Viva la Vida, or Death and All His Friends.

Coldplay’s Viva la Vida, or Death and All His Friends is the first full album I’ve bought in at least two years. I have always been a singles guy, whether those were songs released as commercial singles or just deep album tracks that I liked. The idea of the album as a cohesive artistic unit rarely succeeded for me, and I always interpreted it as more marketing/finance than art, since it was not terribly economical to sell songs individually when that involved moving physical product.

Then came the compression algorithm behind MP3 files, which allowed for delivery of single tracks at virtually no cost to the vendor, with some loss of audio quality to the consumer (although much audio quality had already been lost with the move to CDs, and most of us can’t hear the difference or just don’t care). The record industry decided to stick two fingers in its ears and one up its ass in a rather stunning combination of physical dexterity and willful ignorance, continuing to push albums and refusing to unbundled them for digital distribution for several years. I have always wondered why this didn’t constitute tying, a type of antitrust violation where the purchase of one product is predicated on the simultaneous purchase of another product even though the two products could be sold separately. Even to this day, some labels and artists refuse to allow their albums to be sold as individual tracks, which, in the existence of a significant black market for music, is like leaving the keys in your car on an urban street with a “steal me” sign in the window. (I have, in fact, done this, without the sign though.)

I bought Coldplay’s new album with the idea of reviewing it, rather than out of any specific desire to have the entire album. I loved Parachutes from start to finish, but felt that A Rush Of Blood To The Head was far less consistent (and we all know how important consistency is), with a fair bit of filler. I didn’t bother with X&Y because I don’t like the type of Coldplay song that my friend Nicole refers to as “mopeysuck,” like “Fix You,” and probably would have bought new Coldplay material as each single came out if it wasn’t for my intention to review the album.

Of course, that’s a long intro to lead up to the obvious point that I am glad I bought the entire album, because it’s good. It is an extended bit of experimentation by a band trying to break out of the musical corner into which they had boxed themselves, and while bits of it dance over the line into pseudo-prog-rock and there is one moment of undeniably twee music perhaps better suited to now-defunct fey Britpop bands like Geneva, Viva la Vida feels more like a transitional album for a band on its way to an extended run of commercially and artistically significant music.

Most of the middle tracks on the album involve multiple movements, a risky maneuver that can leave the listener liking half of each song. On “42,” a mopeysuck intro leads to a more uptempo instrumental transition followed by the peculiar but catchy singalong chorus of “You thought you might be a ghost/You didn’t get to heaven but you made it close.” Similarly, the two-part, seven-minute track “Lovers in Japan” starts with a driving background reminiscent of Mercury Rev’s “Delta Sun Bottleneck Stomp” (also uneven yet fun), but around the four-minute mark switches to the second part, a mopeysuck ballad with no apparent connection to the first movement, although I imagine they would just be split if released as a single. Every one of these songs has a great sequence in it, but only the two-part “Yes” – actually the song “Yes” plus a hidden track, sold as a single song in the downloadable version – delivers in both halves, although the transition is jarring and the connection between the two pieces is not evident.

The album kicks into high gear when “Yes” is followed by “Viva la Vida,” which should put Coldplay into Record of the Year territory (especially since they’ve won the award before – and you thought the baseball writers were predictable). It’s a classic combination of upbeat music as an ironic background to an extended lament, this time with a deposed monarch (or tyrant?) as narrator. It’s probably the closest Coldplay has ever come to putting an actual groove into one of their tracks. “Viva” is followed by the lead single, “Violet Hill,” a dark, almost gothic ballad carried by a Bonham-esque drumbeat – you might wonder if they’re on Violet Hill because the levee broke and they had to head for higher ground – with a distinctive modulation behind the chorus’ final line that provides a sinister contrast to the words (“If you love me/Won’t you let me know”).

What elevates the album despite the trademark strain of melancholy that always infects Coldplay’s music is the way that nearly every song possesses a sort of musical greed that drives it forward, or perhaps pulls the listener in and forces you to want to come along for the ride. There’s more layering than ever before, almost a 180 from the sparse arrangements of Parachutes and much of X&Y. There’s also a lot of what I could only call prog-rock leanings, like the Russian-sounding, minor-key violin solo in “Yes,” or the heavily syncopated transitional movement in “42.” If this is a sign that they’re heading full-on into Yes or King Crimson territory, then this is my stop and I’m getting off, but I’m hopeful that Viva la Vida is more of a sign of maturation in their music, and that we’re about to get their equivalent of The Joshua Tree or Revolver the next time out.

Comments

  1. Keith, what’s your favorite Coldplay track, including the new album?

  2. I listened to the album On Demand five times through. I enjoyed it as well. X&Y wasn’t very good. And A Rush of Blood to the Head had 4 or five good songs, but was nothing special. This however is worth a purchase. But then again, you know that, because you just wrote a review.

  3. I think the main thing keeping it from being illegal tying (and not all “tying” arrangements are illegal, thankfully) is that here the “tying” product and the “tied” product are in the same market (songs/rock songs/whatever), and the whole crux of a tying claim is that a company is using its power in one market to increase its market power in *another* market. Nobody can come along and say “we’re trying to sell crappy individual songs, but because Sony ties all *its* crappy songs to its hit songs, they’re foreclosing the ‘crappy song’ market from us.”
    That seems to be the best I can do. It’s a little sad that I just took a break from work to write about the law for free…

  4. Keith,

    Have you heard the new Spiritualized album (Songs from A&E)? It’s excellent.

  5. Keith,
    If Coldplay is the first album you have bought in two years you are really missing out on some great music, unless of course your single song buying is off the charts. The new album is a very solid album, but not on the level of many recent (last year or so) releases. If you like Coldplay, may I suggest the superior The National. Their last two albums (Alligator and Boxer) are spectacular with hardly any filler.

    Radiohead is one band where the album format is essential. EMI, against the band’s wishes recently released a greatest hits compilation which is an unsatisfying listen at best. It isn’t that the material is great, but taken out of the context of the album it isn’t as strong. Radiohead have just recently allowed online retailers to sell their music, however only in the album format I believe.

  6. I disagree about the relative merits of albums versus single tracks. Sure, there are many albums that lack the cohesiveness necessary to necessitate listening to it in its entirety, but such albums do exist. Pink Floyd is a great example and as JK said, Radiohead is too. And since Keith threw in a Beatles reference, why not Sgt. Pepper’s? I look at that as more of a brilliant album than a collection of 10 odd great songs.

  7. After checking ITunes and Amazon, Radiohead songs can now be bought individually.

    The list of albums that cannot be separated into singles is virtually endless. Maybe the “popular” acts can’t produce albums, but the top acts can. You just need to look in the right places.

  8. Keith and Bill – Not an AT lawyer, so forgive me if some or all of this is incorrect, but I think the reason a tying claim wouldn’t pass muster in the case of an album would be because the relevant market would be something like “Pop Songs” or even “Songs,” general. No single company could be held to possess enough Market Share or Economic Power in that relevant market to successfully tie their products. Also, although I’m sure that a majority of music enthusiasts would agree with Keith about the fact that the idea of the album as a “cohesive artistic unit” is obsolete, it would still be a fine argument against the assertion that the products were not naturally related – a necessary condition of a successful tying suit. Tell that to Pink Floyd (The Wall) or the Eagles (Desperado) Finally, anyone who doesn’t secretly like “Fix You” just a little bit is emotionally stunted.

  9. Throw in my $.02 on the great “complete” hip hop albums –

    Ice Cube – Death Certificate
    A Tribe Called Quest – Low End Theory
    Nas – Illmatic
    Dr. Dre – The Chronic
    BDP – Criminal Minded
    De La Soul – Stakes is High, 3 Feet High and Rising and just about all their other albums
    Andre 3000 – The Love Below (released as the 2nd of a double album by Outkast)
    Prince Paul – A Prince Among Thieves
    Erik B & Rakim – Paid in Full

  10. I like “Viva La Vida” a lot, but then I liked “X&Y” a lot and it seems like no one else did. Maybe I’m just not very picky.

  11. Matt- I think that’s essentially right, except: you *could* define the market such that a Sony or one of the other huge labels controls a substantial enough part of it, because they control so much of the distribution and “entry” on a national scale by a smaller label can be exceptionally difficult. And the control needs to be “substantial,” not necessarily a majority of the market or anything. BUT, no one song or artist (not even Coldplay!) is so ubiquitous that tying one song to the rest of an album will have a significant impact on that market. You could say that each album is a little tying arrangement and the aggregate forecloses competition, but I can’t imagine how the analysis would go.

    Alternatively, you could argue that the fact that almost all songs are now available individually on itunes and the like indicates that nobody ever DID have that kind of power, and that consumer demand, threat of entry, etc. did away with the tying. So, I don’t know. I think there are a lot of reasons that the claim wouldn’t work…they’re just hard to explain. 🙂

  12. Alex DiTullio

    I am admittedly not a big Coldplay fan, and have not yet heard the whole album, but the two singles out now are no better than solid average it seems they have gone from a poorman’s Radiohead circa Bends sound to a U2 Joshua Tree feel. I dont think Coldplay will ever find their own voice it doesnt seem to be in them. On another note my picks for album of the year thus far are Fleet Foxes self titled debut, and Wolf Parade’s at Mount Zoomer. Lil Waynes the Carter III is also in the conversation.

  13. I find it tough to stomach Cold Play anymore, due to the obvious liberalism they exude through their music. I see the people listening to Cold Play as they sell their HEMP shirts and preach this collective guilt that the worlds problems are our fault. Cold Play strayed from the genius that was Parachutes, and into a liberal billboard for the self-entitled snits.

  14. I have no idea how I never answered the question above, but my favorite Coldplay track is probably “In My Place.”

    I’ve never listened to the other suggested bands, but I’ll check them out if I can.

  15. I second Alex on Fleet Foxes. Saw them yesterday in concert and they were brilliant. Listening to the harmonies live was almost as good as it gets. For the uninitiated, they are a mix of Beach Boys, Simon and Garfunkel, and CSNY.

    For a more pop sound, Cut Copy is a great new album.

  16. Alex DiTullio

    Top five cd’s of the 2000’s

    1.)Arcade Fire- Funeral
    2.) The Shins- Oh Inverted World
    3.) Broken Social Scene- You Forgot it in People
    4.) Jay-Z- The Blueprint
    5.) Interpol- Turn on the Bright Lights

  17. I don’t know how often people read older posts like these, but there’s a neat great albums blog post at the AV Club right now.