites, and you can’t run a pharmacy, an essential public service, but only dispense medications you agree with.
Anyway, thanks for the kind wishes, and I hope you and your family do the same. The fireworks around here already started last night, which always makes me a bit nervous because I have no faith in people to use those things safely. I’ve never set one off myself or even touched one more significant than a sparkler. Fire is good for cooking and for heat but not so much for me to play with. So be safe!
Coach McGuirk? That’s so last decade. Sterling Archer is the name now..
I’m all about the deep cuts.
At least the citizens of Las Vegas didn’t pay for the new arena that will house the hockey team. That proposed stadium for the Raiders? Not so much.
Nitpicking, but Perdue is the chicken place, Purdue is the university. Also, I’m the Lancaster Jon who still is willing to game with you sometime. I also have posted a couple times recently as Shaun Q.