Restaurant Wars! This show makes me more nervous than the finale, because I have yet to see a Restaurant Wars episode where neither team ended up in the soup and at each others’ throats. Edward even gets the ball rolling by trashing Sarah, which becomes doubly ridiculous when we see that he shows more respect to servers who forget to put table numbers on tickets than he does to a competitor who suffered from heat exhaustion in triple-digit temperatures.
As much as I like Restaurant Wars, however, there are fundamental flaws in the execution. This year, the producers split the challenge over two days rather than having the teams operate their restaurants simultaneously, which seemed like a big advantage to the team that went second. We always get two chefs handling front of the house duties, thus forcing them to hand off their dish to a competitor who will inevitably not make the dish up to the first chef’s standards (even ignoring, for a moment, the second chef’s incentive to focus on his/her own dishes, let alone the possibility of sabotage). The chefs are also forced to waste time on décor, which would be great if this was Top Design; are the chefs really judged on this crap or is it just product placement for the sponsors?
To the bullets…
* The men (the chefs were split into two teams by gender) name their restaurant “Canteen” and not one person drops a “You’ll need a tray” reference? I am disappoint. Anyway, as is typical of Restaurant Wars, the teams worry more about restaurant names than they do about execution, as in the case of the men, who forget about the need for an expediter because they’ve never watched “Ramsay’s Kitchen Nightmares.”
* Canteen’s menu seemed to take a page – or a whole book – from Thomas Keller with dishes called ham and eggs, Almond Joy, and Cracker Jack, and if you’re coming at the king of clever nomenclature, you’d best not miss. They missed, although the peanut butter “noodles” seemed like a cool concept that just didn’t work out.
* The diner who said she’s “not a big pork belly fan” but loved Paul’s dish has probably never had pork belly done correctly. Seeing him judged by the standards of his previous output is a bit unfair, since it seems like Below Average Paul is still above everyone else here. He’s also the one chef who, both in live action and in the confessionals, shows some actual grace under pressure, focusing on getting the job done while trying not to offend Ty or Chris J., both of whom failed in some of their responsibilities.
* Ty gets hammered on the Thai lettuce cups, but I was more weirded out by the caramel sauce – I know caramel is a big thing now in savory dishes, but I find caramel (which I love in dessert) so overbearing that I can’t imagine putting it in a dish where it might overshadow the main protein.
* Chris J. makes one dessert, and it looked kind of like a kid gorged on Halloween candy and then threw it all up before he could digest any of it. Even before considering whether peanut butter and cherries are a good combo (I’ll vote no), I would flunk that dish on presentation.
* Edward makes a chocolate almond dessert and calls it Almond Joy because once, back in the kitchen, it sat next to a coconut. Good luck with that.
* To the women, who named their place Half bushel (snicker) … It’s Sarah’s turn to be the villain, bossing everyone around like she’s been possessed by the spirit of Heather, even after she’s told everyone that they have to remain calm in the kitchen, thus flambéing her credibility with her colleagues.
* Did Lindsay just happen to have an outfit that coordinated with the décor of their restaurant? Did she just pick up a few separates at the interior design store?
* Every year on Restaurant Wars, we see the judges arrive at one restaurant when the host(ess) is in the back or otherwise absent. Is that staged? Although in this case, Lindsay was clearly spending too much time in the kitchen – I don’t think they ever showed Edward in the back – so it wouldn’t have been hard to have the judges show up when she wasn’t out front.
* Speaking of which, this was the ideal judges’ panel: Padma and three legit chefs, one of whom is Hugh, who had less opportunity for snark this week. Although one week they need to have Paddington at Judges’ Table, because he can do that cold, dark stare they do better than anyone.
* Grayson’s salad looked like a work of art, but was it too simple? Anyone could make that if you could get the produce, although Hugh pointed out that the cheese was at the right temperature, which I imagine is tricky in a hot kitchen. And good for Grayson for standing up to Lindsay multiple times.
* Why is Sarah firing three courses? Three chefs in the back, six dishes, so … check my math for me here … but isn’t that two per chef? I think Paul did the same, but of course, he’s a better chef.
* Did Lindsay actually explain Schaum torte to the judges, or was that just for our benefit?
* So, at judges’ table: Lindsay throws the team under the bus before learning they won. She seemed to have the worst individual performance. Her dish wasn’t well made (of course, not entirely her fault), but she was also in the wrong place much of the time she was on camera.
* The verdict: The women beat the men, and Beverly beats the women. Grayson smiles, Lindsay and Sarah are steaming like a couple of xiao long baozi. Hey ladies, maybe if you hadn’t tried to put Beverly in timeout earlier, this would have gone better for you. Meanwhile, Ty’s dull Thai wrap was … I’m not saying it. He’s been on the bottom enough times that I never thought he had a chance to win this thing, and while he may not have been the worst of the eight chefs remaining, he wasn’t top three material anyway.
* LCK: Make a dessert in 30 minutes, using one of the eliminated chefs as your sous. Nyesha makes a baked custard with coconut and lime. Ty’s “dark chocolate mousse” (melted dark chocolate combined with mascarpone) looked like pâté, an unappetizing color combo that I think gave him a distinct disadvantage against Nyesha, who wins yet again. (I did predict a long winning streak for her, and I believe this gives her four.) Very impressive to see Heather and Malibu Chris work as if their own fates were on the line.
* Final three: Paul and Edward, probably still Lindsay despite the bad week, but Grayson coming on strong (I feel like I thought she lacked range as a chef, but other than the modernist quickfire, has that ever really been accurate), and Nyesha a legit threat if she does end up the winner of LCK. But this is still Paul’s competition to lose.
* One final thought. Hugh Acheson’s blog post on this episode has Lindsay calling Beverly “fucking retarded,” and if that is true (I didn’t catch it), she should be ashamed of herself, to the point where producers should have considered whether to keep her on the show. Using the r-word in a pejorative sense is always reprehensible, but using it as a direct insult to another person’s face is worse than inappropriate, worse than unprofessional. We’re in hostile work environment territory with this one. So the prediction that Lindsay makes the final three is not a rooting interest.
Least favorite episode of my least favorite season.
The editors are running this show into the ground.
I don’t necessarily disagree with Ty going home; I am totally ambivalent about the result. What galls me is the fact that previous chefs have been eliminated for performing just as Lindsay did. Teams lose because of stuff like that. So the men’s food may have been so uninspirational that the women won, but which is it judges? Is front of the house important enough to lose and/or go home, or is it not.
They also need to quit with the dekes in editing. I get it, you fooled us. They just keep doing it EVERY episode and it is tired. I don’t want to be “fooled” (at this point it’s predictable, though) I want to see what they are making and the judges’ EARNEST critique that will logically be followed by the end result.
Then there is Padma. Good LORD she is getting worse and worse. For her to posture as an expert while merely parroting the words, phrases, and concepts of people who actually know what they are talking about has been grating in other seasons, but is beginning to make this show almost unwatchable.
I have been on-board since episode 1 and haven’t missed one. Maybe I am spoiled having been able to follow the likes of Blais and Kevin Gillespie, but it seems the current crop of cheftestants know less about what they are doing as far as dish composition and plating.
This show needs a revamp, quick.
Keith, I think Ty was maybe confusing Thai and Vietnamese cuisines when he did the fish sauce caramel. Caramel sauce is traditional in Vietnamese cuisine http://www.vietworldkitchen.com/blog/2007/10/caramel-sauce.html but I would imagine his was probably too dessert-y.
I’m curious why you’re putting Lindsay in the top three, and Grayson close, but not Sara. I have mixed feelings on her as a person/competitor, but to my mind she’s clearly got the best mastery of flavor. I suppose she is a little one-note in her leaning on Italian, but it seems like she’s never done anything really bad, unlike Grayson, and has really knocked a few out of the park. Lindsay…has just been so invisible to me. Has she ever been at the top of a (non-team) challenge? And she’s maybe been at the bottom once? I hate those kinds of contestants. Boring!
At any rate, I’m still rooting for Nyesha to plow through LCK and make it to the finals. She got so shafted it’s not even funny, and she’s really fun and likable too.
Appreciate your last bullet very much.
I wonder if Ty was trying to do a take on palm sugar (prevalent in Thai cuisine), which has some notes of caramel, rather than just caramel sauce because it’s the popular thing to do
“and if you’re coming at the king of clever nomenclature, you’d best not miss.”
Great reference. Love it.
Daphne: I don’t think Sara has the range to win this, or even get into the top three. (I’m ignoring her odious on-screen performance in this episode.) One-cuisine chefs don’t seem to get that far, and she all but refuses to leave her Italian comfort zone. Completely agree on Nyesha – she was ousted for the worst reason (failure of a teammate), but it has just further motivated her. I’d take her over any other chef on the show but Paul and maybe Edward.
FWIW, I’ve seen caramel sauce on Vietnamese menus, but haven’t tried it. Of course, I’m regularly assaulted by billboards for Pei Wei that advertise it … but I’m guessing that’s not quite the real thing.
This is the second group competition where Sara and Lindsey worked in concert to undermine someone during service, then threw that teammate under the bus during Judges’ Table (Big Keith sends his regards, Bev). To see Sara “consoling” Lindsey after Beverly won the trip, including saying to the latter’s face that, basically, she didn’t deserve the win, made me sick.
Sara was also really annoying in the other episode (sure, Ed was callous and and unsympathetic, but he had a point in that she recovered juuuust long enough to serve the judges, then went back to lying down. Maybe I’m the only one who thinks this way, but she came off as duplicitous). In any case, I really dislike Sara in this show: she’s essentially a less racist Heather, with a little Iago thrown in. This is also why I see her making it into the finale, since most of the seasons have had a villainous character in the top 2 or 3 (e.g., Tiffany, Ilan/Marcel, Lisa, maybe Angelo and Mike I. to a lesser extent).
I’d actually be somewhat shocked if Nyesha didn’t win LCK and then come and lay a whooping on anyone not named Paul. I totally agree with Paul being the clear front runner and Edward being right up there with him, but I’d have Grayson in the top three for the current competition.
And can someone explain to me how Chris J. is still on here? It always seems like he comes up with incredibly bizarre concepts and then doesn’t fully excute whether it’s through flavor/taste or presentation. Everytime he makes something, all I can think of is when Hung made his Smurf Village dish — except not nearly as funny.
I originally thought this season would be really poor after the first couple of tryout epidodes, but it’s gotten somewhat compelling. The random nastiness is an odd thing, but not necessarily uncompelling.
What is most bemusing, however, is that competitors continue to forget that “Food wins.” An obvious truism, but continuously ignored. Lindsay was a disaster as front of the house, but the food was apparently good. Beverly may be a space cadet, and she may know fewer techniques then anyone else, and she may have a limited zone… but the plates win because they obviously have great balance. And having eaten at a lot of expensive restaurants in this and other countries: Balance of flavor suffers at expensive places when tricks and techniques become too important. Nothing is more depressing then drinking top wine, knowing the chefs are talented and using top ingredients, and then taste a dish with the flavor balance out of wack.
I’m kind of stunned that KLaw thinks Grayson might make top-3. The Tribute episode where she served an abomination for a steak and bland potatoes? I mean, any “Tribute” meal which i take one look at and feel absolutely convinced I could do better with 20 minutes at Whole Foods and one hour in the kitchen is an abject failure from a top chef. Who buys the steaks that she bought for a competition?
Paul’s obviously the star of this season, but I think Ed is inventive and competant so long as he’s not forgetting the above truism (pre-cutting his bbq ribs because he was wary of time constraints? Bizarre move). Nyesha’s clearly awesome, as her swagger and strategy are what make LCK compelling.
Great work on the blog Keith! Love the show a lot. I agree that this is Paul’s to lose. Does Beverly somehow sneak into the top three if she gets on a roll? I am hoping that Grayson/Lindsay join Paul and Edward in top 3 but it seems that one chef always sneak into the top three that makes you question it a bit.
Hurricane Nyesha is a force to be reckoned with. She is blatantly the best chef left outside of Paul. A shame she was eliminated so early.
“Why is Sarah firing three courses? Three chefs in the back, six dishes, so … check my math for me here … but isn’t that two per chef? I think Paul did the same, but of course, he’s a better chef.”
Professional kitchens aren’t organized to split the dishes on a menu up evenly. It depends on what station they are working. Most kitchens are set up based on principals originating from Escoffier. I’d have to re-watch to check, but I assume that the chefs set up their kitchen for restaurant wars the same way their own restaurants are set up (at least I would).
Are we to believe the previews that Moto Chris finally excels in a challenge? I’ve got Paul & Ed in my top three. It’s sort of a mixed bag after that which leaves the spot for Nyesha if/when she renters the competition.
Keith and others, I’m wondering if anyone else agrees that this episode might well validate the chefs who have been frustrated with Bev. Removing the reprehensible brand of expression from Heather and Sarah, we must realize that these are still real expressions of frustration. One chef might be racist or competitive or threatened, but three chefs (and counting?) might point to a real problem. I mean, even Hugh seems to think she is not someone he would like to have in his kitchen. I just thought I’d point it out so it doesn’t get lost in the noise.