The Little Sister.

I’m back at mental_floss today with an article about the designing of the game Dominion, based on an email exchange I had with designer Donald X. Vaccarino.

“Do you drink, Mr. Marlowe?”
“Well, now that you mention it–”
“I don’t think I’d care to employ a detective that uses liquor in any form. I don’t even approve of tobacco.”
“Would it be all right if I peeled an orange?”

Raymond Chandler’s Philip Marlowe isn’t just hard-boiled – he’s dry, sarcastic, self-effacing, and mercurial, making him one of the most compelling protagonists I’ve found in any novel in any genre. Consigning Chander’s novels to the detective-fiction bin does him a great disservice, as his greatness is in his mastery of the language; not only is the prose itself readable and rich with metaphor, but it becomes the tool by which Chandler creates well-rounded characters through a handful of seemingly effortless lines.

I understand that The Big Sleep is considered Chandler’s best work, and it is phenomenal … but there’s little to no difference between that and Farewell, My Lovely, or the work I just finished over the weekend, The Little Sister. They’re all superb, all following the basic Chandler template of putting Marlowe in a situation where the line between solving the case and saving his life is blurry.

In The Little Sister the titular character – quoted above – shows up in Marlowe’s office, asking the gumshoe to help find her older brother, who has disappeared in Bay City not long after leaving his family in Manhattan, Kansas. Marlowe takes the case against his better judgment (S.O.P. for him), even though he believes the girl is holding back information. With a modest amount of investigating, Marlowe ends up in the middle of a blackmail scheme, a dope ring, and a lot of questionable identities – something Chandler creates in his usual economical way, with just a handful of new characters outside of a few corpses.

I picked the wrong time to read The Little Sister by starting it on day one of the winter meetings, which left me very little time to actually read the book until the meetings ended on Thursday – frustrating when it’s a book you never want to put down in the first place. I found it moved more quickly than The Big Sleep, but the plot was a little less complex – it was relatively easy to figure out what most of the characters were up to, and I say that as someone who almost never figures things out in books – so the question of which is the better book is one of personal taste. (It’s possible that The Big Sleep enjoys its status at the top of Chandler’s canon because of its film adaptation, directed by Howard Hawks with Humphrey Bogart as Marlowe.) No matter where you start, though, if you haven’t given Chandler at least one shot, I can’t recommend his work highly enough.

Comments

  1. Keith, you read an epic amount. Do you buy all of these books hardcover, paperback, or on a Kindle or other e-reader? Do you borrow from the local library? Just wondering…

  2. Peter Labella

    Of course, The Little Sister was adapted for film as well: James Garner starred in Marlowe. Pretty underrated 60s film.

  3. Having read The Long Goodbye recently, I think I put that up there with Farewell, My Lovely and The Big Sleep.

    I dread the day that I exhaust the Chandler catalogue. At least when I finished my last Russo book I knew that it wasn’t necessarily the end.

  4. As far as I’m concerned, Marlowe is the most likeable character in all of fiction. He couldn’t care less about respect for social status, etiquette or any of the other learned behaviors we’re supposed to embrace. He is the rare (nonexistent?) man who knows exactly who he is and who has a pretty good idea who you are, too. For me, “The Little Sister” is right up there with “The Long Goodbye” (Terry Lennox is Chandler’s most intriguing character not named Marlowe), but I think the opening to “Little Sister” is Chandler’s best. (“I had been stalking the bluebottle fly for five minutes, waiting for him to sit down. He didn’t want to sit down. He just wanted to do wing-overs and sing the prologue to Pagliacci.”) But you’re right about Chandler – you can’t go wrong with any of his books. I haven’t read “Payback” yet (I’m trying to hold off as long as I can), and I don’t know whether I’ll ever be able to read “Poodle Springs,” his “collaboration” with Robert B. Parker, but I suppose if I get desperate … Anyway, great post. Hopefully it will get people reading Chandler.

  5. Love, love, love Chandler. One of the advantages of the dense plots is that you can re-read without feeling like you’ve been there/done that. Of course, as you say, the real genius is in the words and not necessarily the story.

    @4, I happen to like Parker also — and I found Poodle Springs to be pretty good. A little like listening to the cast of Glee sing Beatles songs, but on the whole a respectable read.

  6. That’s “Playback” not “Payback.”

  7. @MarkW – I definitely didn’t mean that as a crack on Parker — it’s just having one author finish another author’s book that has made me stay away. That said, I’m sure I’ll find my way to Poodle Springs eventually.

  8. Loved Little Sister, and Chandler in general. I am holding off on reading the Long Goodbye, since it is the last remaining novel I have left to read.

    I made the mistake of reading all of Hammett’s novels in a row because I loved them so much (Red Harvest was my favorite work, as well).

    On a completely off topic note, I saw your comment on seasoning cast iron pans in the chat today and thought I would pass along this article. I plan to try it once the current seasoning on my pan starts to wear a bit.

    Seasoning Cast Iron with Flaxseed Oil