A Clockwork Orange.

Anthony Burgess’ A Clockwork Orange appears on the three major lists of the best books of the 20th century (Modern Library, Radcliffe, and the TIME 100), one of 25 books to pull off the trifecta. It’s a masterwork, a deeply philosophical novel that poses serious questions about liberty and free will, as well as a linguistic tour de force written in a brilliantly expressive invented slang.

The novel is narrated by Alex, who refers to himself as “Your Humble Narrator,” a teenage tough called a “droog” who spends his evenings causing mayhem, assaulting older citizens, dabbling in the occasional rape, and listening to dramatic pieces of classical music. Eventually arrested in a home invasion gone awry, Alex spends two years in prison before he’s offered a chance to gain his freedom in two weeks if he submits to an experimental treatment known as the “Ludovico Technique,” probably the best-known sequence from the book or the movie version, where Alex is forced to watch violent films with his eyelids held open. In its final third, Alex re-enters society and the questions begin: Is a man still a man if he’s acting morally by force rather than choice? How much do we want or expect our government to do in the name of public safety?

Burgess created his own slang for the novel to give it a futuristic or alternate-history feel. Most of the new words draw from Russian vocabulary – “nadsat,” meaning teenager, from the endings of the Russian words for the numbers between eleven and nineteen; “viddy,” to see, from the Russian “vidyet” – with occasional invented slang words, like “sinny” for the cinema. It makes the first few pages of the book a bit tough to get through, but after a while, it becomes easier to follow and adds color to Alex’s language, sometimes sarcastic, sometimes almost musical, while also creating a clear delineation between his speech and that of the adults around him.

My senior year in high school, I took an AP lit class with Mrs. Glynn – who saw phallic and “concave” symbols on every page of every book – and she assigned us a choice of one of three books: Slaughterhouse-Five (also on all three top-100 lists), Catch-22 (ditto), and One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (omitted by Modern Library). I ended up reading and enjoying all three, since they presented moral or philosophical questions, often about horrible situations, with heavy doses of humor and a thoroughly modern tone. A Clockwork Orange would have fit perfectly on this list, and if anything, Burgess’ novel is more clever and more serious than the other three.

Comments

  1. Keith,
    I believe you said your chat that you didn’t like the movie. I was wondering your reasons. I preferred the movie and thought it was one of the best exceptions to the rule that books are always better. I admit a strong Kubrick bias, however.

  2. MiguelJAcero

    Do you buy all the books you read, borrow from a library, or something else?

  3. Keith-

    Did the edition that you read contain Chapter 21? If so, what’s your take on it?

    I, personally, was disappointed. I think that the novel (and the film adaptation) work much better without it.

    -Ryan

  4. Keith – I’m a big fan of the book as well, and though I hate the fact that the end is chopped off the film, I really do enjoy that as well – what are your thoughts on Kubrick’s version?

  5. I assume it was a reaction to the notoriety following the flawed Kubrick film version which completely distorted the ending, but Burgess distanced himself from this novel. Among his fiction I personally prefer “Earthly Powers” but to each his own.

  6. Happy holidays, folks. Some answers:

    Sam/Robert: I haven’t seen the movie. I’m torn on whether or not to see it, since I thought that chapter 21 was essential to the book.

    Ryan: I don’t think the book worked without the last chapter. It would have lacked any sort of resolution and really skimped on the development of Alex’ character. And of course, the 7-7-7 chapter structure has other meanings as well.

    Will: The edition I read had a preface by Burgess excoriating the idiot US publishing exec who chopped the last chapter off, so if he distanced himself from the novel, it must have been towards the very end of his life.

    Miguel: It’s a mix. I’ve been hitting the library hard of late, but received a handful of novels for Christmas. I tend to buy all the Wodehouse books I read, and I’ve been buying the Anthony Powell books secondhand. I don’t buy many new books unless it’s something that’s hard to find used or in a library.

  7. Keith – totally unrelated topic, but have you tried swaptree.com yet? It’s a pretty useful site for trading stuff – I’ve done quite well there trading for books. Yes, most of the stuff there is the Grisham/Patterson variety, but you can trade used books for other people’s used books (and videogames, DVDs & CDs).

  8. I should have explained myself further. Distanced was probably the wrong word to use but I recall reading an interview he did late in life where he expressed frustration over the fact that Clockwork Orange cast such a large shadow over his career and expressed a desire to not speak about it any longer. My use of distance implies that he didn’t think it was worthy of it’s reputation which would be incorrect.

  9. Klaw, Happy Holidays. I enjoy your baseball chats. This is one of my favorite books. I first read the American version in High school and as a rather adventures youth I found it thrilling. I read the Britsh version as an adult and found the last chapter the key to the whole book. The fact that Alex turned from being a 15 year old punk to a 18 year old adult looking settle down was to me very telling of your average kid. In my humble opinion, I think great literature is wasted on youth with out the life experiance to appriciate it. The Catcher in the Rye is another book I found very different to read as an adult.

    Thanks for allowing me a forum to express my opinion. Will continue following your chats. If you like military history books try reading Shelby Foote’s The Civil War a Narrative, a great look at the people, stategies and brutality of that war.

  10. Just wondering, is it considered cheating if you have to use the Nadsat Dictionary to figure out what they’re talking about in the first few chapters? 🙂

  11. Justin, it isn’t cheating at all. While it may be more rewarding to figure things out as you go, it probably also means you have to re-read the first seven chapters once you get into the flow of the language, which I find disruptive to my reading.

    Klaw, hope your holidays were fantastic! I’m a regular four-letter chat reader/questioner and am just getting into your blog. Love what you’re doing!