Sherlock, season two.

Season two of Sherlock, which just aired here in the U.S. for the first time, turned out to be even stronger than season one, in part because the characters are so well developed, and in part because the bromance between Holmes (Benedict Cumberbatch) and Dr. Watson (Martin Freeman) seems so natural at this point, as if the two actors have been doing this for years. The only real negative of the season is that it will be so long before we see a third set of episodes, especially on this side of the Atlantic. (My writeup on season one went up in February.)

As in the first season, the middle episode was somewhat weaker than the two surrounding it, with the first episode the strongest of the troika. Irene Adler’s dominatrix character is fascinating – with her clothes on or off, it’s all good, really – and the tense flirtations between her and Holmes were absolutely electric, even though it’s clear he has (or will simply admit to) no interest in sex with her. The crime he’s solving is almost secondary, and she seemed a more convincing adversary than Moriarty because her methods of social engineering are so foreign to Holmes. An American police procedural would have played up her professional life, whereas this episode focuses instead on layers of intrigue and the aforementioned dialogue between the two main characters.

The second episode, derived from the one full-length Holmes novel, The Hound of the Baskervilles, takes the setting and some core elements of the original story and adds a host of modern twists, including a play on our worst fears about our governments and their research into weapons of mass destruction. The solution hinged on Holmes guessing a password rather impossibly quickly, which I’d peg as a copout; it’s a neat trick, but not that likely on the first try, and any decent network security setup would lock an account after an attempt or two. (Wouldn’t the modern Holmes carry a cracking program on a USB drive? Or is that too easy?)

The final episode, “The Reichenbach Fall,” brings an unexpectedly early confrontation between Holmes and his nemesis, Jim Moriarty, played diabolically by whats-his-face, clearly having the time of his life. Based on the story “The Final Problem,” in which Holmes originally dies, only to have it later revealed that he merely faked his death after public outcry forced Conan Doyle to hit control-Z, “Reichenbach” turns the tables and puts Moriarty on the offensive, destroying Holmes’ life from the inside-out with a cleverly plotted, intricate trap, from which Holmes can extricate himself only through his own death – or so it appears. The whole detective-as-suspect plot device is quite hackneyed at this point, but I’ll give the writers points for the Richard Brook twist, and for crafting the scheme so tightly that Holmes does indeed appear to be trapped when we reach the final clash between the two antagonists. I’ll get to the end of this episode, the subject of much speculation online (which won’t be answered until next year as the show becomes victim of its own success), later on, to avoid spoiling anything for those of you who haven’t seen it.

This season felt faster and tighter than the first one, which I think is in large part because the three episodes in season one had to spend time introducing us to the main characters and developing their relationships with each other. Cumberbatch and Freeman have a very easy chemistry and superb timing, enhanced by British series’ willingness to keep the pace up rather than slow it down to accommodate an audience looking for large print and short chapters. It feels like smart television because it is smart television, rapid-fire, witty, and demanding. It should have you talking long after each episode is done. To wit…

Spoiler alert: I’m discussing the end of season two, episode three below. Just stop reading if you haven’t seen it.

Seriously, go away.

For those of you who have seen it, it seems like some suspected elements of Sherlock’s faked suicide are, if not obvious, quite likely to be true. We have Sherlock’s conversation with Molly, where he says he expects he’s going to die and needs her help, a plea that remains unresolved at the end of the episode but that we know would be fulfilled because Molly is inexplicably smitten with the great detective. We have the flatbed truck that starts up the moment Sherlock’s body is about to hit the pavement. And we have the cyclist who hits Dr. Watson at the moment he’s about to cross the street to see to his friend, leaving Watson on the ground and quite groggy when he stands up. I submit that the grogginess is the fourth clue.

Here’s my theory, although it is a bit tinfoilhatty: Sherlock landed in the truck and threw a cadaver, supplied by Molly and rigged to bleed from the head on impact, to the sidewalk, obscured from witnesses by the truck. The cyclist clocked Dr. Watson and somehow drugged him – perhaps a gas like that from the previous episode – so that he wouldn’t be able to properly examine or even identify Sherlock. (That gas would make him suggestible, meaning one member of the crowd could also have been a plant from Sherlock, there simply to tell Dr. Watson it was Sherlock’s body and that he was dead.) This would explain Sherlock’s confession to Dr. Watson, which was wildly out of character for him – it was an act, yet one that, oddly, didn’t set off any alarms in his only friend’s mind.

This leaves a few unanswered questions: Why was Molly, who was on Moriarty’s radar after they had a few lunch dates (seriously, Molly, are there no other fish in the English sea?), omitted from the final hit list, while Holmes’ landlady and Lestrade were included? Who notified the other two shooters (we can assume the hitman assigned to Dr. Watson witnessed the suicide) that Sherlock was presumed dead? Why did the kidnap victim scream upon seeing Sherlock’s face? And, really, why did Moriarty kill himself? I believe he is actually dead, as Moriarty dies in the original story, “The Final Problem,” that inspired this episode. I can’t imagine the writers deviating that far from the source material, and the Moriarty character, who only appeared in two of the original stories anyway, is pretty well played out from here. But why would he die of his own hand, leaving himself unable to witness Holmes’ final humiliation?

Feel free to discuss any of these spoilers or questions in the comments; I assume anyone who’s made it this far has already seen the full season.

Comments

  1. Josh Francis

    The acting is just so far above that of “normal” television. The performances of Cumberbatch and Freeman have me even more excited to see The Hobbit, in which both play pivotal roles. The dude that plays Moriarity was also terrifically maniacal. Simply outstanding.

    My wife and I were aghast that they left off not sharing how he pulled it off at the end, but I suppose its fun to speculate and certainly builds the anticipation for the next season. Can’t wait.

  2. i loved season two-and agree with much of your theory. My brother and I were discussing the girl screaming at Sherlock when she saw him-my first guess is someone dressed up to look like Sherlock was what caused the reaction. I think the interplay with Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman is the best part of a series that I thoroughly enjoy.

  3. With the SPOILER alert on-

    I really don’t understand why Moriarty killed himself, but when it happened it was one of the biggest (and somehow, most natural) surprises I’ve seen in television. Just a shocking moment, for all the right reasons, and while I tend to believe that all the threads the writers unwound this episode cannot be cleaned up as perfectly as we might all like, I’m really, really looking forward to season 3. Just a terrific episode. As good as the Hounds of Baskerville were (I thought) bad. That second episode might have been pretty good, but I think it’s the weakest of the series by a longshot, and a disappointment in a show that has been generally so, so good.

  4. Maybe the drugging is from the highly suggestible from Baskerville.

  5. That analysis is more or less dead on with what I have been thinking (though, admittedly, I did not much consider Watson being drugged – I just assumed he was disoriented from being struck by the cyclist). I’m a bit saddened that I, too, believe Moriarty is dead. And his character is simply astounding. He really stole the show (which says a lot given the strong performances by Cumberbatch and Freeman).

  6. Mackenzie Mae

    The truck is not an option. Somebody I know went to St. Bart’s to test the theory and there is no way he could have landed in the truck…even by pushing off intentionally. It’s just too far…which foiled my plan. :/ Here’s something, though, that no one seems to have caught. My sister and I have been trying to get people to see it, but we aren’t very big on Youtube. Maybe you’ll agree? http://youtu.be/GkE-KMv_V-k

  7. Keith,

    You saw the episode, but Moriarty obviously killed himself because he believed with him dead, Sherlock couldn’t win… Either S.H. lives and his friends die or vice versa and either way Moriarty wins… Like the character said, he was so “bored” with normal people… maybe a bit suicidal himself and that’s why he had the gun with him. He certainly wasn’t planning on shooting S.H. with it, so his death seemed to be a part of his plan.

  8. *naturally, my reply will contain spoilers encompassing season 2*

    My biggest issue with Baskervilles is that it seemed pretty apparent that there was an aerosol thing going on. It’s easy for a viewer who is any kind of familiar with mystery fiction to make that deduction, but Sherlock’s own behavior after going to Dewar’s Hollow really makes it obvious. That Sherlock thought it was SUGAR seems to suspend our disbelief that he would ignore the unnaturally foggy hole in the ground.

    Definitely followed the arc of the first season, quality-wise, but with the added bonus of two actors who work great together. Also, Holmes and Watson have the best jackets ever. I don’t pay attention to what characters wear on TV much, but I desperately need Watson’s shooting jacket.

    I really enjoyed how the last episode played with Sherlock’s need to see serpentine, complex puzzles in everything he sees. Whether it’s some guy playing with a boomerang or the disappearance of Bluebell, he needs things to have an unexpecteded but satisfying connection. So when Moriarity plays dirty pool not only with his fake actor’s persona, adding another layer of deception, to one that is completely fabricated (the entire “lines of code” subplot), it’s fun to see how it sets up Holmes to fail.

    Or so we think. I’m glad that at least with this season, they don’t fade to black in a Mexican standoff (or whatever variant that was).

    And yes, Molly’s apparent safety seems an egregious oversight for a brilliant criminal mastermind who once WORKED WITH HER TO GET TO HOLMES.

  9. To answer your questions at the end, Moriarty didn’t need to see Holmes’s death, because Holmes forced his hand by showing him that he could beat Moriarty and make him call off the snipers as long as he kept him alive. Thus out-played, Moriarty was satisfied with Sherlock’s last move but to win the game in his eyes, he knew he had to kill himself so he could NEVER call off the attack, thus forcing Sherlock to jump off the roof. Shame he never factored in Molly, who he probably wrote off as a useless airhead way back in the first season or that Holmes would be able to deduce that this could only end in his death and have the means to circumvent that unhappy ending. It’s not surprising he never paid any attention to Molly, Holmes hardly ever did, and Moriarty assumed someone like her could never be high on Holmes’s priorities, all he ever did, right up until the end, was use her. Moriarty only dated her in the first season so he could fuck around with Holmes, after that, he had no interest in her.

    And about the fake corpse? I’m pretty sure that’s a no, and no to drugging Watson either, that was him being in catatonic shock. Although I do believe the biker was in on the whole thing and hit him just to give Holmes a little more time to set up and to knock him about to further disorient him, but he didn’t need a corpse to fake his death. Remember that little rubber ball that he was playing with in the lab? Well if you put that in the right spot under your armpit and pinch the artery, you can make your pulse disappear. So he didn’t need a fake body or anything, just jump on the truck, smack his head a bit and lie really really still until they got him in the morgue and Molly helped him from there. And to be honest, I’d be quite surprised if Mycroft wasn’t in on it somehow, he was in the original stories and considering how be basically fucked Sherlock over six ways from Sunday, he kind of owes his little brother for the rest of forever. >=/

  10. I’ve seen that rubber-ball theory online; seems as convoluted, if not more so, than the one I proposed. (Not that I have any particular reason to believe mine is right.) That theory either requires him to jump to the truck and then jump off it and play dead, or to survive the fall without any serious injury.

    The rubber ball would meet one criterion, though – the writer/creater/whatever said in an interview that there was a significant clue in the episode that no one had picked up on (to his knowledge).

  11. really off topic, but there is a new Scotland yard for ipad app. Ive never played this but the interface looks pretty!

    is this game a number 3 starter or a non prospect?

  12. I found it odd that none of the newspaper articles published after Sherlock’s death mentioned anyone finding Moriarty’s body on the roof. I wonder if somehow SH used Mortiarty’s body–especially because when Watson comes to “identify” the body, they never really show the body’s face.