{"id":386,"date":"2008-10-24T14:47:46","date_gmt":"2008-10-24T18:47:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.meadowparty.com\/blog\/?p=382"},"modified":"2008-10-24T14:47:46","modified_gmt":"2008-10-24T18:47:46","slug":"the-mailbag-of-malcontent-returns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/meadowparty.com\/blog\/2008\/10\/24\/the-mailbag-of-malcontent-returns\/","title":{"rendered":"The Mailbag of Malcontent returns&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been digging out from a big pile of reader mail, including some emails from as far back as late July. (I wasn&#8217;t able to see new reader mail to my ESPN mailbag for about two months, and then suddenly, there they all were.)<\/p>\n<p>One reader, Scott Moore, wasn&#8217;t happy about my on-air criticism of umpire Doug Eddings (I referred to Eddings as &#8220;crooked or incompetent&#8221;) after Eddings blew a fairly easy obstruction call involving A.J. Pierzynski. His original email:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Your comments on the umpire were way out of line. You had the benefit of Slo-Mo replay. From that guys angle &#8211; it appeared the White Sox runner was tripped. Sure he missed the call, but you called him a &#8220;crook.&#8221; You must have lost money on the game.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>My reply:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I said Eddings was either &#8220;crooked or incompetent.&#8221; Neither one is particularly forgivable &#8211; he blew the call, blatantly, and it was the second time he blatantly blew a call in favor of the White Sox and AJ Pierzynski. &#8220;Incompetent&#8221; is kind.<\/p>\n<p>And no, I didn&#8217;t have money on that or any other game this year. Nice try.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Scott (who calls himself &#8220;Scooter&#8221;):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Crooks are &#8220;crooked&#8221; are they not?  I must have touched a nerve.  You&#8217;re simply not man enough to admit you overreacted to the missed call.  Not to mention the fact that the other player involved didn&#8217;t stick to the basics of the &#8220;pickle drill&#8221; &#8211; after you&#8217;re out of the play, get to another bag and back up the next guy.  Instead he jogged too near the base path.<\/p>\n<p>The other play a year or before that was a mistake by the catcher not to make sure of the out by throwing to first base, he rolled the ball to the mound.<\/p>\n<p>In both cases, AJ made &#8220;heads up&#8221; baseball plays.  You still sound like you lost a bet&#8230;<br \/>\nNice Try &#8211; Up Yours!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I like the &#8220;blaming the victim&#8221; approach he takes, although those are at least sort of baseball arguments.<\/p>\n<p>Me:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I give at least one response to everyone who writes, no matter how childish they are.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Him:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>You&#8217;re a hack and a pathetic journalist.  Dude your days of never being chosen on the playground are over.  It&#8217;s not my fault, not an umpire&#8217;s fault&#8230; get over it and try not to be such a prick along the way.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>After which I told him to keep the insults coming so I could publish them, to which he responded: &#8220;Good luck with that Keith.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Guess it&#8217;s my lucky day. Oh, and Eddings? Still blew both calls, and the fact that they both involved and went in the direction of the same player doesn&#8217;t sit well with me at all. Given the umpiring horrorshows we&#8217;ve seen the last two nights (the Hamels balk, the Baldelli whiff, the Rollins HBP), I would think fans would be less tolerant than ever of incompetent umpiring.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been digging out from a big pile of reader mail, including some emails from as far back as late July. (I wasn&#8217;t able to see new reader mail to my ESPN mailbag for about two months, and then suddenly, there they all were.) One reader, Scott Moore, wasn&#8217;t happy about my on-air criticism of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[19],"class_list":["post-386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-reader-mail","entry"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/meadowparty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/386","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/meadowparty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/meadowparty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meadowparty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meadowparty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=386"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/meadowparty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/386\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/meadowparty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meadowparty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/meadowparty.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}