Beasts Of The Southern Wild was one of two surprises among the nine Best Picture nominees – Amour was the other, since foreign-language films rarely show up outside of their Best Foreign-Language Film ghetto – and the only one that was already gone from theaters and available for home viewing when the nominees were announced. It’s a low-budget film set in the Louisiana Bayou and relied on locals in both the crew and the cast, giving the performances an authenticity that carries a ho-hum storyline to the level where it might be mentioned among the year’s best films.
Beasts follows the adorable five-year-old Hushpuppy (played by nine-year-old Quvenzhané Wallis, now the youngest-ever Best Actress nominee, and the actress whose dress I am most interested in seeing), resident of an impoverished Bayou settlement called the Bathtub, along with her ailing, ill-tempered father Wink (Dwight Henry, a baker with no prior acting experience) and a handful of local eccentrics. The town is cut off from the rest of the region by a levee, although the residents seem to share the laissez les bon temps rouler philosophy of greater New Orleans. Climate change threatens the Bathtub’s very existence, which the local and unconventional schoolteacher Bathsheba (Gina Montana, also an amateur) explains to the children in terms of Aurochs, giant boar-like creatures who have been trapped in the Earth’s icecaps for centuries but who will be freed as the ice melts. When Wink’s situation and that of the Bathtub both take turns for the worse, Hushpuppy and her friends take off on a raft to try to find her long-absent mother.
The casting decisions, including giving three of the biggest roles to amateurs, absolutely made this film, as the plot, which relies on some magical realism but probably could have gone farther in that regard, is actually pretty slight. Wallis’ performance is pretty mind-blowing given her age, although her tiny stature also gives you the impression that you’re watching an actual five-year-old deliver these lines and scream and burp on command. I was even more shocked by Henry’s performance once I read that he wasn’t a professional actor – his role demands a broad range of emotions and the ability to switch between them with very little transition, and his determination to keep Hushpuppy away from the obvious consequences of his illness for as long as possible conveys such a deep affection that it seems hard to believe it’s not real. (Then again, I’m imagining the whole cast and crew fell in love with Wallis after a few days.) Even Montana shines as the one discordant note in the community, talking in apocalyptic (and prescient) terms while she shares a giant beer-and-shellfish feast with her neighbors.
Unfortunately, the story seemed a little half-baked, or maybe three-quarters-baked, and while some people (like my wife) like their chocolate chip cookies pulled from the oven when the center is still a little on the gooey side, I prefer mine fully cooked. We don’t get a lot of character development beyond Hushpuppy, and the main internal conflicts aren’t resolved. The (mostly white) authorities who forcibly evacuate the Bathtub at one point are stock villains, more than a little unfair to people who were probably largely volunteers or just underpaid in reality. Beasts‘ plot doesn’t make enough use of the Aurochs or any of the magical realism potential unlocked by Bathsheba’s preaching, but it doesn’t dwell quite enough on the serious aspects of anything that goes on in the film, even Wink’s illness. If this was intended to make a broad statement about the impact of climate change, I don’t think it went far enough. The kids’ quest for Hushpuppy’s mama is a beautiful sequence, a short story that could almost stand on its own, but the rest of the plot tended to drift rather than find itself propelled by its own energy.
The film’s nomination for Best Picture seems like a stretch to me, although the only films I’ve seen other than this one that might have been worthy, Looper and The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel, weren’t obviously better, and either one could have dropped into the unused tenth nomination slot. (Looper absolutely deserved a Best Original Screenplay nod, though.) The absurd nomination among the four that Beasts earned was the Best Director nod for Benh Zeitlin over, among others, Zero Dark Thirty director Kathryn Bigelow, which I can only assume was politically motivated. Zero Dark Thirty was far more ambitious and more difficult to craft, including the intense final scene in the Abbottabad house, thus far the single best segment of any 2012 movie I’ve seen. For Bigelow to end up on the outside while Zeitlin got a nod is … peculiar, to say the least.
Ultimately, I found it cloying and that it’s point of view was a little touristy. It always seemed to treat these characters as strange others. (And I know it’s hard to make a movie about terrible things happening to a cute little girl without it being a little cloying.)
Not sure when it’s out on DVD, but you need to see the 2012 French movie Holy Motors if you haven’t. It’s totally bonkers, and kind of a love/hate movie, but if you’re on the pro side, the upside is huge and very unique.
Wallis was only 6 when the movie was filmed. It was made in late 2009
While I haven’t seen Zero Dark Thirty and don’t mean this as an argument as to which director or directors best deserved nominations, I do think it is possible that others saw that Zeitlin pulled such great performances out of a mostly amateur lead cast and decided to reward that. At that point, though, much of your opinion of his work depends on how much credit you think directors deserve for making a well-acted movie.
Klaw, what were your thoughts on some of the media’s claims that Beasts’ tone was too paternal and borderline racist with respect to its poor black subjects? I haven’t seen the movie yet myself, and can’t comment, but I’ve heard a fair number of complaints, and some good points.
Personally, I felt that the movie treated all of its poor subjects the same way, and the Bathtub was certainly not an all-black community. It may be possible to perceive some class or education bias, but I’m not sure a racial bias could be found.
I’m with Matt. I didn’t think it was at all racist; I originally had a line in this review discussing it, but felt that I was wrong to even address the complaint because it was so baseless. The whites in Bathtub are, in character, indistinguishable from the blacks, and I can’t recall race ever coming up in the script.
Holy Motors is definitely on the to-do list.
I think the Academy must indeed have been giving Zeitlin extra credit for choosing amateur actors, while probably docking Bigelow for having won in recent memory. To me, the real snub is Affleck for Argo–his direction was essential to holding that movie together, when it could easily have been another lame caper flick.
Of course, adding a name to the list would mean taking a name off. And the name I would remove is Ang Lee. I do not understand the Academy’s love affair with him–I find his films to be heavyhanded, preachy, and artsy for the sake of being artsy. He’s a combination of the worst qualities of Oliver Stone and Steven Spielberg.
Stephen Hunter recently posited that he believes that Ben Affleck was snubbed due to members of the Academy still perceiving him as a pretty-boy actor who never earned his status, and that they prefer to reward directors who went to film school, did a lot of grunt work, and worked their up to famous director status. It’s ridiculous if true, but then it’s not hard to believe that it could be true based on recent voting behaviors of the academy.
Matt,
That wouldn’t surprise me at all. Gordon Willis was cinematographer on Godfather I & II, Annie Hall, All the President’s Men, and Manhattan without getting an Oscar nomination. It’s always been thought that this was because he was a “snobby New York guy,” not “a Hollywood guy.”
Hell, some thought Fassbender didn’t get a nomination for Shame because he was so well endowed.
I’ll put it this way. After the first 5 minutes of dialog, I wondered aloud to my wife whether the folks who helmed this movie were white. I checked imdb and was not surprised that Behn Zeitlin is a 30 yr old who went to Wesleyan. I didn’t think the dialog was racist, because that would go against the generous spirit of what the movie was trying to accomplish. I felt that the dialog was written in the way that a 30 yr old white man who grew up in Manhattan would think that poor folks in New Orleans talk. It felt forced and inorganic to me. In retrospect, it’s possible that my perception of race/class tourism was actually just an effect of watching the delivery of amateur actors (in particular Miss Bathsheba who opens the movie with the subtlety of a hammer hitting glass). Hushpuppy and Wink were gems- the others were about what you’d expect from amateurs. I don’t think you should get points for using amateur actors- movie tickets aren’t priced on a curve and being unskilled isn’t a virtue if it detracts from the vision that the work is trying to accomplish.
I’m with Keith that the movie felt not fully baked, and I’m of the mindset that the magical realism aspects, particularly the Aurochs, were used as a hook to generate interest rather than being intrinsic to the plot. You could have removed the Aurochs and other trappings from the movie and still had the same emotionally resonant movie centering on a flawed, but caring father and a girl who reacted to the world in a peculiar, but endearing way. It’s also worth noting that because this isn’t a plot-heavy movie, a lot of the running time is spent exploring the setting of The Bathtub. The characters in The Bathtub happen to live in a way that is similar to how people may imagine life in post-Katrina New Orleans to be (improvised parades, lots of drinking, raucous displays of emotion, crab meat, etc). While the creation of the movie may not have had a tourism component, it’s quite possible the response to this movie does, similar to what informs certain people’s reaction to the grittiness of The Wire. I think If you changed the setting of the movie so that the father/daughter were in the snowy woods similar to Hanna (a superior magical realism movie in a similar vein), I wonder if the jury at Cannes and Sundance would have been as glowing.
I took to the interwebs to get outside perspective on this movie and came across this article by Jarvis DeBerry from the New Orleans Time-Picayune that I’d encourage folks to read and draw their own conclusions.
http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/07/beasts_of_the_southern_wild.html
Overall, I wasn’t a fan of this movie, although I’m glad I saw it. I can best describe the experience as being akin to watching a 90 minute Arcade Fire video. It was over-flowing with emotion, but the emotion was non-specific and I couldn’t connect to it, outside of the final scene with Wink and Hushpuppy.