Top Chef, S12E12.

I’m not chatting this week to allow myself more time to write the top 100 prospects package.

Mei says correctly that Gregory would have gone home after the previous challenge if there’d been an elimination. Of course, the absence of an elimination threat may have affected each chef’s choices on what to cook, but I think her comments led the show to hammer home the point that Gregory, who lapped the field in the first half of this season, has slumped toward the finish.

Top Chef logo* George’s comment before the quickfire, to the confessional: “I never in a million years would have made as far as I have.” Rosie Ruiz said the same thing, if I remember correctly.

* Wylie Dufresne, who just closed his restaurant WD-50 in Manhattan and still needs a haircut, is here for the final Quickfire. He’s a molecular gastronomy guy, so of course the challenge is about … beans. (And I thought Chicago was Beantown. Did Andy Dwyer lie to me?) The chefs can prepare any dish they want that features beans. Wiley says texture is the key to success with beans. Since they only have an hour, the chefs all go for the canned beans – I’ve pressure-cooked beans in less than an hour, but only for dishes where I’m going to mash or purée them.

* Did you know beans give you gas? I did not know that. I’m so glad George told us about that.

* Gregory says he rarely cooks with beans because they’re not common in Asian cooking. But they go well with pork and rice, both of which are kind of common in Asian cooking, so assuming he knows how to prepare them, this doesn’t seem like it should be an issue.

* Melissa says of Gregory, “you can’t really win Top Chef just making curries.” Yeah, but you can win with knife skills and vegetable dishes?

* Mei knows Wylie “loves eggs;” I believe he called himself an “egg slut” in a previous judging stint. She’s aerating beans in an iSi gun to make bean foam. It kind of looks like coarse butterscotch pudding.

* George made yigandes plaki, a Greek bean dish with a tomato-based sauce, using chickpeas, cumin, paprika, and pork tenderloin.

* Mei made black beans and corn with chipotle, bacon, a poached egg (pandering!), and pinto bean foam. Wylie comments on … the egg.

* Melissa made a seared pork tenderloin with bacon, butterbean puree, roast carrots, and fried chickpeas. Wylie points out that “beans are not really the focus” of the dish, which was kind of the point of the challenge.

* Gregory made navy beans with sake, ham, avocado, and carrot chips, using ginger, shallots, and serranos as aromatics. Padma loves to cook navy beans, but both she and Wylie note a bitter finish in his dish which could come from the sake, avocado (if it starts to cook), or shallots (if they burn). The avocado detracted from the dish as well; the beans were slightly overcooked, so that made for two soft textures without much contrast from other elements.

* Mei’s dish didn’t look appealing, but Wylie thought the textures and flavors worked really well, and he liked that she used the bean two ways. She wins the challenge, her first Quickfire win, and a trip to Napa. “Napa, here I come! I’m gonna get wasted.” Look, I’m not judging her, but you don’t really need to go to Napa to get hammered, and maybe that’s not the best way to soak up the Napa experience either?

* The final elimination challenge in Boston, before the show shifts to Mexico: Make a dish that’s innovative, pushing culinary boundaries. That’s why Wylie is here, I assume. That’s all the direction the chefs get, unfortunately, which is going to be a problem for the rest of the episode, because it isn’t even clear what the judges mean by “innovation” – and I’d say the judges themselves aren’t consistent about it. There’s a $10,000 prize, so there’s something on the line that means I’m not just arguing semantics here.

* George points out that innovation means failing, which means you probably won’t nail it the first time, so doing it just once doesn’t give you much chance to innovate.

* Their Whole Foods is out of pork belly, which ruins George’s plan for his dish. I’ve only bought it a few times, but I know that the various Whole Foods where I’ve shopped over the years have all been inconsistent about carrying it.

* The chefs are all interpreting “innovative” by using ingredients they don’t normally use. In this context, shouldn’t that term be about technique and presentation? It’s not like the judges haven’t had octopus (George) or chicken skin (Gregory) before – there probably isn’t an ingredient anywhere in Whole Foods that these judges haven’t eaten.

* Mei went to nursing school because it’s what her parents wanted, then dropped out to go to culinary school because it’s what she wanted, and her parents were pissed. Don’t you want your kid to be happy and successful and safe? What the hell is wrong with these parents?

* George making a green apple harissa with octopus, charring the tentacles and puréeing the heads for fritters. It’s definitely weird; I don’t know if I’d call that “innovative.” It’s just a poor word choice for the show; maybe it isn’t possible to innovate when you have three hours in total to cook your dish.

* Gregory stumbles when Tom and Wylie ask how he’s innovating. Even if you’re not innovating, you need to have a bullshit answer ready for this question, which you had to expect Tom to ask.

* They’re cooking and serving at Catalyst in Kendall Square, which is in Cambridge (across the river from Boston) close to MIT. The chef William Kovel doesn’t appear in this episode, but he’d previoulsy helmed the kitchen at Aujourd’hui at the Four Seasons, which was one of the top fine-dining restaurants in Boston before it closed in 2009.

* One of the guest diners is Dr. Michael Brenner of Harvard, who brings chefs in to speak to try to inspire people to want to learn about science. He’s a professor of engineering, applied math, and physics, and among his many research foci is the observing practical operation of evolution by examining the functions of two protein families – hemoglobin and voltage-gated sodium channels. So he’s reasonably bright.

* We get a little physical comedy in the kitchen, as the line is too narrow for all four chefs to cook and plate at once, leading to a lot of one-word shouts between them, including Mei’s galline refrain of “back!”

* The dishes … Gregory serves a pan-roasted salmon in tom kha broth with roasted tomatoes, crispy salmon skin, and crispy chicken skins. Padma says it’s delicious. Gail asks what’s innovative about the dish, and Gregory says it’s about playing with textures, so at least he was ready with an answer this time. Tom says he’s “having a hard time finding the innovation.”

* Mei shows no emotion when winning or losing anything. She says she suffers from “chronic bitch face.” See for yourself.

* Melissa serves a seared duck breast with farro, walnut miso, and pickled cherries. She says this was out of her “comfort zone.” That’s also not innovation; that’s just growing up. Everyone likes the dish, but other than her combination of walnuts and miso, no element receives any praise for innovation, and really, she just took two high-umami ingredients and stuck them together.

* George makes charred octopus and octopus head fritters with yellow split pea puree, green apple harissa, pickled mustard seeds, bacon chips, lentils, rhubarb, and God knows what else. It’s a complicated plate, but the bottom line is that he charred the octopus too far and it came out bitter. Poor George is sweating like mad as he gets the feedback. It’s a Mediterranean thing, George. I feel your pain.

* Mei’s dish was duck curry with vadouvan, coated with fish sauce caramel, served with lemongrass ginger and yuzu yogurt. She says tried to make it lighter than most curries. Tom smiles and says, “I like it but I don’t know how to describe it. As you eat it, it changes … it’s really complex.” If there’s any innovation anywhere here, I think this is it. Innovative or highly creative (as a proxy) dishes should confuse you and make you think or rethink what’s in front of you.

* Blais argues that Melissa’s dish was the best, with the walnut miso as the innovation, and that it had the best flavors. Gail says it was the least exciting, and Mei’s was the most creative and interesting. Wylie says Melissa’s duck and Mei’s curry together would be the winner, so he’s useless. Tom says George’s octopus was overcharred. He swung for the fences, but Gregory didn’t. Dr. Brenner says that he’d rather eat Gregory’s than George’s. So it’s Gregory’s execution without innovation versus George’s innovation (maybe) without execution.

* I love how the camera always shows the four judges at the table, trying so hard to look deadly serious before they tell the chefs who won or lost. Some are better than others; Gail’s serious face reminds me of Paddington’s cold dark stare, where no matter how hard he tried he couldn’t possibly look intimidating.

* Tom points out that there wasn’t a whole lot of innovating. Yeah, no shit. Maybe the chefs should have had two days to cook if the goal was to get real innovation – or maybe access to different equipment, such as devices not typically seen in the kitchen.

* Mei and Melissa made the two favorite dishes … and Melissa wins? What the hell was the innovation there? Well-executed but so what? Granted, it doesn’t affect the chefs’ advancement in any way – Mei also goes through to the finale – but the $10K ain’t nothing to sneeze at, and I have no idea at all how Melissa’s dish answered the challenge more than Mei’s did. Gail’s blog seems to say the same: Melissa won for execution, even though Mei’s dish was more innovative. So the main criterion for the dish wasn’t the main criterion in the final judging?

* George is eliminated. Failure to execute loses to failure to innovate – not that George innovated wildly, but I think he did more than Gregory did. That said, I’d rather see Gregory in the finals than George, based on their relative track records on the show.

* LCK: George vs. Doug. Doug gets to choose clams or octopus, and chooses clams. He uses a grilled pineapple butter, tomatillos, and onions, and says he grilled everything he could. George steamed his clams, them made a soup with a lot of aromatic vegetables and fruits as well as serrano chilies. Tom loves both dishes. As usual, we don’t find out the winner of LCK until we tune in next week.

* Rankings: Mei, Gregory, whoever wins LCK, Melissa. I’m a bit relieved to see Gregory execute this challenge’s dish well, as he’s been more stymied by failures of execution than creativity over the last few episodes, and him vs. Mei would be the ideal final two based on what we’ve seen from all of the chefs so far this season.

Comments

  1. Yea I don’t get the love for Wylie either. Not sure why every time he’s on the show, he’s held in such high regard. I also hate how these challenges are timed at this point of the competition; especially when you are one spot away from the finals. A good challenge would have been cook something that was inspired by being in Boston and giving the chefs 24 hours to make a meal.

    • Totally agree, Matt. This whole episode fell flat for me.

    • I agree that Dufresne usually doesn’t bring much to the show as a judge, but the reason he’s so well-regarded is because his food is outstanding and, yes, innovative. It’s very easy to just reductively call him “the molecular gastronomy guy” and move along, and that term itself is pretty loaded. It’s too bad there’s such a disconnect between how he presents his food/philosophy on the plate vs. on TV, as there’s a lot of potential for a fun episode with him involved, yet that never seems to be realized. I’ve had fantastic, fun and unique meals at both wd-50 and Alder (and met Dufresne at the latter – seemed like a nice, down to earth guy). Maybe things would’ve been more focused if the one-word direction was for them to cook something “playful.”

      tl;dr – Don’t knock Dufresne’s food based on his Top Chef appearances – if you have a chance to try it, do so.

  2. I may be a slightly biased as I’m a DC local (though haven’t been to Kapnos yet). But having George eliminated over Gregory because he charred the Octopus too much vs just not being innovative seems insane to me. The human condition leaves us all biased, so I’m think some of the judges want Gregory to make it to the finals. Assuming they have the month plus gap before arriving at the finale location, as in prior seasons, I hope that means Gregory gets his mojo back so the last 3 plus winner of LCK is actually a good competition.

    Also I kind of hate myself for liking Melissa more now. It seems that she’s learned from her “vegetable perfection” mistakes of the early rounds and is starting to cook more “complete” though still fairly safe. In the end unless she finds that extra gear, I’m thinking it’s Mei (who I’ve been rooting for since the beginnning) or Gregory if he digs himself out of whatever held him back the last few rounds.

  3. Scott Seabridge

    Definitely a flat episode with the “innovative” stipulation

    I think Mei is the only chef still around that is cooking interesting food. The rest of the chefs either cook similar stuff all the time or cook classics well

    One thing that interests me is when they bring family for the final, will they bring in Mei’s parents? She talks negatively all the time about them so is there foreshadowing going on and Mei will win and make her parents proud

  4. I agree with the comments above – the whole episode seemed off. I figured beans would show up in Boston sometime, but it seems strange to do it as a quickfire. I think that would have actually made for a much better elimination challenge, it would have allowed the chefs to cook dried beans, which offers a much wider array, as well as providing a farily blank canvas for the chefs to really express themselves.

    The innovation theme failed for a few reasons, most notably the lack of clear expression of what was expected, and inconsistent judging. It might have worked OK much earlier in the season, when a so-so dish could have slid by as weaker contestants were worse, but among the last 4, the stakes were much too high.

    I think Mei seems like the clear favorite now, with the other 3 sort of jumbled together, unless the break between Boston and Mexico rejuveinated Gregory, and he is back to being the chef from the first half of the season versus the last half.

  5. “What the hell is wrong with these parents?”

    In most Asian cultures? Sadly, basically nothing. My 36 year old wife is a senior scientist in R&D for a major pharmaceutical company. Her Filipina mom is still pushing for her to get a PhD or go to med school. My wife already works along side PhDs (and actually holds a higher position than some) and decided a doctorate isn’t helpful because she has no desire to pursue management positions. That doesn’t matter to her mom, letters do.

    My wife’s cousin was basically disowned by her doctor parents because she decided to become a teacher. My grandmother was equally disappointed by the career paths of her children and doesn’t have a relationship with any of them.

    So, I was much more (pleasantly) surprised by Melissa’s mom’s acceptance and support than shocked by the description of Mei’s parents and Melissa’s dad.

    • Yea it’s terrible. But it is a cultural difference. They are authoritarian parents instead of authoritative parents. Meaning they are strict and have very high expectations rather than supportive.

    • That just makes me queasy. Your child is always your child. To turn your back on one because s/he chose a different career … My mom wanted me to be a doctor or a lawyer, but she never once failed to support me when I chose different directions, and she’s my biggest cheerleader now.

    • Man, Asians are the worst

  6. Keith, I am also chiming in on the cultural difference. I am a college counselor and I can’t begin to quantify the number of east Asian/south Asian/immigrant parents in general who push their children to STEM careers, leaving them anxious and depressed. I wish it were as simple as “support your child,” but that’s not the case.

    Mei is clearly leading at this point, and Gregory at the top of his game for the final two would be one of the better finales since the Voltaggio season.

  7. In fairness Keith, I’m pretty sure Mei was joking when she was going to get wasted in Napa. As she pointed out, she does have chronic bitch face, so it can be hard to detect her sarcasm.

    Gregory reminds me a little of Nicholas from last season (?) – he had a very strong pedigree and performed well very early, so there was a bias towards giving him the benefit of the doubt when he started to struggle a little down the stretch. I also think the judges/producers tilted the field a bit towards Gregory out of a sense of fairness because George skipped about 8-10 challenges in the middle there without even going through LCK.

  8. Also, was I the only one was surprised that Mei said Melissa was like an older sister to her? I always sensed that it would be the other way around, maybe because Mei has such a hardened exterior while Melissa seems so upbeat and sunny all the time.

  9. many of the recently eliminated chefs have been the chef that has taken the most risk. granted the purpose of the show is to make good food, but it seems like this season may be rewarding the chefs who have played it a little closer to the vest.

    this is especially vexing when the chefs are told to “be innovative” and gregory barely moves the needle.

    • Bang on. I should have thought of that – the whole point of the show, at least through its history, has been to identify a chef who’ll push the boundaries like Blais, Qui, Kish, Dieterle, etc. Melissa strikes me as the least likely of the final six or seven on this show to do that.

  10. Gregory, being asked in the kitchen how his dish is innovative:

    http://vimeo.com/3800527

  11. I don’t think that there’s any question the judges (i.e. Tom) wanted Gregory in the finals; that’s been obvious for 2 months. And he’s been bottom tier or the last month (and I realize that the best dishes of the season came from him).
    Nevertheless, you can’t burn your food and expect to advance, no matter how innovative you are. Being innovative is no excuse for not executing. Proper execution is a baseline requirement – if you mess that up, you should lose.